I was just thinking about this and you know what? It's a toss up between 1.3 and 1.11.
The 1.3 update brought Simpleplanes to steam, ushering in a new era of playing. The 1.3 era broght us racing, weapons, and combat, thus changing the game. Pc users got two new islands to explore as well.
Then came the 1.4 era of course with it's wheels, car engine, and heli parts.
But 1.11 changed the game. Interior cockpit parts. Glass. After 1.11 there really is no excuse for a plane not to have a full functioning cockpit.
Some of your suggestions have been confirmed like better fuselage options and wings. Others are good points such as Electronic Weapons and Countermeasures. Go join the discord and READ ALL THE SHOWCASES!!! That will tell you what's hot and what's not. Keep in mind, Some features haven't been showcased because those features are still in development.
@ShizzleStyx as for your decision to go with the F-111, I think it was a much better move.
Us players are expecting an F-14 but that's in part due to F-14s being present in every flight game there is and honestly that makes the F-14 overrated. At this point. The only game I played that featured the F-111 was HAWX on xbox360 way the hell back in the day.
@Graingy it's an early cold war jet! No it's not good! The gun is the only decent armament on it. The missiles, you have to get behind the target, and basically closer than you need to with the gun. The gun, is so off center it completely changes how you use the reticle in first person vew, and forget using it in third person.
It honestly begs the question: What the hell was MD thinking!?
A little Tidbit: To make a youtube video a short the easiest way is to do it from your phone.
-To get the video on your phone typically you want to plug your phone into your pc but if like me your phone only charges, you can email yourself and attach the mp4, download it and go from there. Youtube makes it pretty easy to do the rest. you can even use it to crop the time down to a minute and add music, even down to a specific part of the song you want.
I will not curate this aircraft, but I will give it a review.
Controls reach: 10/10
Fun to fly? 10/10.
Cockpit detail? 9.95/10
Realistic flight? This one doesn't really matter: 5/10
Easy to fly? 10/10
Startup and operation sequence? (craft requires fuel and battery to be turned on for operation) 10/10
I have one issue with it and the reason I am holding it to standard is that I wish curators had done the same with me when I was starting out making vr builds.
It doesn't have a flaps lever. Though it looks like you tried to add one and it may be broken.
I would like to see you fix this one issue. You can update the xml with the new one.
@LanceEngelbertsSkyHeroes Yes! i made it before the designer suit was a thing and actually had my dad make me a 1:32 scale blueprint for it. At that time that was the best way to make a 1:1 scale plane. Taking a 1:32 scale blueprint (or model) and building it in game using a "lego ruler" where two studs equals 1 unit in game.
@BMilan sure did! 2 door Coupe! Loved that engine! Beat a Hando vicec on 7 cylinders. It was light blue with a dark blue leather top and red interior. I miss it.
A lot of players new and og share your opinion. While I personally welcome all the new improvements I also see your opinion. The parts will be completely different and the game is starting to look alot like Flyout and Juno. I was building with the idea that the parts from sp1 would be completely interchangeable with sp2 parts but it looks like that's not exactly the case. I have been left struggling with weather I want to keep building for sp1 or stop and wait for sp2.
It depends. Probably one of the AI crafts since we won't be able to rip them. I need to see all the parts we have to play with because I really want to build a B-1, F-16, and maybe a P-40 but I don't know if those will be doable.
@jamesPLANESii in the suggestion post on the discord that the Supreme D answered, it mentioned radial and inline and even boxer engines. With that being said, I believe multiple engines connected to one transmission will be supported. And, the engines have a procedural cylinder number system. So, theoretically, any odd number of cylinders greater than one could be displayed as either an inline or radial.
Or, you could say, build several 1 cylinder engines, and connect them.
My question is how much lift can a fuselage block be manipulated to generate? Are wings going to be our answer to concave fuselage cross sections? If so will this answer the lifting body fuselage?
Don't know where to put this so I'm commenting on an old build. If you wish to discuss the short video challenge further, we can do it on my discord.
+1I was just thinking about this and you know what? It's a toss up between 1.3 and 1.11.
The 1.3 update brought Simpleplanes to steam, ushering in a new era of playing. The 1.3 era broght us racing, weapons, and combat, thus changing the game. Pc users got two new islands to explore as well.
Then came the 1.4 era of course with it's wheels, car engine, and heli parts.
But 1.11 changed the game. Interior cockpit parts. Glass. After 1.11 there really is no excuse for a plane not to have a full functioning cockpit.
+1That's Strep. It's going around.
+1@TheMouse yeah he told me yesterday after I submitted a bug report about the login page being bogged down.
But it looks to.me like we're having issues again today
+1Andrew removed ads from the login page.
+1@AndrewGarrison Thankyou for taking that action. I know you guys generate revenue on ads and appreciate you taking that hit to smoothen logging in.
Website performance has greatly improved.
+1Some of your suggestions have been confirmed like better fuselage options and wings. Others are good points such as Electronic Weapons and Countermeasures. Go join the discord and READ ALL THE SHOWCASES!!! That will tell you what's hot and what's not. Keep in mind, Some features haven't been showcased because those features are still in development.
+1I didn't date until 25. Still ended up married with 2 kids. You'll be fine.
+1That championship race was something
+1I agree with your opinions on the map.
+1@ShizzleStyx as for your decision to go with the F-111, I think it was a much better move.
