Why exaggerate this achievement?
.
Also, why would you want to become moderator?
.
If you want to become a moderator, you have to be experienced and faithful in this website, as well as keeping calm and be able to solve even the most difficult problems amid drama. You must keep watch over a million pages and try to stop any rule breaking for 30 hours straight. They are currently no applications yet. Thanks.
People have different skillsets. I am able to use SimpleRockets2 to almost full extent on mobile (but not on computer), hence why I deem it easy. One of my most favorite things is how the editor works, especially the ability to move and rotate parts in a grid-like pattern like a 3D creation software; the pattern can be modified as well. If you can’t do Simplerockets2, that’s okay but if you really want to make creation in Simplerockets2 easier, then you have to train yourselves.
.
I also usually try to replicate mechanisms in Simplerockets2 (e.g. continuous track suspension systems from different eras).
Jundroo’s servers were problematic because they were cheap. They have the chance to get disabled. Jundroo couldn’t afford another server company that handles the website better, so they have to get used to it.
@IceCraftGaming, it’s okay if you cannot flash your points because your points flair will be replaced by the mod flair. At least, you are still active (and maybe making keep on funny things).
Challenge organizer: Nooooo! You cannot cheat the props only challenge by putting propellers in a duct to make a jet engine. You’re disqualified from all challenges! Noooooo!
.
Cheater: Haha! Ducted fan go nyooom!
Curators need to have both SPVR and a working headset and must review crafts to see if it works in VR or not. I cannot go further on this subject and would rather await response from an official curator.
@hardy57, @50CalChicken, @Tsuchiisan, what I mean is if realistic physics, somehow, applied to the craft. For me, the glass canopy doesn’t look good underwater and may break under pressure. Furthermore, the fins appear a bit detached from the main fuselage and the propeller pods are not polished, causing drag. Submarines for exploration usually carry tools to allow for either research or to allow further exploration. This one does not, but I would give a pass; it’s up to you.
.
For me, the fictional tag applies if the craft is fictional, and yes it is fictional, but that does not stop me from giving critique with realism. All I want are good looking planes with a good to great amount of realism, not good looking planes with little or no realism or have realistic defects.
The missing stock aircraft named “Biplane” in question.
.
So far, this is the only stock aircraft to represent a large aircraft.
.
I do not know why it got removed. Is it because the developers fear getting a copyright infringement notice from BoxGlow (the original creator of the “biplane”)?
.
@BeastHunter
@WormWithLegs
Posting this does not give you upvotes. And what’s the point of truing to get as much upvotes as you can anyways as they don’t give you any benefits whatsoever (although you need a certain amount of upvotes to upvote stuff, in which you have reached). So, please to focus on other things like building planes in SimplePlanes rather than trying to do futile endeavors to gain pointless stuff like upvotes.
Datcha advises you can get silver in like a week if you make something good enough, although I cannot guarantee the results. We will just see about that...
.
You can use intricate fuselage designs and use blueprints and other references to create better looking aircraft. Focusing on designing building things more than focusing on upvotes helps you create better builds.
You may need to set the fuselage parts to sufficient buoyancy, which can be found in the settings for said part. As for the propulsion, you may use jet engines above the water as any forms of propulsion, regardless of method, cannot work underwater.
Smooth with stunning photos, you should become a cameraman for hire! Now the plane appears disproportionate, so it’s a good thing you use DesignerSuite (already added in the game, in the mods section), and try to make the plane in line with the blueprints. The cockpit appears nonexistent; I assume you had to make the part count lower so you didn’t include the cockpit. Also you should thicken the base of the wings and the tips thin. Hope that helps. :)
The wings and the design made me think this is a fictional plane straight out of a typical dieselpunk fantasy setting. On the other hand, the hull appears to only work as a helicopter hull, since the exposed frames, while creative, cause a good amount of drag.
Simpleplanes allows for multiplayer mod, in which I absolutely love (though I no longer participate in multiplayer mod frequently). The second thing I like is the fuselage and hollow fuselage and the ability to slice such. As for the glass fuselages there is a good thing that the back and front meshes disappear and won’t make the glass look, at least, “faux”. The game also have built-in guns and weapons. These are what SimpleRockets2, a game useful for building complex machines for it’s controls, lack.
