Winning this challenge is not based only on how well made your submission is. In fact, I will primarily look at the difference between the remaster and the original build. In other words; a god-tier submission based on a already god-tier original post, will not be graded as high as good submission which remastered a mediocre creation.
So what you're saying is, if someone makes a god tier remaster of the German Corsair, they'll automagically win? :o
/s
It would be nice if there was a feature where it wouldn't render in first person. It works here, but on some aircraft, there's no space to hide the dummy. (i.e. ultralights)
@Kangy I don't have the sabre in DCS so WT is the only thing I have to go off of. (And I still don't have an F-sabre in that.)
So I'm not exactly sure what I'm doing with Korean War jet FM's
Sort of like real-time telemetry? That'd be pretty awesome.
It shouldn't be that hard to implement either. It's very similar to the already existing debugExpression command.
Technically, you probably could.
Using FT, you could have the gun fire when a target is in a certain targetDistance, targetHeading, and targetElevation.
Not sure what that code would look like exactly though.
@Kangy For some reason i got a bad feeling about this...
Should've realized Gaijin would monopolize off the most anticipated aircraft in the game ever. Fair play I guess. Ground RB will be crazy when the update drops.
Try making the main wings semi-symmetric, that fixed it for me.
Also, add some trim to the elevators, the A-10 has a CoT pretty high above the CoM, so it likes to pitch downwards at lower speeds. Mine had the same issue.
And make sure your CoM is in front of your rear landing gear.
@JamezTV well akshulee
This has a universal C-type wing because it has the extra slots for a 20mm hispano or 50 cal M2. Although afaik, the C-type wing was never fitted to anything before the Mk.V. Granted, it is indeed in a B-configuration with 2 20's and 4 7.7's.
A small innaccuracy, but still a beautiful spit, the blending of the wing into the fuselage is very well done.
Judging from the spaghetti...
You should try multiplying instead of subtracting. Pitch*.5*(f(IAS))+Trim*.07+Roll*.5
Where f(IAS) is some function of your airspeed. This should be more gradual and less spazzy if f(IAS) doesn't involve the Condition ? True : False. A clamped linear or exponential function should do.
Now I wanna redo my typhoon...
Also, you should try making the targeting pod functional, it's really satisfying to track your targets and see them get smacked by a GBU
@Spitfirelad05 One of life's greatest mysteries, sir.
+1This color scheme is so underrated. Nice mustang!
+1So what you're saying is, if someone makes a god tier remaster of the German Corsair, they'll automagically win? :o
+1/s
On June 17th, this guy ain't running.
+1@AlmostADev I guess?
+1@AlmostADev Yeah, idk what was happening.
+1Usually, it's from people using the tracks mod but I don't think you were
@DeveloperKorzalerke I was more surprised by Gaijin adding this to War Thunder right I was about to finish it
+1nice
+1It would be nice if there was a feature where it wouldn't render in first person. It works here, but on some aircraft, there's no space to hide the dummy. (i.e. ultralights)
+1@Kangy I don't have the sabre in DCS so WT is the only thing I have to go off of. (And I still don't have an F-sabre in that.)
+1So I'm not exactly sure what I'm doing with Korean War jet FM's
@comradeKaiser7
+1@Alvin8 @Fooddoesnttastegood @NewWorld
+1Sort of like real-time telemetry? That'd be pretty awesome.
+1It shouldn't be that hard to implement either. It's very similar to the already existing debugExpression command.
@BeastHunter How can we use AIRPLANES to solve world hunger? :o
+1How many upvotes does it have in this parallel universe?
+1So many new plats today
+1o7
+1Good memories.
@OsazPeople that is a common misconception
+1Be careful what you wish for
+1Pog plane
+1Technically, you probably could.
+1Using FT, you could have the gun fire when a target is in a certain targetDistance, targetHeading, and targetElevation.
Not sure what that code would look like exactly though.
Yes
+1Manually edit the connections so that each missile you want to fire is connected to the bottom of the same pylon
this is what V2 was for
+1@Korzalerke 👍 done
+1When it's perfectly mirrored
+1But there's assymetric drag
I concur
+1@Kangy For some reason i got a bad feeling about this...
+1Should've realized Gaijin would monopolize off the most anticipated aircraft in the game ever. Fair play I guess. Ground RB will be crazy when the update drops.
@Kangy What a weird coincidence :l
+1I bet they're doing the A-variant tho
Lookin good!
+1You should be proud of that part count
@ZeroWithSlashedO They're not the nicest mavericks, but they are part efficient
+1@SCPCalebkid
+1@CarrotSlicingCompanyCat
+1@Bobyo
@AirCrashInvestigationFLR
@Almost
+1@Bryan5
@donkski
@WolfHunter9111
+1d/d🗿(🗿^n)=n🗿^(n-1)
∫(🗿^n)d🗿=[(🗿^n+1)/(n+1)]+C
I'm a canon normie: F-15C or F-22A
+1@AeroAeroTheMen I think the XFA-27 is probably the best all rounder in the game
Those MSTM's are no joke
🗿
+1@XD69 Yep! The drag records are all P50's because ramming them into a wall with a race truck sends them flying!
+1@Phox I think the image is posterized so it only looks paneled
+1Snipin's a good job mate
+1@Korzalerke Ah, thanks, didn't know about that.
+1Try making the main wings semi-symmetric, that fixed it for me.
+1Also, add some trim to the elevators, the A-10 has a CoT pretty high above the CoM, so it likes to pitch downwards at lower speeds. Mine had the same issue.
And make sure your CoM is in front of your rear landing gear.
its 22/02/2022 twosday my dudes
+1Tuscany?
+1@rexzion ngl, if I had the choice to fly one or the other
+1I'd take the frogfoot
I think sometimes we forget how revolutionary the Wii was. Amazing console, it was.
+1@JamezTV well akshulee
+1This has a universal C-type wing because it has the extra slots for a 20mm hispano or 50 cal M2. Although afaik, the C-type wing was never fitted to anything before the Mk.V. Granted, it is indeed in a B-configuration with 2 20's and 4 7.7's.
A small innaccuracy, but still a beautiful spit, the blending of the wing into the fuselage is very well done.
I Can't Believe it's not Margarine
+1(butter)
A simple addition that adds a lot
+1nice
Judging from the spaghetti...
+1You should try multiplying instead of subtracting.
Pitch*.5*(f(IAS))+Trim*.07+Roll*.5Where f(IAS) is some function of your airspeed. This should be more gradual and less spazzy if f(IAS) doesn't involve the
Condition ? True : False. A clamped linear or exponential function should do.Now I wanna redo my typhoon...
+1Also, you should try making the targeting pod functional, it's really satisfying to track your targets and see them get smacked by a GBU