Also the IR missiles should have the ability to either be programmed to lock rear sector only or all sectors of the enemy plane, to avoid firing an early Sidewinder in the front angle of a MiG...
Anyway how did you manage to make Bogdan take a screenshot of his profile and send it to you ?
I don't believe he could give you his login informations.
@asteroidbook345 he can decide to change the title, not me.
Also I strongly disagree with you about Bogdan. Your objectivity is quite surprising since true objectivity would involve all the pros and cons of the subject. Just a quick reminder, he is an amazing player who always helped those who needed him, and I owe him plenty of things in my builds, i.e. the wing tips and trimming of my T-6 Texan, and FT formulas for my current projects. He always has been nice to me and absolutely everybody who didn't call him a jerk for no reason. True objectivity would be saying he was a great builder that was loved by some and hated by some others, but in no case he was a jerk. I won't let you insult him like that.
@asteroidbook345 I really don't know what he did to you for you to say that, but that's easily one of the less justified comments I've ever seen on this site. He is a nice person and helped whoerver needed his help and was nice with him
@F104Deathtrap yep, the Mustangs were Cavalier F-51Ds, modified by a private American company into ground attackers with bombs, rockets and wing tip tanks if I remember correctly.
You have to put activationGroup=NANin the bomb and name=Paweway II in both the bomb and the missile. This will allow both weapons to appear in the same weapon panel and to see (and therefore, shoot) ONLY the Inferno missile.
Trust me, this technique is THE perfect one.
I haven't tried it yet but I'm a bit disappointed. I see a lot of mistakes on these screenshots that I don't like, as a lover of the Vautour.
- First, the version here is obviously a IIN, since it's the tandem two-seater. The IIN was an all-weather and night fighter, which was equipped with 4x 30mm DEFA 552, internal rockets and semi-active radar guided missiles. Therefore, it must not be equipped with bombs or rocket pods like here.
- Second, about the shape itself. What are these circles and hollow fuselages above the wings and backbone of the plane ? The wings had wing top partitions to redirect the airflow and not these ugly circular rings. Check the photos in the description. Where do you see such things ?
- Third, why did you make this glass nose cone ? The glass nose cone was mounted only on the Vautour IIB, the bomber version, which didn't have a RIO behind the pilot but a navigator/bombardier in front of the pilot. Also, the IIB could carry bombs and didn't have any guns. Which version did you really choose ? Check the pics again, the IIN didn't have the nose cone.
- Fourth, check the pics in the description one more time. About the livery, why did you paint it like it ? I mean it's your choice but for a replica you should have chosen a French Air Force or IDF/AF livery...
- Fifth, small detail but inevitable one, the IIN had small gun blast deflectors called in french "rascasses", that were placed just in front of the 30mm cannons. Is that what we can see just behind the glass nose on your version ? They're incorrectly made and placed.
- Sixth, about the description. Maybe try to improve it, and check the history of the plane. First, all the roles are mixed, second, the Vautour IIA and IIB were replaced by the A-4, indeed, but only in the IDF/AF. France never had Skyhawks.
I thought a platinum user such as you would make more researches and be more accurate on such a beautiful plane.
If you want me to help you improve it, it'll be a pleasure. I can provide you the armament such as the R.511 missiles if you wanna make a IIN, as well as the guns.
Sorry if you consider this comment mean, but I just wanted to make constructive criticism and not be an asshle.
*EDIT : Also, none of the Vautours had pylons between the engines and the fuselage.
Well, like@ThePilotDude said, I think having your name as username can't be such a problem since half the Devs have their names as usernames (Andrew, Philip and Nathan...) and even if it doesn't really matter since they're the devs, if they don't have problems about that I don't see why you would... And why do you have "too many points" ? It just show you're a great builder ! Be proud of them, you earned them and deserve them !
