@DuckMint Maybe not this one, but since it appears that nobody has anything against the forward superstructure design, I'll be able to use it more often and get more upvotes.
@GritAerospaceSolutionsLTD Yes. And like the herald of Free Enterprise, its nearly impossible to see the bow doors from the flying bridge. Or the main bridge.
1: Thrust vectoring AKA putting engines on a rotor
2: ; Larger control surfaces, though this makes the aircraft quite twitchy at higher speeds unless you use an activation group to turn it off.
3: Custom control surfaces AKA wings stuck onto rotors.
4: Gyroscopes, which is probably the easiest method.
@Sgtk I always use fuselage blocks scaled up by 5,10 or 20 so I can reduce the number of parts, which allows me to use more for the superstructure. And it allows me to assemble ships easily since they are mostly the same size.
@randomusername But if the cost of a naval nuclear reactor is excluded, two of these ships could be build and they would still cost less money than a B-2 when in service.
While I do not believe that you can make them work while submerged, you can go around the problem by sticking the missiles on pistons. It also works very well in multiplayer if you want to massacre the server without getting caught.
@Fjorge Its basically the closest thing I have got to an Iowa class battleship in terms of size and main guns. but its armour is basically non-existent. While it would normally be a battlecruiser, I just copied the HMS Courageous and called it a light cruiser instead.
@randomusername Unfortunately, changing the cockpit design by adding fuselages to the back will merely reduce the size of the cockpit and make future modifications much harder. And making it out of a hollow fuselage will send the part count through the roof.
Well, you could either increase the propeller horsepower to 500,000 and add more of them if you still aren't fast enough. OR you could use xlml modded jet engines, but these will probably prevent you from reversing. @Spacedoge12345plane
Houston? I think i see the Enron Center South in the photo.
Rosetta?
+1@DuckMint Maybe not this one, but since it appears that nobody has anything against the forward superstructure design, I'll be able to use it more often and get more upvotes.
+1@GritAerospaceSolutionsLTD Yes. And like the herald of Free Enterprise, its nearly impossible to see the bow doors from the flying bridge. Or the main bridge.
+1@Strikefighter04 Thanks!
+1@Minecraftpoweer Thanks!
@Strikefighter04 The Unidad Popular is close enough.
+2@dootdootbananabus Soon. @CRJ900Pilot Well, you could set the rotors on the bogies to something that is not "floppy"
@BoeyingOfficial Close enough
+2No. The shape of the cab is just a rounded DMU cab design and the rear end is just a poorly designed gondola. @GritAerospaceSolutionsLTD
If there were instruments, they would have been on the ceiling because I have no idea where to put them. @CSP27
@ThePilotDude Its here
Here
404 plane not found?
+6Go to properties/updates on steam and disable steam cloud synchronisation?
@DepressedTortoise Possibly.
@BoeyingOfficial Probably. I think I have enough subassemblies to make one.
@CSP27 Heavy crafts tend to have that issue.
@Bman01 SWTOR
@Bman01 Антонов Ан-24, actually. Though mine can't fly like a certain Q400.
Does this help? Or maybe this
I can't exactly remember how I did it, but i do recall downloading and Android SDK, the SDK and saving it to andoid from SP mod builder
1: Thrust vectoring AKA putting engines on a rotor
2: ; Larger control surfaces, though this makes the aircraft quite twitchy at higher speeds unless you use an activation group to turn it off.
3: Custom control surfaces AKA wings stuck onto rotors.
4: Gyroscopes, which is probably the easiest method.
@Sgtk I always use fuselage blocks scaled up by 5,10 or 20 so I can reduce the number of parts, which allows me to use more for the superstructure. And it allows me to assemble ships easily since they are mostly the same size.
+1If all the collisions in the landing gear are set to false, you could nudge the rotator up.(Just the rotator, not the other parts)
+3@AnelGaming You might very think that, but I couldn't possibly comment.
@randomusername But if the cost of a naval nuclear reactor is excluded, two of these ships could be build and they would still cost less money than a B-2 when in service.
+1@Minecraftpoweer And the honor of being run over by a 330,000 kg pair of freight locomotives
+1@Pilotmario Yes, but any large objects on the stern would be at risk of being hit.
@KerlonceauxIndustries Yes.
While I do not believe that you can make them work while submerged, you can go around the problem by sticking the missiles on pistons. It also works very well in multiplayer if you want to massacre the server without getting caught.
+1@Fjorge Its basically the closest thing I have got to an Iowa class battleship in terms of size and main guns. but its armour is basically non-existent. While it would normally be a battlecruiser, I just copied the HMS Courageous and called it a light cruiser instead.
@AviownCorp нет. I mean no.
@BroAeronautics Its going to go very well if even the tail number knows that the plane is doomed
@ViciousTNT Well, it is easier to make the keep the cabin unpressurised and the passengers passed out than it is to use round windows.
@Theron Go into xml or use overload: look for chordScale and increase it to chordScale="8" or higher.
@Theron Increase the propeller chord.
@randomusername A jet powered Carvair with a long nose.
+1@randomusername Yes, a few days ago, though It'll take a while before the first planes with it are posted.
+1@randomusername Unfortunately, changing the cockpit design by adding fuselages to the back will merely reduce the size of the cockpit and make future modifications much harder. And making it out of a hollow fuselage will send the part count through the roof.
@randomusername Its not actually a HS.121 trident, the name is just a placeholder.
+1Well, you could either increase the propeller horsepower to 500,000 and add more of them if you still aren't fast enough. OR you could use xlml modded jet engines, but these will probably prevent you from reversing. @Spacedoge12345plane
+3Put a rudder at the front and invert the input?
+3@Tovarishch Possibly
@ThePrototype As expected.
2,2,2 @KerlonceauxIndustries
@Amaker You might very well think that, but I could not possibly comment.
@KerlonceauxIndustries Yes. This also applies my other airliners, since most of them use this cockpit as well.
Try flying 135 degrees or so from Wright? Or go in the same direction as the USS Tiny and you'll see it eventually.
@BrianAircraftsNew There would have been a "mom" in the middle. But since there was no space, it now looks like an aircraft registered in Ukraine.
+3