Wait why are you apologizing?
Wasn’t angry at you or anything - perhaps my wording was misleading.
What I was trying to say is that shooting missiles and blowing a 1k part aircraft up most of the time induced for lag for everyone than just letting him be.
@Lahoski107
I can see why you guys find this stupid. As a Chinese person, I frankly find it stupid too. The fact that this was at a furniture showcase/fair, its even dumber.
"It is imperative that we destroy this ship immediately, and I'm afraid we would have to use a different tactic other than throwing capital ships at it. May the Light guide our path."
How hard is it to blow a huge-ass ship up? Just hire some crazy purple-haired lady and ram one of your empty capital ships at the thing at light speed. Its not rocket scien-- oh wait it is. Nvm.
Honestly, that sounds about right. From what I've learned with RC model aircraft (especially pusher designs), in the case of a COT too far back, inducing roll on the main wing would either cause the nose to rise or dip down significantly depending on the angle of attack. E.g. if the plane is descending at a 3 degree slope, rolling causes some weird behaviors to the pitch of the aircraft, mostly causing the nose to rise significantly. ...but that's RC, not sure if it's the same reasoning behind the DC-10.
OH. MY. GOD. SOMEONE HAS DONE IT!
I've personally tried something somewhat similar to this, but me being the idiot I am, had a bomb for the "blue block" in which blew up in a total catastrophic explosion after each firing. (IDK why i thought my method would work)
Well well, I was originally ganna spotlight this today morning but I forgot. However, when I returned a few minutes ago to spotlight, you have more points than me... I guess no spotlight for u!
My only two complaints are that the writing looks like my hand writing from grade 1 and the fact that Mao's portrait isn't there. Other than that, pretty cool.
I still have the same problem up to this date.
I normally just copy the mini URL (Z685Uy) of the address https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/Z685Uy/Guided-Bomb-3-5 then press CTRL+L in the editor. Works every time.
Here's a tip if you don't like non-scaled builds: download fine tuner, do math to calculate the difference of the X,Y,Z axis of both planes, find the number (0.x) if scaling down, (1.x) if scaling up. Make sure your math is correct so that either 0.x(beforescale) or 1.x(afterscale) is equivalent to the real deal in length, wingspan/widgth and height. Now punch in the numbers into the scale too in X,Y,Z boxes respectively and press that scale button. It takes less time to do that than write this rant.
I don't know why, but I've been just staring at this and laughing my a$$ off. Haven't moved an inch yet.
+1Wait why are you apologizing?
+1Wasn’t angry at you or anything - perhaps my wording was misleading.
What I was trying to say is that shooting missiles and blowing a 1k part aircraft up most of the time induced for lag for everyone than just letting him be.
@Lahoski107
@Thoum I bet. From the you profile picture, the view must be a hundred times better than that from my DJI.
+1@AviownCorp I know, it breaks the aircraft.
+1I like his shirt, but comic sans just ruined the whole picture. @Awsomur
+1Genius
+1Ba(C₃ON)₂
+1Get on my level.
Impractical but creative landing gear system. I liek
+1Ah. You should keep the nose for a cargo plane tho, I think it'd fit.
+1I can see why you guys find this stupid. As a Chinese person, I frankly find it stupid too. The fact that this was at a furniture showcase/fair, its even dumber.
+1"It is imperative that we destroy this ship immediately, and I'm afraid we would have to use a different tactic other than throwing capital ships at it. May the Light guide our path."
How hard is it to blow a huge-ass ship up? Just hire some crazy purple-haired lady and ram one of your empty capital ships at the thing at light speed. Its not rocket scien-- oh wait it is. Nvm.
+1UGHHEHHHHHHHGHHHHHHHH!!
+1Cya. Was a pleasure having you amongst the community. Farewell.
+1@KidKromosone I never said I liked it deleted. I'm just saying it may offend Chinese ppl in a jokingly sarcastic manner.
