@Typhlosion130 Make sure the thrust vecoring is not more than 15 degrees, and also try making the CoM and CoL on the same horizontal plane, that makes it stable and much more maneuverable
Try thrust vectoring engines. This is when the engine rotates to change the pitch or roll of the aircraft. I reccomend VTOL nozzles for two-dimensional vectoring (only up/down).
Also bigger engines with less weight helps. A higher thrust/weight ratio is essential. For example almost all fighter jets have a T/W ratio of >1 so they are more maneuverable and can accelerate in a climb
Also bigger engines with less weight helps. A higher thrust/weight ratio is essential. For example almost all fighter jets have a T/W ratio of >1 so they are more maneuverable and can accelerate in a climb
Try bigger wings/more lift. Bigger wings will make roll slower but you can make those control surfaces bigger. Also move the Center of Mass closer to the Center of Lift. Finally, dont make the vertical stabilizer control surface too big. If the control surface is too big it will actually make the manuverability worse.
@MrVaultech had to delete those plans, dont want someone to be inspired lol
Halfaxe, highly effective air superiority fighters and small tanks (which will be finalized when I get my hands on the tablet)
@DelphFoxFan bigger wings help with pitching, but smaller wings help with rolling. Also, dont make the control surfaces too big or the controls will be jerky and it will actually make the maneuverability worse.
@AnarchistAerospaceIndustries really they are pretty close. The 38 was less manueverable but had two engines (so more reliability), 51 is just more famous. Really the 38 could attack from any reasonable distsance because it had nose-mounted guns, while the 51 had wing mounted guns (so you had to be close enough for the bullets to diverge onto the target). Also, war thunder is not the most unbiased source... I mean, where's the P-38J?
@Homersdonut @MediocrePlanes @amazingperson124 @MrSilverWolf @DeezDucks @dsr1aviation @TheOwlAce (?)
Time is up, (actually a little past up) and all of you need to submit your ships
Its all about PR.
Basically, talk smart, make clever names, and make good planes. If you cant do one of those, then the other 2 better be darn good.
-Wahoo12's 3 Rules of Public Relations in Simpleplanes
(E-book planned release in SP forums some day, pre order yours for free now!)
@Jettison The points system itself is competitive, although that is a key motivation to many players. I think it should still be added, but instead of commanders it could be Squadron leaders, flight leaders, etc.
@tacos well, as it is magic, explaining it would ruin the trick. But i'll give you a hint.
Copy and paste this
 and close the parenthesis.
First of all, posts like these make me kinda mad. You just have to be lucky, if you post enough quality planes then people will notice (at least eventually).
A secret weapon of the Seitwälder republic is in development. A few have spotted it, claiming it looks like a swing wing aircraft with impressive manueverability and sudden, extreme speed capability. Radars have not been able to verify the information. Brace yourselves, WSR, and good luck getting anywhere near Germany
@WWIIPlaneBuilder Yeah, Im really into the air to air combat ( although air to ground isnt bad, but there will be an SU-25T for that). Do you know if the hornets in DCS will be better than the F-14A/B? I know most of the hornets will at least be more modern and will win a (now rare) close dogfight. Are they better at BVR?
@Typhlosion130 Make sure the thrust vecoring is not more than 15 degrees, and also try making the CoM and CoL on the same horizontal plane, that makes it stable and much more maneuverable
@ShatterFox haha no
Lockheed connie
Haha not sure if the wildcat will have a chance... it was my first plane with fuselage blocks
Try thrust vectoring engines. This is when the engine rotates to change the pitch or roll of the aircraft. I reccomend VTOL nozzles for two-dimensional vectoring (only up/down).
Also bigger engines with less weight helps. A higher thrust/weight ratio is essential. For example almost all fighter jets have a T/W ratio of >1 so they are more maneuverable and can accelerate in a climb
Also bigger engines with less weight helps. A higher thrust/weight ratio is essential. For example almost all fighter jets have a T/W ratio of >1 so they are more maneuverable and can accelerate in a climb
Try bigger wings/more lift. Bigger wings will make roll slower but you can make those control surfaces bigger. Also move the Center of Mass closer to the Center of Lift. Finally, dont make the vertical stabilizer control surface too big. If the control surface is too big it will actually make the manuverability worse.
