Do you have plans for earlier Tupolev and Ilyushin jets like Tu-104/134/154 or Tu-114? Or later ones like 204 you already have the plan for and Tu-334 sharing the fuselage. By the way since you have Boeing 707 planned and COMAC C919 in consideration I as a Chinese personally recommend you to make a Shanghai Y-10, a similar design to Boeing 707 and has the 707-320 as reference during design.
BAC 1-11 and DC-9 series are a good choice, late DC-8 (-70) variants will be nice too.
DC-8 is always a reliable jet.
Thats typical AI moment
Bing AI recognize a Soviet large anti submarine ship as "a Ticonderoga class cruiser" so i guess this is probably the same mechanism.
@CptLiar
Just remove them or I'm pretty sure these moderators gonna soon bring in the ban hammer.
Tip: if you dont want any trouble just remove all the words might stir up debate in the description.
And also, welcome back!
About fighter generations - just different systems. It's gen 4 and also gen 3 in an other system.
@YamatoHotel Not everyone play modern warships people make ship doesn't because they are in a game but they exists in real life spamming things modern warship everywhere is not awfully funny so as a MW player i request you kindly shut
Quote, It is okay to download someone else's airplane, make some tweaks, and re-upload a new variation.
In fact, the original designer may even receive bonus points. However, if your variation does not offer any improvements over the existing airplane, then it may be removed., Quote end, Simpleplanes forum site rules; I will hereby call for moderation since this is a post violating such rule.
@Vincent @BaconAircraft
o-O Fascinating.
+2o-O Fascinating.
.
How many stars on that US flag?
o-O Fascinating.
They should add a better automated flying system too btw
+1Do a ZTZ99A please)
Welcome to Simpleplanes
+1Do you have plans for earlier Tupolev and Ilyushin jets like Tu-104/134/154 or Tu-114? Or later ones like 204 you already have the plan for and Tu-334 sharing the fuselage. By the way since you have Boeing 707 planned and COMAC C919 in consideration I as a Chinese personally recommend you to make a Shanghai Y-10, a similar design to Boeing 707 and has the 707-320 as reference during design.
+1BAC 1-11 and DC-9 series are a good choice, late DC-8 (-70) variants will be nice too.
DC-8 is always a reliable jet.
o-O Fascinating.
+2Tag me!
@SheriffHackdogMCPE no they don't
+1Ch @u llenge
Thats typical AI moment
+1Bing AI recognize a Soviet large anti submarine ship as "a Ticonderoga class cruiser" so i guess this is probably the same mechanism.
Ah yes the demon
I prefer Ki-44s tho (ik not the same BR but i just prefer)
By the way,
o-O Fascinating.
Goooooooood morning local people,
+2AMERICA has landed!
o-O Fascinating.
o-O Fascinating.
+2.
.
Where is Khan by the way?
BTW CK in the aircraft desg number itself means Ching-Kuo.
Nice aircraft carry on!
Grammer nazi moment:
+1Both H and K should be capital in word Hong Kong.
o-O Fascinating.
+1No it's still April the 30th
+1o-O Fascinating. Makes one feel familiar yet unfamiliar.
@CptLiar
+1Just remove them or I'm pretty sure these moderators gonna soon bring in the ban hammer.
Tip: if you dont want any trouble just remove all the words might stir up debate in the description.
And also, welcome back!
About fighter generations - just different systems. It's gen 4 and also gen 3 in an other system.
o-O Fascinating. That request was a year ago.
+1o-O Fascinating.
Britannia has entered the chat
+7o-O Fascinating.
o-O Fascinating.
+1o-O Fascinating.
T
Rather early paint scheme. Not using that today
+2757 model from CombatAce site, Boeing 757 mod for SF2NA.
T
o-O Fascinating.
+1I CAN HEAR AMERICA 10/10
+6*Shocked, unable to wake up
+2huehuehue eat upvote
@YamatoHotel Not everyone play modern warships people make ship doesn't because they are in a game but they exists in real life spamming things modern warship everywhere is not awfully funny so as a MW player i request you kindly shut
+2Waking up in the morning be like:
+3Damage report!
Fascinating.
I guess ASDB style is dismantle a starship (or two) and reassemble the parts randomly...
Fascinating.
Wow ten minutes ago
+2@UmbrellaCorporation What seems to be the problem?
@GalacticaAsia oh war thunder destroyed my ability to see
+1Consider Ilyushin IL-86/96
+1Quote, It is okay to download someone else's airplane, make some tweaks, and re-upload a new variation.
In fact, the original designer may even receive bonus points.
However, if your variation does not offer any improvements over the existing airplane, then it may be removed., Quote end, Simpleplanes forum site rules; I will hereby call for moderation since this is a post violating such rule.
@Vincent @BaconAircraft
Nice
+2Very good
+1o-O fascinating
+1@BaconAircraft
好，很有精神！
+2我趣，车王活辣，车王他活辣
+39) The Label has no thickness which means I CAN NOT give a certain word about my these labels are located correctly or not.
cool i love this
+3mind me make a livery stuff?