I could’ve sworn there was another Wolfenstein Ho-229 on this website but I couldn’t find it when I looked it up again. Yours looked very similar so I assumed you were the creator of the one I saw before. @FlyingThings
Yeah I know, but I was thinking you could remove one of the more populated tags like “bomber” and be more specific with “Heavy Bomber.” If you don’t want to then that’s your decision. @BirdOfSteel
What I think I remember: United States put out a request for a cheap, easily produced, simple fighter that civilian pilots could fly in the event the United States was ever forced to defend itself. The project was dropped because we realized how unrealistic it was. Can’t remember anything else though.
What are these “Civillian Defense” aircraft the United States designed. I vaguely remember something about one design I read about, but that could just be my mind paying tricks on me. Any elaboration would help!
This is not dramatic thiough. If you saw the leaving posts that people would post before that rule you would think someone was about to die. @Johawks1976
😂 Of course! I still play occasionally! I just don’t interact with the community to often! @Plane66373637
+1Yeah what’s up? @Plane66373637
Very cool. I tried to do a similar thing unsuccessfully a while back.
+1Very cool! Flight characteristics aren’t the best but with some tweaking it could be made better.
Nice meme
+1@Sgtk np
This thing was 90% complete. Unfortunately it was never finished.
It’s about time!
+1I could’ve sworn there was another Wolfenstein Ho-229 on this website but I couldn’t find it when I looked it up again. Yours looked very similar so I assumed you were the creator of the one I saw before. @FlyingThings
Why was the original removed?
Lol just like the switching sides jokes were when the Italians came! @Stellarlabs
The next update. @Stellarlabs
Ha!
Those were missiles right? @whalesharkgaming
Ever heard of the V-1 and V-2?@whalesharkgaming
@DestinyAviation Thanks!
Could you upload an unmodded version?
Thnx @Meltingvenus1999
Sure @Meltingvenus1999
I agree, I-400 class! @F4f879 it would run fine on iPhone6 or higher.
Yeah I know, but I was thinking you could remove one of the more populated tags like “bomber” and be more specific with “Heavy Bomber.” If you don’t want to then that’s your decision. @BirdOfSteel
Ah, Thank you! @henryscp
What does the cleaver do?
Fair enough... @BirdOfSteel
You know there’s a heavy bomber tag, right?
Np! @Milo1628xa
You’re welcome and thank you! @Sgtk
What I think I remember: United States put out a request for a cheap, easily produced, simple fighter that civilian pilots could fly in the event the United States was ever forced to defend itself. The project was dropped because we realized how unrealistic it was. Can’t remember anything else though.
What are these “Civillian Defense” aircraft the United States designed. I vaguely remember something about one design I read about, but that could just be my mind paying tricks on me. Any elaboration would help!
This is not dramatic thiough. If you saw the leaving posts that people would post before that rule you would think someone was about to die. @Johawks1976
Ok :) @Irobert55
I spotlighted you just because I could 😛
Eggcellent! XD
HYYYYYYYYYPE!
Thanks! @UssInvincible
Update: found out the landing gear control makes them extend.
I meant to say ”Do the wings extend?” As in fold out. I changed my original comment. I’m sorry if I offended you. @UssInvincible
Do the wings extend?
All I see is a weather balloon
+7I saw a real one of these yesterday 😁It made me happy!
Unique!
You’re welcome! @hopotumon
You’re welcome! @EpicPigster1
You’re welcome! @VernalTie513
Awoooooh! @AdrianFlyingAce
Yes very much! Btw thanks for spam. :) @PhantomBladeCorp
Ah! Yes, muzzle brake. It turned out nicely! @PhantomBladeCorp
Woah! How’d you do that muzzle flash?
You’re welcome @Awsomur
A gyroscope does wonders to this airplane