8,104 LofiTurtle Comments

  • Wow 8.4 years ago

    Yep, the "planes" part is up for interpretation

  • High definition photoshoot 8.4 years ago

    Nice, I like the overcast weather in the second one

  • let's to be photographers chalenge 8.4 years ago

    Also, another question. Are we allowed to edit the photos, or is that not allowed?

  • let's to be photographers chalenge 8.4 years ago

    Is there a limit of one plane in each ss?

  • Am I becoming less relevant? 8.4 years ago

    @CODENAMEBOB I recognised you as CL4TRP, but just from forum comments and such

  • Improve Building 8.4 years ago

    1 sorta does that already, 2 I wouldn't have a use for really, I just place things on the end of fuselages and extend the fuselage to move parts into place, 3 would be nice, it's annoying to have to cover wings in fuselage blocks, 4 YES YEEESSSSESDSRHDSSS YES YES YESSSS!!!!1!!!! And 5, I kind of like that the dummy isn't on the parts list anymore because there were a number of cheap "kill the dummy" type creations

  • Progress Update! 8.4 years ago

    Pshh 540 parts? That's no problem iPhone quietly sobbing. It looks great!

  • Honey Badger Upgraded 8.4 years ago

    @zed thanks!

  • lets talk about blimps 8.4 years ago

    @Sunnyskies yeah that would be cool. When I saw this it prompted me to play around with negative mass and the craft that weighed less than 2 pounds should have been floating upward if it modeled density correctly. Stuff like that would definitely be what I would want if physics updates come at any point

  • lets talk about blimps 8.4 years ago

    @Sunnyskies that would require a lot of changes. For example, right now most parts have different densities in water compared to air. Cockpits for example are very buoyant, but weigh nearly 200 pounds. They are about the size of a long sloped block, or two normal blocks. Both of these would be much much lighter than 200 pounds but unless you use floating blocks they sink like a rock

  • How Many of You Know Me? 8.4 years ago

    I've seen your username before but i don't really know you

  • I was super bored and made something AWESOME! (Video) 8.4 years ago

    Cool. I like that you detached the guidance hardware before impact

  • How do you post pics 8.4 years ago

    @Booster456 you put what he said in the forum post. Not Google. Lol

  • My 3D print has finally arrived! Pictures, info and extras! So small, so cool! X-93 silver battle axe. 8.4 years ago

    That us insignia looks really well detailed. I'm contemplating getting a larger one and am not sure whether to leave the landing gear on it or not... Also I need to wait until it becomes available on mobile quietly dies inside

  • Mod request 8.4 years ago

    @Legitpotato yeah. There's some legit planes on the XML tag but the majority are helpful stuff like that

  • Back to the Stone Age? 8.4 years ago

    Yeah, happens sometimes. It just doesn't load any of the design aspectsfor some reason

  • Mod request 8.4 years ago

    @XxcreedexX you won't be able to make a fuselage that goes up to 25 in the editor (unless you use the fine-tuner mod) but you can use scaled fuselages to create bigger sections. I typically do that with scaled down fuselage blocks to get finer detail but it works with bigger fuselage blocks as well

  • Mod request 8.4 years ago

    @Legitpotato if you click tags in the planes section and search highest rated of all time in the XML tag you'll find loads of useful things

  • Mod request 8.4 years ago

    What size do you need? Bc there's kits of like all the parts at x2 scale, x0.33 scale etc

  • Chevelle with bed 8.4 years ago

    This is really cool! Two things though, I think it would definitely benefit from suspension, and if you have a cockpit with a working steering wheel and stuff put a camera or something so we can use it :)

  • M-100 Badger 8.4 years ago

    Cool little walker. It's usually best to put instructions in the description though

  • Combination lock! 8.4 years ago

    Cool concept, but it's kind of easy to solve. Maybe (if you can) try and rotate the second and third wheel a bit? Bc right now you only need to move the first one to solve it

  • Big baby 8.4 years ago

    Pretty cool, however I would recommend using the circular corner style for the fuselage blocks to give it a more sleek look. Also having slightly bigger ailerons (roll control surfaces) would help the performance, because the roll is a bit slow

