15.1k Rodrigo110 Comments

  • How can i get to USS Tiny 2? 7.0 years ago

    He said ‘a plane I can use’, and my new plane is designed for carrier landings, so it’s not self advertisement because he did ask for it @DarthAbhinav

  • A10X Cayman 7.0 years ago

    Thanks, I did put a lot of effort into making an experimental and also functional design @JettStorm

  • Hellkeska 7.0 years ago

    Oh ok, then... why did you upvote it as well? @KiwiPlanes

  • Hellkeska 7.0 years ago

    This is the stock plane that comes with the plane @KiwiPlanes @TheLatentImage you might want to delete this

  • My next video on Youtube SimplePlanes #3 Good builds, do you want to see? 7.0 years ago

    I’d like to see my new aircraft in your next video if you would like?

  • How can i get to USS Tiny 2? 7.0 years ago

    This aircraft is capable of landing on carriers and is equipped with a very good braking system. You should be able land relatively easily on the USS Tiny 2 with it

    +1
  • A10X Cayman 7.0 years ago

    Thanks! @Treadmill103

  • Ground Attack Jet 7.0 years ago

    The detailing is very nice, good job.

  • Lotus f1 upgraded 7.0 years ago

    Beautiful!

  • I think I figured out how to get mods on ios! 7.0 years ago

    There are no developer settings on iOS unfortunately

  • Aeronaut GAM-501 7.0 years ago

    Thanks for featuring this on your video @FranticMatty

  • Ocean Floor Explorer 7.0 years ago

    Spiritus Raptor actually means ‘Spirit Rapist’ In Latin @DarthAbhinav

  • F-14 TOMCAT 7.0 years ago

    Nice job!

  • Aeronaut GAM-501 7.0 years ago

    Thanks guys @Ephwurd @Treadmill103

  • Aeronaut GAM-501 7.0 years ago

    Also, thanks for the spotlight! @Blue0Bull

  • Aeronaut GAM-501 7.0 years ago

    Fair enough and thanks! The A-164 has superior manoeuvrability, but the GAM-501 is faster and is heavily armoured; she’s able to soak up a lot of damage! The A-164 and GAM-501 are both very different attack aircraft, but they are both very effective! @Blue0Bull

  • Aeronaut GAM-501 7.0 years ago

    Thanks! @TexJohnston

  • 0 drag powered glider 7.0 years ago

    Then it’s an aircraft and not a glider @Stellarlabs

  • 0 drag powered glider 7.0 years ago

    Well, if by rocket you mean jet engine then yes it is an aircraft, if by rocket you mean the weapon; then it is still a glider @Stellarlabs

  • 0 drag powered glider 7.0 years ago

    There is no such thing as ‘a powered glider’, it’s called an aircraft.

  • Iphone 7 plus 7.0 years ago

    Last time I checked the iPhone 7 Plus didn’t have the power button on the top

  • Heavy Tank T57 7.0 years ago

    And yet you are on the SimplePlanes website replying to every single comment I put @GermanWarMachine

  • Heavy Tank T57 7.0 years ago

    Oh, I’m sorry I didn’t foresee that a random person in a location and time zone and unknown to me was sleeping and didn’t have the sense to turn down their notifications @GermanWarMachine

  • Heavy Tank T57 7.0 years ago

    Good, because it’s quite literally the polar opposite of funny @GermanWarMachine

  • Heavy Tank T57 7.0 years ago

    You’ve done this on so many posts I’ve seen; and it’s not remotely funny, so stop. @GermanWarMachine

  • DMRI “Phalanx” Mk IX 7.0 years ago

    Thanks! @M4A4Firefly

  • Gyros on VTOLs/Quads? 7.0 years ago

    But making a helicopter that flies well is not hard, the real skill comes in making it functional in its role and in the details and aesthetics

  • Piston Powered Cargo Plane 7.0 years ago

    Nice, but I think it’s very illogical to not have a gyroscope on a VTOL, why would you not want to have it?

