29.6k LegnaK Comments

  • PF-31 Barracuda 5.4 years ago

    @Ruffes123 Thank you!

  • IA-2 Farukon 5.5 years ago

    @CRJ900Pilot @Aeromen Thank you!

  • WLR-9 Mamut 5.5 years ago

    @Roswell Thank you!

  • WLR-9 Mamut 5.5 years ago

    @CRJ900Pilot thank you

  • CA-343I la Choise 5.5 years ago

    @CptJacobson it looks really good!

  • Thunder Dome Challenge: 200 Part Prop League 5.6 years ago

    This was an incredibly fun challenge, I can't wait for the next one.

  • Rocket Plane Contest 2019 5.6 years ago

    I'm down for this challenge!

  • Hildisvíni MK.VII Strategic bomber 5.6 years ago

    @ThomasRoderick it's a more original aircraft, however, I did get inspired by the V bombers and I did borrow queues from the Victors cockpit.

  • Arado Ar 234 5.6 years ago

    Looks good!

  • Rough Terrain crane 65-40m 5.7 years ago

    @Minecraftpoweer No problem, this is a very nice and well built vehicle!

  • HiC-840 Suzume no°3 5.7 years ago

    @Texasfam04 Thanks, I just now seen this message, that was actually what I got the inspiration off of.

  • Arsenal Bird 5.8 years ago

    Magnificent! This is easily one of my favorite builds on SP now!

  • Rüstung IV Ausf. W-2 5.8 years ago

    @BMilan Originally it was set at 500,000 and I forgot the original number :L

  • DFI Rustung Ausführung IV 5.8 years ago

    @LOWEWAYY Absolutely :)

  • DFI Rustung Ausführung IV 5.8 years ago

    @LOWEWAYY oh there's no problem, there's still a TON of differences

  • DFI Rustung Ausführung IV 5.8 years ago

    Looks good! looks a bit like a planned variation I called the Hornisse

  • Rüstung IV Ausf. W 5.8 years ago

    @LOWEWAYY sure! just don't forget to credit me :)

  • WS-290 Weltkugelbomber 5.8 years ago

    @DJS8Corporations for some reason it doesn't notify me when I get messages anymore, I do buildings of aircraft.

  • WS-290 Weltkugelbomber 5.8 years ago

    @DJS8Corporations I do, although not super commonly, I'm trying to work it more into my schedule, actually I may decide to stream simpleplanes in a bit.

  • WS-290 Weltkugelbomber 5.8 years ago

    @Vidal99977 @DJS8Corporations Thank you :)

  • Peace Walker XB-75 5.8 years ago

    @Shootingstar07 yeah that was the half point docker and what really confused me, in the screenshot it was really good, but in PC flight it was super reflective,

  • Spitfire F Mk IX 5.8 years ago

    Absolutely fantastic work!

  • HiC-840 Suzume no°3 5.9 years ago

    @PlayingSimple yeah I have no idea why multiplayer was crashing, that was super odd..

  • Blackburn Basilisk B.1 Strategic Bomber Challenge 5.9 years ago

    @GhostHTX had to update it abit, I missed something.

  • VX-4 Shadow 5.9 years ago

    @Texasfam04 hey any time! I can't wait until I make a new challenge, everyone brought something interesting to the table. and on the extensions, there will never be an issue if anyone needs one, I understand life happens.

  • FSB-22 Wraith 5.9 years ago

    .

    Handling, stability, agility: 9/10 - This aircraft acts much more like a fighter aircraft than a bomber, however given that it's more set as a 5th gen bomber I'm not going to dock as many points off for the roll capability.
    
    Realistic model and behavior: 5/10 - I really hate to dock points here because this is such a nice build, but the fact that fuel tanks were modded for extra fuel really nips some points away. the aircraft otherwise does a fantastic job with its reliability. 
    
    Details, paint and other: 8/10 - A very nice, subtle two tone grey, leading to a darker nose is very nice, however it does lack any paneling and markings which kinda leaves a little more to be desired. 
    
    Build quality: 10/10 - Practically flawless in design; the FSB-22 Wraith definetly excels at both form and function.
    
    Personal impression: 10/10 - I absolutely love everything about the look of this aircraft, the sleek 5th gen style, paired with the very well done moving parts, this aircraft is near perfect.
    
    Description: 0/10 - the lack of any description really docks this plane a lot...
    

    final score: 42/60

  • B-151 Fresco V.1 5.9 years ago

    .

