Also I am concerned that there is a lack of custom naval (sea) vehicle/vessel submissions that are not any naval aircraft or flying boats in this challenge. And almost or at least all of the submissions are entirely aircraft, excluding the ground SPAA that we apparently have.
So here's a specification requirement for an anti-air patrol frigate or destroyer:
The Maximum Displacement must be 5,000 t but must not be lesser than 1,340 t, The max speed that the craft can go is at 32 knots minimum target. It must be equipped with an effective radar equivalent to or greater to that of Snowstone's most effective radar available. Sonar must also be included. It must be armed with a comprehensive armament of at least 3 CIW Systems of the same caliber (No mixed calibers to simplify logistics), a main gun no lesser than 76mm nor greater than 8-inch (203.2mm) that must be able to have an effective accuracy equal to the 76mm gun of OTO Melara (Or just fit the ship with it), and it must at least have 20 Medium Range SAM's in store with at least a missile launcher system that allows those missiles to be launched from. Other missiles (inluding said med-range SAM's) can also be included on whatever is necessary.
Well, considering the situation going on right now, should I suggest we remain in a neutral stance and allow Snowstone to go on a fool around find out approach while we plan on further training and development of more effective early warning and detection technologies? Should I also suggest putting up a more effective defensive stance aimed at killing off more snowstone assets as possible when they are on offensives while reducing as much Wright casualties as possible?
Omenia threatens the use of nuclear weapons against Union and Estovian fleets as anti-nuclear and nuclear batteries are put up by Omenia near member states of the Union. Union retaliates by deploying its own nuclear capable bombers as tensions in the main continent return to what it was 15 years ago.
Oh damn, just about time while I was slowly making an AEW aircraft converted from a turboprop transport for the Union.
Check my most recent comment in this challenge page. In other words: Is any work within SimplePlanes only allowed for this challenge and not on other games?
Wait, are we allowed to post images of our builds from other games in this comment section but still influences the overall situation of the conflict, in this challenge? (Example: An image of some warship built in UA:D or NavalArt, An image of a tank built in Sprocket TD, etc?)
I got finals to do, and unfortunately it's neither physical sciences or maths. Although I might consider taking interest in this challenge, if I had given a higher free time priority to SP
Please keep in mind of the cannon shell, it has been fitted with time fuzes that explode at a certain distance. You can modify it in xml if you want to switch the fuzes.
I got a medium fighter in the works and I don't know which nation to pick from but here's 2 images of my WIP aircraft to compare specifications.
It was armed with initially just 2 cannons, an underpowered engine in a heavy yet well-protected airframe along with 3 air scoops. That's all I can tell for now. Image1 Image2
My previous name "Creeper304" came from a cut-off part of my roblox name which I still have as of December 1 of the double 20 year, which in turn was a misunderstood name suggestion from my cousins a few years ago.
"Ductwind589" however, was a different name I actually come up with by my own. I pretty much know I would rush on a single direction without thinking.
As far as I know, the air inside the ducts move in a single direction, hence why I managed to come up with the new name.
One of my reasons to changing into a new name was that I am continuously more aware of the multiple definitions of the word "creeper", another reason is that I'm vaguely getting tired of using the old name.
Edit: The numbers are just random, I did add them for identification.