Bon pas besoin de te parler de moi tu dois savoir comment je fonctionne par Discord, mais par contre je peux témoigner à l'intention des autres
As a mobile user, I can say that some mobile builds don't get as much recognition as if they were made on a PC.
Example : I made a Bell XS-1 that some consider to be the best X-1 of the game. I built it entirely on mobile and it still became kinda famous. But I uploaded two versions of it, and that's where the difference is :
The first version was uploaded from my mobile and got 55 upvotes.
The second one, which differed only with the engine and paint, was uploaded from my PC so I could use upload with screenshots. This one, with a better thumbnail and maybe bc it was labelled as PC, got 104 updoots.
Big difference, right ? I know upvotes aren't a good measurements system but that's quite a proof for me of the difference of treatment between both platforms, at least because mobile users can't use eye-catching, fancy screenshots as their builds' thumbnails.
@TheFantasticTyphoon EALC, in Corbas, near Lyon, France.
We have a Dassault Mirage IV, the nuclear bomber, and plenty of other fighters such as Mirage III/F1/2000 and Jaguars, Mystères, plus a 1:1 scale model of a Spitifire that was used to shoot Dunkirk. But the museum is really small too, it only takes two hangars on the local airfield
Mine is connected to my pfp. Yep, that's it... The P-40 is my favorite warbird.
And about the "95", well... I thought it was a cool number. And since it appears that I got a phone number with "95" in it. What a coincidence.
Looks like i'm not the only one
But how are the Blade T2000 and T3000 "legacy parts" ? Did the devs change anything about them, except the blade pitch animation on the T2000 ?
Oh OK I got it.
You're on mobile, right ?
I also have this problem.
You have to be very careful. When using the picking tool, don't put it in a corner and use your finger. If youn do so, double-click on the picker/finger icon to replace the picker in the middle of your screen.
If you want to use your fingers to rotate the view, be careful not to rotate the view while on a part bc it will drag the part and not the view.
@Trollium if someone modified one of your builds but you don't like it, you shouldn't be able to delete it. What if he really like his modifications ? You can't just delete his rework without his consent.
Just ask him to delete it, that's more fair.
Well Andrew, you know what ?
I don't care about ads, and I think almost everyone here agrees.
If you have to put ads here, OK. If it's not too intrusive or if it doesn't hide a half of the page for me it's OK.
The most important for me is the fact that you can continue making my favorite website work.
Hey Andrew, quick idea : make a "forever sale" of -10%.
- Maybe fewer people will think about downloading the APK instead of buying the game ;
- More people are gonna buy it because everytime they'll see it, it will be in sale ;
- PEOPLE WANT SALES !
Who didn't know this, seriously ?
+2Did you know begging for upvotes is forbidden ?
+2Also the IR missiles should have the ability to either be programmed to lock rear sector only or all sectors of the enemy plane, to avoid firing an early Sidewinder in the front angle of a MiG...
+2Sixth upvote/comment
+2Anyway how did you manage to make Bogdan take a screenshot of his profile and send it to you ?
+2I don't believe he could give you his login informations.
@F104Deathtrap wow, finally someone with a brain here. Thanks mate.
+2British ppl : * start sweating *
+2At least he'll stop insulting the ones he doesn't like and spread lies on this site.
+2@Stickman unless they can break into your house then break into your PC lmao
+2@asteroidbook345 he can decide to change the title, not me.
+2Also I strongly disagree with you about Bogdan. Your objectivity is quite surprising since true objectivity would involve all the pros and cons of the subject. Just a quick reminder, he is an amazing player who always helped those who needed him, and I owe him plenty of things in my builds, i.e. the wing tips and trimming of my T-6 Texan, and FT formulas for my current projects. He always has been nice to me and absolutely everybody who didn't call him a jerk for no reason. True objectivity would be saying he was a great builder that was loved by some and hated by some others, but in no case he was a jerk. I won't let you insult him like that.
Oh yeah, the Brown Water Navy !!
