@Jim1the1Squid
If it's in deep waters, tough luck.
It's going to take no less than two years to bring back into working order.
Not to mention that everything will have to be replaced in that thing.
Plus, where are you even storing all these equipment?
Canonically, you're a micronation situated in Midway Island.
@Jim1the1Squid
The common international protocol for sunken ships with deceased onboard are considered cemeteries and are not to be disturbed.
Plus, the cost of such a salvage mission would be so immense that anyone who'd be attempting to do the same would be better off constructing newer ships.
@Jim1the1Squid
You are quite literally halfway around the world.
By executing this operation, you are most certainly violating the airspaces of several nations.
It's still technically considered stealing since you've been caught taking them, using them as your own and just outright lie about having "replicated" them.
I'll give an example.
ErvenDynamics' Gun Optic from his MBT-2A Tyrfing and Dllama4's APS.
.
Oh and by the way, from what we've seen in your escapades in "The Royal Suite", we don't know whether to laugh or fear for humanity's future.
.
Try and continue your endless web of lies and you'll see yourself looking at a reel of every single thing you've lied about compiled into an album.
And.. are you aware that you're breaking the rules by bypassing the successor system?
Link to the original.
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/8k8Dnv/MTB-Amphibious-Aircraft
@HellRaiser Two months passed after this was made and the revised version was painted black, the smoke dischargers relocated to the top and additional side skirts.
To add to that, I wouldn't even think of doing these things:
- Using obsolete ammunition like APCBC on a modern tank as you'd only be able to use it against IFVs, APCs, lightly armoured vehicles and tanks straight from WW2 and the early cold war.
- Carrying smoke rounds for the main gun even though there's already the smoke dischargers, to which I wouldn't go more than 70mm.
- Releasing something that doesn't have the proper sensor equipment on the turret or sights.
And take note, there's only one single hatch there.
- Having flat sides on a turret.
- Having armour thickness well below 600.
@PlanesofJundroo
Sending fighters and ships to a high-stakes hostage situation would be a definition of misuse of forces.
It can and most likely result into an escalation by the hostage takers due to excess pressure, causing them to execute the hostages.
.
Competent and well-equipped counter-terrorist teams have a higher chance of defusing the situation rather quickly, saving the lives of the hostages.. because not everything can be solved by explosives alone.
What a coincidence to suddenly have repairs on the 95th.
That's one hell of a retcon.
And you do realize that Security Forces setup three perimeters solely for the President's protection, not to mention the insane amount of background checking.
Plus, they will actually shut down any building or work in the security perimeter's vicinity which may become a place for a threat to hide in.
Could you like, put some thought into the writing to make it solid and believable..?
.
Because this is barely believable by most standards.
Especially the part with the sniper.
.
First off, that man wouldn't even come close to within 600 meters of where the President is because he'd have several layers of security such as counter-sniper teams, SUVs with mounted machine guns, military guards and possibly layers of bulletproof glass of the highest level.
Counter-sniper teams would be constantly scanning the horizon for any possible threat with sensors such as IR cameras and the like.
If he does manage to get through, he's either got inside help, massacred his way into a rooftop without somehow getting detected or that you have one of the most incompetent guards to exist.
.
Second, in the case that he is apprehended on the rooftop, tried to resist and ended up getting shot on the shoulder, chances are that he'd actually die from it.
The shoulder contains the main artery of the arm and the nerve bundles which control the arm.
Plus, he probably won't even be caught up close, but rather caught up in a body bag because the police won't risk an encounter with such an individual and as such, engage them at a distance with a sniper team.
That is not the only thing I propose.
I also propose the formation of a committee, headed by and composed of neutral nations for the purpose of recording warcrimes in times of war.
@GeneralOliverVonBismarck
I've seen you on discord with that FEV of yours, which is basically a biological weapon (an airborne strain of virus).. ultimately violating a ruling already.
@MrVaultech
This bman guy launched a carpet bombing campaign against a city, mainly targeting a large skyscraper as well as the refusal to pay any sort of reparation to Halcyon or the UN, so you may want to look into that.
I would suggest the limitation of all orbital weapons stations, such as lasers and kinetic rods because not only could they be possibly overpowered (wherein a nation could inflate it's capabilities out of proportions), they could also be used indiscriminately against civilian targets in the same way as some use nuclear weapons.
They are also quite expensive to operate, maintain and at times, impossible to get into orbit as I've seen someone claiming that they were on the works to have an OWS which drops 2000 ton tungsten carbide projectiles
I highly suggest you don't cook up another concoction of failure and losses and just rescind this decision as well as pull out all of your troops, because this time, we'll be involved and we won't tolerate such barbarism.
