5,498 SpartanBallistics Comments

  • So I just made a calculator for SimplePlanes artillery... 7 hours ago

    @Axartar
    Prototype build or prototype spreadsheet? Either way I have both, the modified M301 is unlisted.

    +3
  • M80A1 Mjolnir II SEPv2 13 days ago

    @UnitedinOne90

    E

    +1
  • M80A1 Mjolnir II SEPv2 13 days ago

    @SPsidearm
    M16A4 Valkyrie II was one f my earliest MBTs, back when I still went by the name Jim1The1Squid lol
    TBF tho the next one might be named M81 Tyr for all I know.

  • M80A1 Mjolnir II SEPv2 13 days ago

    @ShinyGemsBro

    tunk.

  • M80A1 Mjolnir II SEPv2 13 days ago

    @RizalAdiel
    thenkyu

  • Thanks for gold ig 24 days ago

    @SILVERPANZER
    I do like how your thumbnails look, I just make mine with in-game features and then edit it with text and logos and whatnot with Pixlr xD

    Go to optimal screenshot location with intact vehicle
    Pose the vehicle
    >>CameraManagerScript.setFov 15
    Set time in-game to 1600
    Find good angle
    Screenshot
    Paste into Pixlr
    Upload blockletter font file to Pixlr
    Edit
    Download edited jpg with 100% quality option selected

    and boom

  • Me is getting close to gold 25 days ago

    Let me help you on your way lol

  • Thanks for gold ig 26 days ago

    @SILVERPANZER
    I would've likely had it by now if I wasn't so damn childish back then and got myself IP banned lol

  • M301 Angurvadal 155mm SPH one month ago

    @Yourlocalhuman
    Just a touch, mate. Got caught up with me mates inna pub near London, you know?

  • M3311 Bjorn WIFV one month ago

    @LunarEclipseSP
    I found that the hull front looks relatively similar lol

    +1
  • M3311 Bjorn WIFV 2 months ago

    @blt
    Thank you for ypur support

    +1
  • M3311 Bjorn WIFV 2 months ago

    @MrOofington
    Unable to add amphibious capability for the time being, the turret being as big as it is renders that an impossibility for now, and the turret is the size it is due to the need to house 3 personnel inside it (Commander, Gunnder, Loader). It would be more feasible and practical to mount an unmanned turret, and that would also allow for more soldiers to be housed in the rear.

  • M3311 Bjorn WIFV 2 months ago

    @blt

    +1
  • A request for the handful of users who take interest in my builds 2 months ago

    @DARZAVIATION
    Spotlights? Like, modded or no? If it's modded, I already have tracks mod on my stuff which leads to fewer downloads, unfortunately

  • A request for the handful of users who take interest in my builds 2 months ago

    @YarisSedan
    I just need someone to tell me what they find that's working funky or doesn't seem to be working correctly xD

  • M106 Hrafn AIFV 2 months ago

    @MrOofington
    Went looking through my unfinished builds, I have an 8x8 wheeled hull similar in shape to the Hrafn IFV, it's large enough to accept a turret that can mount a 120mm and is capable of accepting thicker armor.

  • M78 Skofnung AMBT 2 months ago

    @DARKSKIES
    Impractial, look up Chrysler TV-8

    +1
  • M106 Hrafn AIFV 2 months ago

    @MrOofington
    To provide sufficient protection against such rounds as 3UBR11, I'd have to almost triple the armor thickness or add some form of lightweight ERA, both of which would compromise the weight distrubution of the vehicle. That would disallow amphibious operations. Adding a 120mm manually loaded cannon would also necessitate a larger turret, of which this chassis will not be able to easily fit without altering or completely removing the crew cab in the rear, and not without severely compromising stability on both uneven terrain and in water, given the armor requirements laid down. Having capability to fire LAHATs wouldn't be an issue if the requirement wasn't for them to be gun-launched, either. Having them gun-launched would require a larger turret ring or bustle-stowed ammunition, both of which also lead to a larger overall turret size. The protection against chemical energy munitions such as RPGs and IEDs is already present, in terms of both armor and active protection systems. Mounting even a remote control .50cal would also prove a challenge without enlarging the turret, of which the detriments and disadvantages have been mentioned. Given your requirements, you might be better off using a modified M51A1 Hauld. It may not have the capability to carry troops like the Hrafn, but it has the capability to meet most of, if not all the requirements laid down by the WRMC and WRLF. The Hrafn, unfortunately, is not a suitable platform to meet such requirements. If you wish to wait for a more advanced option, I will soon be releasing my M78 Skofnung Advanced MBT, which will also be able to meet most of your requirements in a better fashion than that of the Hauld LMBT or even the Mjolnir MBT

  • M400 Thor SPAA 2 months ago

    @DARKSKIES

    I agree!

