Great job. FYI you can simply implement the fixed code and re-upload without deleting this post (it will allow any future downloads to have the fixed version).
Looks really good! I rode these for a living one time...
Some details are missing but overall really well done.
Can't say for the MGS, but for the ICVs the low front doesn't have that many bolts & plates.
@mrxml
.
Lmao. You're really saying using an in-game feature that existed before this was published is something I didn't know about when I built this? You're completely missing the point. This is here because people don't wanna use in-game elements to "cheat". This is for vanilla simulator purists that wanna use an actual vanilla built mechanism with the UI turned off.
Not to mention, the in-game CCIP is not a "bombsight". It projects the full trajectory of the bomb.
@mrxml
.
You're complaining about the accuracy of a nearly 5-year old build. There was way less to work with then; this does not account for drag or terrain deviations.
The crosshairs being orange is a you problem... colors are determined by the palette you have on the destination build (as you are likely using this as a subassembly).
@StockPlanesRemastered
.
Read carefully about what this is for. There still are niche cases in which this is your only option :)
I think I know what I'm doing with the game 😅
You learn to hate these when you have to drain wastewater from the drain plugs on these. Pretty good job, could use more details like handholds. Most Strykers these days have got a CROWS on them too though.
@Bellcat
.
Yes, it does. Surprised this hasn't been done before with how long it's been out for. Styling is heavily inspired by standard laboratory analytical balances (which presumably have been around for much long before the 2000s).
@FarrowTECH
.
Nobody likes prebuilts, but saying HP puts in 350W for a 5800X + 3060 is downright slander. You can't even power the thing on with 350.
Prebuilts have their place, and it's very much preferable for people who cannot handle anything more complicated than an iPad (or you're enterprise and cannot and will not spend time to building PCs).
@AlbertanPlaneMaker
.
Have a source of income that you save for components.
Also, most gamer crap is pretty cheap. The target audience isn't exactly rich.
Flyout people have been saying the same thing since like 3 years ago.
There is still no direct alternative to SP.
The aesthetics and mechanics of SP are still very much its own.
Excellent. Made a terrible attempt of this long ago with much less sophistication. Quite polished
I imagine you made use of the better collision hitboxes added since then?
@Deandash
.
Not really. Either you upgrade your processor to something with better single-core performance, or somehow the world of computing figures out how to parallelize things previously considered serial operations.
Resolution aside, beautifully crafted video!
+1@overlord5453
+2.
Needs a decent bit of math. If anything, you can do it the "old" way and rotate the whole text part if you so wish.
Great job. FYI you can simply implement the fixed code and re-upload without deleting this post (it will allow any future downloads to have the fixed version).
+1Looks really good! I rode these for a living one time...
Some details are missing but overall really well done.
Can't say for the MGS, but for the ICVs the low front doesn't have that many bolts & plates.
@mrxml
.
Lmao. You're really saying using an in-game feature that existed before this was published is something I didn't know about when I built this? You're completely missing the point. This is here because people don't wanna use in-game elements to "cheat". This is for vanilla simulator purists that wanna use an actual vanilla built mechanism with the UI turned off.
Not to mention, the in-game CCIP is not a "bombsight". It projects the full trajectory of the bomb.
@mrxml
+1.
You're complaining about the accuracy of a nearly 5-year old build. There was way less to work with then; this does not account for drag or terrain deviations.
The crosshairs being orange is a you problem... colors are determined by the palette you have on the destination build (as you are likely using this as a subassembly).
@Samfpanzer
+4.
What told you SP2 will have bootleg Vizzy? FT is here to stay.
@PPLLAANNEE
.
Been done since the advent of VR.
@32
+1.
The code itself is over 4 years old so you're not wrong. I just happened to tidy it up and release it recently.
@StockPlanesRemastered
.
Read carefully about what this is for. There still are niche cases in which this is your only option :)
I think I know what I'm doing with the game 😅
SP had it coming!