+1Exactly. There is a difference between getting shit down and collision.@Akali @JackTheBestBoss
+1The only new one I saw was the rocket plane. Rest of them I believe I still had saved on my iPad over 5 years ago.
+1Honestly, that sounds about right. From what I've learned with RC model aircraft (especially pusher designs), in the case of a COT too far back, inducing roll on the main wing would either cause the nose to rise or dip down significantly depending on the angle of attack. E.g. if the plane is descending at a 3 degree slope, rolling causes some weird behaviors to the pitch of the aircraft, mostly causing the nose to rise significantly. ...but that's RC, not sure if it's the same reasoning behind the DC-10.
+1OH. MY. GOD. SOMEONE HAS DONE IT!
+1I've personally tried something somewhat similar to this, but me being the idiot I am, had a bomb for the "blue block" in which blew up in a total catastrophic explosion after each firing. (IDK why i thought my method would work)
Well well, I was originally ganna spotlight this today morning but I forgot. However, when I returned a few minutes ago to spotlight, you have more points than me... I guess no spotlight for u!
+1@Johndfg Oh ok... Well if someone were on, their pc would of thought of this
+1Ironically this is the exact shuttle design I use in the game Kerbal Space Program.
+1@Dllama4 lmao. My parents get mad over Bs as well. However they just make me do extra stuff around the house instead of grounding me.
+1Interesting design. Based off KSP, i see. Nice addition of the nuclear engines in the center.
+1I use rotators with 0.5-1 degree free spin at key flex points. I think REW uses a different system. @EpicPigster1 @CoolPeach @QingyuZhou
+1HEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE
^ click it
+1The literal definition of r/dankmemes during october.
+1S P O O K Y
My only two complaints are that the writing looks like my hand writing from grade 1 and the fact that Mao's portrait isn't there. Other than that, pretty cool.
+1@spefyjerbf Yeah same. But the clever is a lot easier to work with. Give it a try with the clever.
+1@MrSilverwolf R.i.p. Our 734 collab...
+1Funny thing is, I went onto this bus before.
+1I still have the same problem up to this date.
+1I normally just copy the mini URL (Z685Uy) of the address https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/Z685Uy/Guided-Bomb-3-5 then press CTRL+L in the editor. Works every time.
Here's a tip if you don't like non-scaled builds: download fine tuner, do math to calculate the difference of the X,Y,Z axis of both planes, find the number (0.x) if scaling down, (1.x) if scaling up. Make sure your math is correct so that either 0.x(beforescale) or 1.x(afterscale) is equivalent to the real deal in length, wingspan/widgth and height. Now punch in the numbers into the scale too in X,Y,Z boxes respectively and press that scale button. It takes less time to do that than write this rant.
+1YOUTUBE DOT COM SLASH DATSATOILET
+1Nice! I made a similar concept 1 month ago, open it up to reveal the gyro!
+1Gyroscopic Sphere
What kind of lettuce did they serve in the salads onboard this ship?
+1Iceburg lettuce.
Ta dum, ching!*
(Hint hint, nudge nudge)
@BaconRoll @Feanor
I think this is more of an artificial horizon instrument...
+1But still; really well done!
I apologize for not being able to help. I had a hockey game and had to leave the house. :/
+1@Wily4bill your creation have been marked!
TYPE: Water: Ship
SCORE: 30.5/35
=> Realistic: 8/10
=> Detail 8/10
=> Others: 4.5/5
30.5 POINTS!
+1Hey! There's a mobile friendly version! @Insertname
+1I am building a fully furnished Lockheed 10E. Except this one will be the one used in Madagascar 2.
+1It's a rickroll isn't it... @Dullwolf
+1@PlanesOfOld Couldn't of said it better! :D
+1COOL!!!!
+1LMFAO
+1BUT IS AMAZING!!!
+1U submitted this 1 day late....
+1@AceSquadIndustries Ugh, dont really have time, I dont really wanna promiss something and not do it...
+1OI! I wonder where u got that design from...
+1xD
Agree for teh most part, but disagree with some.
+133 seconds
+1