I don't think it's possible to change gauge faces without extensive modification. The closest you will get is making a digital flight display using the text label part.
@YEEEETplane Yes. Connecting a rocket to a detacher and then activating the detacher will fire the rocket, but if you do not want the rocket to fly off after activation, connect the rocket to the detacher and another part of your aircraft.
selfDestructTimer
Setting this to some ridiculously large value such as 9999999999 will keep it from exploding for about 317 years (at 9999999999 seconds).
You can angle the main rotor a few degrees forward, or add a rotator to manually rotate it.
You could also add a rotator to the base of the tail rotor, so that it can be angled backwards after enough forward speed is gained (assuming you have a vertical stabilizer). A V-STAB should mostly counteract torque from the main rotor if you're going fast enough.
Is it single-rotor or dual-rotor?
If it's single-rotor, it needs a tail rotor. Though this may not completely stop the spinning. Your main rotor may also be spinning in the wrong direction.
@ZeroWithSlashedO You wouldn't be entirely incorrect...
It is based on the X-29.
The next VSRA is going to based on the X-31.
However, it isn't a replica.
@CalebRepublic That's one way of doing it. Personally though, I prefer XML modifying the size of the stock jet engines, and putting them in a fuselage shell.
The sound, prop-blur effect, and RPM limitations of using propellers as jets is rather annoying.
But it works fine as a ducted-fan engine in this scenario, and it can be used in the WW2 challenges and propeller-only races.
I'm assuming there is supposed to be an image. However, it is not visible.
You might try using postimages.org, and if it still doesn't work, try re-uploading the image with a different URL.
@GrandmasterPotato Ah, I see. Well, unfortunately I don't have any solutions to this.
I have had this problem with my aircraft as well, and this seems to be typical of these types of aircraft.
You might try asking someone else, perhaps they might have a solution.
I might post a tutorial forum on how to make digital flight displays soon, if that helps.
I don't think it's possible to change gauge faces without extensive modification. The closest you will get is making a digital flight display using the
text labelpart.Link to the aircraft.
Link to the aircraft.
@YEEEETplane Yes.
@YEEEETplane No problem!
@YEEEETplane Yes. Connecting a rocket to a detacher and then activating the detacher will fire the rocket, but if you do not want the rocket to fly off after activation, connect the rocket to the detacher and another part of your aircraft.
selfDestructTimerSetting this to some ridiculously large value such as
9999999999will keep it from exploding for about 317 years (at9999999999seconds).Thoughts or suggestions? Let me know!
@Echostar
@Dragoranos
@MrCOPTY
@BeastHunter
@Aviator01
@GildedCroissant
@Soardivision160th Ah, ok.
You can angle the main rotor a few degrees forward, or add a rotator to manually rotate it.
You could also add a rotator to the base of the tail rotor, so that it can be angled backwards after enough forward speed is gained (assuming you have a vertical stabilizer). A V-STAB should mostly counteract torque from the main rotor if you're going fast enough.
@LeaveUsAlone Thanks!
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/WDPDSg/C900-VSRA-2CANCELED-PROJECT
@GrandmasterPotato That's probably the reason.
In my experience, resizable wheels drift at high speeds.
You may need to change some traction settings.
@GrandmasterPotato Does the aircraft use custom landing gear with resizable wheels?
@Usatiger Try reversing the spin direction of the main rotor.
@GildedCroissant Thanks!
Is it single-rotor or dual-rotor?
If it's single-rotor, it needs a tail rotor. Though this may not completely stop the spinning. Your main rotor may also be spinning in the wrong direction.
@ZeroWithSlashedO You wouldn't be entirely incorrect...
It is based on the X-29.
The next VSRA is going to based on the X-31.
However, it isn't a replica.
Link to the aircraft.
Link to the aircraft.
Link to the aircraft.
@CalebRepublic That's one way of doing it. Personally though, I prefer XML modifying the size of the stock jet engines, and putting them in a fuselage shell.
The sound, prop-blur effect, and RPM limitations of using propellers as jets is rather annoying.
But it works fine as a ducted-fan engine in this scenario, and it can be used in the WW2 challenges and propeller-only races.
@MrCOPTY Ok, will do.
@TheGliderGuy Thanks!
@JamesG771 No problem!
@Aviator01
@BeastHunter
@LeaveUsAlone
@xNotDumb
Thoughts or suggestions? Let me know!
There shouldn't be any issues. There are videos longer than 5 minutes on the website, so uploading should be fine.
Link to the update post.
@ThereIsNoahScape As HuskyDynamics said, manually connecting parts seems to fix it.
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/knkrcp/king-air-15-FIXED
Thoughts or suggestions? Let me know!
I'm assuming there is supposed to be an image. However, it is not visible.
You might try using postimages.org, and if it still doesn't work, try re-uploading the image with a different URL.
@ChamDel7 I'll consider it. I haven't made any official plans at the moment regarding interior designs.
Link to the aircraft.
Thoughts or suggestions? Let me know!
Edit: disregard this comment.
@Donduck1 No problem!
Using
Throttle>0.9will activate after 90% throttle. You can also doThrottle=1which will activate at 100% throttle.@TheGliderGuy Thanks!
@GrandmasterPotato Ah, I see. Well, unfortunately I don't have any solutions to this.
I have had this problem with my aircraft as well, and this seems to be typical of these types of aircraft.
You might try asking someone else, perhaps they might have a solution.
@GrandmasterPotato You could try moving the landing gear more forward (assuming it's a tail-dragger aircraft).
@GrandmasterPotato In that case, it's just the aircraft's design. You will probably need to modify the aircraft if you want to fix the problem.
@XiliamXD
Thoughts or suggestions? Let me know!
If you want the glider without the launcher, let me know!
Try taking off using lower engine power. The less thrust and acceleration, the less intense the nose-down movement will be (theoretically).
@Reworkable It seems only to work with specific websites. Try using postimages.org.