58.2k BMilan Comments

  • BM Requests [TEMPORARILY CLOSED] 2.5 years ago

    @Theaverageman I don't play it

  • BM Requests [TEMPORARILY CLOSED] 2.5 years ago

    @Samflugzeugpanzer Sorry but no

  • BM Requests [TEMPORARILY CLOSED] 2.5 years ago

    @Dominick0291 sorry but no, I see no point in building a fletcher class destroyer, because there are plenty of them on the website

  • RMS Titanic 2.5 years ago

    @DEADSHOT14 Yes, but I sent you a link to an unlisted post with the bridge equipment (click on the blue 'Here' on my first reply), that's just 112 parts and it only has the EOT, the Wheel and the Compass

    +4
  • RMS Titanic 2.5 years ago

    @DEADSHOT14 Your phone can't handle a 112 part build??

    +1
  • RMS Titanic 2.5 years ago

    @DEADSHOT14 Here, just make sure to credit me if you use it somewhere :)

    +1
  • RMS Titanic 2.5 years ago

    @realSavageMan bad marketing I believe. I wanted to test how well would it do without any teasers and stuff.
    Olympic had a quite a few teasers before it was released, while this one was just posted out of nowhere.

    +1
  • Can I make the headlight with out mod? 2.5 years ago

    Wow, very clever! nicely done!
    tag me when you release it

    +3
  • Wreck Exploration - HMHS Britannic 2.5 years ago

    @Feve @RishantYT747fan The real life wreck lies about 3 kilometers away from the island of Kea

  • Did sodium chloride like leave? 2.6 years ago

    @ZeroWithSlashedO He wasn't banned, he left

  • BM Requests [TEMPORARILY CLOSED] 2.6 years ago

    @hadum Ohh, that's a great idea!
    Approved! Thanks for the recommendation!

  • BM Requests [TEMPORARILY CLOSED] 2.6 years ago

    @Hikaru007 That sounds interesting, I haven't built any destroyers before anyways. I'll put it to the Approved (Later) list,. Thanks for the recommendation

  • BM Requests [TEMPORARILY CLOSED] 2.6 years ago

    @LegendaryPilot Unfortunately, aircraft carriers are not really my thing, they are nice ships but I don't find them to be interesting as SP builds. The only carrier I'm considering to build is USS Hornet, but that's a story for another time

  • BM Requests [TEMPORARILY CLOSED] 2.6 years ago

    @Dominick0291 sorry but Yamato and Missouri are just way to common on the website, there is no point in building another one when there are already a dozen around. As for USS Ohio, it just doesn't interest me enough currently

  • RMS Titanic 2.6 years ago

    @Jo52167 It's a modded part that comes with the Sea Traffic mod

    +2
  • Free candy Van 2.7 years ago

    Please credit TakicraftCorporation too, because he is the original builder of the truck (the guy you credited only added a logo to it)

    +2
  • Bombardier Dash 8 Q300 [MALEV livery] 2.7 years ago

    @JakiTheIndoAviationKid The company ceased operations in 2012 and they never had any flights outside Europe, so that's probably the reason you've never seen any of them in real life. A few of their planes are preserved in the collections of aeronautical museums in Hungary, so those are the last places where you can see them in real life

  • RMS Titanic 2.7 years ago

    @Feve I wish to do that myself if you don't mind, but thank you for the offer :)

    +1
  • RMS Olympic (1911) 2.7 years ago

    @TakicraftCorporation Igyekeztem belemenni amennyire csak lehet (meg amennyire a gépem bírta), hogy ez legyen az abszolút mesterművem (nos, amíg valami mással felül nem múlom)

    +3
  • RMS Titanic 2.7 years ago

    ‏‏‎

  • RMS Olympic (1911) 2.7 years ago

    @Mach99999 Apple must have developed miniature portable nuclear reactors, also the lot of wheel spinning is the result of it being realistically set: in real life, the wheel would have needed to be turned 4 times to one direction for the rudder to go hard over

    +3
  • RMS Olympic (1911) 2.7 years ago

    @Atoka220 Good luck mate! Prepare a fire extinguisher next to your computer first xd

    +1
  • RMS Olympic (1911) 2.7 years ago

    @Jo52167
    @Someoneelse
    @Vivy

    +1
  • RMS Olympic (1911) 2.7 years ago

    @goxictamer88
    @TheFlyingHusky
    @Ryandyrbye

    +3
  • RMS Olympic (1911) 2.7 years ago

    @Ajsufususjfka
    @Starwarsboi170707
    @Owynn2009

    +2
  • RMS Olympic (1911) 2.7 years ago

    @RYZ3NCHR1ST3NS3N
    @Tookan
    @Aden101

    +1
  • RMS Olympic (1911) 2.7 years ago

    @Feve
    @Bobyo
    @MTindustries

    +1
  • RMS Olympic (1911) 2.7 years ago

    @BeastHunter
    @Hazerz
    @WoodBananaBoy

    +2
  • RMS Olympic (1911) 2.7 years ago

    @Alvin8
    @AliceArisuShimada
    @CountriBoi

    +1
  • RMS Olympic (1911) 2.7 years ago

    @Bryan5
    @ShiroNeko
    @XAircraftManufacturer

    +2
  • RMS Olympic (1911) 2.7 years ago

    ‏‏‎

  • RMS Olympic Teaser - The Old Reliable, Out on the ocean 2.7 years ago

    Bad news for mobile players:

    As opposed to my initial plans, I will probably not be able to finish the mobile friendly version of the ship by the planned release date (14th of April). It will be finished sometime, but you will have to wait a little. I'm sincerely sorry about this, but I feel burnt out a bit recently, and I just can't force myself to play the game for longer than 10 minutes. I will keep working on the mobile friendly version bit by bit, but it will need some time. Sorry again

  • [Teaser] Simple Mobile Friendly Olympic+Fictional Victoria boat! 2.7 years ago

    I wish I could give two upvotes, with the second one being for the creativity of solving the underwater scene on mobile, very smart and looks good!