One of the main servers died out because of the host mass removing a certain type of server; attempting to connect said server results in a connection error. The only main server remaining is the one with the IP address of 157.7.214.47.
If you cannot connect manually, open the console, accessible by tapping the backtick (`) button, type “Connect” and paste the IP address after the word “Connect” (e.g. “Connect 157.7.214.47”). Doing so will connect you to the designated IP address as “LazyNullName”.
There has been an update to both the game and the mod recently. Make sure both the game and the mod are up-to-date. While this advice is not necessary if you already updated both the game and the mod, it should remind you to check if you are up-to-date or not again.
If you need any questions, please ask me, or another member of the community (one tag is enough).
.
I am sorry for your misfortunes.
The Imperium of Mankind has declared war and launched an invasion against the denizens of simpleplanes.com and the MultiPlayer server...
PREPARE FOR THY INVASION!
I like the amount of work you have done here, especially the walking motion needed to make it function. Nice walker. Maybe you could make a Blood Ravens version, eh? :)
Good instructions, but you can stall even without terminating the engines. The pugachev’s cobra maneuver does not require thrust vectoring, it requires an amount of inertia, so a heavy prop plane can do that. Maybe helpful for you though.
. Joke ruining spoiler
Best of luck. May you return soon.
.
I’ll give an advice, to study earlier than to hurry up late; This is one of the advices I do not like the most. Studying earlier means you get to know more and pass more.
Thank you. I would like if you use a 2 part glass attached to each other by their ends instead of a 1 part glass. I can see some leftover meshes either.
Your plane has a plethora of unusual features. I can give some.
The looks implies that the yoke’s wheel does not turn but the entire yoke assembly moves like a joystick. Add a real yoke kiddo, or use the stock yoke.
The gear button on the yoke looks awkward. Put it as a lever on the instrument panel.
The buttons are very large, saying “press me”. Make the buttons smaller so it doesn’t eat too much space like the cells in agar.io.
While not so important at all, you could just use an XML-scaled blocked canopy because it looks better in my eyes.
The yaw pedals appear non-existent on your aircraft; most stock planes, except for some like the sea plane, don’t have yaw pedals but I would like if you add them. :)
I understand you have problems with making the plane fly while keeping true of the tutorial plane, but the gyroscope isn’t necessary.
.
This bug happens because the gyroscopes have very little mass and need to stabilize themselves too much. Since one rotational force attempts often create a discreperancy on the other, another rotational force acting on the other stands in to fix the discreperancy and the forces counteract, creating a dancing effect.
@JuanNotAnAlt, @Dathcha, @MrSilverWolf, actually it was a lame joke comment meant to contain a link to a joke parody of the 20th century title card the craft depicts. The big text is actually a link. No drama please...
.
Upon closer inspection, it becomes clear that the build appears to be build on hard work.
. Comment removed, seems like it did not have any jokey context at all, or is it???
If you are a computer user, you are lucky there is an underwater camera mod that allows you to peep underwater (with special underwater effects.) link to mod
A spammy pingaloo is a spammy day...
.
It is likely the spammer wants to get your attention so badly, it started spamming to the point that a moderator had to perma-ip-ban the spammer and for the spammed to block the spammer.
.
Try to ignore the spammer and block the spammer. It might certainly work, since most spammers are either trolls or annoying advertisers.
Why exaggerate this achievement?
+3.
Also, why would you want to become moderator?
.
If you want to become a moderator, you have to be experienced and faithful in this website, as well as keeping calm and be able to solve even the most difficult problems amid drama. You must keep watch over a million pages and try to stop any rule breaking for 30 hours straight. They are currently no applications yet. Thanks.
He has known everything...
