@Kipai Then the ends justified the pain. This is amazing! One thing you could do though is create fully procedural wings, by doing a taper at the end, creating the control surfaces separately and allowing them to move on a hinge, and setting wing thickness to 0.
Aesthetic: 2/10, there appears to be a lot wrong, including unneeded fuselages, the nose cone being from WACK, and the lack of real landing gear. please fix.
Practicality: 8/10, actually glides really well, and manages to keep speed all the way to Wright Airport on testing.
I have seen and tested your contraption, and this is possibly worse than the Spartow. Completely unflyable, we tried and failed for it to enter the air due to uncontrolled roll. We may need to file a health and safety lawsuit if this continues. Thank you.
Can't fly well, too much torque from one of the rotors, maybe improve slightly before posting again. I know you put so much effort in, but there is still a problem. Sorry, but this is best for your PR.
Hi, from BRITAIN. Here's how to add a permalink. First, [Put what you want to say here.] Then, (Addthelink_here.) Lastly, remove the space. And done, You have a permalink!
@ImZerkkZxe I'll tell you about points, upvoting a craft gives you 15, along with videos if OG content, otherwise 2 points are given, like an upvote on forums.
Never thought that you would be,
Standing here so close to me.
There's so much I think I should say.
But words can wait, until some other day.
Kiss me once, then kiss me twice, then kiss me once again.
It's been a long, long time.
Never felt like this my dear since can't remember when.
It's been a long, long time!
You never know how many dreams I dream about you.
And just how empty they all seem without you.
So, kiss me one and kiss me twice and kiss me once again...
It's been a long, long time!
Fly well, SimplePlanes.
2014 - 2023
+3Cool!
+3No WAY, where did you learn to do this!? And the fact that this is entirely original. God.
+2@HomoSapiens
@MAPA
@Majakalona
@Zerkkzxe
+2Aesthetic: 7/10. Decent fuselage and simple color scheme. Good work.
Practicality: 8/10. Near perfect, except that for optimal gliding, the COL needs to be a bit further back.
+2HOLY CHRIST! HOW ARE YOU THIS UNDERRATED. Jeez, you need the attention you deserve.
+2This species, Gemini magnus, is the closest living relative of the Archaeus corsarius, the oldest documented species of plane.
+2I tried. I had never made a car before that, and I'm happy to know it managed to beat the course first try.
+2@Majakalona
+1@AmethystAicraft
@Kipa
@CR939thenewSPplayer
@FarewellZerkk
Where it lacks in prettiness, it makes up for in function. This thing GLIDES. One improvement I could see happening is maybe using fuselage next time.
+1@Kipai Then the ends justified the pain. This is amazing! One thing you could do though is create fully procedural wings, by doing a taper at the end, creating the control surfaces separately and allowing them to move on a hinge, and setting wing thickness to 0.
+1Cool! Reminds me of the old hypnoplanes, maybe that's the way you could go?
+1@SpamtonGSpamton
+1@Majakalona
@ZerkkFujimi
@Aviator720 1/3650.
+1@Graingy denenta
+1@Majakalona Have you ever heard of
w i d e b o d y
+1@Majakalona . . . I can't do races.
+1@Majakalona I don't feel like saving the glider in my storage.
+1Aesthetic: 2/10, there appears to be a lot wrong, including unneeded fuselages, the nose cone being from WACK, and the lack of real landing gear. please fix.
Practicality: 8/10, actually glides really well, and manages to keep speed all the way to Wright Airport on testing.
+1THE FIRST EVER C-1.7 ON SIMPLEPLANES
ALL HAIL THE BEBE
+1@Majakalona That's what THAT was based off of. Not bring rude, just saying that you're pointing out the obvious.
+1This thing can't fly. The floats are too far back, It cannot land, and its pitch is mediocre.
+1@Majakalona Maybe cuz that's what it's based on! Wow!
+1@Majakalona GOD, YOUR SPELLING.
+1@Graingy S10.
+1I have seen and tested your contraption, and this is possibly worse than the Spartow. Completely unflyable, we tried and failed for it to enter the air due to uncontrolled roll. We may need to file a health and safety lawsuit if this continues. Thank you.
+1Not too good, gust of wind made me crash and break my back, 2/10.
-Otto Lilienthal
+1@Majakalona Part if the cockpit is under the fuselage, like
the real spitfire
+1Still weird.
+1Cool, but how can 2 1000 HP engines power an entire aircraft?
+1This is public.
+1@Majakalona No, just for accuracy.
+1Can't fly well, too much torque from one of the rotors, maybe improve slightly before posting again. I know you put so much effort in, but there is still a problem. Sorry, but this is best for your PR.
+1@ImZerkkZxe b u t w h y
+1For cannons? Yes. For miniguns and wing guns? No.
+1@ZangXia Lifting body??? ADD LARGER WINGS!
+1Play fun
w h a t
+1CUZ YOURE AN IDIOT! HAHAHA!
+1@ToeTips DON'T LET THEM KNOW
+1Hi, from BRITAIN. Here's how to add a permalink. First, [Put what you want to say here.] Then, (Addthelink_here.) Lastly, remove the space. And done, You have a permalink!
+1@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore Sure.
+1@SPAircraftOfficial Looks like you miss a year then, have fun.
+1Works extremely well! 9/10. Maybe those things can be flaps?
+1@MrCOPTY Thanks :)
+1Cool thing. Could you also help me get to silver? I want to make a trophy for everyone.
+1@ImZerkkZxe I'll tell you about points, upvoting a craft gives you 15, along with videos if OG content, otherwise 2 points are given, like an upvote on forums.
+1@Real08 Okay.
+1@ImZerkkZxe No worries, I also want to make a silver trophy for the community. Could you help me get there?
+1I think you just need to use normal missiles on normal aircraft, this doesn't seem to work.
+1Flies quite well, I have to say.
+1