I found another one, name of REAPER, disregards the 500 part count rule, and when he gets killed for disregarding, he attacks you and everyone around you. (Disregard)
@EngineerOtaku Would you be obligated to create an RA-5C, or possibly an EA-6B? If not it's fine.
I might also have an Ejection Seat that you might be able to use. It’s 17 parts, and it’s got thrusters that don’t explode, and it’s 567lbs
Do you think you can attempt making a FW-200 Condor or an accurate B-17E? There doesn’t seem to be many Condor’s on here. (the website) Just a suggestion
Other than that, this is amazing. I love it
@SimplySoviet you don’t want to if you’re going for a historically accurate load out. They didn’t use the gunpods on the F-4 because it made it less maneuverable, they added them on later variants (G-6, G-10, G-12 etc etc)
@BagelPlane
@BagelPlane disregard that, he just uses high part planes. FCSJ is the one who was killing, thats my bad.
I found another one, name of REAPER, disregards the 500 part count rule, and when he gets killed for disregarding, he attacks you and everyone around you. (Disregard)
@BagelPlane new troll, by the name of Hier, in an Aircraft named SLD FAV (not the full name)
The servers are back online btw guys
@HyperViper the main server is 157.7.205.136, second is 157.7.214.47
@HyperViper both
Wait, wasn’t the original plane E2AEF22? Hmmm.
Wait, the 205.136 server is down for me. Is it up for y’all rn?
@asteroidbook345 actually false, they’re on every day
@BagelPlane I’m gonna go on a search for that F-22. I hope to find him
Possibly for the next heli, a CH-53E? The only ones on the site are far outdated
Oooo!
T
@BagelPlane @InuYasha8215 @Farmlad @Rawhide
Nice!
@EternalDarkness I understand, I just haven’t got the slightest idea why I’ve been blocked, thought I’d ask about it. Thanks for rules link tho.
I mean you all have a point, but yeah, I honestly don’t care it this gets taken down, just asked a question.
Ever thought of a ‘14 or ‘18 Charger?
A majority of the people who downloaded haven’t upvoted. Makes me feel bad. I must work harder on other builds.
Mostly the things that made it different. All except the aircraft itself, the letters and the missiles.
Wow
@EngineerOtaku I’m working on multiple rn, but I’ll tag you on the base I made.
@EngineerOtaku Would you be obligated to create an RA-5C, or possibly an EA-6B? If not it's fine.
I might also have an Ejection Seat that you might be able to use. It’s 17 parts, and it’s got thrusters that don’t explode, and it’s 567lbs
@MintLynx how about for another submarine, an Akula-Class maybe? After all your projects before anyhow... if not it’s cool
It's fine, dont worry about it
I absolutely love this.
Y’all need to spotlight this
Ok, no the A-4E did not have a moving stab. Therefore, the build is inaccurate
The A-4 did not, no. The A-4E might’ve, not sure but I know it didn’t have one on most
No. Suffer mobile user.
Yes.
@FLOWRIDER0 The power of Y E S compels you
YES
T
Just wondering, you have the rear seater set right? Because if not, it’s not an Echo variant (probably a stupid, and annoying question
@Brields95 Read ChiChi’s comment.
The... A-7 didn’t have afterburner... it isn’t a F-8...
I don’t really like it since it was used to troll before it was released.
There seems to be a traction issue with the front LG after landing or dropping munitions. High Physics on PC and Mobile
Amazing job nonetheless
Do you think you can attempt making a FW-200 Condor or an accurate B-17E? There doesn’t seem to be many Condor’s on here. (the website) Just a suggestion
Other than that, this is amazing. I love it
Dude MP is getting annoying with the amount of trolls who found out what missiles to use. Honestly
Np!
It’s absolutely amazing tho
So, on one side, the doors open (once you fire 8 of them) but the missiles on the other side fire, and get stuck inside.
This is amazing.
Ah crap. I’ll be sure to fix it in the next builds lmao
Beautiful! I don’t think mine can Compete with this. Great job and keep it up!
Uh yes I do, I’m currently modifying the ambulance for a special livery, and light setup.
That’s true. Worse than a Phantom. But anyway, you do you
And by Variants, did you mean variants of Livery or the actual aircraft? If it’s the aircraft I’d like that. But you don’t have to
@SimplySoviet you don’t want to if you’re going for a historically accurate load out. They didn’t use the gunpods on the F-4 because it made it less maneuverable, they added them on later variants (G-6, G-10, G-12 etc etc)