@WarHawk95 aight I threw it through Google Translate
"Pose destroy USS Beast instantly. The aim is not very accurate so you should aim a few millimeters down or up depending on the angle you are shooting. To fire 1 to move trim and VTOL"
Last time I checked that Tiger was taken back from the Japanese before ever leaving due to the Normandy landings. And apparently the P-47 can't carry torpedoes.
The C-16B isn't even a military plane. Neither is the SAR-77. In fact the Star is the propeller C-16. What use does a propeller seaplane from the 70's even have as a torpedo fighter rather than something like a Search And Rescue aircraft or a Cargo plane. Not everything can be made better by adding torpedos.
@PlaneSmith it's honestly a tradition. I generally write a story around whatever I build and have slowly been constructing a canon out of them. Some results have been good, and others... less so.
@Murks basically it has a severe issue of either nosediving at 350mph or front flipping at lower speeds, and I can't think of a way to stop that without Gyro's
@JamesBoA yes. I think some as old as the FT17 ended up being called Beutepanzer and used for internal security. To my knowledge the British MK4 never received the designation, as serving for 20 minutes before being piledrived by 15 RussianT34's doesn't warrant it.
Ok boomer
Get me in the screenshot Reddit
Make it 6.
I'm unlucky but stubborn
@RailfanEthan gee, why didn't I think of that?
@Zlmainka I was talking about the carriage it's on.
The Recoil would send it either through the planet or over 5 borders & an ocean
(Fires once)
+1(Ends up in Australia)
@TrislandianAlliance speeding up Brexit
Ok but seriously in relation to the fuselage that's a pretty standard ratio. The fuselage just so happens to be huge
I use an integer limit (567 million) fuel tank though. It's even exposed on some of the "bees"
Ok I know it was called the Hypermax but I HAD TO after that designation
I may have entered in something I built in April but that thing was decently good
You threw an A10 and your style together and created a better HE-173. Honestly in awe
+2@BlackhattAircraft the only good thing is I also like the thing he became addicted to so that's the least of the problems. But he is really petty.
@WarHawk95 aight I threw it through Google Translate
"Pose destroy USS Beast instantly. The aim is not very accurate so you should aim a few millimeters down or up depending on the angle you are shooting. To fire 1 to move trim and VTOL"
Last time I checked that Tiger was taken back from the Japanese before ever leaving due to the Normandy landings. And apparently the P-47 can't carry torpedoes.
@CMAircraftManufacture I pulled up too hard at about 900mph and the aircraft went into an uncontrollable spin.
(Stalls at 900mph)
+1Magnificent
@randomusername well we both have our methods, mine more rigid and yours more fluid. I respect you for that
+1Tried to land and it burst into flames but it's not like a couple of my creations are any better.
(Immediately crashes into the ocean)
@Gameboi14 the guy didn't harp on the fact that I'm a furry, but instead just hit my sexuality. Complete idiot
Apparently hated on me when I released a Dev version of an aircraft. IDK wasn't there
What in the name of god did I miss?
First up after another server crash.
Very impressive
+2Y'all better like this because it took me 10 days to get enough energy to design another plane.
T
The C-16B isn't even a military plane. Neither is the SAR-77. In fact the Star is the propeller C-16. What use does a propeller seaplane from the 70's even have as a torpedo fighter rather than something like a Search And Rescue aircraft or a Cargo plane. Not everything can be made better by adding torpedos.
@Dale200101 I'm the guy who built 2 Toby replicas so what do you expect
Peppy pig. Brilliant for target practice
+1@PlaneSmith it's honestly a tradition. I generally write a story around whatever I build and have slowly been constructing a canon out of them. Some results have been good, and others... less so.
Ah yes. The literal only canon plane in Fallout that actually flys
If you stick this next to the C-16 at a 90* angle they'd fit in the exact same area
@JamesBoA oddly enough I only did that because it was easier and simpler. And I gotta say it shows. This would've exceeded 100 parts if I used blocks
@Awsomur I'm on IOS but my parents use android so I can't use any of theirs
Can we get a mod free version?
@I got better
@Murks I tried lowering the propellers, as well as several design changes involving a complete design. Nothing worked
@PositivePlanes yes but only slightly
@Murks basically it has a severe issue of either nosediving at 350mph or front flipping at lower speeds, and I can't think of a way to stop that without Gyro's
I still hold the unmodded record
+1Like the LMS Turbomotive but R I P P E D
+1T
Nice
@JamesBoA this was in 1941. The only comparable allied tank, the Tetrarch, was literally designed to be airdropped
@Armyguy1534 after testing I found twin rotors are not only good but putting a tail rotor on this thing is a recipe for disaster.
@Armyguy1534 well it functions. I mean German helicopters of the same style worked well. I'll probably follow your advice though.
@JamesBoA yes. I think some as old as the FT17 ended up being called Beutepanzer and used for internal security. To my knowledge the British MK4 never received the designation, as serving for 20 minutes before being piledrived by 15 RussianT34's doesn't warrant it.
UYP
+1(Unidentified Yorkshire Pudding)
On low physics these things loose the tracks faster than I lost my hope in humanity
+2@Loopy200 as far as I can tell no Tank has been designated "T-71". I was referencing the infamously unreliable German tank
Isn't the name "Panther" already taken?