  • This Community is... 8.4 years ago

    Yeah, the people here are great. But you missed a perfect opportunity to call the community saucy lmao

  • Lockheed L10E Electra: Which one first? 8.4 years ago

    Normal would probably be better lol

  • POSITIVE criticism for Zed! 8.4 years ago

    @TTHHSSSS yeah, even if it was just how he made it but with the right angle fire a cockpit view

  • POSITIVE criticism for Zed! 8.4 years ago

    It might not fit with his style, because it seems he's trying to make everything simple and super mobile friendly so it could have too many parts because of that

  • V-1 Flying Bomb 8.4 years ago

    Thanks, but why ... ?

  • Teaser!!!!!!!!!! 8.4 years ago

    Looks pretty good

  • Hey guys!!! 8.4 years ago

    Ccooper is back, his new name is zed. Not sure if you were there for that or not

  • R-28 Raven tease 8.4 years ago

    It's same as links just add an ! Before the [

  • Interior or no 8.4 years ago

    Yeah do it. But if you do, you'll need three versions. The full PC one, one identical to the PC but with a detached cockpit (so high end mobile devices can run the full thing) and one mobile friendly version with a lowered part count

  • How to make this more Rally-esque? 8.4 years ago

    @MasterMindIndustriesAndAviationCorporation Yeah that kind of thing

  • B-17F "Memphis Belle" (Boeing) 8.4 years ago

    @Johndfg could you also upload one with all the parts, just a detached cockpit for people with high power devices?

  • How to make this more Rally-esque? 8.4 years ago

    @MasterMindIndustriesAndAviationCorporation No. I mean a wide-body body modification. It just means the panels around the tires are usually extended here is an example of a normal car and here is the same car with a wide-body kit (it's not a rally kit but you get the gist)

  • B-17F "Memphis Belle" (Boeing) 8.4 years ago

    Amazing Just getting the pictures! One question though, are you just going to make a lower part count for the mobile version, or use that detached cockpit loophole to let us download it? Bc with replay disabled and low physics settings I should be able to run this without much issue on my phone

  • How to make this more Rally-esque? 8.4 years ago

    Yeah you need to wide body it

  • Polikarpov I-16 8.4 years ago

    It has nice flight characteristics

  • FAQ for 17.5K! 8.4 years ago

    @Viper28 haha I can understand that

  • FAQ for 17.5K! 8.4 years ago

    I think you mean AMA (ask me anything) FAQ is frequently asked questions

  • Little Bugger 8.4 years ago

    Just FYI, uploading a copy of a plane without any notable changes is against the rules. here is a link to the rules page

  • A guide on how to be nice 8.4 years ago

    @TehDuck I just want you to know that if I was in squirrel's place, I would've just banned you already. Be glad he gave you so many chances to present an argument without taking things further

  • ALRIGHT EVERYONE, JUST STOP WITH THIS DRAMA, IT'S UNNECESSARY!!! 8.4 years ago

    The title made me think I was gonna read some bs. This is actually well explained and prices the point fairly well. Also, what's this auto-mod thing people are talking about?

  • Thought of a neat idea. 8.4 years ago

    @AstleyIndustries that only works if you use a single fuselage block. If you use multiple you will just be looking at the next one in front

    +1
  • Thought of a neat idea. 8.4 years ago

    Hmm, that's interesting. It would also mean glass cockpits (negative length fuselage blocks) would also support a cockpit view

  • How do I destroy the rocket launchers on the snowstone 8.4 years ago

    Easiest way is to fire the inferno missiles (the air to ground ones) last minute. Don't fire them too early or the anti missile lasers will destroy them

  • How do I destroy the rocket launchers on the snow i 8.4 years ago

    Easiest way is to fire inferno missiles (the air to ground ones) at them last minute. Make sure not to fire them too early or they will be destroyed by the anti missile lasers that are also on the base

  • Intrepid Class LHD Standard Version 8.4 years ago

    @Snapdragon yeah. I could probably run this with replay off but the mobile version is broken and it doesn't let me download this