@WorldWorldtheWar Here's what I seem to have gathered the tier 1 ground vehicles in the regular tech tree from the 9 nations in War Thunder into a list:
USA:
M2A4
M2A2
M3 Stuart
M3A1 Stuart
M2
LVT (A)(1)
M13 Machine Gun Motor Carriage
M3 Gun Motor Carriage
M22
Germany:
Panzerkampfwagen II Ausführung C
Panzerkampfwagen II Ausführung F
PanzerKampfwagen III Ausführung B
PanzerKampfwagen III Ausführung E
PanzerKampfwagen III Ausführung F
PanzerKampfwagen III Ausführung J
PanzerKampfwagen 35 (tschechisch)
PanzerKampfwagen 38 (tschechisch) Ausführung A
PanzerKampfwagen 38 (tschechisch) Ausführung F
PanzerKampfwagen IV Ausführung C
PanzerKampfwagen IV Ausführung E
Sturmgeschütz III Ausführung A
15 cm sIG 33 auf Fahrgestell Panzerkampfwagen II
Leichter Panzerspähwagen Sonderkraftfahrzeug 221 (2.8/2cm Schwere Panzerbüchse 1941)
2 cm Flak 38 auf Panzer I Ausführung A
Flakpanzer 38(t) auf Selbstfahrlafette 38(t) Ausführung M (Sonderkraftfahrzeug 140)
Brits:
Tank, Cruiser, Mk III (A13 Mk I)
Tank, Cruiser, Mk IV (A13 Mk II)
Tank, Light Mk VII, Tetrarch I (A17)
Armoured Car, Daimler Mk II
Tank, Light AA Mk I
T17E2
Stuart I (M3 Stuart)
Stuart III (M3A1 Stuart)
Japan:
Izusu Type 94 (Type 98 20 mm Machine Cannon Carrier Truck)
Type 4 Ho-Ro
Type 2 Ka-Mi
Type 98 Ke-Ni
Type 95 Ha-Go
Type 89b I-Go Ko
Type 97 Chi-Ha
Type 97 Chi-Ha Kai
Italy:
Fiat-Ansaldo Autoblinda 41
Camionetta AS 42 Tipo II "Metropolitana"
Fiat-Ansaldo M11/39
Fiat-Ansaldo M13/40 I Serie
Fiat-Ansaldo M13/40 III Serie
Fiat-Ansaldo M14/41
Carro Armato modello L6
Fiat-Ansaldo Semovente L40 da 47/32
France:
Automitrailleuse de Combat AMC.34 YR
Char léger modèle 1935 H
Char léger modèle 1935 H modifié 39
Char léger d'accompagnement FCM.36
Char léger d'accompagnement 1935 R (SA38)
Automitrailleuse de Reconnaissance AMR 35 ZT3
Automitrailleuse de Découverte Panhard modèle 1935
Char de Combat Renault AMC.35 (ACG.1)
Char de cavalerie SOMUA 1935 S
Char D2
Citroën Kégresse P.7.T
China:
American Vehicles:
M3A3 Stuart
M8 Greyhound
M8 Scott
Japanese Vehicles:
Type 97 Chi-Ha
Type 97 Chi-Ha Kai
@Brields95 I could really think of doing that but I was in the morning after you've commented and I submitted this post while at the middle of a night without much consideration on grammar corrections. Other than that, thanks for notifying me that this post is in need of proofreading.
@jamesPLANESii I'm writing that because I do expect drama to happen at some point in any topic. I might have that last paragraph copied for future forum posts that I would make if I seem to be considered necessary (Or rather compulsive).
@U2
I remember having steam work with windows 8.1 on another computer. I don't know how you managed to think of that.
@U2
You can't just simply say a few words just for me to become convinced, at least back it up with some sources.
@U2
Expand on that
@U2
I am hooked with what you just said. Mind to bring up more about that matter? I am concerned.
ok
canard triplane
Also I am concerned that there is a lack of custom naval (sea) vehicle/vessel submissions that are not any naval aircraft or flying boats in this challenge. And almost or at least all of the submissions are entirely aircraft, excluding the ground SPAA that we apparently have.
So here's a specification requirement for an anti-air patrol frigate or destroyer:
The Maximum Displacement must be 5,000 t but must not be lesser than 1,340 t, The max speed that the craft can go is at 32 knots minimum target. It must be equipped with an effective radar equivalent to or greater to that of Snowstone's most effective radar available. Sonar must also be included. It must be armed with a comprehensive armament of at least 3 CIW Systems of the same caliber (No mixed calibers to simplify logistics), a main gun no lesser than 76mm nor greater than 8-inch (203.2mm) that must be able to have an effective accuracy equal to the 76mm gun of OTO Melara (Or just fit the ship with it), and it must at least have 20 Medium Range SAM's in store with at least a missile launcher system that allows those missiles to be launched from. Other missiles (inluding said med-range SAM's) can also be included on whatever is necessary.
@Yourlocalhuman
What. This is a bit incomprehensible.
Well, considering the situation going on right now, should I suggest we remain in a neutral stance and allow Snowstone to go on a fool around find out approach while we plan on further training and development of more effective early warning and detection technologies? Should I also suggest putting up a more effective defensive stance aimed at killing off more snowstone assets as possible when they are on offensives while reducing as much Wright casualties as possible?