    +1
  • What happened to Randomusername? 2.7 years ago

    @enzoBoeing757 No, I don't think of it as competition either. Our builds had different goals: yours was to make a very good mobile friendly replica while mine was to make it as detailed and accurate as possible, no matter the part count. Make sure to tag me on your build when you release it tho.
    Also if you have a discord, we'd be happy if you joined us at Port SP. It's a discord server dedicated to ship building in SP. We help each other there, show off our builds etc etc, just click on the name if you are interested :)

    +1
  • What happened to Randomusername? 2.7 years ago

    @enzoBoeing757 Oh yeah definitely. I plan to build a mobile friendly version of mine too, but I've seen some screenshots of yours and it looks amazing too, especially for a build made on mobile!

    +1
  • What happened to Randomusername? 2.7 years ago

    @enzoBoeing757 I heard the same about you, that's how I found your profile hehe

  • Appearance 2.7 years ago

    T

    +1
  • What happened to Randomusername? 2.7 years ago

    In short:
    She was a very talented female user who had some issues with the fact that the community modified her builds because she didn't want it: she had her reasons but the most important one was that all her builds were "electric" (meaning they did not use any fuel in the game to operate) and many beginner users would often put regular engines on them, which she found disrespectful because she wanted her builds to be eco-friendly.
    She also had some other personal problems but let's not get into those, it's a very long story. Also the fact that she revealed herself to be a girl which caused a lot of simping and unwanted attention towards her by many users. So after quite some drama she left the community for good.

    +1
  • This Scene Was Looks Familiar, Don't Ya? 2.7 years ago

    @WolfHunter9111 It's not like I'm gonna read it 'cause I'm not into these kinds of stuff, but I satisfied my curiosity and it really wasn't as bad as you said it'd be.

    +2
  • This Scene Was Looks Familiar, Don't Ya? 2.7 years ago

    @Kthepersonorguy I finally found the sauce, thanks to another post made by WolfHunter9111. Both this build and another build made by him are depicting a weird, disturbing hentai manga called "Metamorphosis" (also called "Emergence"). Mystery solved, case closed

    +7
  • This Scene Was Looks Familiar, Don't Ya? 2.7 years ago

    @WolfHunter9111 You just made me more curious, I really want to know now (I don't mind creepy or disturbing stuff)

    +1
  • Why?( 2.7 years ago

    As others said already, mod support is not possible on iOS and Android anymore and there is nothing Jundroo can do about that apart from implementing mods into the game as vanilla features.
    "Why don't you make small updates with the integration of major mods"
    They did:

    • Overload
    • Fine Tuner
    • Glass
    • Cannon
    • Blueprints
      and there are probably more that I'm forgetting about

    These used to be mods, but Jundroo implemented them so that everyone can use them. Between two whining-for-mods posts, you could at least give them some appreciation for that effort.
    Many mods are also often very unstable and can cause crashes even on PC (for example the Tracks2 mod crashed my old laptop multiple times in the past), so imagine what would they do on some of the more potato mobile devices. Then we'd get another wave of whining to Jundroo that "mah phone is crashing, Andrew fix da game!".
    To properly implement these, Jundroo would first have to fix them and make them stable enough to match the SP's level of quality. Needless to say, this'd be a huge task to do and certainly not an easy one.
    And then comes the problem of which mods to implement? To quote you "Funky Trees are cool, but not what I really wanted.", but others did, you may be wishing for Tracks2 or some other mod, but then there are others who don't care about those just like how you don't care about FT.
    So, naturally, Jundroo has to select which are the features that have the widest range of usability: FunkyTrees and Fuselage Cutting is exactly this, perfect features to be used for many many things. Meanwhile, Tracks2 could only be used for a single purpose and that purpose is not really related to aircraft either (and no matter how great of a sandbox SP is and how many possibilities there are in it, the primary scope of the game is still aircraft building), so Tracks2 should be around the last mods to be implemented.

    TL;DR
    - Mods are not possible to add on iOS and Android (and Jundroo can't do anything about it)
    - They did implement some mods into the game
    - They can't implement every single mod because it'd be very hard and not worth the effort
    - They need to be selective about the stuff they add: They are focusing on features that are widely usable and are related to aircraft in some way (afterall, the game is called simplePLANES)

    I hope that clears it up

    +4
  • This Scene Was Looks Familiar, Don't Ya? 2.7 years ago

    I don't get it, what's up with the broken glasses and the blood inside the box?

    +8
  • USS Beast Pre 1.8 (1:1 Scale Replica) 2.7 years ago

    @Inuyasha8215 I put it in the decription, thanks again!

  • USS Beast Pre 1.8 (1:1 Scale Replica) 2.7 years ago

    @Inuyasha8215 Oh, thank you very much, I probably should have done this long ago but thanks for doing for me!

    +1
  • RMS Olympic Teaser - The Old Reliable, Out on the ocean 2.7 years ago

    @Starwarsboi170707 Well, the plan is to release them around the same time, and so far it seems I will be able to pull that off, but I don't want to make any promises

  • S.S. Courageous 2.7 years ago

    Amazing!

    +1
  • RMS Olympic Teaser - The Old Reliable, Out on the ocean 2.7 years ago

    @LegendaryPilot Im not really interested in those ships, I like the late 19th century and early 20th century liners more