@LoganAviation
@LoganAviation we can't do anything against modders
So the simplest revenge is to avoid talking to modders.
Show them your attitude let them know you don't care about them
Confirmation of the Plane's Existence in Real Life
The plane described in the post, inspired by the F-35 and YF-23, is a fictional design and does not exist in real life. While the F-35 and YF-23 are real aircraft, the combination of these two planes into a single-engine, multirole aircraft with the specific features mentioned (such as the design of JDAMs and HARM missiles) is purely a creation of the user. Israel, or any other country, does not operate a plane exactly like this one, and no aircraft exists with this exact configuration in real-world military service.
Points Where the Post Violates SimplePlanes Website Guidelines:
Use of a Political Symbol (Israel Flag):
According to the SimplePlanes rules, the use of symbols tied to political or current conflicts is discouraged. While symbols such as the Israeli flag may be used for historical accuracy (e.g., WWII-era planes), in this case, the use of the Israeli flag on a fictional aircraft, especially one in the context of a current geopolitical situation, could be seen as politically charged and problematic.
"Symbols associated with current active conflicts" are not allowed, and this flag can potentially stir debates or negative reactions.
Misleading Historical Accuracy:
The aircraft in question is a fictional design and does not represent any real-world Israeli aircraft. Since the plane itself is not based on a real-world historical Israeli aircraft, using the flag associated with Israel may be seen as misleading. The rule about historical accuracy applies only to real-world, historically accurate representations, which this plane does not fall under.
Potential for Stirring Debate:
The political content—in the form of the Israeli flag—could create divisive discussions within the community. The rules state that political symbols can provoke unwanted debates, and this could result in the removal of the plane or the flag in order to maintain a neutral and friendly environment.
Inappropriate for Non-Historical Fictional Builds:
Fictional aircraft (like this one) should generally avoid the inclusion of controversial symbols or flags unless the design is based on real-world historical context. Since this is not a real or historical plane, it would be better to avoid any controversial symbols that could cause issues within the community.
Confirmation of the Plane's Existence in Real Life
The plane described in the post, inspired by the F-35 and YF-23, is a fictional design and does not exist in real life. While the F-35 and YF-23 are real aircraft, the combination of these two planes into a single-engine, multirole aircraft with the specific features mentioned (such as the design of JDAMs and HARM missiles) is purely a creation of the user. Israel, or any other country, does not operate a plane exactly like this one, and no aircraft exists with this exact configuration in real-world military service.
Points Where the Post Violates SimplePlanes Website Guidelines:
Use of a Political Symbol (Israel Flag):
According to the SimplePlanes rules, the use of symbols tied to political or current conflicts is discouraged. While symbols such as the Israeli flag may be used for historical accuracy (e.g., WWII-era planes), in this case, the use of the Israeli flag on a fictional aircraft, especially one in the context of a current geopolitical situation, could be seen as politically charged and problematic.
"Symbols associated with current active conflicts" are not allowed, and this flag can potentially stir debates or negative reactions.
Misleading Historical Accuracy:
The aircraft in question is a fictional design and does not represent any real-world Israeli aircraft. Since the plane itself is not based on a real-world historical Israeli aircraft, using the flag associated with Israel may be seen as misleading. The rule about historical accuracy applies only to real-world, historically accurate representations, which this plane does not fall under.
Potential for Stirring Debate:
The political content—in the form of the Israeli flag—could create divisive discussions within the community. The rules state that political symbols can provoke unwanted debates, and this could result in the removal of the plane or the flag in order to maintain a neutral and friendly environment.
Inappropriate for Non-Historical Fictional Builds:
Fictional aircraft (like this one) should generally avoid the inclusion of controversial symbols or flags unless the design is based on real-world historical context. Since this is not a real or historical plane, it would be better to avoid any controversial symbols that could cause issues within the community.
I must give this plane a 1.5/10. While the design is visually appealing, it is overshadowed by serious flaws in functionality. The flying performance is poor, the maneuverability is severely lacking, and the weapon systems are far below acceptable standards.
Is this platform meant to showcase visually attractive designs, or are we here to build and share planes that actually function as they should?
No offense is intended, but this is my honest and straightforward assessment.
I must regrettably assign this aircraft a rating of 1.5/10. While its aesthetic design is commendable, it is overshadowed by glaring deficiencies in critical areas. The flight performance, maneuverability, and armament systems are egregiously inadequate, failing to meet even basic standards of functionality.
One is left to ponder—are we engaging in a display of superficial artistry, or is this platform genuinely dedicated to the innovation of aviation engineering?
No offense is intended, but this evaluation represents my candid and unvarnished perspective.
I want to acknowledge the original builder for their excellent work on this project. My modifications and experiments are solely for learning purposes and to explore new design possibilities.
@FRMKConstructionBureau
Plane is alive Click Here
@AndrewHK62 @Boeing727200F @cooldude321
Plane is alive Click Here
@FRMKConstructionBureau thanks for coming by man but I already figured it out
@AndrewHK62 @Boeing727200F @cooldude321 Thanks but I already figured it out 2 hours ago
and it's ready and now working on a good looking description. It will be available in an hour.
