Sorry I’m just gettin to see this just now, but it might be laggy cause the game has to do lift calculations for all those wings. Try just having a few actual working wings, and have the rest be made of either structural panels or fuelselage blocks. You could also try normal wings but with the airfoil disabled using xml so maybe the game/ur pc won’t have to do as much math.
@ThomasRoderick last pic is from the synergy website. I didn't do that fluid analysis. Although I am aiming to be an aerospace something in the future.
Just a few criticisms. First, the wing roundel is facing the wrong way. The top most point of the star should be pointed forward. The tips of the props need to either be painted yellow or white. The wheels are also way too shiny. There is also some collisions on the landing gear when retracting and extending. Other than that that this is pretty nice.
SP isnt really a good choice for trying to accurately simulate aircraft. Perhaps the best thing SP would be good for would be giving a rough estimate of CG, CoL, and CoT.
@EternalDarkness I have a build that hasn’t been posted yet. When I do post it can you spotlight that and either my Boeing Quiet Bird and/or IS-2 biplane?
P.S. thanks for running this challenge. I needed an excuse to build this and I had a lot of fun building it!
@wafafet21 I made the airfoil shape, then duplicated it many times. Then I made a fuselage part that had the diameter I wanted. Lastly I rotated and nudged the airfoil sections together using the perimeter of the large fuselage as a guide.
I think an e100 build would be an interesting challenge, especially with those side skirts. If you can pull it off well it could turn out amazing. If you need I can make the running gear once I've settled on how I'm going to build tank suspension in the future.
Since you can’t use pc why don’t you put some reduced drag fuelselage parts in your sub assemblies?
+1Lol I’m making a couple planes using ur realistic wing technique. So far it’s a lot of work but the result looks awesome.
WEP it all the way bby.
@IStoleYourMeme np keep up the good work.
A fantastic interior and fuelselage. But falls to pretty meh for all flying surfaces and the landing gear. Custom gear is never a bad thing.
Sorry I’m just gettin to see this just now, but it might be laggy cause the game has to do lift calculations for all those wings. Try just having a few actual working wings, and have the rest be made of either structural panels or fuelselage blocks. You could also try normal wings but with the airfoil disabled using xml so maybe the game/ur pc won’t have to do as much math.
@SelectAKey lol well to be fair mine is a straight up replica, no inspiration or other original ideas to be had.
+1@SelectAKey what other ones are there? Urs is the first with obvious design insparation
First fictional plane I've seen based on the boeing quiet bird. Very cool!
Rare bepis
@mikoyanster you need ideas for mission objectives???
+1Possibility of WWII themed mission???
Looks good
flys pretty good too.
@Supernovaboss504 I can spread my 5 hours over a week or easily. 5 hours is just the total number of "man hours".
Coming to steam, yeah or nah?
@Baby lol ur definition of almost done is VASTLY different from mine.
you: almost done = 30min later
me: almost done = 5 hours later
well that was quick.
the rotors should be angled to either side. Other than that pretty kewl.
kewl
@EternalDarkness it's a land based point defence interceptor. I had a feeling it would be stretching your definition. SPAA it is then!
would a natter be an acceptable entry?
@P0TET0Z eeeyyyyy
@CRJ900Pilot Np
So is this what you wanted @CRJ900Pilot ?
@sheepsblood eh I’ve seen worse. There wasn’t as much effort in the flight model as there would have normally.
@AerialFighterSnakes it’s those composite structures my dood.
@ThomasRoderick last pic is from the synergy website. I didn't do that fluid analysis. Although I am aiming to be an aerospace something in the future.
+2@EternalDarkness owO. Thks btw.
@EternalDarkness this one plz
@WIZARD2017 the v-3 mortar/cannon that was bombed by lancaster's using the grand slam bomb.
@WIZARD2017 except it did/does exist and you can find pics of it with a quick google search??
no custom gear?
lol "poor part efficiency". Aint' seen nuthin yet!
Yeah i've found that a good tank is always a little parts heavy.
Just a few criticisms. First, the wing roundel is facing the wrong way. The top most point of the star should be pointed forward. The tips of the props need to either be painted yellow or white. The wheels are also way too shiny. There is also some collisions on the landing gear when retracting and extending. Other than that that this is pretty nice.
I was wondering if someone was going to try this. Nice.
SP isnt really a good choice for trying to accurately simulate aircraft. Perhaps the best thing SP would be good for would be giving a rough estimate of CG, CoL, and CoT.
yus
@EternalDarkness I have a build that hasn’t been posted yet. When I do post it can you spotlight that and either my Boeing Quiet Bird and/or IS-2 biplane?
P.S. thanks for running this challenge. I needed an excuse to build this and I had a lot of fun building it!
wow thats a lot of parts
@KerlonceauxIndustries bruh 30 upvotes just gone that I’m not sure I’ll get back. I’m runnning out of salt shakers here.
+6Bruh much salt.
+1@wafafet21 I made the airfoil shape, then duplicated it many times. Then I made a fuselage part that had the diameter I wanted. Lastly I rotated and nudged the airfoil sections together using the perimeter of the large fuselage as a guide.
+1Rip. Just checked it out looks kewl m8. Keep up the good work!
I think an e100 build would be an interesting challenge, especially with those side skirts. If you can pull it off well it could turn out amazing. If you need I can make the running gear once I've settled on how I'm going to build tank suspension in the future.
@SuperSix lol. All ur frustration will be worth it.
@SuperSix it was kinda bs I know
@SuperSix lol. VK 36.01 (H)
@SuperSix nope. its a honest to god tank. Its not a Tank destroyer or SPG or APC or none of that jazz.
@SuperSix it is german, and it is a tank (not a tdor spg)
@InternationalAircraftCompany nope