Cool tank but some realism is necessary in fiction so the Centurion an M48 series I honestly don't see how or why America or Britain would ditch they're beloved tanks especially the brits with the Centurion they didn't decommission it tell the challenger 1 an even then it's still in service too this day in some countries an not to mention without the Centurion the MBT as a whole wouldn't exist probably tell the early 2000s since it was thee very first MBT
@Yuper I can see the Leo 1 not existing but the Centurion an M48 M60 I can't see as Centurion was built an produce during WW2 an the M48 an M60 were designed in the late 40s to 50s an i don't see a realistic point of view not to mention America's disbelief in welded turrets tell the Abrams as America didn't discontinue cast turrets tell after the M60
You do needa check your facts better before posting history in your descriptions the M59 was a APC during the 60s to 70s Germany had the Leo 1 America the M41 M60 an M48 an British had its dominant Centurion all of which were more then capable of dealing with Soviet armor an the M59 wasn't a slouch either with it being able to be fitted with any assortment of weaponry tho at the expense of the design limitations tho it is a fictional story the M59 wouldn't be Germany's main tank in any sense of realism or fiction since it was never a medium tank but a APC
@Tachiko I'm well aware of how hard it is on a potato device my tablets a 2013 my two phones are 2016 an 2019 respectively lol an oddly enough my 2013 tablet works far better then my 2019 phone lol
@PionierDynamics very very different ways of looking at that but as the Prime chancellor for a country that's seen conflict since before its very founding this intriguing but also kinda yikes
See now tho with your military the way it is is also counter productive an intuitive keeping them deployed an not allowing them the chance to come home puts a bigger dissolution into the military making the threat of a civil unrest an civil distrust in the government higher this is no more apparent then in the recent conflict which will not be named
I mean I hate coming on this stupid site with a passion but I saw this whilst going an clearing out notifications just wanted to say the undo button has zero logic just a simple thought process of how much an how badly do I wanna screw this builder over
@Kendog84 I do actually tho not uploaded an yes it's not in watcher as this accounts been mainly made use for checking in on the community every once an a blue moon since I quit uploading most my modern paneled ships follow a similar principle in your design tho probably simpler an easier but does better represent individual compartments an bulkheads
@Kendog84 Its really interesting to see this as it's fairly similar to what I do already pretty cool as I've said but after looking at it yea it is fairly similar
@HorizonHitingxt by irl naval standard this would be considered a CG at 611.8ft DDGs sit between 505ft to 545ft in length plus the bow is overly long an a concern as that'd be prime torpedo real estate
@Quec I would say tho try making your own naval gun tbh the Mk.45 5inch is a bit over used an just drabs the uniqueness of a fictional ship
@Quec ah must be a ship on his project list I haven't seen yet
Well I see a kerlo ship in design an general appearance
@DeathStalker627 oh nice it's really interesting
@DeathStalker627 will say this is interesting itd be cool to get it to work
Now that'd be a terrifying fortification to come across as a enemy
Uh what happened to it's turret it get a weight loss program?
I hadda learn that the hard way unfortunately but I learned
Learn to do screenshots an good looking og builds of your of imagine but keep realism in mind
@AdmiralGelvain in just curious cause it being the narrow an long itd be a roll over nightmare especially at 17ft tall
Sir why why is it so bloody narrow an long
Ah battle star galactica
I really like this tho bottom is of some concern
@Bobyo huh force depreciation much
My biggest concern is the cockpit well an truly its massively oversized an the airframe as a whole is all outta proportion
Cool tank but some realism is necessary in fiction so the Centurion an M48 series I honestly don't see how or why America or Britain would ditch they're beloved tanks especially the brits with the Centurion they didn't decommission it tell the challenger 1 an even then it's still in service too this day in some countries an not to mention without the Centurion the MBT as a whole wouldn't exist probably tell the early 2000s since it was thee very first MBT
@Yuper I can see the Leo 1 not existing but the Centurion an M48 M60 I can't see as Centurion was built an produce during WW2 an the M48 an M60 were designed in the late 40s to 50s an i don't see a realistic point of view not to mention America's disbelief in welded turrets tell the Abrams as America didn't discontinue cast turrets tell after the M60
You do needa check your facts better before posting history in your descriptions the M59 was a APC during the 60s to 70s Germany had the Leo 1 America the M41 M60 an M48 an British had its dominant Centurion all of which were more then capable of dealing with Soviet armor an the M59 wasn't a slouch either with it being able to be fitted with any assortment of weaponry tho at the expense of the design limitations tho it is a fictional story the M59 wouldn't be Germany's main tank in any sense of realism or fiction since it was never a medium tank but a APC
But good otherwise
Imma say this the engine deck is too tall an turrets a bit long
Will say there is a very very good alicorn already on the site by legit
Really cool but man alive id be scared going nose first if it were to crash an the way in is forced shut by pressure
AMX 10RC nice
@Tachiko I'm well aware of how hard it is on a potato device my tablets a 2013 my two phones are 2016 an 2019 respectively lol an oddly enough my 2013 tablet works far better then my 2019 phone lol
@Farewellntchii paneling isn't that terrible I thought so myself for awhile a long while lol but by a very decent user I learned
@PionierDynamics well imma just say don't base your tanks off game interpretations look at real examples cause I can see several major design failures
@PionierDynamics very very different ways of looking at that but as the Prime chancellor for a country that's seen conflict since before its very founding this intriguing but also kinda yikes
That is dangerously low in the water plus the triminan hull is made useless sitting that low
I just wanna know where you learned tank design form
See now tho with your military the way it is is also counter productive an intuitive keeping them deployed an not allowing them the chance to come home puts a bigger dissolution into the military making the threat of a civil unrest an civil distrust in the government higher this is no more apparent then in the recent conflict which will not be named
I mean I hate coming on this stupid site with a passion but I saw this whilst going an clearing out notifications just wanted to say the undo button has zero logic just a simple thought process of how much an how badly do I wanna screw this builder over
Just wanna point this out but anyone notice that the left airbrake has a back an the right side don't on the bottom image
@Kendog84 I can show you on Discord if you like
@Kendog84 I do actually tho not uploaded an yes it's not in watcher as this accounts been mainly made use for checking in on the community every once an a blue moon since I quit uploading most my modern paneled ships follow a similar principle in your design tho probably simpler an easier but does better represent individual compartments an bulkheads
@Kendog84 Its really interesting to see this as it's fairly similar to what I do already pretty cool as I've said but after looking at it yea it is fairly similar
@BaconAircraft @MrSilverWolf congrats on making mod you two
@ollielebananiaCFSP the heck did I do I legit did nothing
@ollielebananiaCFSP it worked this time
@ollielebananiaCFSP link expired lol
Reminds me of the American car industry went form being boxy an oh so sexy to the now streamlined hunk a jinks we have today
@HorizonHitingxt by irl naval standard this would be considered a CG at 611.8ft DDGs sit between 505ft to 545ft in length plus the bow is overly long an a concern as that'd be prime torpedo real estate
@TheChosenOne welcome back I must admit it's bit of a stir seeing you back lol
HOLY CRAP HES ALIVE WOAH!!
Welcome back
Only issue might be how forward the gun because weight offset otherwise very decent
@Javelin so two things main gun an CIWs calibers are too big Main gun would be around 57mm to 155mm an CIWs 20mm to 40mm other then that lovely ship
@laffey adjust the price slightly realistically 883 million is a bit steep for 32 FFGs maybe 4 or 5 at this price
Oh god again
@mezmer horrible excuse but ight than lol
Only thing missing is the Harpoon Launchers behind the forward VLS