+1@FRMKConstructionBureau
@FRMKConstructionBureau
Need help over here
@LoganAviation
@LoganAviation
Need help over here
@LoganAviation ok
@L1nus sorry for that too
@L1nus are you feeling ok today?
@L1nus oh come on
@L1nus good
That's a cool plane
@Khichi2866 there is no need to use funky trees in ai auto spawn planes
+1@LoganAviation
You can tag me also where ever you want
I will help you and support you
@LoganAviation
@LoganAviation we can't do anything against modders
So the simplest revenge is to avoid talking to modders.
Show them your attitude let them know you don't care about them
@overlord5453 not you again
I m blocking you
Not in the mood for old things
Currently focused on this issue...
@LoganAviation okay 👍👌
@LoganAviation let's see what to do with me
@LoganAviation oh your post removed as well
@LoganAviation yes friendly
@crazyplaness
@MrSilverWolf
@YarisSedan nothing happened here it's just a friendly game discussion we are having... everything is fine..
Just chill
@LoganAviation
I m interested to see that post of yours
@LoganAviation the way you get 24500+ points from just 86 upvotes.
@FRMKConstructionBureau ahhh ok
I will do it
Thanks
@LoganAviation
+1We can do hell of a debate on it but not in the mood. I m currently focused on building something.
@Khichi2866
+1I m expert in this markdown syntax
@Khichi2866
+1How to use these funky trees
@MohammadAli787
@FRMKConstructionBureau
Artillery scope?? Whee do I get that??
@FRMKConstructionBureau
I m building a modified version of this in which a drone will fly above tell you where the shell of this mortar will land
@BaconAircraft ok
@L1nus
Confirmation of the Plane's Existence in Real Life
The plane described in the post, inspired by the F-35 and YF-23, is a fictional design and does not exist in real life. While the F-35 and YF-23 are real aircraft, the combination of these two planes into a single-engine, multirole aircraft with the specific features mentioned (such as the design of JDAMs and HARM missiles) is purely a creation of the user. Israel, or any other country, does not operate a plane exactly like this one, and no aircraft exists with this exact configuration in real-world military service.
Points Where the Post Violates SimplePlanes Website Guidelines:
Use of a Political Symbol (Israel Flag):
Misleading Historical Accuracy:
Potential for Stirring Debate:
Inappropriate for Non-Historical Fictional Builds:
Overview:
This plane, while creatively de
@Freerider2142
Confirmation of the Plane's Existence in Real Life
The plane described in the post, inspired by the F-35 and YF-23, is a fictional design and does not exist in real life. While the F-35 and YF-23 are real aircraft, the combination of these two planes into a single-engine, multirole aircraft with the specific features mentioned (such as the design of JDAMs and HARM missiles) is purely a creation of the user. Israel, or any other country, does not operate a plane exactly like this one, and no aircraft exists with this exact configuration in real-world military service.
Points Where the Post Violates SimplePlanes Website Guidelines:
Use of a Political Symbol (Israel Flag):
Misleading Historical Accuracy:
Potential for Stirring Debate:
Inappropriate for Non-Historical Fictional Builds:
Overview:
This plane, while creat
@MrSilverWolf Nee, ik spreek geen Nederlands
+1@MrSilverWolf 🤣🤣🤣
+1Well I didn't get you
But I can use a translator
@MrSilverWolf ah never mind
+1@MrSilverWolf
I must give this plane a 1.5/10. While the design is visually appealing, it is overshadowed by serious flaws in functionality. The flying performance is poor, the maneuverability is severely lacking, and the weapon systems are far below acceptable standards.
Is this platform meant to showcase visually attractive designs, or are we here to build and share planes that actually function as they should?
No offense is intended, but this is my honest and straightforward assessment.
+1@MrSilverWolf ahhhh
+1@MrSilverWolf
I must regrettably assign this aircraft a rating of 1.5/10. While its aesthetic design is commendable, it is overshadowed by glaring deficiencies in critical areas. The flight performance, maneuverability, and armament systems are egregiously inadequate, failing to meet even basic standards of functionality.
One is left to ponder—are we engaging in a display of superficial artistry, or is this platform genuinely dedicated to the innovation of aviation engineering?
No offense is intended, but this evaluation represents my candid and unvarnished perspective.
+1@MohammadAli787
I want to acknowledge the original builder for their excellent work on this project. My modifications and experiments are solely for learning purposes and to explore new design possibilities.
@MohammadAli787
+1Well this one is better then the cockpit version.
@Jundroo
I give this plane 2.3/10.
Keep trying friends.
You can make it better.
Never lose hope.
@RamboJutter
Just remove the terrorist logo from your plane and you don't have to delete the comments
@MohammadAli787 thank you
@RamboJutter
Can you make a plane with a baby killing technology??
Because I heard that terrorist organization like Israel have baby killing technology.
Sorry no offense
I m just asking