Increased flexibility in FT #2:
Possibly accessing FT data for specific parts, instead of only the cockpit--perhaps in the form of calling existing variables with the part id, like GForce.id(204) to get data for that part.
Increased flexibility in FT #1:
Variables of some form to condense blocks of code
.
Implementation of this is unclear to me as well, but I would imagine it being some part of the aircraft file's header in the backend, and in the frontend probably some entry field, similar to Overload, where we enter a name for the variable and its contents.
.
This would allow for this custom variable to be referenced multiple times in inputs of the aircraft, greatly simplifying and modularizing FT code.
@Default4
.
Activity of questionable value and taking ample time to produce good content are two different things. The purpose of my "server" is different by nature... not to mention the fact that I never called out whatever server y'all are up to--you're demonstrating ample incapacity in knowing the difference between a generalized statement and an attack on anyone, as you now for whatever reason resort to zero-sum messaging against an uninterested party.
.
Banding together to try so hard to defend your status doesn't look good on you all either! Try something new. As I said, something of value will have a natural demand to it. This is a general statement on absolutely anything. If I really wanted to call your server or whatever out, I could do that, if you really want me to.
Your supposed anti-LGBT claims are unfounded. You have been specifically calling out an user who clearly was trying to deescalate a situation instigated by another, you repeatedly continue to assail these users regardless. Seems you're new over here, this type of disruptive behavior has never ended well.
Name-calling is generally not acceptable. You have repeatedly called out specific communities and users; this is a general disruption of nominal operation and subject to moderation. Don't expect this to fly well with them, i.e. your post may be subject to removal irrespective of how this community sees LGBTQ rights.
I'm guessing coordinate based with differently painted fuselage pieces cycling over each other. Nothing too complicated but probably painful to get all the data required.
Yeah sucks that you can't easily issue software certificates... Although a program that generates files of unknown content definitely does look suspicious
@11qazxc
.
Nope, it's the stabilizer doing its job. Besides, the gun itself is limited to from -10º to 20º, so if the ground slope exceeds that value it obviously won't stabilize. The code for the stabilizer has a mathematical formula that's designed to work on slopes. This is done by dividing the PitchAngle correction by the cosine of the RollAngle in order to obtain the correct adjustment using only gun elevation.
You're not wrong in that this becomes problematic at very high angles like 45º, but no MBT I know of has gun handling that goes to such ranges.
Flyout people have been saying the same thing since like 3 years ago.
There is still no direct alternative to SP.
The aesthetics and mechanics of SP are still very much its own.
Duck is the common name for numerous species in the waterfowl family Anatidae which also includes swans and geese. Ducks are divided among several subfamilies in the family Anatidae; they do not represent a monophyletic group (the group of all descendants of a single common ancestral species) but a form taxon, since swans and geese are not considered ducks. Ducks are mostly aquatic birds, mostly smaller than the swans and geese, and may be found in both fresh water and sea water.
Dammit, you beat me to it! Excellent interface and all around great work!
I would definitely say that there is a lot of room for optimization however--100 variables is a little finnicky to work with.
@11qazxc
.
Unfortunately, my paneling skills aren't as good enough, or neither is brute forcing minute increments of rotations and positions well worth my time. By performing calculations, I can ensure that the shape is accurate and no errors are incurred in the process. Besides I can practice some unique geometry I don't really get to touch otherwise, and I also get a kick out of having everything planned out and watching it all click into place. The rod rotation method was attempted actually, but I was quite dissatisfied with the eventual result and resorted to calculation.
Hope that clarifies the reasoning behind my methodology. My aim was to create a perfect (almost) shape. Something as good as a render.
Increased flexibility in FT #2:
+36Possibly accessing FT data for specific parts, instead of only the cockpit--perhaps in the form of calling existing variables with the part id, like
GForce.id(204)to get data for that part.Solution:
- Block
- Don't make complaining post
- Profit
+28Increased flexibility in FT #1:
+27Variables of some form to condense blocks of code
.
Implementation of this is unclear to me as well, but I would imagine it being some part of the aircraft file's header in the backend, and in the frontend probably some entry field, similar to Overload, where we enter a name for the variable and its contents.
.
This would allow for this custom variable to be referenced multiple times in inputs of the aircraft, greatly simplifying and modularizing FT code.
@WNP78
+19.
Can we ban these posts? Kinda need rules for the forums now...
@Default4
+17.
Activity of questionable value and taking ample time to produce good content are two different things. The purpose of my "server" is different by nature... not to mention the fact that I never called out whatever server y'all are up to--you're demonstrating ample incapacity in knowing the difference between a generalized statement and an attack on anyone, as you now for whatever reason resort to zero-sum messaging against an uninterested party.
.
Banding together to try so hard to defend your status doesn't look good on you all either! Try something new. As I said, something of value will have a natural demand to it. This is a general statement on absolutely anything. If I really wanted to call your server or whatever out, I could do that, if you really want me to.
