4,088 JSTQ Comments

  • MDA-JSTQ Non aggression treaty 3 months ago

    @overlord5453 It's too polite of you to issue a treaty in advance before starting a war, isn't it?

  • [FT missile]/[TFMR] LS-1 Air defense missile 3 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover ? I don't think my missile will drag a fuel pipe behind it when flying at Mach 6

  • [FT missile]/[TFMR] LS-1 Air defense missile 3 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover no. The main cockpit in the game will not be destroyed, it will continue to provide coordinates

  • [FT missile]/[TFMR] LS-1 Air defense missile 3 months ago

    @KPLBall I don't play with kids who only boast about their ability to modify engine thrust. Remember to use TheMouse's UFOs next time

  • [FT missile]/[TFMR] LS-1 Air defense missile 3 months ago

    @KPLBall When this missile strikes, your plane won't sound the alarm

  • [FT missile]/[TFMR] LS-1 Air defense missile 3 months ago

    @KPLBall If we're talking about speed, it means you don't understand the terrifying aspect of this missile

  • [FT missile]/[TFMR] LS-1 Air defense missile 3 months ago

    @KPLBall 7900kmh

  • MDA-JSTQ Non aggression treaty 3 months ago

    @KPLBall Sorry, this sentence usually appears on the Chinese Internet. The meaning is not to disappoint me

  • [FT missile]/[TFMR] LS-1 Air defense missile 3 months ago

    @KPLBall Little brat, this is my missile. May I ask where yours is?

  • MDA-JSTQ Non aggression treaty 3 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover I may have more things to do with KPL, can you please not intervene

  • MDA-JSTQ Non aggression treaty 3 months ago

    @KPLBall ok. I have high expectations and respect for you, please don't give me a big piece of shit

  • MDA-JSTQ Non aggression treaty 3 months ago

    @KPLBall If you wish to use it, then I may prefer to use something more than you

  • MDA-JSTQ Non aggression treaty 3 months ago

    @KPLBall Actually, we have already reached an agreement with TUPL and The Mouse on this treaty.

  • MDA-JSTQ Non aggression treaty 3 months ago

    This treaty shall come into effect when MDA publishes the same treaty

  • MDA-JSTQ Non aggression treaty 3 months ago

    MDA 3:
    @Christiant2
    @JaxHere
    @Randomplayer

  • MDA-JSTQ Non aggression treaty 3 months ago

    MDA 2:
    @windshifter1
    @Karroc9522
    @KPLBall

  • MDA-JSTQ Non aggression treaty 3 months ago

    MDA 1:
    @TheMouse
    @CrestelAeronautics
    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26

  • MDA-JSTQ Non aggression treaty 3 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover

  • [TFMR] Arms race, start! 3 months ago

    @TheMouse @TheUltimatePlaneLover If there's no problem, I'm ready to announce it, and you remember to announce it too

  • [Siroe's Funnies, S-WAR] B-52 3 months ago

    You look familiar, isn't this an AI bomber for escort missions in the game

    +1
  • GUYS. ONE. MORE. 3 months ago

    what's this

  • [S-War] Operation Astro-Inferno 3 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover But it's very difficult to create a good series of events, which is what I'm worried about
    He needs a good existing entry point, not something created out of thin air.

  • [S-War] Operation Astro-Inferno 3 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Then let the situation worsen and keep beating them until they follow the issues. Ignoring is a free choice, and freedom must bear the cost of choice.

    This is just enriching the gameplay, not changing the game objectives.

  • [S-War] Operation Astro-Inferno 3 months ago

    I suddenly had an idea, what would happen if we did a series of events?
    For example, starting a conflict and requiring us to implement a resolution, if our speed slows down or we fail to complete it smoothly, it will lead to further escalation of the conflict, make it more difficult to resolve, and ultimately result in terrible consequences

  • Nammo F3N Perforar 3 months ago

    Please change hideInside to true in the XML of the glass used as the cockpit, otherwise I won't see anything. Thank you

  • [S-War] Weapons Evaluation Program, Pt. 1 3 months ago

    Why is this still being evaluated... Are you going to equip your own troops?

  • Captured [S-War] 3 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Because at first I thought it was an FT missile, I didn't know who the original author was.

  • Captured [S-War] 3 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover By the way, I also have FRCM (S-25), which I obtained from S (Why do you think I still gave him the T-3 in the end?) Although that transaction left me very dissatisfied

  • [TFMR] Arms race, start! 3 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover I have no objections, I also have great respect for him.

