@Hedero I mean you don’t have to make cockpits my man
Builds without them still get a lot of support and people still enjoy them! Don’t get yourself too down over a cockpit
@Hedero unfortunately no I wish I did. I’ve been here for almost 3 years and still don’t know how to panel lmao
I may try it. My thought is a 3 angle hollow fuselage cut
Top one is a smooth fuselage cut to maybe 7 to 15
Then angle flat-circular cut down to 3 to 7
.
Edit: 30 minutes but made a basic example. Rushed, it’s not perfect nor 1:1 but basic 1 2 3
You start with that, slowly slim the top part out and connect the 2 side circles near the mid to rear
@rexzion agreed
People seem to just want to wing it all the time and don’t look at the cockpit frame shape. I always say that, but I understand that they don’t wanna panel it. It’s impossible to not panel
OH MY GODDDD
Funny, this was one of the first 4 P-51’s I’ve ever seen taxiing irl
Old Crow (51D)
Gentleman Jim (51D)
Gunfighter (this one, 51D)
Ain’t Misbehavin’ (51D)
@MintLynx funny enough that’s what I actually did lol
I’ll have to have talks via discord about new floatation designs. I have a more rugged version that seems a little more “Stone Age” but works pretty well for what I attempt. I may as well share with you while it’s on topic
Copy-pasting from Google's download screen
.
"Sorry, you can't view or download this file at this time.
Too many users have viewed or downloaded this file recently. Please try accessing the file again later. If the file you are trying to access is particularly large or is shared with many people, it may take up to 24 hours to be able to view or download the file. If you still can't access a file after 24 hours, contact your domain administrator."
we've asked for 3 years, not happening for a long time
from before I made an account I saw forums about suggesting new sounds. The physics engine is literally impossible to try and rework. If they did, everyone's previous hard work would be screwed and most likely wouldnt work right anymore.
Coolpeach's phantom? Would probs handle like a hot air balloon
This is awesome! It's got a little bit of a bouncing issue but its workable.
What you should really try starting to make is Anchors. Self-explanatory why.
Are you gonna keep making cars or are you gonna get back into the swing of the sea? Or maybe something new?
.
I see your description mention. Good to see you got it working!
YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
.
Question, is it possible you could do this AND the mk.IV variant?
It’s the bomber variant with the bombardier station
@Bruhmomehtjd there’s a good reason that tag is there, but when posts get too far off topic it can be dangerous.
This is the type of post that a person can DOX, even leak personal information. I know what you mean, and you know what I mean.
.
Besides now the whole comments are like “oOoH aMeRicA PoLiCe bAd”
@WiiMini deez isn’t inactive
He’s still working you just can’t see it (I talked on and off with him about certain issues on here maybe a month, 2 ago)
He’s also part time moderating SPBC
Ok listen
This isn’t meant to be reddit, please if you’re making forums like the mods say “keep them on topic.”
This can be turned into a DOX if you aren’t careful, no one wants that blood on this place. Keep IRL stuff to a minimum. No one comes here to see “I got drunk!”, “I bought a Ford!”, “I did so and so!”
I definitely won’t be the only person saying this, I’ll probably be the only one commenting about it but not the only thinker
@JustWingIt correct
Not worth the trouble.
.
If anyone wants it so bad they have to beg, how about do the work yourself by learning how to make mods? They say “If you want something done right, do it yourself”
I’m amazed with how clean this is but the other 3 quarters of my brain are also like: pleasedontletthepartcountbeover2000pleasedontletthepartcountbeover2000pleasepleaseplease
@DieLoaf honestly it’s not that bad it just seems like it was rushed.
Technically it is with the amount of detail this has but that’s ok. It happens.
I could fix it and give proper sonobouys if it came to that.
I like it, it’s better than almost every P-3 I’ve seen on here. Maybe even the best one
Ngl, kind of disappointed.
The shape is amazing, but there is a lot of missed details and inaccuracies, and the physics are somewhat broke, and it being rushed.
There’s an auto roll issue, somewhere parts are colliding in the plane (on max physics btw) and a couple others.
.
Good exterior, on par physics but could have been better, some issues, not bad.
@CountriBoi honestly let it go, they’re foreign they won’t understand western firefighting
I see now it’s more rude than I thought. But seriously it’ll just dent our name. Besides, Chinese. It’s a terrible country with mostly terrible people.
So
Yes, but no. You’ve got to have fuselage grips (the one with the transparent hands) in places so the VR grip can properly attach to the models.
You’ve obviously got to have the joystick base too, but the grip fuselages are required to work.
.
V did a better explanation so listen to him
Ok tbh that B-17 is very unrealistic. Even the interior.
But everything else I’ve seen blows my mind
But welcome back dude! Glad you came back
The burner looks sooooo goooooooooood
+1No point in T’ing people it won’t be done or come out in the next year lmao
+2Worth it tho
@Hedero I mean you don’t have to make cockpits my man
+1Builds without them still get a lot of support and people still enjoy them! Don’t get yourself too down over a cockpit
@Hedero unfortunately no I wish I did. I’ve been here for almost 3 years and still don’t know how to panel lmao
I may try it. My thought is a 3 angle hollow fuselage cut
Top one is a smooth fuselage cut to maybe 7 to 15
Then angle flat-circular cut down to 3 to 7
.
