:) might have something for you soon. need to finish landing gear first and do more weapons testing. ill hit you up on discord when im ready @ollielebananiaCFSP
also on the reported numbers, you can normally bump it up by 5-7% as militaries don't like to report exact numbers on most aircraft. Like the F-22, on wiki, it says >35,000 lbf it could go all the way up to 37500 with a 7% bump which is fairly reasonable. doing some sourcing for this is important as well if you are looking for info on the F-35, F-22, or F-16 the best place to look is f-16.net a lot of pilots on there that can help you with specs where other places lack. For example the turn rate of the F-35 was originally 11 dps but the actual turn rate is reported to go up to 28 dps source
Another example is that the f-22 specs say it can only go mach 1.8 but by doing some research the f-22 is actually limited around 2-2.3 by the FCAS to not damage the RAM and air intakes and it could go up to 2.8 although it would have significant damage to the surface. source source
Yeah, also when you are adjusting drag make sure you test the max speed of the jet without weapons attached. The maximum speed on jets is only done with clean stores.
@FlyingPatriot google translate isn't the best translator for Cyrillic languages try looking around for a different one as right now its hard to understand. I hope it helps :)
why don't we get rid of those ridges and just have roads that aren't enclosed I find the ridges entirely pointless and annoying if I'm trying to blow up the convoy
@SussyBreadBoi yes there are significant problems with acceleration, and some problems with the general shape and functionality, sorry for the late reply college has been a b**
:) might have something for you soon. need to finish landing gear first and do more weapons testing. ill hit you up on discord when im ready @ollielebananiaCFSP
@WNP78
@LieutenantSOT i live in kansas now lmfao
+1@asteroidbook345 yeah thats the thing abt this update everything looks too good lmao
I think you should a dd a couple details here and there but it looks pretty good
Im the real texan
@Brendorkus yeah i don't think that's fair they all have a lot more followers
+2also on the reported numbers, you can normally bump it up by 5-7% as militaries don't like to report exact numbers on most aircraft. Like the F-22, on wiki, it says >35,000 lbf it could go all the way up to 37500 with a 7% bump which is fairly reasonable. doing some sourcing for this is important as well if you are looking for info on the F-35, F-22, or F-16 the best place to look is f-16.net a lot of pilots on there that can help you with specs where other places lack. For example the turn rate of the F-35 was originally 11 dps but the actual turn rate is reported to go up to 28 dps
source
Another example is that the f-22 specs say it can only go mach 1.8 but by doing some research the f-22 is actually limited around 2-2.3 by the FCAS to not damage the RAM and air intakes and it could go up to 2.8 although it would have significant damage to the surface.
source
source
Yeah, also when you are adjusting drag make sure you test the max speed of the jet without weapons attached. The maximum speed on jets is only done with clean stores.
damn it's like what I've been saying for 4 years XD
jealous XD
the whole point was to not do that and im not gonna do it just bc one person asked for it redoing this would take days of work @simpleaerospace
+1@asteroidbook345 boat drop
@FlyingPatriot google translate isn't the best translator for Cyrillic languages try looking around for a different one as right now its hard to understand. I hope it helps :)
@FlyingPatriot working on it? or did you mean something else
@ReinMcDeer highest rated all-time pages? if anything you can prob get the metric from the devs
+1why don't we get rid of those ridges and just have roads that aren't enclosed I find the ridges entirely pointless and annoying if I'm trying to blow up the convoy
what control board is it based on is it the one in the F-18?
+1good one XD
+4bruh this guy on crack XD @asteroidbook345
dang you must be fun at parties @MiGEater
@MiGEater cool idc
Kim Jong Un approves this statement
maybe bc this community picks on ppl for the smallest thing. this place is a call of duty lobby without swear words.
+1@MiGEater imagine not knowing we are good friends and its a joke XD
I love this! flew it till the fuel ran out
+2ligma my sigma @asteroidbook345
ur beta
prolly should have used auto aim on the guns but its pretty nice
cool fact: they dumped cesium into the fuel to creat a RAM cloud when the fuel was burned to mask the radar signature of the aircraft from the back
+1no
+1and now its gone wth
@BaconEggs they dont want you to know the truth
@TDevil36 XD calm down bud just trying to give suggestions m8
that nose looks too narrow but overall not bad
just look at other ppls builds thats hiw i normally learn how to do it and then i just apply the same technique to my aircraft @SussyBreadBoi
intakes dont look right messes up the visuals for me everything else is good
as far as i can tell
needs to be longer no real plane could be squished like that
+1dark asf XD
+2same
Yes i do remember how bad CLB and Donda are.
+2I hereby name them: all
+1@SussyBreadBoi yes there are significant problems with acceleration, and some problems with the general shape and functionality, sorry for the late reply college has been a b**
heh he used nividia for the last clip
@HellFireKoder
whats ur specs
just got a new one
ryzen 9
3070
1Tb
ehh its ok but definitely needs more attention
damn it i was working on one and was almost done except for tuning the PID cuz i suck at FT
+1meh close enough lol @Chancey21
how lol
welcome to my nightmare
cool bro
+1