+7https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/v30lb9/Electronic-Scale
Measures mass.
Pressure = Force/Area.
Mass x g = Force.
Thus pressure = (Mass x g)/Area.
Simple & old as the shock compression variable.
+1You learn to hate these when you have to drain wastewater from the drain plugs on these. Pretty good job, could use more details like handholds. Most Strykers these days have got a CROWS on them too though.
+3The 10 bucks I spent on this game has given me the largest amount of enjoyment money ever has.
It has been a critical driving force in shaping my career, and I strongly appreciate your team's creation for it.
Thank you for your countless hours of hard work, and I wish you the best in Jundroo's next big endeavor.
+14The energy in this post is incredible
+1@V
.
No clue why it was glossed over. Patch notes are your friend
@spefyjerbf
+1.
Indeed, a certified
F = -kxmoment@JJsimple
.
Salt crystals (I swear)
@Topgun757
.
Said realistic missile has already been made with better math than I ever can by Bacon... it's also on the front page.
@Nerfaddict
.
That is generally what "tare" does on most balances, yes.
@FairFireFlight
.
I was gonna photoshop Andrew into a bootleg Heisenberg, but decided against it
@Dragoranos
.
There is a unit conversion option.
@Bellcat
.
Yes, it does. Surprised this hasn't been done before with how long it's been out for. Styling is heavily inspired by standard laboratory analytical balances (which presumably have been around for much long before the 2000s).
The hell, when did you upload?
+7Downright illegal
@FarrowTECH
.
Nobody likes prebuilts, but saying HP puts in 350W for a 5800X + 3060 is downright slander. You can't even power the thing on with 350.
Prebuilts have their place, and it's very much preferable for people who cannot handle anything more complicated than an iPad (or you're enterprise and cannot and will not spend time to building PCs).
@AlbertanPlaneMaker
.
Have a source of income that you save for components.
Also, most gamer crap is pretty cheap. The target audience isn't exactly rich.
いいですね～
+1@BOING767
.
We did with what we had. Even now, labels aren't a end-all for more pixelated display applications, although marginally easier to create.
You cannot.
Complaints should be directed to Apple Inc.
Alternatively, purchase the PC version of this software for that capability.
Excellent work!
@FairFireFlight
+5.
😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳
Flyout people have been saying the same thing since like 3 years ago.
+7There is still no direct alternative to SP.
The aesthetics and mechanics of SP are still very much its own.
@MobileGamer21
.
To be fair, I am fairly certain I spent more time editing that video than I did building this.
Excellent. Made a terrible attempt of this long ago with much less sophistication. Quite polished
I imagine you made use of the better collision hitboxes added since then?
@Reworkable
+1.
Wikipedia is not "open source".
@WinsWings
.
Outdated. See the FT documentation for a up to date, more detailed document.
Nice Integral.
@SkyJayTheFirst
+7.
Yes. There is no data exposed by the game to you for functional purposes. Only the visual (and auditory) lock/launch warning exists.
Frankly I'm not sure if anyone does. Lol
+1@SkyJayTheFirst
+6.
For good reason. Missiles (or other non-cockpit objects) are not detectable via any game system.
Did you set up all the parameters properly? You can't just paste code and expect it to work.
Yep @BaconAircraft , saw this on the Labs... Nice job to IA
+2@TRD
+1.
Thanks for the compliments! Lots of things to find and explore on this build. At the expense of 2690 parts, however :)
@TRD
+2.
Yes, because I harbor a small dislike for part-mods.
Sheesh, this is some kinematic DOF mastery
@Deandash
.
Not really. Either you upgrade your processor to something with better single-core performance, or somehow the world of computing figures out how to parallelize things previously considered serial operations.
@Deandash
.
You probably have a multicore processor. There is a limit to what operations can be parallelized simply due to how math works.
@AlexyxD
.
abs() will make any value positive. Try it without the absolute value function