@Strikefighter04 they should add "vehicle" tag to the search then, just like I did in the link below. Or do you want a tag for a specific model of a truck? We want to keep the tags versatile. If you can describe the build by combining existing tags, there's no need for a new tag.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
It has changes from the original, it's a successor, and credit has been given. It is even approved by the original builder a few comments below. An example of how to do a successor build.
I've removed your post so it won't spark any drama. Thanks for letting me know, but in the future, please be more subtle. Discord DMs and tagging on unlisted posts are options too.
@DPSAircraftManufacturer flaps are easy. Use this technique to get pretty wings and set inner control surface rotators to VTOL and their input to "-1,0".
@DPSAircraftManufacturer stock control surfaces act depending on the position of the wing, not position of the control surface. If most of the wing is ahead of CoM, elevators and flaps will act "reversed".
@ChunderDownUndeR you should have mentioned that in description. You would have gotten a higher quality and performance mark, though I didn't take out a lot from that anyway, not being sure if it's a feature.
@JohnnyBoythePilot I said that the chassis wouldn't hold the system because the chassis is segmented instead of being one single tubular or frame chassis. Weak spots are right in front and behind the system. Also, a spam of small missiles wouldn't be effective, as there's too many of them, making reloading too expensive for the kind of system that is expected to spend four to five missiles per sortie.
@Minecraftpoweer yeah, my challenges tend to attract a lot of entries. I always try to make them as professionally as possible, considering what's lacking on the site, what people want to build, and that I've proven myself competent in making, and thus judging creations of that kind.
Leehopard's build really is incredible. His is the only high-caliber entry that has actual guided and proximity fused rounds.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@Chancey21 I've only picked up one curse, and it's a pretty mild one. From the rules: "We are not going to moderate every curse word, but please try to keep it clean.".
@ThomasRoderick I've used that trick before. However, it only works up to a certain speed, which is too slow, and suddenly it tries to spin at full speed.
Well, you usually won't be having two different missiles on one platform. Even platforms compatible with multiple types of missile usually use one at the time. Also, missiles are generally heavy. Land launched missiles based on air-to-air missiles will be air-to-air missile plus a booster. I don't think you can fit them in those boxes off the sides of the truck. Maybe those could fit missiles that are usually paired with MANPADS, but I don't see a point of that.
@Abhishek700 yes. It can replace what used to be on the chassis. For example, you have an APC. You remove its turret and put air defence system there. Or you already have a truck and you put system on it. Even if I rate the air defence system here while disregarding the rest, it's not really a winner material. I suggest making an actual system for area air defence.
@Hiluks1 since you've said camera isn't your own, you should credit the guy who made it in description. I do believe you made the rest yourself, so it's acceptable.
@SubXTribe this doesn't seem to be a copy of the system you linked. Enough things are done differently, and even the shape of the base is different. Also, the one you linkes is smaller.
Join some SP Discord servers. Hanging out with other members of the community might help. You can join the most oopular one through a link in my bio.
+1@Strikefighter04 they should add "vehicle" tag to the search then, just like I did in the link below. Or do you want a tag for a specific model of a truck? We want to keep the tags versatile. If you can describe the build by combining existing tags, there's no need for a new tag.
+1I removed it, then noticed @randomusername, the original builder, approves this post so I re-approved it. Forgot to remove the comment though, @Nickr.
+1Planes will be made regardless of challenges, @enzoBoeing757 .
+1Maybe he blocked you, so you cannot tag him while he can still tag you if he decides to communicate. If you don't want him to, block him back.
+1Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
+1Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@spefyjerbf no problem. Beautiful design.
+1It's so cute :)
+1And it's named after my favourite place.
It has changes from the original, it's a successor, and credit has been given. It is even approved by the original builder a few comments below. An example of how to do a successor build.
+1Nora B-52 howitzer, Utva Kobac intermediate trainer, BOV-10 scout car, or any other Yugoimport SPDR product.
+1You seem to have accidentally posted this twice. I have removed the one with no upvotes for you.
+1@SpencerTreePuncher I have a few unposted builds in my saves. I might post one of those or make something new.
+1@SpencerTreePuncher thanks.