Edit: 30 minutes but made a basic example. Rushed, it’s not perfect nor 1:1 but basic
1
2
3
You start with that, slowly slim the top part out and connect the 2 side circles near the mid to rear
@rexzion agreed
People seem to just want to wing it all the time and don’t look at the cockpit frame shape. I always say that, but I understand that they don’t wanna panel it. It’s impossible to not panel
OH MY GODDDD
Funny, this was one of the first 4 P-51’s I’ve ever seen taxiing irl
Old Crow (51D)
Gentleman Jim (51D)
Gunfighter (this one, 51D)
Ain’t Misbehavin’ (51D)
Ok
@MintLynx funny enough that’s what I actually did lol
I’ll have to have talks via discord about new floatation designs. I have a more rugged version that seems a little more “Stone Age” but works pretty well for what I attempt. I may as well share with you while it’s on topic
Copy-pasting from Google's download screen
.
"Sorry, you can't view or download this file at this time.
Too many users have viewed or downloaded this file recently. Please try accessing the file again later. If the file you are trying to access is particularly large or is shared with many people, it may take up to 24 hours to be able to view or download the file. If you still can't access a file after 24 hours, contact your domain administrator."
we've asked for 3 years, not happening for a long time
+3from before I made an account I saw forums about suggesting new sounds. The physics engine is literally impossible to try and rework. If they did, everyone's previous hard work would be screwed and most likely wouldnt work right anymore.
Coolpeach's phantom? Would probs handle like a hot air balloon
This is awesome! It's got a little bit of a bouncing issue but its workable.
What you should really try starting to make is Anchors. Self-explanatory why.
Are you gonna keep making cars or are you gonna get back into the swing of the sea? Or maybe something new?
.
I see your description mention. Good to see you got it working!
YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
The earrape was a bit too much. It was good before it was ruined.
+8@SilverStar power steering may not agree and just limit it
@ArkRoyalTheDDhunter it doesn’t have the A3’s engine
It has the engine DECK but doesn’t mean it is an A3
FINALLY
+5AN/SOME ACCURATE M1/M1’S
ITS BEEN TOO LONG SINCE SOMEONE MADE A CORRECT ABRAMS
This is more or less a M4, not an A2, A3 or A1. This is just a normal M4
+1@LegendaryPilot only*
| I agree!
V
There is a discord server devoted to funky trees research, discovery and coding. Check the pinned forum with all the discords
Honestly this is a really good end result.
+1I like it, it gives the right feel. Looks 1:1
YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
.
Question, is it possible you could do this AND the mk.IV variant?
It’s the bomber variant with the bombardier station
@Bruhmomehtjd there’s a good reason that tag is there, but when posts get too far off topic it can be dangerous.
This is the type of post that a person can DOX, even leak personal information. I know what you mean, and you know what I mean.
.
Besides now the whole comments are like “oOoH aMeRicA PoLiCe bAd”
Submarine is pretty good imo
GOOD
+1GOD
SWEET
JESUS
THIS IS SO GOOOOOD
@WiiMini with the power of 4 hours of sleep I can be mentally retarded!
+2I’m just every German ground Main in war thunder, blind!
Unfortunately that isn’t a thing yet.
A bunch of people wish that was a thing, but it’s not in the FT yet nor a usable input
@WiiMini deez isn’t inactive
He’s still working you just can’t see it (I talked on and off with him about certain issues on here maybe a month, 2 ago)
He’s also part time moderating SPBC
Wait
+1So all this time he was being a ghost?
I never heard of this happening and now I’m concerned
yes
+1Ok listen
+9This isn’t meant to be reddit, please if you’re making forums like the mods say “keep them on topic.”
This can be turned into a DOX if you aren’t careful, no one wants that blood on this place. Keep IRL stuff to a minimum. No one comes here to see “I got drunk!”, “I bought a Ford!”, “I did so and so!”
I definitely won’t be the only person saying this, I’ll probably be the only one commenting about it but not the only thinker
wait but mods aren’t devs
+61head lookin *&#
@JustWingIt correct
Not worth the trouble.
.
If anyone wants it so bad they have to beg, how about do the work yourself by learning how to make mods? They say “If you want something done right, do it yourself”
I’m amazed with how clean this is but the other 3 quarters of my brain are also like: pleasedontletthepartcountbeover2000pleasedontletthepartcountbeover2000pleasepleaseplease
@Gestour thank you for adding it back. A lot
What happened to your Lights Mod?
I used that for everything, loved it.
I’ve shot planes down with cannons.
+2There ARE bugs with cannons but this is NOT one of them
AAAAAAA THATS SO CLEAN
@DieLoaf might take a month but F* IT I’ll do it
@DieLoaf honestly it’s not that bad it just seems like it was rushed.
Technically it is with the amount of detail this has but that’s ok. It happens.
I could fix it and give proper sonobouys if it came to that.
I like it, it’s better than almost every P-3 I’ve seen on here. Maybe even the best one
Ngl, kind of disappointed.
The shape is amazing, but there is a lot of missed details and inaccuracies, and the physics are somewhat broke, and it being rushed.
There’s an auto roll issue, somewhere parts are colliding in the plane (on max physics btw) and a couple others.
.
Good exterior, on par physics but could have been better, some issues, not bad.
@CountriBoi I’m a firefighter too but do you see me freaking out?
Chill
On god.
That’s how they get you down just don’t acknowledge it.
@CountriBoi honestly let it go, they’re foreign they won’t understand western firefighting
+1I see now it’s more rude than I thought. But seriously it’ll just dent our name. Besides, Chinese. It’s a terrible country with mostly terrible people.
@DieLoaf I can test it for you on both mobile and PC if you’re running into device issues
@DieLoaf Royal New Zealand Air Force. RNZAF
Do you mean a P-3C? PC-3 isn’t a thing.
+1ngl bones livery is overrated but it’s good in its own right
+1Didn’t you say it was a C-47 before?
So
Yes, but no. You’ve got to have fuselage grips (the one with the transparent hands) in places so the VR grip can properly attach to the models.
You’ve obviously got to have the joystick base too, but the grip fuselages are required to work.
.
V did a better explanation so listen to him