@DrMinh I have to say that with a limited number of parts your work is almost perfect overall and in detail, the wing loadsing is reasonable, the cockpit details are realistic. My creation is more like a waste of parts, although it works well, in fact it took me almost a month of spare time.
@CRATE52PART2 Historically this wooden plane crashed because of weak bonds, but in war thunder it was still a good plane, disintegrating at a high rate, and though it disintegrated at high speed or the flaps fell off, it recovered in the game The difficulty is not high, but due to the limited time and the friendliness of the players, I did not recover the speeding disintegration.
@Sorren Thank you for your good comment. This is the motivation for my creation. This aircraft has gone through an unimaginable number of test flights to become the current work, good control and fine appearance are equally important
Nice to see this work, your Roundel is very similar to my 'USAF Roundel low visibility (1 label)' but not copied and much cleaner.
Looking forward to more work :)
@KDnotSpy @Galland Thank you very much, it looks better than I expected, but it also uses up my patience. In fact that the cockpit could be more refined.
I highly recommend you to check out Baidu Tieba, especially some excellent tutorials, you will learn a lot. A final piece of advice, like the one the site gives you: don't give out personal information, don't argue, but trust me, there will always be people who have positions and views that differ from ours.
what a coincidence, I also built a Yak3VK108, not released yet, but it has over a thousand parts that are not mobile-friendly.I welcome you to have a look at my YAK3VK108 in the future, rest assured that I will postpone the release for a while to avoid
@lingcod Coincidentally, I have a semi-finished ta152c3, originally I was going to release it later, because I still have a yak3 to make, I will try to finish them at the same time
@sam1333 In the past, I improved the aircraft and released the improved aircraft, which limited the speed of the aircraft, but other problems were not solved. After all, the maneuverability of the aircraft can be greatly improved through XML. I am also keen on high maneuverability aircraft, maybe I should try to make aerobatics aircraft or current jet fighters
@sam1333 Thank you for your comment. Due to my excessive pursuit of the maneuverability of the plane, the plane has too small weight and strange flight characteristics, which really does not conform to the actual situation in history
Note:
1.Low Quality Settings do not give any thrust.
2.The aircraft accelerates slowly from 0 to 50kph when taking off from the ground, please wait patiently or fast forward.
🎉 army day
+3@RolandTelmsFrossag 你做的已经很好了，特别是在时间不充足的情况下，我造一架飞机至少需要一周的时间，期待你以后能够有足够的时间。
+3祝你学业有成！ (/^▽^)/
支持支持！
+2Military fans have waited too long
+2@Beifenglenglong Although I haven't played Ace Combat, I know a bit about it. I've never heard of Ace Combat having a WWII fighter,
+2@DrMinh I have to say that with a limited number of parts your work is almost perfect overall and in detail, the wing loadsing is reasonable, the cockpit details are realistic. My creation is more like a waste of parts, although it works well, in fact it took me almost a month of spare time.
+2I welcome you to have a look at my YAK3VK107 in the future, rest assured that I will postpone the release for a while to avoid competition.
+2大佬！
+2I also released a he162 this month
+2@RolandTelmsFrossag Thanks for your support.
+2@CharlesDeGaulle @JaeBeansS thanks
+2@CRATE52PART2 Historically this wooden plane crashed because of weak bonds, but in war thunder it was still a good plane, disintegrating at a high rate, and though it disintegrated at high speed or the flaps fell off, it recovered in the game The difficulty is not high, but due to the limited time and the friendliness of the players, I did not recover the speeding disintegration.
+2@Sorren Thank you for your good comment. This is the motivation for my creation. This aircraft has gone through an unimaginable number of test flights to become the current work, good control and fine appearance are equally important
+2Excellent work with minimal parts. When I first saw it, I thought it would need at least 300 parts.
+1Nice to see this work, your Roundel is very similar to my 'USAF Roundel low visibility (1 label)' but not copied and much cleaner.
+1Looking forward to more work :)
@SweetSuccubus Thank you very much
+1@localf15enjoyer Nice work. Sorry I'm late, I've been busy the last few weeks.
+1Coincidentally, I'm going to make D.550
+1Simple but beautiful
+1@KDnotSpy @Galland Thank you very much, it looks better than I expected, but it also uses up my patience. In fact that the cockpit could be more refined.
+1109z3 form bilibili
+1cool!
+1@hotowg congratulations！
+1nice！
+1I highly recommend you to check out Baidu Tieba, especially some excellent tutorials, you will learn a lot. A final piece of advice, like the one the site gives you: don't give out personal information, don't argue, but trust me, there will always be people who have positions and views that differ from ours.
+1what a coincidence, I also built a Yak3VK108, not released yet, but it has over a thousand parts that are not mobile-friendly.I welcome you to have a look at my YAK3VK108 in the future, rest assured that I will postpone the release for a while to avoid
+1From Bilibili
+1nice
+1cool
+1冰墩墩,Прекрасный
+1@lingcod Coincidentally, I have a semi-finished ta152c3, originally I was going to release it later, because I still have a yak3 to make, I will try to finish them at the same time
+1Looks like a Swiss C-3605
+1nice！
+1@jangelelcangry Thank you for the great previous comment, I just couldn't resist mentioning the xml, it helped me a lot
+1@jangelelcangry The brake force can be modified in XML
+1nice！
+1nice!
+1nice job
+1@sam1333 In the past, I improved the aircraft and released the improved aircraft, which limited the speed of the aircraft, but other problems were not solved. After all, the maneuverability of the aircraft can be greatly improved through XML. I am also keen on high maneuverability aircraft, maybe I should try to make aerobatics aircraft or current jet fighters
+1@sam1333 Thank you for your comment. Due to my excessive pursuit of the maneuverability of the plane, the plane has too small weight and strange flight characteristics, which really does not conform to the actual situation in history
+1Very good aircraft. if you agree, I will upgrade to Sea Harrier frs.1 based on this work.
Very good aircraft. if you agree, I will upgrade to Sea Harrier frs.1 based on this work.
Note:
1.Low Quality Settings do not give any thrust.
2.The aircraft accelerates slowly from 0 to 50kph when taking off from the ground, please wait patiently or fast forward.
3.The thrust drops when slow motion
cool
@HOPKINS234 thank you for you upvote
upvoted form billbill
nice!
upvote form qq
nice
nice!