+1I've removed your post so it won't spark any drama. Thanks for letting me know, but in the future, please be more subtle. Discord DMs and tagging on unlisted posts are options too.
+1Excellent build. The most realistic broadside I've seen so far.
+1@Kimcotupan15 thanks. Main goal was to keep the part count as low as possible.
+1@Minecraftpoweer no problem.
+1@DPSAircraftManufacturer what I mean is that by now, I might have over a hundred planes with flaps. That's over two hundred flaps :)
+1@DPSAircraftManufacturer flaps are easy. Use this technique to get pretty wings and set inner control surface rotators to VTOL and their input to "-1,0".
+1@DPSAircraftManufacturer no problem.
+1@DPSAircraftManufacturer you get to have flaps that only move one way (down) and that produce extra lift exactly where you put them.
+1@DPSAircraftManufacturer stock control surfaces act depending on the position of the wing, not position of the control surface. If most of the wing is ahead of CoM, elevators and flaps will act "reversed".
+1@ChunderDownUndeR you should have mentioned that in description. You would have gotten a higher quality and performance mark, though I didn't take out a lot from that anyway, not being sure if it's a feature.
+1@JohnnyBoythePilot I said that the chassis wouldn't hold the system because the chassis is segmented instead of being one single tubular or frame chassis. Weak spots are right in front and behind the system. Also, a spam of small missiles wouldn't be effective, as there's too many of them, making reloading too expensive for the kind of system that is expected to spend four to five missiles per sortie.
+1@Minecraftpoweer yeah, my challenges tend to attract a lot of entries. I always try to make them as professionally as possible, considering what's lacking on the site, what people want to build, and that I've proven myself competent in making, and thus judging creations of that kind.
+1Leehopard's build really is incredible. His is the only high-caliber entry that has actual guided and proximity fused rounds.
@SnoWFLakE0s it's a moderator perk.
+1Your post has been removed. You have been issued a strike for bypassing successor system.
+1Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
+1Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@EliteArsenals24 your entry has been accepted.
+1@JohnnyBoythePilot that's nice. Thanks for the entry.
+1@Chancey21 I've only picked up one curse, and it's a pretty mild one. From the rules: "We are not going to moderate every curse word, but please try to keep it clean.".
+1@BogdanX I'm glad you like it. It takes around 100m to stop from 120km/h, which is roughly realistic.
+1@ThomasRoderick I've used that trick before. However, it only works up to a certain speed, which is too slow, and suddenly it tries to spin at full speed.
+1@Gameboi14 :)
+1@Abhishek700 dunno.
+1@Abhishek700 yes, custom missiles would add extra points.
+1Well, you usually won't be having two different missiles on one platform. Even platforms compatible with multiple types of missile usually use one at the time. Also, missiles are generally heavy. Land launched missiles based on air-to-air missiles will be air-to-air missile plus a booster. I don't think you can fit them in those boxes off the sides of the truck. Maybe those could fit missiles that are usually paired with MANPADS, but I don't see a point of that.
+1@Abhishek700 sure. I'll rate one entry per user. You can post as many successors as you want and pick which one is your entry.
+1@Abhishek700 yes. It can replace what used to be on the chassis. For example, you have an APC. You remove its turret and put air defence system there. Or you already have a truck and you put system on it. Even if I rate the air defence system here while disregarding the rest, it's not really a winner material. I suggest making an actual system for area air defence.
+1So, it's got air defence system for self defence while being an offensive ground attack system. Still doesn't fit the challenge.
+1Pro tip: zoom in on your upload pictures so that the build covers as much of the screen as possible. Nice sub though.
+1@KingHandspider that's good to know.
+1Alternative inputs. They are useful for multi=rotor helicopters.
+1@Chancey21 only flaw I found is that rudder rotator isn't at the correct angle.
+1@grizzlitn no problem.
+1@Hiluks1 since you've said camera isn't your own, you should credit the guy who made it in description. I do believe you made the rest yourself, so it's acceptable.
+1@SubXTribe this doesn't seem to be a copy of the system you linked. Enough things are done differently, and even the shape of the base is different. Also, the one you linkes is smaller.
Your post has been removed for bypassing successor system.
+1@14ROVI no you're not :)
+1@PvPSky no problem.
+1@PvPSky I've explained the picture in a few comments below.
+1