@Mage2IsTriggered
the Falken is 90s tech, (Fortress Intolerance) I just wanna point that out
yes, Raven is not 90s tech, technically speaking, but if you want to point out the fact that the Raven is a drone, so is the Falken
they both operate on the same system, really the thing that only makes them different is their mission type
kinda like the F-15C and the F-15E
btw T
kinda interested in how it flies, assuming it won't exceed 2000pc
I mean... Kinda? Truth is, I kinda rather have SR2 than SP. I just didn't think about it ever since I've found SP, but now that I know, I wanted to buy it rather than pirate it. However, my fund saving is... Lacking, you can say.
I personally use clamp01(GS>certainspeed ? AngleOfAttack/20 : 1) for slats
for your code hmm
maybe GS<166.6 ? VTOL : 0?
I mean you can't really adjust manual slats if you want different angles without the trim or vtol slider
that is if you want to have it not just in the cockpit but in the ui
For sound inputs also,
Sonic boom.
Also gun impact noise depending on damage, gun noise becoming a bit echoey after shooting, and gun delay noise depending on camera range.
Also, please add more camera options. The fly-by view kinda sucked.
@SyntheticL
Yeah, definitely some mistakes.
The first mistake was because I dunno what to put there, so I just put "air force".
The canopy part is more of my preference, so yeah. And also it kind of resembles more like a bubble canopy.
@OperatorLeaf
I don't mean the whole repainted thing
I just don't like the copy+paste description
makes it look like you added some things when in reality I added those things
then again just minor problem so don't bother it
Alright. Here we go.
Slanted tails:
They exist mainly to reduce Radar Cross Section.
Twin tails or single tail:
Twin tails for more stability.
Single tail to reduce financial issues.
Twin engines or single engine:
Twin engines for, well, double the thrust.
Single engines to reduce financial issues.
Canards increase stability of the aircraft. They move either according to pitch input, or angle of attack.
Nose pointed downwards:
That I'm not sure. Probably to reduce drag.
@ReinMcDeer oh I guess I didn't pay attention enough
When I looked at the blk 30/32 again I see something like: "From now on, F-16s with block ending 0 will be outfitted with GE engines and block ending 2 will be outfitted with Pratt & Whitney engines"
As for why they decided to put the GE engines, probably because it's more efficient despite the lower thrust
@Mage2IsTriggered
the Falken is 90s tech, (Fortress Intolerance) I just wanna point that out
yes, Raven is not 90s tech, technically speaking, but if you want to point out the fact that the Raven is a drone, so is the Falken
they both operate on the same system, really the thing that only makes them different is their mission type
kinda like the F-15C and the F-15E
btw T
+2kinda interested in how it flies, assuming it won't exceed 2000pc
nice
+2the transition from engine is a bit off but overall it gud :thumbsup:
I mean... Kinda?
+2Truth is, I kinda rather have SR2 than SP. I just didn't think about it ever since I've found SP, but now that I know, I wanted to buy it rather than pirate it. However, my fund saving is... Lacking, you can say.
as much as I want to critique how much innacurate this is, it's great job :)
+2man's be spending money to get peoples usernames on the carryout
+2what a dude
god the opening music is playing in my head
+2reinmcdeer
+2back at it again at simpleplanes
making the truly simple planes
amazing
wish I could've spotlighted this
@SemiCollin
+2No, the F-22 doesn't have Roll TVC.
I personally use clamp01(GS>certainspeed ? AngleOfAttack/20 : 1) for slats
+2for your code hmm
maybe GS<166.6 ? VTOL : 0?
I mean you can't really adjust manual slats if you want different angles without the trim or vtol slider
that is if you want to have it not just in the cockpit but in the ui
- fried eggs, cuz yes
- about 10 months now
- mine or...?
- pretty much anything as long as it doesn't taste like shit and edible
- fon
- it's fine as of now tbh
+2if it's mine, uhh, the veeper?
if not mine then uh not sure, I don't download planes that much
why does it look so big
+2woah woah dyna
+2mm childhood memories lmfao
Atleast they got the background right!
+2Also, those are some very nice builds.
goodbye you're getting court martialed
+2@SemiCollin
+2Because it doesn't have one in the first place.
For sound inputs also,
+2Sonic boom.
Also gun impact noise depending on damage, gun noise becoming a bit echoey after shooting, and gun delay noise depending on camera range.
Also, please add more camera options. The fly-by view kinda sucked.
@TRD6932
+2You're doing the X-29, yes?
Well, that would considered to be on the Stability group.
@ReinMcDeer
+2ayoooooooo
I didn't ask for me to be a judge.
+2What?
I said I'll pass, not "I'm in".
I am casually dominating the competition lmfao
+2this feels unfair
more dudes need to join I feel like I'm crushing it too much
YESSS LMFAO
+2@BeastHunter, you were the only one who requested a tag.
+2@Vincent
+2I'm sorry, but can you make this thing a successor to this?
Idk, they just decided to.
+2cool
+2Wingflex already kind of exists in the game, it's just that it's too exaggerated.
+2As for the lighting, yeah, no. They need to fix that.
Goddayum
+2Panelling? Huh.
+2I said I'd like to join again... But this will be truly a challenge! Especially since I'm not that good at designing fictional aircrafts.
+2@OkaNieba
+2I think he already made that.
Looks like I have another challenge to participate in...
+2@Spitfirelad05
+2Thank you.
@Dragorans
+2@CptBell
@Shimamurahougetsu
Not me, but like Phoebe said, if you have NASA computer, then sure.
+2I'm sure somebody had done it before.
device issue
+2I'm already crushing the competittion kekw
+2@SyntheticL
+2Yeah, definitely some mistakes.
The first mistake was because I dunno what to put there, so I just put "air force".
The canopy part is more of my preference, so yeah. And also it kind of resembles more like a bubble canopy.
@IceCraftGaming
+2ty
@OperatorLeaf
+2I don't mean the whole repainted thing
I just don't like the copy+paste description
makes it look like you added some things when in reality I added those things
then again just minor problem so don't bother it
so uh
+2the jeff is a delta wing, yes?
Alright. Here we go.
+2Slanted tails:
They exist mainly to reduce Radar Cross Section.
Twin tails or single tail:
Twin tails for more stability.
Single tail to reduce financial issues.
Twin engines or single engine:
Twin engines for, well, double the thrust.
Single engines to reduce financial issues.
Canards increase stability of the aircraft. They move either according to pitch input, or angle of attack.
Nose pointed downwards:
That I'm not sure. Probably to reduce drag.
just to be clear
+2I don't think anyone gives a damn about the war when they're making something
I'm boutta end this challenge's whole competition
+2hopefully, Idk
@ReinMcDeer
+2oh
I guess I didn't pay attention enough
When I looked at the blk 30/32 again I see something like: "From now on, F-16s with block ending 0 will be outfitted with GE engines and block ending 2 will be outfitted with Pratt & Whitney engines"
As for why they decided to put the GE engines, probably because it's more efficient despite the lower thrust
Yep, it's weird.
+2But it's cool.
@IceCraftGaming
+2it's a T-10
@IceCraftGaming
+2more hint:
the reporting name is the same as the finished product
@IceCraftGaming
+2no
hint:
something to do with Flanker
Oh also:
+2DSI intakes.
hmm good Idea
+2they also need to ACTUALLY spawn on the carrier if they are told to