@Tachiko I'm well aware of how hard it is on a potato device my tablets a 2013 my two phones are 2016 an 2019 respectively lol an oddly enough my 2013 tablet works far better then my 2019 phone lol
@PionierDynamics very very different ways of looking at that but as the Prime chancellor for a country that's seen conflict since before its very founding this intriguing but also kinda yikes
See now tho with your military the way it is is also counter productive an intuitive keeping them deployed an not allowing them the chance to come home puts a bigger dissolution into the military making the threat of a civil unrest an civil distrust in the government higher this is no more apparent then in the recent conflict which will not be named
I mean I hate coming on this stupid site with a passion but I saw this whilst going an clearing out notifications just wanted to say the undo button has zero logic just a simple thought process of how much an how badly do I wanna screw this builder over
@Kendog84 I do actually tho not uploaded an yes it's not in watcher as this accounts been mainly made use for checking in on the community every once an a blue moon since I quit uploading most my modern paneled ships follow a similar principle in your design tho probably simpler an easier but does better represent individual compartments an bulkheads
@Kendog84 Its really interesting to see this as it's fairly similar to what I do already pretty cool as I've said but after looking at it yea it is fairly similar
@HorizonHitingxt by irl naval standard this would be considered a CG at 611.8ft DDGs sit between 505ft to 545ft in length plus the bow is overly long an a concern as that'd be prime torpedo real estate
Really cool but man alive id be scared going nose first if it were to crash an the way in is forced shut by pressure
@Airheaddivision I love the Black Hawk but the Venom the modern huey has my heart
+1AMX 10RC nice
I believe the helicopter your referring to is the tired an true army workhorse the UH-60 Black Hawk
+1@Tachiko I'm well aware of how hard it is on a potato device my tablets a 2013 my two phones are 2016 an 2019 respectively lol an oddly enough my 2013 tablet works far better then my 2019 phone lol
@Farewellntchii paneling isn't that terrible I thought so myself for awhile a long while lol but by a very decent user I learned
@PionierDynamics well imma just say don't base your tanks off game interpretations look at real examples cause I can see several major design failures
@PionierDynamics very very different ways of looking at that but as the Prime chancellor for a country that's seen conflict since before its very founding this intriguing but also kinda yikes
That is dangerously low in the water plus the triminan hull is made useless sitting that low
I just wanna know where you learned tank design form
See now tho with your military the way it is is also counter productive an intuitive keeping them deployed an not allowing them the chance to come home puts a bigger dissolution into the military making the threat of a civil unrest an civil distrust in the government higher this is no more apparent then in the recent conflict which will not be named
@Airheaddivision it could also be that your screen renders the blades as fast as they spin my tablet did the same thing
+1I mean I hate coming on this stupid site with a passion but I saw this whilst going an clearing out notifications just wanted to say the undo button has zero logic just a simple thought process of how much an how badly do I wanna screw this builder over
Just wanna point this out but anyone notice that the left airbrake has a back an the right side don't on the bottom image
It woulda been cooler if it had the FW-190 bubble canopy
+2@Kendog84 I can show you on Discord if you like
@Kendog84 I do actually tho not uploaded an yes it's not in watcher as this accounts been mainly made use for checking in on the community every once an a blue moon since I quit uploading most my modern paneled ships follow a similar principle in your design tho probably simpler an easier but does better represent individual compartments an bulkheads
@Kendog84 Its really interesting to see this as it's fairly similar to what I do already pretty cool as I've said but after looking at it yea it is fairly similar
@Kendog84 so very similar to what I do already tho mines works far more simply an easily
+1@Tohu no just looking at it form a realistic stand point fictional it still looks like it's on its frame an not actual feet
+1@Tohu only issue that is a critical flaw with this design is the feet those wouldn't be able to hold the mech up or withstand the cannons recoil
+1Good to see you again bud
+1Why is the bow a torp thirst trap like holy moly is it long I like the look just the bow is overly long
+1Holy moly the king an or queen of WW2 ships is back
+1@DerekSP not what I meant lol surprised to see you back on SP
+1@DerekSP Holy crap your back
+1@BaconAircraft @MrSilverWolf congrats on making mod you two
@ollielebananiaCFSP the heck did I do I legit did nothing
@ollielebananiaCFSP it worked this time
@ollielebananiaCFSP link expired lol
Reminds me of the American car industry went form being boxy an oh so sexy to the now streamlined hunk a jinks we have today
@HorizonHitingxt by irl naval standard this would be considered a CG at 611.8ft DDGs sit between 505ft to 545ft in length plus the bow is overly long an a concern as that'd be prime torpedo real estate
@HorizonHitingxt it's a small FFG compared to some at only 406ft in length she's definitely a smaller warship
+1@TheChosenOne welcome back I must admit it's bit of a stir seeing you back lol
HOLY CRAP HES ALIVE WOAH!!
Ok this may be first time posting in years but would a CGX be fine too? @HoshinoStudioOfficial
+1Welcome back
Good to see your still around old friend roll on 18 wheeler roll on
+2Only issue might be how forward the gun because weight offset otherwise very decent
@Javelin so two things main gun an CIWs calibers are too big Main gun would be around 57mm to 155mm an CIWs 20mm to 40mm other then that lovely ship
@laffey adjust the price slightly realistically 883 million is a bit steep for 32 FFGs maybe 4 or 5 at this price
Oh god again
@mezmer horrible excuse but ight than lol
Only thing missing is the Harpoon Launchers behind the forward VLS
@LegnaK glad to see it
@LegnaK wait your back!
+1Tracks 1 an 2 should be added along with the rest plus underwater camera
+1Very nice but at this size id hate to see the cost of operations an maintaining these ships with a conventional powerplant
+1@X4JB that is true but still kinda sad
@X4JB that's as I tought kinda sad the Panzer III didn't get a better gun then the 5cm