  • Open for public testing! 7.0 years ago

    Better than nothing @alexchub1

  • Open for public testing! 7.0 years ago

    -

  • Open for some ideas! 7.0 years ago

    Boeing 2707

  • Modern JetFighter Challenge [Cancelled] 7.0 years ago

    How is 21 players a lack of participants, and why would you cancel before the deadline when you don’t even know how many people are going to compete? @mikoyanster

  • NTMR “Wetwork” Ram-Bike 7.0 years ago

    Incredible! This needs a few spotlights from players like @Dllama4

  • Jango Fett Ver1.0 7.0 years ago

    How dare you: phrase spoken. used for telling someone how shocked and angry you are about something that they have done or said.

    +1
  • Jango Fett Ver1.0 7.0 years ago

    How dare you @FGW2014

    +1
  • PAC C7A Samson 7.0 years ago

    I’ll spotlight as soon as I get them back (I’ve spotlighted the maximum amount of aircraft today) @JohnnyBoythePilot

  • PAC C7A Samson 7.0 years ago

    Very, very good! Nice job

  • 2018 Ford F150 Raptor 7.0 years ago

    I’ll spotlight it as soon as I can, I just ran out for today @nfsplatinum

  • 2018 Ford F150 Raptor 7.0 years ago

    My god this is incredible

  • Messershcmitt Bf 109E4 [ Fighter ] 7.0 years ago

    Yeah, but I hate to see a great builder not getting the attention they deserve@Datom

  • Messershcmitt Bf 109E4 [ Fighter ] 7.0 years ago

    No problem! You’re not getting the attention you deserve so I want to get some more people on your profile @Datom

  • Anyone running SP on a MacBook Air with 4GB RAM and an i5? 7.0 years ago

    Very odd... looks like my friends MacBook Air might have performance issues @EpicPigster1 @samg32332

  • Anyone running SP on a MacBook Air with 4GB RAM and an i5? 7.0 years ago

    How’s the performance on maywar and with 600 part + creations? @EpicPigster1

  • Anyone running SP on a MacBook Air with 4GB RAM and an i5? 7.0 years ago

    I wouldn’t recommend getting a MacBook Air, as they are becoming obsolete as the MacBook Pro is now lighter, thinner and much more powerful than the Air. You can get a MacBook Pro from 2013 for the same price as a current generation MacBook Air and you would get better specs with that @EpicPigster1

  • Anyone running SP on a MacBook Air with 4GB RAM and an i5? 7.0 years ago

    I have a friend who does, and it runs worse on there than it does on my iPad Air 2. It lags on marywar even if you load in just a cockpit, though builds from 350-400 (maybe 500) seem to work fine on other landscapes. I believe he is running a MacBook Air 2015 with Intel HD Graphics 6000, 4GB of RAM and an i5 that is clocked at around 1.6Ghz

  • Suggest Something To Me! 7.0 years ago

    Boeing 2707

  • Heracles RT.11A 7.0 years ago

    Thankyou! @MAHADI

  • SAF Fusilier CG-71E 7.0 years ago

    Thanks a lot! @MAHADI

  • SAF Fusilier CG-71E 7.0 years ago

    Thanks, but I’m not sure what you mean when you say the X5 doesn’t have roll or pitch? It has both @BogdanX

  • Multiplayer request,Probably the best one yet, Yep. (MODS AND DEVS PLZ READ THIS.) 7.0 years ago

    Alright, I respect your opinion @WNP78 as you obviously know more about that field than me, but can I enquirer why it would not be possible? The destroyers in the game, if you look closely, appear to be SP builds that have been reduced to 2 or 3 parts (including the rotating turrets.) Ive already said that multiplayer would be impossible in the current state of SP, and that it was only a suggestion to increase optimisation if SP2 was to be released, but I only wish the devs had possessed the foresight to develop the game in a way that would support multiplayer when they first started developing it. @WNP78 @MrDoolittle