+2Apocalypse Now flashbacks kick in
@asteroidbook345 I really don't know what he did to you for you to say that, but that's easily one of the less justified comments I've ever seen on this site. He is a nice person and helped whoerver needed his help and was nice with him
+2@asteroidbook345 well, this chain needs to stop. it's not funny anomore. Wait... It has never been funny. Just. Stop.
+2All jokes aside you should put a rotator with
+2RollAngleas input,min=-360 ; max=360and attach an orbit camera set on Chase view@F104Deathtrap yep, the Mustangs were Cavalier F-51Ds, modified by a private American company into ground attackers with bombs, rockets and wing tip tanks if I remember correctly.
+2Some of the Corsairs were former french F4U-7 I think, and the rest was american F4U-5
+2You have to put
+2activationGroup=NANin the bomb andname=Paweway IIin both the bomb and the missile. This will allow both weapons to appear in the same weapon panel and to see (and therefore, shoot) ONLY the Inferno missile.Trust me, this technique is THE perfect one.
I haven't tried it yet but I'm a bit disappointed. I see a lot of mistakes on these screenshots that I don't like, as a lover of the Vautour.
- First, the version here is obviously a IIN, since it's the tandem two-seater. The IIN was an all-weather and night fighter, which was equipped with 4x 30mm DEFA 552, internal rockets and semi-active radar guided missiles. Therefore, it must not be equipped with bombs or rocket pods like here.
- Second, about the shape itself. What are these circles and hollow fuselages above the wings and backbone of the plane ? The wings had wing top partitions to redirect the airflow and not these ugly circular rings. Check the photos in the description. Where do you see such things ?
- Third, why did you make this glass nose cone ? The glass nose cone was mounted only on the Vautour IIB, the bomber version, which didn't have a RIO behind the pilot but a navigator/bombardier in front of the pilot. Also, the IIB could carry bombs and didn't have any guns. Which version did you really choose ? Check the pics again, the IIN didn't have the nose cone.
- Fourth, check the pics in the description one more time. About the livery, why did you paint it like it ? I mean it's your choice but for a replica you should have chosen a French Air Force or IDF/AF livery...
- Fifth, small detail but inevitable one, the IIN had small gun blast deflectors called in french "rascasses", that were placed just in front of the 30mm cannons. Is that what we can see just behind the glass nose on your version ? They're incorrectly made and placed.
- Sixth, about the description. Maybe try to improve it, and check the history of the plane. First, all the roles are mixed, second, the Vautour IIA and IIB were replaced by the A-4, indeed, but only in the IDF/AF. France never had Skyhawks.
I thought a platinum user such as you would make more researches and be more accurate on such a beautiful plane.
If you want me to help you improve it, it'll be a pleasure. I can provide you the armament such as the R.511 missiles if you wanna make a IIN, as well as the guns.
Sorry if you consider this comment mean, but I just wanted to make constructive criticism and not be an asshle.
+2*EDIT : Also, none of the Vautours had pylons between the engines and the fuselage.
Well, like@ThePilotDude said, I think having your name as username can't be such a problem since half the Devs have their names as usernames (Andrew, Philip and Nathan...) and even if it doesn't really matter since they're the devs, if they don't have problems about that I don't see why you would... And why do you have "too many points" ? It just show you're a great builder ! Be proud of them, you earned them and deserve them !
+2Bon pas besoin de te parler de moi tu dois savoir comment je fonctionne par Discord, mais par contre je peux témoigner à l'intention des autres
As a mobile user, I can say that some mobile builds don't get as much recognition as if they were made on a PC.
+2Example : I made a Bell XS-1 that some consider to be the best X-1 of the game. I built it entirely on mobile and it still became kinda famous. But I uploaded two versions of it, and that's where the difference is :
The first version was uploaded from my mobile and got 55 upvotes.