    The theory of FT missile hypersonic has also been broken through

  • [TFMR] Arms race, start! 3 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover @TheMouse So will you sign this treaty or not?

  • Captured [S-War] 3 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Just for your words, I specially went back to see the M War

  • [FT missile]/[TFMR] LS-1 Air defense missile 4 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover I will try to break through the last layer of shackles (7900kmh)

  • [S-War] Operation All-out 4 months ago

    forget one Spectator
    @AManWillDieButNotHisIdeas

  • Big Problem [Resolved] 4 months ago

    To be honest, the only reasonable condition for such activities to occur is for the administrator to be indifferent

  • Big Problem [Resolved] 4 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover He may not have much presence in reality, but he can search for presence online. You are equivalent to satisfying him.

  • Big Problem [Resolved] 4 months ago

    @TheMouse A matter that can be resolved by simply reporting and blacklisting

  • Big Problem [Resolved] 4 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover … This kind of person is just an internet clown. In reality, things don't go smoothly, but in the internet, they strike hard. Just ignore him and tell the administrator that they can handle it.

    As soon as you promote it, everyone knows, including those who support these statements. You know, on the Internet, traffic promotion is a very rare thing, and you helped him.

  • F-33R Railgun Falchion 4 months ago

    @KPLBall But he needs to aim before he can use it. And the issue I pointed out is related to operability

    +1
  • [S-WAR] We're joining in. 4 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover …
    First of all, let's talk about your concern: this change will lead to a significant reduction in lethality.
    Both the thermobaric bomb and the FAE belong to the category of sub nuclear weapons, with the difference being that the thermobaric bomb is more advanced than the FAE. Based on this, at the cost of a partial kill radius, it greatly enhances the ability to attack.
    As a sub nuclear weapon, although known as second only to nuclear bombs, its actual lethality is like: a nuclear bomb is worth 100 points, and a sub nuclear weapon is worth 20 points.
    It should be noted that due to their high explosive content, even individual rocket launchers can be equipped with them. But because it is a high explosive bomb, it is not suitable for anti tank operations.

  • [S-WAR] We're joining in. 4 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover wdym
    Wait a minute, don't you know what a thermobaric bomb is?

  • [FT missile]/[TFMR] LS-1 Air defense missile 4 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover bro dont forgot it

  • F-33R Railgun Falchion 4 months ago

    Um... inheriting the problem of F-33A rolling too sensitively, if I were to fly this plane on the computer, I would go crazy. By the way, the electromagnetic gun can consider adding a proximity fuse

  • [S-WAR] We're joining in. 4 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Speaking of which, seeing nuclear bombs is like PTSD, striving to promote a ban on nuclear weapons. To be honest, I prefer this type because I personally promote precision guided weapons. But your own FAE (all weapons of mass destruction) have almost the same effectiveness as a nuclear bomb. Okay, let me make a suggestion. I don't want small nuclear weapons anymore. I'll switch to thermobaric bombs instead.

  • [S-WAR] We're joining in. 4 months ago

    To be honest, the Antetus Alliance is very pleased and has added another audience here. We are more than happy to invite you to watch this great show together. However, the audience should have their own criteria

    Providing assistance to both parties is acceptable, do not provide too much assistance to the advantageous party. If you ruin this great show, I will hold you accountable.

  • [S-WAR] We're joining in. 4 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover What are you saying to me? It wasn't me who did it.

  • [S-WAR] We're joining in. 4 months ago

    I always feel like something is missing. Surely, the Great TUPL Summoning Technique!
    @TheUltimatePlaneLover

  • Remodel the Plane Challenge! 4 months ago

    A tailless delta wing, duckless wing, single vertical tail, single engine, belly inlet... according to these requirements, manufacture an aircraft, right?

    +1
  • KCC Dolphin Dart 4 months ago

    KCC Flying Shark

    +1
  • [S-War] Operation Astro-Inferno 4 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover hum… I am not from the MDA camp, so as I have observed that he does not pose a particularly great danger to MDA, I hope he can become a sharpening stone and indulge himself. I didn't expect his surrender.

  • [S-War] Operation Astro-Inferno 4 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Am I Anti-MDA-supporter? I show you all the FT missiles first. Am I Anti-MDA-supporter? Am I experiencing schizophrenia?