@Yourlocalhuman
That pinned comment has been 6 days ago.
However, do not enact the decision now. We have to wait for other people's decisions and votes.
@Yourlocalhuman
I'd suggest we keep ourselves neutral for now. Can't risk making this war turn into a proxy war with 2 superpowers. Wait and see what will happen.
I do not doubt that Snowstone conducts espionage on this comment section or on other media as they become more aware.
EYY! The Union must prepare a nuclear triad at this point again.
Commissioned an AEW aircraft for the Union
Oh damn, just about time while I was slowly making an AEW aircraft converted from a turboprop transport for the Union.
Somebody working for the Union, commission such electronic aircraft for the UFN's troops. I won't be able to make one at this time.
@lewishasnoiq Are electronic warfare aircraft viable for this challenge perhaps?
@ALMIGHTYFRIDGE
Medium Tank, M4A2
Anybody made any fixed-wing transport aircraft or vehicles yet for this?
Wait is it okay if I reuse designs of my older work as surplus vehicles at the moment?
@lewishasnoiq
Check my most recent comment in this challenge page. In other words: Is any work within SimplePlanes only allowed for this challenge and not on other games?
Wait, are we allowed to post images of our builds from other games in this comment section but still influences the overall situation of the conflict, in this challenge? (Example: An image of some warship built in UA:D or NavalArt, An image of a tank built in Sprocket TD, etc?)
Kind of nice how I didn't get included in the video.
I got finals to do, and unfortunately it's neither physical sciences or maths. Although I might consider taking interest in this challenge, if I had given a higher free time priority to SP
Pampagueño living in Canada.
These rounds are cool. Now sabot pieces next
Released a Ryclian Fighter
@DragoransEscarti I might not be able to do it now but thanks for giving the idea of a different method
@KrAkenAtomic
If at some point you come back, I think this war has to end, it's all quiet nowadays
I'm going to ask: Does my tank's 2 side view image looked sufficient enough? If not, what perspectives should I add?
I got a 2-side outline of one of my tanks albeit rushed, technologically comparable to IRL 1950's tanks: "48 Tonnes Tank, Assigned Model Number 1509"
Edit: Unnamed4503 is the same person as me
OH YEAHHHH
Okay, is there some possibility that I can get both the of the options shown instead of just 1 or none. My screen size is up to 1366x768mm
Someone tell me what caused the Tagalog-speaking discord's invite link to expire?
Submitted a design of mine:
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/WWdX09/Selthiag-Sg-37-1
Edit: Formatting is now fixed
Okay, so the deadline has been reached 2 days prior by the time I post this comment.
Man, is this challenge ended up in nearly a year of ceasefire...
Please keep in mind of the cannon shell, it has been fitted with time fuzes that explode at a certain distance. You can modify it in xml if you want to switch the fuzes.
lol, no review yet
Aircraft is significantly changed and now became some sort of an interceptor. https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/0925D3/Yakran-I152-A1-Alpine-Challenge This aircraft is now in the challenge.
I got a medium fighter in the works and I don't know which nation to pick from but here's 2 images of my WIP aircraft to compare specifications.
It was armed with initially just 2 cannons, an underpowered engine in a heavy yet well-protected airframe along with 3 air scoops. That's all I can tell for now.
Image1
Image2
My previous name "Creeper304" came from a cut-off part of my roblox name which I still have as of December 1 of the double 20 year, which in turn was a misunderstood name suggestion from my cousins a few years ago.
"Ductwind589" however, was a different name I actually come up with by my own. I pretty much know I would rush on a single direction without thinking.
As far as I know, the air inside the ducts move in a single direction, hence why I managed to come up with the new name.
One of my reasons to changing into a new name was that I am continuously more aware of the multiple definitions of the word "creeper", another reason is that I'm vaguely getting tired of using the old name.
Edit: The numbers are just random, I did add them for identification.