@XVIindustries Lets do another CedVIAeroPeregrine Corporation build (but more successful)
@DeezDucks Very true lol
Thank you for posting this
@Dredex I have been a member for a year and I am still at 2000 pts. It takes perseverance.
@AnarchistAerospaceIndustries Seitwälder
@Sirstupid Very true
I 'hired' a modder a while ago, @dsr1aviation
EUM
@@BRuthless thanks man
@AviationXpert154 its a Panavania Tornado
I think?
@@BRuthless hmm... something must be going on with the site because I copied and pasted those numbers from the descripion.
@TheMasterSoldier it became complex planes a long time ago, I saw rotators added and it changed everything
I got to land at the speeds cough 31, 72, 113, 134, and my favoriet flavor of pie is pecan
@MrVaultech had to delete those plans, dont want someone to be inspired lol
Halfaxe, highly effective air superiority fighters and small tanks (which will be finalized when I get my hands on the tablet)
Ive been using it for since it came out, I have never gotten spam or stuff from Gravatar. Its pretty safe. Even (I think) American Idol uses it (?)
Ill join
@DelphFoxFan bigger wings help with pitching, but smaller wings help with rolling. Also, dont make the control surfaces too big or the controls will be jerky and it will actually make the maneuverability worse.
First image
Second image
.
Personally I like both
@AnarchistAerospaceIndustries really they are pretty close. The 38 was less manueverable but had two engines (so more reliability), 51 is just more famous. Really the 38 could attack from any reasonable distsance because it had nose-mounted guns, while the 51 had wing mounted guns (so you had to be close enough for the bullets to diverge onto the target). Also, war thunder is not the most unbiased source... I mean, where's the P-38J?
@MediocrePlanes thats alright, dont worry about it
@Homersdonut @MediocrePlanes @amazingperson124 @MrSilverWolf @DeezDucks @dsr1aviation @TheOwlAce (?)
Time is up, (actually a little past up) and all of you need to submit your ships
Haha P-38G to '51D is a downgrade
@picy @Nickasaurus just realized it was not very related... it was like 9:00 to 10:00 pm when i posted lol
@Warbrine Also, dont repost, dont spam tags, and post teasers in the forums.
Its all about PR.
Basically, talk smart, make clever names, and make good planes. If you cant do one of those, then the other 2 better be darn good.
-Wahoo12's 3 Rules of Public Relations in Simpleplanes
(E-book planned release in SP forums some day, pre order yours for free now!)
@Jettison The points system itself is competitive, although that is a key motivation to many players. I think it should still be added, but instead of commanders it could be Squadron leaders, flight leaders, etc.
Well, I cant call this rushing
@tacos well, as it is magic, explaining it would ruin the trick. But i'll give you a hint.
Copy and paste this
 and close the parenthesis.
@Noman0rumeral
Dude, this is cool
@TheRemesy Sure, but just know that I'm Jundroo Republic
@bobthetitan New personal motto
But does it drop eggs?
Aahhhhhh thats cool
Like this?
First of all, posts like these make me kinda mad. You just have to be lucky, if you post enough quality planes then people will notice (at least eventually).
Lol same @amazingperson124
@TheRemesy well, you hit dresden, but... I mean, thats just normal people. The capitol is in Stuttgart.
A secret weapon of the Seitwälder republic is in development. A few have spotted it, claiming it looks like a swing wing aircraft with impressive manueverability and sudden, extreme speed capability. Radars have not been able to verify the information. Brace yourselves, WSR, and good luck getting anywhere near Germany
@WWIIPlaneBuilder Yeah, Im really into the air to air combat ( although air to ground isnt bad, but there will be an SU-25T for that). Do you know if the hornets in DCS will be better than the F-14A/B? I know most of the hornets will at least be more modern and will win a (now rare) close dogfight. Are they better at BVR?