    Handling, stability, agility: 8/10 - It flies very nicely, however it acts more of a heavy fighter/attacker than it does a bomber, which unfortunately docks some points.
    
    Realistic model and behavior: 10/10 The stability, and reaction time of this aircraft is really well done! 
    
    Details, paint and other: 5/10 - as much as I like this aircraft, the lack of details and other things does make me a little sad that it was so barren.
    
    Build quality: 10.5/10 - Very well done with the sleekness of the aircraft, paired with it's efficency, I am also adding a .5 to the score for the gun movement!
    
    Personal impression: 10/10 - honestly, I was a little hesitant on flying this aircraft in the beginning, however it far exceeded my expectations with everything it can do! I look forward to seeing more aircraft from you.
    
    Description: 7/10 - a nice short history, however I feel a little more would have sufficed.
    

    final score: 50.5/60

  • Lightning Aircraft Industries - Delta 19D2 5.9 years ago

    Handling, stability, agility: 9/10 - Handles very nicely, however there is a slight problem that the aircraft seems a little too nose heavy. It's mobility is nice and low, fitting for a bomber role.
    
    Realistic model and behavior: 8/10 - the wings do flail slightly, aside from that, the aircraft behaves nicely. 
    
    Details, paint and other: 8/10 - love the design of the roundels, however the stripey grey and green are something that I had to adjust to a bit.
    
    Build quality: 9/10 - Functions well and looks great! It's very nicely done, however its just that wing flail that hurts her.
    
    Personal impression: 10/10 - From the moment I seen this aircraft I knew I was going to have some fun with it, and it did not disappoint.
    
    Description: 10/10 - good description, nicely laid out.
    

    final score: 54/60

  • The Impossible Maze 5.9 years ago

    @FlipposMC This is really difficult lol, had to modify the car I wanted to use a few times, and still can't get it.

  • The Impossible Maze 5.9 years ago

    @FlipposMC absolutely will do! https://www.twitch.tv/legna_k I might be starting in about an hour and a half tops

  • The Impossible Maze 5.9 years ago

    mind if I do a live stream trying to complete this?

  • AC500 "Patriot" Bomber 5.9 years ago

    Handling, stability, agility: 3/10 - this plane is incredibly tough to keep level outside of autopilot. The AC500 Patriot rolls FAR too well for its own good.
    
    Realistic model and behavior: 2/10 - Very unresponsive upon take-off, the aircraft has issues with any kind of pitch and roll.
    
    Details, paint and other: 2/10 - it's very monochromatic and difficult to even see the cockpit.
    
    Build quality: 4/10 - overall I feel the aircraft had potential, however, it needs more effort put into it.
    
    Personal impression: 3/10 - this plane was just far too unstable for me to enjoy it... sorry.
    
    Description: 5/10 - Not really much to go on here.
    

    Final Score: 19/60

  • Marshall-Lewis B-95 Phoenix Bomber Submission 5.9 years ago

    Handling, stability, agility: 4/10 - the Marshall-Lewis B-95 Phoenix Bomber has a really high pitch rate, the speed also exceeds the maximum speed for the challenge which severly knocks the score rating down a bit.
    
    Realistic model and behavior: 4/10 - As mentioned before the pitch and speed are incredibly high, paired with the issue of a natural tendancy to pitch downwards makes this plane rather unsuitable for flight.
    
    Details, paint and other: 6/10 - while I do very much enjoy the XB-70 esque white and black, paired with some roundels, I feel more could have been done, and the  orange of the inlets seem to be an oversight.
    
    Build quality: 6/10 - It has potential, however the aircraft often explodes without warning, deploying the missiles also causes the aircraft to explode. outside the fact the aircraft is a big Micheal Bay fan, I feel this planes physical appearance makes up a little for these issues.
    
    Personal impression: 5/10 - the Marshall-Lewis B-95 Phoenix seems to be fun to fly aside from the aformentioned issues. however, those issues REALLY hider my enjoyment of the aircraft.
    
    Description: 10/10 - Very nicely fleshed out in terms of the history and other data!
    

    Final Score: 35/60

  • Sodsworth XV-800 5.9 years ago

    Handling, stability, agility: 9.5/10 - my absolute only problem with the Sodsworth XV-800 is that it rolls a heap, although it's not enough to take a full point away. 
    