+1Us players are expecting an F-14 but that's in part due to F-14s being present in every flight game there is and honestly that makes the F-14 overrated. At this point. The only game I played that featured the F-111 was HAWX on xbox360 way the hell back in the day.
I would like to see wider roads
+1@Graingy it's an early cold war jet! No it's not good! The gun is the only decent armament on it. The missiles, you have to get behind the target, and basically closer than you need to with the gun. The gun, is so off center it completely changes how you use the reticle in first person vew, and forget using it in third person.
It honestly begs the question: What the hell was MD thinking!?
+1Thanks for the spotlight @HudDistance! It's good to know i still got it!
+1See pinned
+1@pobondo
@YarisSedan
@LunarEclipseSP
A little Tidbit: To make a youtube video a short the easiest way is to do it from your phone.
+1-To get the video on your phone typically you want to plug your phone into your pc but if like me your phone only charges, you can email yourself and attach the mp4, download it and go from there. Youtube makes it pretty easy to do the rest. you can even use it to crop the time down to a minute and add music, even down to a specific part of the song you want.
I will not curate this aircraft, but I will give it a review.
Controls reach: 10/10
Fun to fly? 10/10.
Cockpit detail? 9.95/10
Realistic flight? This one doesn't really matter: 5/10
Easy to fly? 10/10
Startup and operation sequence? (craft requires fuel and battery to be turned on for operation) 10/10
I have one issue with it and the reason I am holding it to standard is that I wish curators had done the same with me when I was starting out making vr builds.
It doesn't have a flaps lever. Though it looks like you tried to add one and it may be broken.
I would like to see you fix this one issue. You can update the xml with the new one.
Then, I would be happy to curate this build.
+1I'll look at it tonight or tomorrow. I'll have to fire up my question ii which i haven't used in a while so it might need an update
+1@Cabbage17 can you link me to the wiki page?
Edit nvm thanks for the input
+1@CatdogAerospace You can also hit them with bombs if you're lucky (VLC deleted the capture)
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph no. Ai spawn in a VERY safe distance above the ground and will attempt to maintain altitude advantage.
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph like I said the only observable AI I can see is in combat.
+1This plane is broken in Simpleplanes 2 @Aano78 @Hiiamhere
+1This plane is broken in simpleplanes 2 @YarisSedan @Hiiamhere
+1@V For the demo only though right? Because that massive dirt Simpleplanes 2 logo is definitely a placeholder
+1ABSOLUTELY!!!
+1Gpu 2060 super
+1Processor i5
Runs smooth in single player
Multiplayer is down in the 20s
@HuskyDynamics01 I did! By the way I love the new kicking fish!
+1@Hughey6576 sources, bruh?
+1You all need to get crimson skies. It's available on xbox one.
+1This is how they handle the allegations against them? THIS!?
I wonder who crumbles quicker. Roblox Corp or Doordash.
+1controls instruction are a must with this kind of build, either in the post or in the craft instructions box.
+1Here's the thing about rizz. You'll only have it if she wants it. In other words she has to choose you.
+1@LanceEngelbertsSkyHeroes Yes! i made it before the designer suit was a thing and actually had my dad make me a 1:32 scale blueprint for it. At that time that was the best way to make a 1:1 scale plane. Taking a 1:32 scale blueprint (or model) and building it in game using a "lego ruler" where two studs equals 1 unit in game.
+1Oh hell no! I know what those are! I was the original! Never got any upvotes though.
+1The comment was left by a copper player.
A lion doesn't concern himself with the opinion of sheep.
+1Is that Pitts gonna be stock?
+1Unexpected pyroclastic disassebly
+1@BMilan sure did! 2 door Coupe! Loved that engine! Beat a Hando vicec on 7 cylinders. It was light blue with a dark blue leather top and red interior. I miss it.
+1I had a 1973 one of these!
+1A lot of players new and og share your opinion. While I personally welcome all the new improvements I also see your opinion. The parts will be completely different and the game is starting to look alot like Flyout and Juno. I was building with the idea that the parts from sp1 would be completely interchangeable with sp2 parts but it looks like that's not exactly the case. I have been left struggling with weather I want to keep building for sp1 or stop and wait for sp2.
+1@SCtheONE ok so hypothetically, baring I haven't said anything offensive, I'd say, "A and B conversation"
+1It depends. Probably one of the AI crafts since we won't be able to rip them. I need to see all the parts we have to play with because I really want to build a B-1, F-16, and maybe a P-40 but I don't know if those will be doable.
+1Keep political posts off the sight please
+1@jamesPLANESii in the suggestion post on the discord that the Supreme D answered, it mentioned radial and inline and even boxer engines. With that being said, I believe multiple engines connected to one transmission will be supported. And, the engines have a procedural cylinder number system. So, theoretically, any odd number of cylinders greater than one could be displayed as either an inline or radial.
+1Or, you could say, build several 1 cylinder engines, and connect them.
My question is how much lift can a fuselage block be manipulated to generate? Are wings going to be our answer to concave fuselage cross sections? If so will this answer the lifting body fuselage?
I can't wait to find out!
+12015 is his birthyear
+1I thought players without points couldn't post forums or leave comments. We need to go back to that system.
+1what map plug-ins are you running?
+1Excuse me sir, but WHAT is that piece the wheel is attached to? You have some explaining to do!
+1