@Bman01
Alright.
I've been summoned from the depths of hell to counter your statement and it's possible fallacies.
«»
First of all, what kind of mind does your diplomat have that you were able to discern exactly what kind of drone they were operating from just a simple mention?
«»
Drones can be anything, ranging from air, land, sea and space drones made for a multitude of tasks.
How did you know that it was an attack drone or that it even existed without any form of concrete evidence such as an intact example (which may be impossible, as it also acts as a suicide drone after expending it's ammunition)?
«»
And lastly, how did you manufacture this without any form of blueprints or examples to reverse engineer?
Not to be rude or anything, but do we really have to know?
Posting something like this makes you look like someone in desperate need of attention or just someone boastful overall.
The idea's great, but the execution, not so much.
The advantage of a bullpup firearm is it's compactness (being short), unless this is something like the L86 LSW, a DMR or a full on Sniper Rifle.
You could do a detailed weapon with a small number of parts, try to find that out on your own.
@0n33
Think of it.
Since you dropped a 13 ton cluster bomb over the heads of possibly your enemies, they're most likely already dead.
If your forces were to capture a certain base which had the bomb dropped over it beforehand, there would most likely be an immense amount of casualties since you've covered the entire area with thousands, ten thousands or maybe even hundreds of thousands of bomblets.
@FlyingHueman Remember the (((AC Server)))
@MrVaultech
thank you avdol, very cool
+1Thank you @bjac0, very cool!
+4@Theflyingtrex
How could anyone take you seriously when no one even knows where your country is?
@Jim1the1Squid
If it's in deep waters, tough luck.
It's going to take no less than two years to bring back into working order.
Not to mention that everything will have to be replaced in that thing.
Plus, where are you even storing all these equipment?
Canonically, you're a micronation situated in Midway Island.
@Jim1the1Squid
The common international protocol for sunken ships with deceased onboard are considered cemeteries and are not to be disturbed.
Plus, the cost of such a salvage mission would be so immense that anyone who'd be attempting to do the same would be better off constructing newer ships.
@Jim1the1Squid
+1You are quite literally halfway around the world.
By executing this operation, you are most certainly violating the airspaces of several nations.
@Linethesmarty
+9You've got no say in this.
Hell you don't even have any builds.
this is not a Rover
you are fake news
thank you snow, very cool!
+1thank you wnp, very cool!
+85/10 not enough bogans banned
+10"there's no control surface therefore it's fake" - VC, sometime in 2019
+6@Othawne how much to ban bogan
There's like more than a dozen people who've seen what you do in there.
@CptJacobson
Invasion of Privacy?
How can you be private if the entire thing is on a public server?
thanks mr mod man
@HarrisCraft I will end you.
@CptJacobson
It's still technically considered stealing since you've been caught taking them, using them as your own and just outright lie about having "replicated" them.
+1I'll give an example.
ErvenDynamics' Gun Optic from his MBT-2A Tyrfing and Dllama4's APS.
.
Oh and by the way, from what we've seen in your escapades in "The Royal Suite", we don't know whether to laugh or fear for humanity's future.
.
Try and continue your endless web of lies and you'll see yourself looking at a reel of every single thing you've lied about compiled into an album.
ban bogan
Highly detailed which can perform realistically.
@Jim1the1Squid
Give us a good example of why he should.
You don't see landlocked countries going "yeah buzz off from that land, we need it."
Would you like to be subject to a strategic strike by a three nation coalition?
And.. are you aware that you're breaking the rules by bypassing the successor system?
Link to the original.
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/8k8Dnv/MTB-Amphibious-Aircraft
when will bogan be banned?
+4ban bogan
@ThePilotDude
Thanks for informing me.
@dimindahouse
So.
Trying hard to pass off my work as yours, eh?
@HellRaiser Two months passed after this was made and the revised version was painted black, the smoke dischargers relocated to the top and additional side skirts.
@HarrisCraft
To add to that, I wouldn't even think of doing these things:
- Using obsolete ammunition like APCBC on a modern tank as you'd only be able to use it against IFVs, APCs, lightly armoured vehicles and tanks straight from WW2 and the early cold war.
- Carrying smoke rounds for the main gun even though there's already the smoke dischargers, to which I wouldn't go more than 70mm.
- Releasing something that doesn't have the proper sensor equipment on the turret or sights.
And take note, there's only one single hatch there.
- Having flat sides on a turret.
- Having armour thickness well below 600.
@HarrisCraft
You'd easily know that the hull isn't original since it greatly contrasts that of the turret's details.
Do not, I repeat, do not request for personal/confidential details such as e-mail address and one's religion.
