I don't think the change makes it better. I think having to state your reason to downvote is kinda besides the point of downvoting. At that point just leave your criticism as a comment. And besides, moderators are already swamped with countless bogus reports.
This has been proven to be a bad idea. Long time ago (like 8 years ago?) the SP website used to use a 5-star rating system instead of the upvote system. What would often happen is that new players would often get low ratings and that would then drive them away because often your first build is gonna be objectively garbage. There were also a few times that players would use the feature to target others and knowing some of the... factions on today's site, I think such a feature would just be a recipe for disaster. It's a lot easier to moderate rude comments than rude ratings.
@RTRMUSTANG28283 honestly the leaf spring how I did it is kind of smoke in mirrors. The parts physically representing the leaf spring don't provide any suspension and are actually used more to guide the springs next to them. Overall creating the illusion of functioning leaf spring
yeah... the security on this site has never been too great, I mean hell back when they added forum posts, I found out you could edit other people's posts by simply changing "/View" in the URL to "/Edit".
@L3FT2R1GHT yeah I'll add them back, wasn't sure if anyone was using them tbh. And unfortunately no, the codes aren't averages, they're rather just instantaneous approximations. I might make some updated versions in the future
would it be cool if I put the target velocity heading code in an updated version of Useful FT Codes forum?(mainly cause my code is super bulky comparison lol) I'll make sure to give you credit
@FlyingPatriot its a really cool map. unrelated though I found some bugs, some parts of the roads have missing collision boxes, images linked below so you can find them
@CanadianAircraftBuilder its under the hood of the car. And the reason that they’re mad is that the CCP (chinese government) would much rather try to convince people that Taiwan isn’t a country, instead of invasion. Since China is a dictatorship, it means that it is very risky to have an opinion that differs from the government narrative, so a lot of people end up getting fired up over what really shouldn’t be that big of an issue.
@Bismarcksurvivor100 the cannon should return to original position a couple seconds after firing (ill check the code though, it might've broken). To use the TOW system, the vehicle has to be stationary (just like irl), and cannon pointed at the target before and during the missile's flight
The new mod did you dirty, man
+1I don't think the change makes it better. I think having to state your reason to downvote is kinda besides the point of downvoting. At that point just leave your criticism as a comment. And besides, moderators are already swamped with countless bogus reports.
+2This has been proven to be a bad idea. Long time ago (like 8 years ago?) the SP website used to use a 5-star rating system instead of the upvote system. What would often happen is that new players would often get low ratings and that would then drive them away because often your first build is gonna be objectively garbage. There were also a few times that players would use the feature to target others and knowing some of the... factions on today's site, I think such a feature would just be a recipe for disaster. It's a lot easier to moderate rude comments than rude ratings.
+4UPDATE: This is now my most upvoted build to date! Thank you all for the support, I love me some internet points.
@THEOKPILOT how did you even find this comment?? lmao
@crazyplaness they're fake images and not of the actual build, pretty dubious tbh
Wow! This looks like a totally different game!
@RTRMUSTANG28283 honestly the leaf spring how I did it is kind of smoke in mirrors. The parts physically representing the leaf spring don't provide any suspension and are actually used more to guide the springs next to them. Overall creating the illusion of functioning leaf spring
curious as to why my b-17 is in the bottom category lol
@RailfanEthan Lack of Skua's nightmare as well lol
@OrangeConnor2 damn what'd we do lol
aw man, I thought cedy had a new post
@GabrielFangster70 those german firetrucks are no joke
Heres my submission https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/iMgGz1/bjac-co-Bullfrog-Rally-Truck @TastuTheOtaku
yeah... the security on this site has never been too great, I mean hell back when they added forum posts, I found out you could edit other people's posts by simply changing "/View" in the URL to "/Edit".
@L3FT2R1GHT yeah I'll add them back, wasn't sure if anyone was using them tbh. And unfortunately no, the codes aren't averages, they're rather just instantaneous approximations. I might make some updated versions in the future
@AtlasAir747MyBeloved bro???
isn't she a minor?
@32
Mach reading added
Forward/Reverse Differentiation code improved
Improved post formatting
@dardragon forgot to mention when I uploaded the post, my bad
+1@ToeTips lol one of my friends sent me the challenge, I just might tbh
+1would it be cool if I put the target velocity heading code in an updated version of Useful FT Codes forum?(mainly cause my code is super bulky comparison lol) I'll make sure to give you credit
+1damn wtf, it did a way better job than me at coding lol
My "Target velocity heading"
(rate(Longitude+(TargetDistance*sin(TargetHeading)))>0?atan(rate(Latitude+((TargetDistance*cos(TargetElevation))*cos(TargetHeading)))/rate
(Longitude+((TargetDistance*cos(TargetElevation))*sin(TargetHeading))))
-90:atan(rate(Latitude+((TargetDistance*cos(TargetElevation))*cos(TargetHeading)))/rate
(Longitude+((TargetDistance*cos(TargetElevation))*sin(TargetHeading))))+90)/-1
AI "target velocity heading"
atan2(rate(TargetDistance*cos(TargetElevation)*sin(TargetHeading)+ Longitude),rate(TargetDistance*cos(TargetElevation)*cos(TargetHeading)+Latitude))
All hail our robot overlords
+1what force made you do this
+4@dearbullet42 around 1k lol...
you might have to look into quaternions (trigonometry on steroids) as well as PID controllers
@Talon7192 much more respectable than reporting the post
+1nuremburg king ! !
@FlyingPatriot its very fast. idk how to get a lap that fast without slamming head first into a wall lol
+2man, minimum avg speed of 156kph
@RepublicOfCursedPlanes dont you dare finish that lol
@RepublicOfCursedPlanes TRUE
@FlyingPatriot its a really cool map. unrelated though I found some bugs, some parts of the roads have missing collision boxes, images linked below so you can find them
picture 1
picture 2
sick as hell
yo where the map download at
@FirstFish83828 lmao how did you even find this
Ukranian technique
@Kangy e
fourth
secon(d)!!111
first!!1!
free cam
@CanadianAircraftBuilder its under the hood of the car. And the reason that they’re mad is that the CCP (chinese government) would much rather try to convince people that Taiwan isn’t a country, instead of invasion. Since China is a dictatorship, it means that it is very risky to have an opinion that differs from the government narrative, so a lot of people end up getting fired up over what really shouldn’t be that big of an issue.
Yep, thats him! Thats the car!
+1@ReinMcDeer agreed
@HuskyDynamics01 unfortunately this completely messes with the physics of the wheel and only reduces the size of the ball, doesnt remove it
+1@Vincent ive seen plenty of 9/11 memorial posts, i dont see how this is any different from those
@NRGCLIX this is a memorial post to remember the Tiananmen square massacre
+1you have no idea how hard it is to resist reporting this
+3@Bismarcksurvivor100 the cannon should return to original position a couple seconds after firing (ill check the code though, it might've broken). To use the TOW system, the vehicle has to be stationary (just like irl), and cannon pointed at the target before and during the missile's flight