The second one, which differed only with the engine and paint, was uploaded from my PC so I could use upload with screenshots. This one, with a better thumbnail and maybe bc it was labelled as PC, got 104 updoots.
Big difference, right ? I know upvotes aren't a good measurements system but that's quite a proof for me of the difference of treatment between both platforms, at least because mobile users can't use eye-catching, fancy screenshots as their builds' thumbnails.
@Tully2001 that's true evil
+2Looks like I'm your only Instagram follower that desperately want you to go back to SP and post SP stuff on IG...
+2@TheFantasticTyphoon EALC, in Corbas, near Lyon, France.
+2We have a Dassault Mirage IV, the nuclear bomber, and plenty of other fighters such as Mirage III/F1/2000 and Jaguars, Mystères, plus a 1:1 scale model of a Spitifire that was used to shoot Dunkirk. But the museum is really small too, it only takes two hangars on the local airfield
@tylerdeveneuxmusic OK bon ben tant que tu as encore des bases c'est bon :)
+2Mine is connected to my pfp. Yep, that's it... The P-40 is my favorite warbird.
+2And about the "95", well... I thought it was a cool number. And since it appears that I got a phone number with "95" in it. What a coincidence.
@tylerdeveneuxmusic HAHA I ALWAYS KNEW "DEVENEUX" CAME FROM FRENCH STUFF
+2@Biscool Take a screenshot, upload it on Discord or Imgur, get its URL and put in your desc
+2. That's all@tylerdeveneuxmusic
+2@Saturnite
@aplayer thanks guys !!!
Looks like i'm not the only one
+2But how are the Blade T2000 and T3000 "legacy parts" ? Did the devs change anything about them, except the blade pitch animation on the T2000 ?
Oh OK I got it.
+2You're on mobile, right ?
I also have this problem.
You have to be very careful. When using the picking tool, don't put it in a corner and use your finger. If youn do so, double-click on the picker/finger icon to replace the picker in the middle of your screen.
If you want to use your fingers to rotate the view, be careful not to rotate the view while on a part bc it will drag the part and not the view.
Now, make Jimmy Doolittle's plane. A Curtiss biplane I think...
+2Plus the Supermarine Sea Lion, S.5, S.6A & B
26th hehe
+2When you max out the default weapon
+2ZZ Top
+2Creedence Clearwater Revival
The Who
@CCCP I'd say China suffers from "Made in China" but OK
+2In case you didn't know, Bogan and Zandgard are the same person. No need to tag both accounts.
+2@Trollium if someone modified one of your builds but you don't like it, you shouldn't be able to delete it. What if he really like his modifications ? You can't just delete his rework without his consent.
+2Just ask him to delete it, that's more fair.
EternalDarkness and all the mods :
+2So you have chosen... Death.
Hmmm.... Where are the landing gears ?
+2Well Andrew, you know what ?
+2I don't care about ads, and I think almost everyone here agrees.
If you have to put ads here, OK. If it's not too intrusive or if it doesn't hide a half of the page for me it's OK.
The most important for me is the fact that you can continue making my favorite website work.
That's a lot of damage
+2I also thought about making it but with a "real" missile instead of a rocket. Great job !!
+2Imagine you wanted to go to heaven
+2But God said "Spam eggs"
Hey Andrew, quick idea : make a "forever sale" of -10%.
+2- Maybe fewer people will think about downloading the APK instead of buying the game ;
- More people are gonna buy it because everytime they'll see it, it will be in sale ;
- PEOPLE WANT SALES !
*You did it. You crazy son of a b••ch, you did it.
+2@BaconAircraft Dude make the 172SP "N700MS" from Microsoft Flight Simulator 2002 please
+2Could you please use English ?
+2Looks like un mix entre un Do 335 et un XP-55
+2Belaz to be tagged whenever it is finished
+2@BMilan @Strikefighter04 I'm so upset. I play WT since ~2015-6 and I'm still stuck on rank II for German tanks... Goodbye Maus 😢
+2