+3Now rename the platinum rank “Obsidian rank”, then make a nether portal out of them. XD
+3People have different skillsets. I am able to use SimpleRockets2 to almost full extent on mobile (but not on computer), hence why I deem it easy. One of my most favorite things is how the editor works, especially the ability to move and rotate parts in a grid-like pattern like a 3D creation software; the pattern can be modified as well. If you can’t do Simplerockets2, that’s okay but if you really want to make creation in Simplerockets2 easier, then you have to train yourselves.
+3.
I also usually try to replicate mechanisms in Simplerockets2 (e.g. continuous track suspension systems from different eras).
Jundroo’s servers were problematic because they were cheap. They have the chance to get disabled. Jundroo couldn’t afford another server company that handles the website better, so they have to get used to it.
+3@ALTMTR, and then said movie gets rated B for your convenience by movie critics. XD
+3What happens when you put Hollywood-esque stereotypical young millennials in charge of a kinetic bombardment control station?
+3@IceCraftGaming, it’s okay if you cannot flash your points because your points flair will be replaced by the mod flair. At least, you are still active (and maybe making keep on funny things).
+3Challenge organizer: Nooooo! You cannot cheat the props only challenge by putting propellers in a duct to make a jet engine. You’re disqualified from all challenges! Noooooo!
+3.
Cheater: Haha! Ducted fan go nyooom!
That grabber thingy reminds me of getting over it. :)
+3Curators need to have both SPVR and a working headset and must review crafts to see if it works in VR or not. I cannot go further on this subject and would rather await response from an official curator.
+3@hardy57, @50CalChicken, @Tsuchiisan, what I mean is if realistic physics, somehow, applied to the craft. For me, the glass canopy doesn’t look good underwater and may break under pressure. Furthermore, the fins appear a bit detached from the main fuselage and the propeller pods are not polished, causing drag. Submarines for exploration usually carry tools to allow for either research or to allow further exploration. This one does not, but I would give a pass; it’s up to you.
+3.
For me, the fictional tag applies if the craft is fictional, and yes it is fictional, but that does not stop me from giving critique with realism. All I want are good looking planes with a good to great amount of realism, not good looking planes with little or no realism or have realistic defects.
Nice idea, but the subassembly will have a high polygon count instead of the high part count.
+3@Korzalerke, functions are lines of code that must be called to run (usually by writing a special line of code).
+3The missing stock aircraft named “Biplane” in question.
+3.
So far, this is the only stock aircraft to represent a large aircraft.
.
I do not know why it got removed. Is it because the developers fear getting a copyright infringement notice from BoxGlow (the original creator of the “biplane”)?
.
@BeastHunter
@WormWithLegs
Posting this does not give you upvotes. And what’s the point of truing to get as much upvotes as you can anyways as they don’t give you any benefits whatsoever (although you need a certain amount of upvotes to upvote stuff, in which you have reached). So, please to focus on other things like building planes in SimplePlanes rather than trying to do futile endeavors to gain pointless stuff like upvotes.
+3See you space striker...
F
+3So you could actually defeat enemy aircraft by just sitting there and shooting at said aircraft.
+3It does not show the image correctly. Are you using this code:
![anyname][imageurl]
Replace “
anyname
” with any word you want, as long as the name complies the rules.Replace “
imageurl
” with the website url of an image (like postimages).If you use this code correctly, you get a working image.
+3Datcha advises you can get silver in like a week if you make something good enough, although I cannot guarantee the results. We will just see about that...
+3.
You can use intricate fuselage designs and use blueprints and other references to create better looking aircraft. Focusing on designing building things more than focusing on upvotes helps you create better builds.
You may need to set the fuselage parts to sufficient buoyancy, which can be found in the settings for said part. As for the propulsion, you may use jet engines above the water as any forms of propulsion, regardless of method, cannot work underwater.
+3Close but not accurate. The back fins should be the same as the front fins,
+3Smooth with stunning photos, you should become a cameraman for hire! Now the plane appears disproportionate, so it’s a good thing you use DesignerSuite (already added in the game, in the mods section), and try to make the plane in line with the blueprints. The cockpit appears nonexistent; I assume you had to make the part count lower so you didn’t include the cockpit. Also you should thicken the base of the wings and the tips thin. Hope that helps. :)
+3The wings and the design made me think this is a fictional plane straight out of a typical dieselpunk fantasy setting. On the other hand, the hull appears to only work as a helicopter hull, since the exposed frames, while creative, cause a good amount of drag.