    +1
  • Dark theme script 4 months ago

    Can someone verify if this works with Opera GX browser?

  • M1100 Ulfr scout car 4 months ago

    @ShinyGemsBro
    Any of my.vehicles you can use, my only request is that you share feedback about its receiving amongst TFM SF units and general vehicle feedback on how you feel it performs and functions. I will say though, I wish I had mitigated the barrel collision issue, and made a slightly wider wheel base.

  • M1100 Ulfr scout car 4 months ago

    In hindsight, probably could've done better lighting or positioning on the thumbnail.

  • M1100 Ulfr scout car 4 months ago

    WritersCrusadersAirCo2
    SILVERPANZER
    I believe some people would consider upvotes as tags, so here you go too.

  • M1100 Ulfr scout car 4 months ago

    MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
    YarisSedan
    Commented tag requests

  • M301 Angurvadal 155mm SPH 4 months ago

    @ShinyGemsBro
    Anything you'd like to see improved or changed? Curious

  • M51A1 Hauld LMBT 4 months ago

    Just realized I forgot the thumbnail for this! my baddd....

  • M301 Angurvadal 155mm SPH 4 months ago

    @ShinyGemsBro
    By all means, you can use it however you'd like lol
    Although, to justify the stupidly heavy weight for what SPHs typically have (35 tons), I kinda had to give it armor kinda like a modern light tank. Means now it can be used closer to the front lines and can take far more than just shrapnel and small arms fire like most SPHs

  • M301 Angurvadal 155mm SPH 4 months ago

    @UkrTehnoAir
    Tank Q :3

    +1
  • M51A1 Hauld LMBT 4 months ago

    @Nerfaddict
    Life been busy lol
    Still in the Marine Corps doing bullshit stuff, started playing Helldivers and picked up Arma 3 for a bit, etc. Two girlfriends (poly)

  • M115A1 160mm Howitzer 4 months ago

    @TTL
    Hello lol

    +1
  • M115A1 160mm Howitzer 5 months ago

    @Yourlocalhuman
    Self propelled version in the making, if you're in the SPSC server, check #sp-general

  • ALTV Heavy Guns Carrier 6 months ago

    @TTL
    SEALs are special forces. Very specific tasks that require extreme precision and skill are their forte. Marines are the US's force in readiness, able to be put on the ground anywhere in the world within 24 hours as the first troops to engage with an enemy or provide humanitarian aid to those in need. Marines are essentially Navy infantry. We're also the guys that go ashore on a landing party and secure beach heads, harbors, etc.

    +1
  • Gunsight label script (M1940 F34) 7 months ago

    @Dmit1300
    My best advice, considering I posted this like a year ago it feels like, would be to use the formatting shown and align specific text characters with what you're looking for.

    +1
  • M115A1 160mm Howitzer 8 months ago

    @Yourlocalhuman
    I'm out in the field right now, but I'm going to start working on designs on paper to make an SPH version. Not yet certain how I'll pull off IDF capability, but I'll start something and see how it develops. I've been stagnating on this for too long and have had several builds planned out but never uploaded, and I need to get off my fat butt lol

  • ALTV one year ago

    I'll admit I thought the ALTV would be more successful.

  • ALTV one year ago

    @Nerfaddict
    Indeed it has

  • Gunsight label script (M1940 F34) 1.2 years ago

    @TTL
    Probably like, 5 or 6 years ago I want to say.

    +1
  • Gunsight label script (M1940 F34) 1.2 years ago

    @TTL
    Yes. That was a LONG time ago though.

  • T-34-76 Mod. 1942(no mod) 1.6 years ago

    Did u delete the gunsight too? That was a label

  • What do you think?? 1.8 years ago

    @That1Furry
    Yesh
    Am rare protogen :3

  • What do you think?? 1.9 years ago

    Do u habs discord?

  • T-34-76 Mod. 1942 1.9 years ago

    @LieutenantSOT
    Factory ran out of Stalinium :(

    +1
  • T-34-76 Mod. 1942 1.9 years ago

    @HuskyDynamics01
    The gunsight was a pain in the rear to make.

  • What do you think?? 1.9 years ago

    I see there be another floomf
    >w>

    +1
  • T-34-76 Mod. 1942 1.9 years ago

    @MAHADI
    In my defense, I did take this screenshot for the thumbnail about 9 months ago, this build has been in WIP status for that long. Will do, though.

  • T-34-76 Mod. 1942 1.9 years ago

    @HOPKINS234
    Wright 2

  • T-34-76 Mod. 1942 1.9 years ago

    @DnzimBR
    Incapaz, muito difícil

    +1
  • M104 Hrungnir MGS 1.9 years ago

    @Sakorsky
    Arty tutorial canceled indefinitely, too video-awkward to make tutorial and making a forum post about it doesn't feel right.

    +1