@SkyJayTheFirst What you are referring to is high angle of attack.
In my experience, it can be achieved by making liftScale on wings =~1 and making the leading edge extensions generate lift with hidden wings.
Smaller control surfaces should help, but it will make your plane less maneuverable. Or you can try giving stabilized control surfaces a try if you don't want to sacrifice maneuverability. (Roll)+(RollRate/100*((-abs(Roll)+1)/1)) (Pitch)-(PitchRate/100*((-abs(Pitch)+1)/1)) (Yaw)-(YawRate/50*((-abs(Yaw)+1)/1))
@BestBuilderEverNOCAP I will admit to being a bit of an F-111 fan. Maybe EF-111
@Ihavesnowball The values for the pitch FT and energy retention FT were slightly changed.
@rexzion I put a torque cancelling system for the rotary engine since it became uncontrollable when rotating at full speed
.
I had issues with it before but that might've completely removed it actually
Although I guess its easier to take off now :v
@MrShenanigansSP Thanks, I did use Baconeggs' blueprints :v
@UmbrellaCorporation The engines have the correct amount of thrust. These are TF30's, the F-14A was called the worst engine to airframe mismatch for a reason. Although, if taking off is hard, you're probably pulling up too early
@Bryan5 @Dragoranos @GAMINGOTAKU66
+1@Khanhlam average DEC fan vs chad RAD enjoyer
+1@IzzyIA I shouldn't even be surprised lol
+1Obligatory I hate this thing in War Thunder comment
+1I've tried it and I don't like it. I can see how it would be an acquired taste.
+1@SkyJayTheFirst What you are referring to is high angle of attack.
+1In my experience, it can be achieved by making liftScale on wings =~1 and making the leading edge extensions generate lift with hidden wings.
@OUGHTO ayyye
+1sv_cheats 1
+1@DeveloperKorzalerke must've forgot, thanks for letting me know
+1We're in your walls.
+1@Bryan5
+1@TheCommentaryGuy @NARGII @donkski
+1@CaptainSquadronLeaderX @Spitfirelad05 @TRD
+1@DeveloperKorzalerke @OkaNieba @KangBaksoSoeharto
+1@Ren My powers have doubled since the last time we met, Count.
+1@DeveloperKorzalerke from college
+1@ZeroWithSlashedO Initial variants were known as the HueyCobra. I'm guessing it's because they share the same engine, transmission, and rotor system
+1@WolfHunter9111 yep!
+1@OkaNieba not atm
@SirRhyvs comedy 100
+1@BeastHunter @NARGII @SirRhyvs
+1Smaller control surfaces should help, but it will make your plane less maneuverable. Or you can try giving stabilized control surfaces a try if you don't want to sacrifice maneuverability.
+1(Roll)+(RollRate/100*((-abs(Roll)+1)/1))(Pitch)-(PitchRate/100*((-abs(Pitch)+1)/1))(Yaw)-(YawRate/50*((-abs(Yaw)+1)/1))@ColonelCanada @WinsWings oo ee oo aa aa
+1@WolfHunter9111 Without markings they're technically the same :v
+1"Abandoned at an air force museum outside of Moscow is a relic of a machine that looks like it came from outer space. Designed 50 years ago by an eccentric visionary, it was to be the most versatile flying machine ever built. An aircraft that can take off vertically, hover in mid air, land on any surface, cruise at high altitudes, and harness the ground effect. But the story of this remarkable machine and its inventor are still shrouded in mystery."
+1@BestBuilderEverNOCAP I will admit to being a bit of an F-111 fan. Maybe EF-111
+1@Ihavesnowball The values for the pitch FT and energy retention FT were slightly changed.
@BeastHunter not quite
+1:D
+1FOR THE EMPEROR!
+1@TheCommentaryGuy @BeastHunter @donkski
+1This should be closed now, shouldn't it?
+1IAS/343 will give you mach at sea level.
+1There probably is a way to make it account for altitude but I haven't tried that
@asteroidbook345 Find out next time on...
+1@HighMike @TheFlyingHusky @BeastHunter
+1big rip
+1Welcome to the club
+1@HuskyDynamics01 you did the thing
+1@TheWeebREBORN jeremy clarkson brain activated
+1@Nerfaddict Your sacrifice will not be in vain
+1@rexzion I put a torque cancelling system for the rotary engine since it became uncontrollable when rotating at full speed
+1.
I had issues with it before but that might've completely removed it actually
Although I guess its easier to take off now :v
@redcrafter sad sopwith triplane noises
+1@GAMINGOTAKU66 Mach 9.9 and more. :)
+1@G2
+1Sure
+1@GAMINGOTAKU66 yep
+1@BaconEggs Sure, go ahead
+1tag me tho
Other car companies naming offroaders:
+1Wrangler
Defender
Bronco
Hilux
Mercedes:
w a g o n
@Reworkable Thanks to you :v
+1@NEOCORP Because when you pull full aft stick in a fighter jet, they tend to not like it very much, especially this one.
+1@Mage2IsTriggered Silverstone '22 was an absolute banger
+1So proud of Mick and Sainz
@MrShenanigansSP Thanks, I did use Baconeggs' blueprints :v
+1@UmbrellaCorporation The engines have the correct amount of thrust. These are TF30's, the F-14A was called the worst engine to airframe mismatch for a reason. Although, if taking off is hard, you're probably pulling up too early