@WiiMini
+16.
If your server has any real value people will flock to it automatically.
The 10 bucks I spent on this game has given me the largest amount of enjoyment money ever has.
It has been a critical driving force in shaping my career, and I strongly appreciate your team's creation for it.
Thank you for your countless hours of hard work, and I wish you the best in Jundroo's next big endeavor.
+14Look at this ripoff of the default seaplane
+13The plot thickens
+12This is amazing. An stunning improvement over the original. Great successor!
+12You did mention it yourself, but revamping fuselage hitboxes would be huge... Especially for cool mechanical things.
+11Your supposed anti-LGBT claims are unfounded. You have been specifically calling out an user who clearly was trying to deescalate a situation instigated by another, you repeatedly continue to assail these users regardless. Seems you're new over here, this type of disruptive behavior has never ended well.
+10Nuts. What can I say
+10Oh no!!!!!
+10funky & tree
+10Name-calling is generally not acceptable. You have repeatedly called out specific communities and users; this is a general disruption of nominal operation and subject to moderation. Don't expect this to fly well with them, i.e. your post may be subject to removal irrespective of how this community sees LGBTQ rights.
+9I'm guessing coordinate based with differently painted fuselage pieces cycling over each other. Nothing too complicated but probably painful to get all the data required.
+9You can't fix this without a new codebase. Maybe in SP2 if ever.
+9Imagine paying less and wanting equal treatment
+9Cursed
+9Not exactly sure how FT causes OCD, it either works as you intended or there's a software bug you've gotta catch
+8Yeah sucks that you can't easily issue software certificates... Although a program that generates files of unknown content definitely does look suspicious
+8@11qazxc
.
Nope, it's the stabilizer doing its job. Besides, the gun itself is limited to from -10º to 20º, so if the ground slope exceeds that value it obviously won't stabilize. The code for the stabilizer has a mathematical formula that's designed to work on slopes. This is done by dividing the PitchAngle correction by the cosine of the RollAngle in order to obtain the correct adjustment using only gun elevation.
You're not wrong in that this becomes problematic at very high angles like 45º, but no MBT I know of has gun handling that goes to such ranges.
+8SP had it coming!
+7The hell, when did you upload?
+7Downright illegal
Flyout people have been saying the same thing since like 3 years ago.
+7There is still no direct alternative to SP.
The aesthetics and mechanics of SP are still very much its own.
@SkyJayTheFirst
+7.
Yes. There is no data exposed by the game to you for functional purposes. Only the visual (and auditory) lock/launch warning exists.
@SheriffHackdogMCPE
+7.
Waves are already ridiculously demanding on PC.
Your last three variables are meaningless and do nothing.
+7Ol' man and the Sea
+7The XML uploading is incredibly helpful! We no longer need 1038 posts!
+7Jesus christ we just got MFDs
+7@JaeBeansS
+7.
It's been aggressively optimized so should run fine on modern devices.
Duck is the common name for numerous species in the waterfowl family Anatidae which also includes swans and geese. Ducks are divided among several subfamilies in the family Anatidae; they do not represent a monophyletic group (the group of all descendants of a single common ancestral species) but a form taxon, since swans and geese are not considered ducks. Ducks are mostly aquatic birds, mostly smaller than the swans and geese, and may be found in both fresh water and sea water.
+7@brians1209
+7.
Yeah, I'm in my senior year and I have to start getting ready for college applications- just a tad bit busy.
@SkyJayTheFirst
+6.
For good reason. Missiles (or other non-cockpit objects) are not detectable via any game system.
Dammit, you beat me to it! Excellent interface and all around great work!
+6I would definitely say that there is a lot of room for optimization however--100 variables is a little finnicky to work with.
Love it Andrew, delivered with impeccable emotion
+6needs to be a game
+6Time to make a computer.
+6Variables. Dear god
+6bruhhh
+6The trap is Vince hasn't uploaded in some
+6@11qazxc
+6.
Unfortunately, my paneling skills aren't as good enough, or neither is brute forcing minute increments of rotations and positions well worth my time. By performing calculations, I can ensure that the shape is accurate and no errors are incurred in the process. Besides I can practice some unique geometry I don't really get to touch otherwise, and I also get a kick out of having everything planned out and watching it all click into place. The rod rotation method was attempted actually, but I was quite dissatisfied with the eventual result and resorted to calculation.
Hope that clarifies the reasoning behind my methodology. My aim was to create a perfect (almost) shape. Something as good as a render.
Just use your 40 African children in the basement to get money for you
+6If you're uploading more than 10 a day something is wrong...
+6B) and C) are the same thing matey
+6Report if you have been harassed, not complain on the forums.
+6@Rickyjasper2
+6.
That's not Jundroo's problem, that's Google's. Please stop.