@NotSoNormalPioneer yes, it is possible, but you'll get 10 fps and it'll take ages to load the plane, I know because I have the A20, which is better than the A10.
I'd probably recommend you the S10 plus, its almost 2 years old and therefore it is cheaper than the S20s, but doesn't have a significant difference in terms of performance.
It has a Exynos 9 (some have the SnapDragon 855) with 12GB ram(that's a lot for a smartphone, 4-8GB is average) , with 1TB storage (that's alot too.)
It'll be able to run over 2000~5000 parts very smoothly for sure.
It'll be around 600-700 USD.
and bruh do you think i dont use blueprints????? i take SP very seriously, and i know i sized the slats right.
If you are, use it properly.
I'm not even sure if the Marut had a slat, but if it had, it would be larger, according to the blueprints. Slat comparison nose section comparison
The cannon placement, canopy shape is so wrong.
Why do you use a blueprint?
Blueprint is to increase the accuracy of the build, at least a bit.
Try using fuselage parts instead of spheres for the canopy since we have the 'smoothing' function.
And now you've found out that you were not the first one to use such a technique, why don't you edit the forum?
lol why would people give you credit for that.
The game is 5 years old, most of those simple techniques are already all known.
If you want better wings, go and learn how to make tapered wings.
There are far more advanced wings already made.
Also the area of the surface are of the slats are wrong, the surface area should be bigger. Use a blueprint to get the approximate size.
my new aircraft may feature 20-30mm cannons and I want to know wether it would be better to make them guns or cannons
I prefer cannons for 20-30mms.
Btw try this to make your aim easier: fuseInput = TargetSelected ? TargetDistance / (1000 - rate(TargetDistance)) : 60 (where 1000 is replaced with projectile velocity).
@mikoyanster
This might be helpful, you can add it to the description if you want to give an G limit exception for replica builds.
Here it be, I researched the G limits of the aircrafts which are on your recommendation list: F-86 Sabre (A model): 13G (F model): 12G F-100 Super Sabre11G Dassault Mystère11G FMA IAe 33 Pulqui IIN/A Supermarine Swift9G DeHavilland Venom10G F-86D Sabre8G (?) F-9 Cougar16G Hawker Hunter (MkI): 11G (Mk6) 12G (Mk9) 14G MiG-1512.5G MiG-1712G F-84F Thunderstreak7.5 (?) Saab 32 Lansen10G F3H Demon11G F2H Banshee12G DeHavilland Sea Vixen5.5G Supermarine Scimitar12G Saab 29 Tunnan11G
You've set limit of the Gforce is 7.5Gs, but some of the aircrafts you've gave as an example can exceed 7.5Gs.
For example, the Supermarine Swift can hold up to 9Gs, and the F-100 can hold up even up to 11Gs, the Supermarine Scimitar, 12Gs.
Should the realism be sacrificed to keep the rules or maybe replicas could be an exception?
@WarHawk95 Those are actually two, it looks like four because the plane was maneuvering while firing, so the tracers got spreaded a bit.
Two 30mm ADENs with 90 rounds each.
@NotSoNormalPioneer yes, it is possible, but you'll get 10 fps and it'll take ages to load the plane, I know because I have the A20, which is better than the A10.
I'd probably recommend you the S10 plus, its almost 2 years old and therefore it is cheaper than the S20s, but doesn't have a significant difference in terms of performance.
It has a Exynos 9 (some have the SnapDragon 855) with 12GB ram(that's a lot for a smartphone, 4-8GB is average) , with 1TB storage (that's alot too.)
It'll be able to run over 2000~5000 parts very smoothly for sure.
It'll be around 600-700 USD.
@NotSoNormalPioneer lmao that thing can't even hold 700 parts properly
Merry Christmas!!
-Tester No.1
I always wanted this in SP!
Thanks for the wonderful Christmas present!
No linux or Windows 9 versions.
Very disappointed.
(Jk)
Merry Christmas to everyone!
@FireFast212
If you are, use it properly.
I'm not even sure if the Marut had a slat, but if it had, it would be larger, according to the blueprints.
Slat comparison
nose section comparison
The cannon placement, canopy shape is so wrong.
Why do you use a blueprint?
Blueprint is to increase the accuracy of the build, at least a bit.
