Nice to see this work, your Roundel is very similar to my 'USAF Roundel low visibility (1 label)' but not copied and much cleaner.
Looking forward to more work :)
Note:
1.Low Quality Settings do not give any thrust.
2.The aircraft accelerates slowly from 0 to 50kph when taking off from the ground, please wait patiently or fast forward.
@KDnotSpy @Galland Thank you very much, it looks better than I expected, but it also uses up my patience. In fact that the cockpit could be more refined.
@Dragorans Thank you for your reply, I hope you understand that I am more about communicating this technology. In fact, I support its development, but for objective consideration, it is necessary for me to remind that this technology has limitations but can be overcome.
While I'm progressively pursuing authenticity including momentum, there will be people who prefer dynamics that are too strong to be realistic.
In addition, your aircraft is really good, and the power decay at high altitude is very realistic. In recent months, the power of my regular engine modified with xml has also been reduced at high altitudes.
I am very happy to see this plane, it flies smoothly
I built a similar powered aircraft a few months ago, but the performance of this type of power is severely degraded at high altitudes. The free-turning JointRotator counteracts the torque, reducing transmission efficiency. A pair of coaxial counter-propellers is recommended, but do not put a free-turning JointRotator behind a powered JointRotator. This will give you the same stable flight, better climb
If you still prefer a single propeller with a free-spinning JointRotator, it doesn't matter, you can modify the function of this axis to increase with height.
If there is something unclear, please point it out.
Excellent work with minimal parts. When I first saw it, I thought it would need at least 300 parts.
+1Nice to see this work, your Roundel is very similar to my 'USAF Roundel low visibility (1 label)' but not copied and much cleaner.
+1Looking forward to more work :)
@SweetSuccubus Thank you very much
+1@localf15enjoyer Nice work. Sorry I'm late, I've been busy the last few weeks.
+1Very good aircraft. if you agree, I will upgrade to Sea Harrier frs.1 based on this work.
Very good aircraft. if you agree, I will upgrade to Sea Harrier frs.1 based on this work.
Note:
1.Low Quality Settings do not give any thrust.
2.The aircraft accelerates slowly from 0 to 50kph when taking off from the ground, please wait patiently or fast forward.
3.The thrust drops when slow motion
cool
@HOPKINS234 thank you for you upvote
upvoted form billbill
nice!
upvote form qq
nice
nice!
Coincidentally, I'm going to make D.550
+1🎉 army day
+3Please note that this aircraft is not participating in the challenge
@ShocK69 Ok, thanks for your advice.
It would be perfect to try to use more thrust engines because you have too many weapons on your plane.
支持支持！
+2@Yourlocalhuman Thank you for your support and comments
The plane had my permission, but it wasn't necessary and it was nice to see the successor.
Can functions be written on rotators? I want the nose to be rotatable. For example: sum(throttle)
@Yourlocalhuman "Atleast someone must be on the berlingshcon side for the war to actually start" ok
支持支持
Simple but beautiful
+1Well made, I saw your plane on bilibili and left my suggestion.
nice！
Well done！modern fighter!
@mateo973 I also thank you for your upvote
Military fans have waited too long
+2@KDnotSpy @Galland Thank you very much, it looks better than I expected, but it also uses up my patience. In fact that the cockpit could be more refined.
+1@KDnotSpy Thanks
nice
I know the movie, and you'll be perfect with the red lightning paint on the plane
I'm going to build a Mirage 2000, too
cool！
good idea
nice！
cool！
Thank you for your support
@KDnotSpy Thank you for your support,my next work is published.I'm sorry for the delay
cool！
nice！
109z3 form bilibili
+1@Dragorans Thank you for your reply, I hope you understand that I am more about communicating this technology. In fact, I support its development, but for objective consideration, it is necessary for me to remind that this technology has limitations but can be overcome.
While I'm progressively pursuing authenticity including momentum, there will be people who prefer dynamics that are too strong to be realistic.
In addition, your aircraft is really good, and the power decay at high altitude is very realistic. In recent months, the power of my regular engine modified with xml has also been reduced at high altitudes.
However, it is normal for its power to decay with altitude, you can still fly very high, but it will take a long time
I am very happy to see this plane, it flies smoothly
I built a similar powered aircraft a few months ago, but the performance of this type of power is severely degraded at high altitudes. The free-turning JointRotator counteracts the torque, reducing transmission efficiency. A pair of coaxial counter-propellers is recommended, but do not put a free-turning JointRotator behind a powered JointRotator. This will give you the same stable flight, better climb
If you still prefer a single propeller with a free-spinning JointRotator, it doesn't matter, you can modify the function of this axis to increase with height.
If there is something unclear, please point it out.
cool!
+1@hotowg congratulations！
+1