@Kipai Then the ends justified the pain. This is amazing! One thing you could do though is create fully procedural wings, by doing a taper at the end, creating the control surfaces separately and allowing them to move on a hinge, and setting wing thickness to 0.
@Graingy Oh, nice. Thanks for acknowledgement of my existence. I won't beg you to do anything because you're popular, so have a good day!
@LowQualityRepublic Still under 96!
@LowQualityRepublic
Sound like a great idea! With the best of intentions!
What could possibly go wrong?
...I can't give any advice about this.
On your horizontal stabilisers, increase your control surfaces' maxDeflectionDegree by 15. Should fix it.
@Majakalona
+1@AmethystAicraft
@Kipa
@CR939thenewSPplayer
@FarewellZerkk
Where it lacks in prettiness, it makes up for in function. This thing GLIDES. One improvement I could see happening is maybe using fuselage next time.
+1@AmethystAicraft i could never imagine that, but on the other hand, I am autistic, so...
Too far man.
Too far.
Cut off all contact. Pawstralia is now under threat because of his meddling. Scrap the Bird Eye entirely and start anew.
Yours truly, Colt Cattle
Why should I ignore this? It looks nice.
@Kipai Then the ends justified the pain. This is amazing! One thing you could do though is create fully procedural wings, by doing a taper at the end, creating the control surfaces separately and allowing them to move on a hinge, and setting wing thickness to 0.
+1Really cool! Maybe you could deviate and add some fins made out of structural wings? Add some more detail in the engine, or improve the livery?
Cool! Reminds me of the old hypnoplanes, maybe that's the way you could go?
+1No WAY, where did you learn to do this!? And the fact that this is entirely original. God.
+2Improved it and gave it a livery.
I am 2 weeks late, but I must say, 2 years is an impressive achievement. Great work.
Good job! I am busy in making my own aircrafts, but I can tell that you have real skill. Keep it up, and keep improving!
@HomoSapiens
@MAPA
@Majakalona
@Zerkkzxe
+2@SpamtonGSpamton
+1@Majakalona
@ZerkkFujimi
@Gagaduck I expected to never get a response. God is real.
Very realistic! Except the fact that it's just a fortified machine gun. 5.25/10.
@Padawan No problem.
This is truly an amazing aircraft, exterior and interior. The inlets are so well designed, and the cockpit is FIRE.
Would absolutely recommend for future players
8.75/10.
@BajaMotors I was just stating.
@IndonesianHoe It's not misleading. It is obvious that is not how it looks in-game.
@IndonesianHoe It only warns against misleading images, not externals in general.
@IndonesianHoe I used the plane the replica was based off of for the thumbnail. Plus, it is very obviously not from the game.
man shut your gob
@Aviator720 1/3650.
+1@IndonesianHoe It's a replica. It's not perfect, but it looks like the original, and that's all that matters.
@CFCOH
@Graingy denenta
+1@LJAircraftmanufacturer Yes?
You did a really good job on this plane, especially with the gear! I would put some fuselage on the wings though, just to make it MORE realistic.
@Majakalona Have you ever heard of
w i d e b o d y
+1THIS IS NOT PART OF THE MEDIUM-HAUL CHALLENGE. IF POSSIBLE, I WOULD LIKE ANY MOD TO DECREDIT THIS AS A SUCCESSOR.
@AuroraPlanes
You used emission on accident. But flies well. 7/10.
@CFCOH It's ridiculously tedious.
Can't fly. Again.
@PlaneFlightX I used Samsung calculator.
This is a triplane. This is the biplane challenge.
Sorry, it was just unexpected. @FireHawkz
Since this is alternate, I have no response to this. 1 submission per physical person. DISQUALIFIED.
@CFCOH ..They don't. They need 3 wheels to be stable on the ground. Gliders are really fragile.
@TheGliderGuy Whenever I feel, which is not now.
@Majakalona . . . I can't do races.
+1@Majakalona I don't feel like saving the glider in my storage.
+1