+3Simpleplanes allows for multiplayer mod, in which I absolutely love (though I no longer participate in multiplayer mod frequently). The second thing I like is the fuselage and hollow fuselage and the ability to slice such. As for the glass fuselages there is a good thing that the back and front meshes disappear and won’t make the glass look, at least, “faux”. The game also have built-in guns and weapons. These are what SimpleRockets2, a game useful for building complex machines for it’s controls, lack.
+3Hello, @Hayhayjam664, @ArkRoyalTheDDHunter...
If you need any questions, please ask me, or another member of the community (one tag is enough).
+3.
I am sorry for your misfortunes.
The first time I see this, i thought it was Don’t Starve. XD
+3The Imperium of Mankind has declared war and launched an invasion against the denizens of simpleplanes.com and the MultiPlayer server...
PREPARE FOR THY INVASION!
I like the amount of work you have done here, especially the walking motion needed to make it function. Nice walker. Maybe you could make a Blood Ravens version, eh? :)
+3@ZeroWithSlashedO, or you can use funky trees like
+3Roll + Pitch
.Good instructions, but you can stall even without terminating the engines. The pugachev’s cobra maneuver does not require thrust vectoring, it requires an amount of inertia, so a heavy prop plane can do that. Maybe helpful for you though.
+3.
Joke ruining spoiler
There’s no way. I’ll give an advice, click on then 4 arrows piece so you can drag and move the blueprint. Click the button again to disable it.
+3Best of luck. May you return soon.
+3.
I’ll give an advice, to study earlier than to hurry up late; This is one of the advices I do not like the most. Studying earlier means you get to know more and pass more.
Thank you. I would like if you use a 2 part glass attached to each other by their ends instead of a 1 part glass. I can see some leftover meshes either.
+3It could propel you to platinum (albeit I have to say it’s just another empty nameplate with no benefits whatsoever)!
Go on, don’t give up. Do what you dream to be!
+3Your plane has a plethora of unusual features. I can give some.
Thanks.
+3PARTY TIME! ヽ(:D)ノ
.
+3This bug happens because the gyroscopes have very little mass and need to stabilize themselves too much. Since one rotational force attempts often create a discreperancy on the other, another rotational force acting on the other stands in to fix the discreperancy and the forces counteract, creating a dancing effect.
Flying winnebago
Too luxurious for this world!
+3Is it auto-aiming?
+3@JuanNotAnAlt, @Dathcha, @MrSilverWolf, actually it was a lame joke comment meant to contain a link to a joke parody of the 20th century title card the craft depicts. The big text is actually a link. No drama please...
+3.
Upon closer inspection, it becomes clear that the build appears to be build on hard work.
.
Comment removed, seems like it did not have any jokey context at all, or is it???
WORLD OF TANKS 2
ELECTRIC BOOGALOO
.
+3Is the crusader doing dues vult again?
It looks like someone ripped the wings of a 2 prop small plane off then slapped all the helicopter stuff onto it.
+3“Nooooooo! You can’t use variables to make complex procedures!”
+3.
“Ha ha, variables go BRRRRRRRRRT!”
When the JDSF gets to update their ospreys.
+3@PSsyalperdna, I and DestroyerP are still having the default pic...
WE WILL NEVER GIVE UP!
It’s likely to better identify alts... I don’t know.
+3This should be pinned into useful links!
+3Nice to see the evolution!
+3If you are a computer user, you are lucky there is an underwater camera mod that allows you to peep underwater (with special underwater effects.)
+3link to mod
A spammy pingaloo is a spammy day...
+3.
It is likely the spammer wants to get your attention so badly, it started spamming to the point that a moderator had to perma-ip-ban the spammer and for the spammed to block the spammer.
.
Try to ignore the spammer and block the spammer. It might certainly work, since most spammers are either trolls or annoying advertisers.