@WorldWorldtheWar Here's what I seem to have gathered the tier 1 ground vehicles in the regular tech tree from the 9 nations in War Thunder into a list:
USA:
M2A4
M2A2
M3 Stuart
M3A1 Stuart
M2
LVT (A)(1)
M13 Machine Gun Motor Carriage
M3 Gun Motor Carriage
M22
Germany:
Panzerkampfwagen II Ausführung C
Panzerkampfwagen II Ausführung F
PanzerKampfwagen III Ausführung B
PanzerKampfwagen III Ausführung E
PanzerKampfwagen III Ausführung F
PanzerKampfwagen III Ausführung J
PanzerKampfwagen 35 (tschechisch)
PanzerKampfwagen 38 (tschechisch) Ausführung A
PanzerKampfwagen 38 (tschechisch) Ausführung F
PanzerKampfwagen IV Ausführung C
PanzerKampfwagen IV Ausführung E
Sturmgeschütz III Ausführung A
15 cm sIG 33 auf Fahrgestell Panzerkampfwagen II
Leichter Panzerspähwagen Sonderkraftfahrzeug 221 (2.8/2cm Schwere Panzerbüchse 1941)
2 cm Flak 38 auf Panzer I Ausführung A
Flakpanzer 38(t) auf Selbstfahrlafette 38(t) Ausführung M (Sonderkraftfahrzeug 140)
USSR:
БТ-5
БТ-7
T-26
T-26-4
T-60
T-70
СУ-5-1
СУ-76М
ГАЗ-ААА (4М)
ГАЗ-ААА (Дегтярёва-Шпагина Крупнокалиберный)
Brits:
Tank, Cruiser, Mk III (A13 Mk I)
Tank, Cruiser, Mk IV (A13 Mk II)
Tank, Light Mk VII, Tetrarch I (A17)
Armoured Car, Daimler Mk II
Tank, Light AA Mk I
T17E2
Stuart I (M3 Stuart)
Stuart III (M3A1 Stuart)
Japan:
Izusu Type 94 (Type 98 20 mm Machine Cannon Carrier Truck)
Type 4 Ho-Ro
Type 2 Ka-Mi
Type 98 Ke-Ni
Type 95 Ha-Go
Type 89b I-Go Ko
Type 97 Chi-Ha
Type 97 Chi-Ha Kai
Italy:
Fiat-Ansaldo Autoblinda 41
Camionetta AS 42 Tipo II "Metropolitana"
Fiat-Ansaldo M11/39
Fiat-Ansaldo M13/40 I Serie
Fiat-Ansaldo M13/40 III Serie
Fiat-Ansaldo M14/41
Carro Armato modello L6
Fiat-Ansaldo Semovente L40 da 47/32
France:
Automitrailleuse de Combat AMC.34 YR
Char léger modèle 1935 H
Char léger modèle 1935 H modifié 39
Char léger d'accompagnement FCM.36
Char léger d'accompagnement 1935 R (SA38)
Automitrailleuse de Reconnaissance AMR 35 ZT3
Automitrailleuse de Découverte Panhard modèle 1935
Char de Combat Renault AMC.35 (ACG.1)
Char de cavalerie SOMUA 1935 S
Char D2
Citroën Kégresse P.7.T
China:
American Vehicles:
M3A3 Stuart
M8 Greyhound
M8 Scott
Japanese Vehicles:
Type 97 Chi-Ha
Type 97 Chi-Ha Kai
Soviet Vehicles:
СУ-76М
T-26
Sweden:
Stridsvagn m/31
Stridsvagn m/38
Stridsvagn m/40L
Pansarvärnslavettvagn fm/42
Stormpjas fm/43-44
Infanterikanonvagn 72
@Brields95 I could really think of doing that but I was in the morning after you've commented and I submitted this post while at the middle of a night without much consideration on grammar corrections. Other than that, thanks for notifying me that this post is in need of proofreading.
Lemme question something about the spitfire's left wing...
Does it have a hole on it's left wing?
@jamesPLANESii I'm writing that because I do expect drama to happen at some point in any topic. I might have that last paragraph copied for future forum posts that I would make if I seem to be considered necessary (Or rather compulsive).
Okay, so I uploaded my aircraft in bad timing. Not gonna tell much but I'm going to go back to making a blueprint.
My aircraft is now prepared to participate. Might release it during midnight.
Edit: Actually, I'm better off releasing it on the next day.
I was not in my country of origin but I'm putting this comment in this thread anyway