+1@PlanesofJundroo
+2Sending fighters and ships to a high-stakes hostage situation would be a definition of misuse of forces.
It can and most likely result into an escalation by the hostage takers due to excess pressure, causing them to execute the hostages.
.
Competent and well-equipped counter-terrorist teams have a higher chance of defusing the situation rather quickly, saving the lives of the hostages.. because not everything can be solved by explosives alone.
@0n33
What a coincidence to suddenly have repairs on the 95th.
+1That's one hell of a retcon.
And you do realize that Security Forces setup three perimeters solely for the President's protection, not to mention the insane amount of background checking.
Plus, they will actually shut down any building or work in the security perimeter's vicinity which may become a place for a threat to hide in.
Could you like, put some thought into the writing to make it solid and believable..?
+4.
Because this is barely believable by most standards.
Especially the part with the sniper.
.
First off, that man wouldn't even come close to within 600 meters of where the President is because he'd have several layers of security such as counter-sniper teams, SUVs with mounted machine guns, military guards and possibly layers of bulletproof glass of the highest level.
Counter-sniper teams would be constantly scanning the horizon for any possible threat with sensors such as IR cameras and the like.
If he does manage to get through, he's either got inside help, massacred his way into a rooftop without somehow getting detected or that you have one of the most incompetent guards to exist.
.
Second, in the case that he is apprehended on the rooftop, tried to resist and ended up getting shot on the shoulder, chances are that he'd actually die from it.
The shoulder contains the main artery of the arm and the nerve bundles which control the arm.
Plus, he probably won't even be caught up close, but rather caught up in a body bag because the police won't risk an encounter with such an individual and as such, engage them at a distance with a sniper team.
Not enough V2™.
+4That is not the only thing I propose.
I also propose the formation of a committee, headed by and composed of neutral nations for the purpose of recording warcrimes in times of war.
@GeneralOliverVonBismarck
I've seen you on discord with that FEV of yours, which is basically a biological weapon (an airborne strain of virus).. ultimately violating a ruling already.
@MrVaultech
This bman guy launched a carpet bombing campaign against a city, mainly targeting a large skyscraper as well as the refusal to pay any sort of reparation to Halcyon or the UN, so you may want to look into that.
@MrVaultech
I would suggest the limitation of all orbital weapons stations, such as lasers and kinetic rods because not only could they be possibly overpowered (wherein a nation could inflate it's capabilities out of proportions), they could also be used indiscriminately against civilian targets in the same way as some use nuclear weapons.
They are also quite expensive to operate, maintain and at times, impossible to get into orbit as I've seen someone claiming that they were on the works to have an OWS which drops 2000 ton tungsten carbide projectiles
I highly suggest you don't cook up another concoction of failure and losses and just rescind this decision as well as pull out all of your troops, because this time, we'll be involved and we won't tolerate such barbarism.
@Bman01
Alright.
I've been summoned from the depths of hell to counter your statement and it's possible fallacies.
«»
First of all, what kind of mind does your diplomat have that you were able to discern exactly what kind of drone they were operating from just a simple mention?
«»
Drones can be anything, ranging from air, land, sea and space drones made for a multitude of tasks.
How did you know that it was an attack drone or that it even existed without any form of concrete evidence such as an intact example (which may be impossible, as it also acts as a suicide drone after expending it's ammunition)?
«»
And lastly, how did you manufacture this without any form of blueprints or examples to reverse engineer?
congrats, you copied a non-existent aircraft
@OrangeBoardEnterprise
+1This isn't a discovery though, as it's been done before.
There are possible consequences for abusing this.
Not to be rude or anything, but do we really have to know?
+5Posting something like this makes you look like someone in desperate need of attention or just someone boastful overall.
So you pretty much moved into a pretty much an uninhabitable land?
The idea's great, but the execution, not so much.
The advantage of a bullpup firearm is it's compactness (being short), unless this is something like the L86 LSW, a DMR or a full on Sniper Rifle.
You could do a detailed weapon with a small number of parts, try to find that out on your own.
If I may, I would like to assist in the redefinition and revision of the RP's equivalent of the Geneva Convention @MrVaultech
What even is the purpose of this bomb?
@0n33
Think of it.
Since you dropped a 13 ton cluster bomb over the heads of possibly your enemies, they're most likely already dead.
If your forces were to capture a certain base which had the bomb dropped over it beforehand, there would most likely be an immense amount of casualties since you've covered the entire area with thousands, ten thousands or maybe even hundreds of thousands of bomblets.
@0n33
It's a thirteen ton cluster bomb
What would happen to the bomblets if they fail to detonate on impact?
Who's the one to clean it all up?