    Realistic model and behavior: 10/10 - the Sodsworth XV-800 flies very nice and its docile behavior makes it very admirable.
    
    Details, paint and other: 10/10 - very nicely built, well fleshed, and great detailing. I love it.
    
    Build quality: 10/10 - no flaws seen here, the aircraft is well designed and functions amazingly.
    
    Personal impression: 10/10 - the Sodsworth XV-800 immediately caught my attention with it's detail and design, and kept me here with its performance.
    
    Description: 8/10 - there's a valid history to the aircraft, although I feel a little more could have been put into it.
    

    Final Score: 57.5/60

  • BLACK OWL STRATEGIC BOMBER 5.9 years ago

    Handling, stability, agility: 5/10 - Rolls far too quickly and the afterburner speed well exceeds the speed limit for the challenge, which really docks a number off the aircraft.

    Realistic model and behavior: 7/10 - Aside from the rolling issue, the Black owl actually handles nicely, especially with the rarely seen vector nozzles.

    Details, paint and other: 3/10 - There's not much in the market in terms of design, it's solid black with no distinctive markings.

    Build quality: 5/10 - Overall, the aircraft is a solid design, however, it is visibly clunky with a lot of items protruding from the aircraft, I think with a bit more work this thing could easily be a solid 8 at the least.

    Personal impression: 9/10 - I was very pleased with this aircraft in terms of ingenuity with its multi-role ability and VTOL capabilities!

    Description: 4/10 - there isn't much to go off of with the data, however there is still enough there to give some story to the aircraft.

    final score: 33/60

  • ABX-10 Flying Body Strategic Bomber 5.9 years ago

    Handling, stability, agility: 9/10 - I feel it rolls just a little too well? although not too much to dock a full point, however the other half comes from the issue that trim causes a roll.

    Realistic model and behavior: 9.5/10 - outside of the trim/roll issue? this aircraft flies very docile and is a overall grand aircraft to fly.

    Details, paint and other: 10/10 - The decals, markings, lights, and paneling all blend very nicely with the aircraft with nothing too distracting. fantastic work!

    Build quality: 10/10 - I normally say function over form, the ABX-10 nails both aspects near perfectly.

    Personal impression: 10/10 - everything about this aircraft is amazing, I don't know what else to say about it aside it's a masterpiece in my eyes.

    Description: 10/10 - very nicely detailed and fleshed out, feels like something that actually could happen.

    final score: 58.5/60

  • F-11D Scorpion (El Salvorco Del Mauno SF 108th outfit) 5.9 years ago

    @Shootingstar07 what do you mean by that?
    Edit: oh, no these are backstock aircraft I've had for a bit, I'm still judging, work has had me in a little more this week, but I promise everything will be done by Wednesday!

  • F/A-41N Voyager 5.9 years ago

    @SelectAKey Huh, I thought I had gotten rid of all of them, whoops :(

  • F/A-41N Voyager 5.9 years ago

    @CoolPeach yeah the engine area is just absolutely insane to do, I kinda just half-wit did it because i was getting frustrated with them myself lol.

  • F/A-41N Voyager 5.9 years ago

    @Shootingstar07 that actually looks pretty good ngl

  • F/A-41N Voyager 5.9 years ago

    @Shootingstar07 it was significantly more difficult that I anticipated.

  • L' otarie Mk.I (Nordenvok Royal Navy Camoflauge) 5.9 years ago

    @donald347 the air brakes are meant for the torpedo bombing only, and for the flaps, it's odd because it works for me just fine, but when I download it does do what you say... incredibly odd...

  • Fictional Strategic Bomber Challenge! -Challenged closed!- 5.9 years ago

    @Shootingstar07 don't worry, I got a notification about it anyways :)
    @Texasfam04 no problem, if you need another week extension I can judge yours a whenever you're done :)

  • Mark 39 Nuclear Bomb 5.9 years ago

    @Texasfam04 I would love to test this out in the Deltarrow once I get home :D

  • OA1 Sandgoblin 5.9 years ago

    Also, holy cow, I can't believe this thing is featured! O.O
    Thank you everyone!!!

  • OA1 Sandgoblin 5.9 years ago

    @Texasfam04 Thank you!

  • Rainier Enclosed Weapon Pods™ 5.9 years ago

    @JohnnyBoythePilot alrighty, well that's no problem, I was going to have to extend it to the first anyways as my job has been picking up and I've been only able to thoroughly judge like one bomber :/