Try using fuselage parts instead of spheres for the canopy since we have the 'smoothing' function.
And now you've found out that you were not the first one to use such a technique, why don't you edit the forum?
lol why would people give you credit for that.
The game is 5 years old, most of those simple techniques are already all known.
If you want better wings, go and learn how to make tapered wings.
There are far more advanced wings already made.
Also the area of the surface are of the slats are wrong, the surface area should be bigger. Use a blueprint to get the approximate size.
+13:12 My favourite part
I'd like to have a new SP site for Christmas, am so excited!
+1@DameTheNewbie That's for your own good to make a realistic build.
Tbh the canopy is very weird. Try using more parts to make it look more curvy.
Try using a blueprint to see what the canopy actually looks like.
submarine
Awesome!
I wanted this in SP so much!
Please tag me when its finished!
@Grogu Thanks!
skreep
+1Give the poor yak-15 (inlet) control surfaces rn
@Ruvien0Republic0Citizen Tenk you too
+1@NotSoNormalPioneer Thanks!
@HappyFeetWhyshouldi Thank you!
@CrimsonOnigiri
Thanks!
+1@jamesPLANESii lol, thanks.
@Belugasub Agreed.
@Numbers
(Can't you just read 2 comments below before you add a comment?)
@Brendorkus No, the exhaust scale changes by the heading, and the colour editors don't work well, they get mixed by orange.
Yep. And how about proper exhaust scalers and colour editors?
@SavageMan I'd love to help you with the F-104's gunsight.
(A functional gyro-gunsight with lead indicating functions and with a range finder.)
It's quite sad that you didn't mention me in the video
+1@MAHADI me sir
@rexzion
I prefer cannons for 20-30mms.
Btw try this to make your aim easier:
fuseInput=TargetSelected ? TargetDistance / (1000 - rate(TargetDistance)) : 60(where 1000 is replaced with projectile velocity).Everything looks great but every vehicle in the pics are missing their pilot
+1@OliveAerospace aha, thanks!
+1@mikoyanster
+5This might be helpful, you can add it to the description if you want to give an G limit exception for replica builds.
Here it be, I researched the G limits of the aircrafts which are on your recommendation list:
F-86 Sabre (A model):
13G(F model):12GF-100 Super Sabre
11GDassault Mystère
11GFMA IAe 33 Pulqui II
N/ASupermarine Swift
9GDeHavilland Venom
10GF-86D Sabre
8G(?)F-9 Cougar
16GHawker Hunter (MkI):
11G(Mk6)12G(Mk9)14GMiG-15
12.5GMiG-17
12GF-84F Thunderstreak
7.5(?)Saab 32 Lansen
10GF3H Demon
11GF2H Banshee
12GDeHavilland Sea Vixen
5.5GSupermarine Scimitar
12GSaab 29 Tunnan
11GYou've set limit of the Gforce is 7.5Gs, but some of the aircrafts you've gave as an example can exceed 7.5Gs.
For example, the Supermarine Swift can hold up to 9Gs, and the F-100 can hold up even up to 11Gs, the Supermarine Scimitar, 12Gs.
Should the realism be sacrificed to keep the rules or maybe replicas could be an exception?
@mikoyanster Thanks for the invitation!
@Musraskrois Use the blueprint view.
@PolyIsGone np, you deserve it.
Btw try using custom thumbnails next time.
@MrEarth That's because I had to use mikoyanster's GForce limit FT codes for the Pitch input and Roll input, since this is my entry for his challenge.
@Inuyasha8215 Thanks!
+1@PolyIsGone Thanks!
@ollielebananiaCFSP Thanks!
My entry! I asked the mods to make this a successor of this post, so I hope it'll be done soon.
@Eternaldarkness
I'm sorry but could you please make this post a successor of this post please?
Thanks in advance.
Teaser Tag:
@One2
@nicolascolissi14
@AWESOMENESS360
Teaser Tag:
@Maximusoftheplane
@Pplz
Teaser Tag:
+1@banbantheman
@ACEPILOT109
@POLYISGONE
Awesome
Collab with @rexrexThezion! (brians1209 editing, rexrexThezion recording).
Link to the Pe-8
@WarHawk95 Those are actually two, it looks like four because the plane was maneuvering while firing, so the tracers got spreaded a bit.
Two 30mm ADENs with 90 rounds each.