@AWESOMENESS360
Making the outside corrosion resistant wouldn't be that hard, Heck you could jsut use paint, but all the hydraulic electric and avionic systems would have to have watertight seals on them, Which is harder than it sounds.
But yeah, you would want a whole new plane design.
@AWESOMENESS360 @CC1010
This would be extremely cool, but I think it would be crippled by seawater ruining the entire Jet. You would either need to keep the plane inside the sub - Heavy and expensive - Or build a plane to be totally corrosion and water proof. - Heavy and expensive.
Its obvious, People don't look through a dozen creations to find something worthy of upvoting, they just click on what catches their eye. And 50 upvotes for a mc block is the tip of the iceberg, it gets so much worse. this happens to everyone who doesn't make super HQ builds.
12 - 20 upvotes is pretty good... You gotta build up a following and make teasers if you want more. Good thumbnails also matter a ton, Yours seem to be dark and you can't see the build well.
This plane is very neat! I really like the design. I def feel your pain with the completing builds thing, i haven't uploaded in over a year because i up my standards faster than i build.
Change maxRange to a high number. You will have to mess with it a bit to get the distance you want, unless you want 10 miles, then just go with 99999999.
Unless you wanted to make a extremely complicated system that launched spheres with bombs inside using detachers. While this could theoretically work, Ammo would be quite limited unless you wanted a 500+ part ammo storage...
Input should be
selectedWeapon = "Insert weapon name"
That ought to work. Might need to be
clamp01(selectedWeapon = "Insert weapon name")
I may be wrong.
Yeah, I think you did! Again, Im impressed with how smooth and simple it looks.
Reminds me of randomusername, Although they were probably before your time.
I
Asteroidbook345:
Because it's an older plane...
That's like asking why the F-16 exists. It's clearly a very good plane, otherwise they
would have retired it by now.
I
The people who own it probably did quite a bit of research into whether or not to replace them, And found it was better to keep them, So... Its probably a good plane for its time. You gotta take into account that planes often last for decades in service.
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/786734570845634610/891297274393686076/daily-meme-dump18-600x540.png
Download some ones you like and take them apart to see how they did it.
This is pretty well built, And i like the design! Nice job!
+1T
+1Oh, Gosh.
I mean... I would Try it.
Pineapple really makes the pizza for me, Almost not worth eating without it. (And olives)
Dang, imma miss him, He was one of my favorite builders. I wonder if he has somewhere i can follow him to see his new, non-sp stuff.
+7@AWESOMENESS360
Making the outside corrosion resistant wouldn't be that hard, Heck you could jsut use paint, but all the hydraulic electric and avionic systems would have to have watertight seals on them, Which is harder than it sounds.
But yeah, you would want a whole new plane design.
@Strucker
+5I would say that sp is still better if you don't know either system cause of all the incredibly annoying bugs in the sr2 designer.
Are you on mobile? It is much easier to build in sp on mobile. I would say its worth buying.
+2@AWESOMENESS360 @CC1010
This would be extremely cool, but I think it would be crippled by seawater ruining the entire Jet. You would either need to keep the plane inside the sub - Heavy and expensive - Or build a plane to be totally corrosion and water proof. - Heavy and expensive.
This is quite well built! I tried this same concept but i was too lazy to make it function well.
I cannot stress how much i love this design. Utterly fantastic.
+1maxTargetingAngle 180 For 360 lock.
Its obvious, People don't look through a dozen creations to find something worthy of upvoting, they just click on what catches their eye. And 50 upvotes for a mc block is the tip of the iceberg, it gets so much worse. this happens to everyone who doesn't make super HQ builds.
Wow, that's actually really sick, looks like a comic panel.
Ayyyyyyyyy, Congrats, bro!
Def going to test this later!
I think i like the pickup better, actually. XD
12 - 20 upvotes is pretty good... You gotta build up a following and make teasers if you want more. Good thumbnails also matter a ton, Yours seem to be dark and you can't see the build well.
This plane is very neat! I really like the design. I def feel your pain with the completing builds thing, i haven't uploaded in over a year because i up my standards faster than i build.
+1Sp building tools are waaaaaaay better. Nuff said.
+2I do like it!
+1T
Change maxRange to a high number. You will have to mess with it a bit to get the distance you want, unless you want 10 miles, then just go with 99999999.
Gasp
+4Oh, I think i see it! Where were the pictures taken? I especially like the tank in the 5th Pic.
Unless you wanted to make a extremely complicated system that launched spheres with bombs inside using detachers. While this could theoretically work, Ammo would be quite limited unless you wanted a 500+ part ammo storage...
Ya' can't.
Vera nice! Teaser may have been posted at a bad time...
Pog
@KnightOfRen Challenge accepted!
Thats nothin' I have an alt with 16 Thousand.
Actually, there isn't any air. Its just not calculated. The drag is just based on the motion of the objects.
+7Dope.
+1Mmm, i like it!
Clear.
+1Yes, just paste the exact weapon name in.
Input should be
+1selectedWeapon = "Insert weapon name"
That ought to work. Might need to be
clamp01(selectedWeapon = "Insert weapon name")
I may be wrong.
You do mean an infinity sign, ∞ right?
+1Use two hollow fuselages stuck side by side, rotated 45 degrees with the corners set to 3 curved 1 hard.
+1I can make an example if you need.
T
Increase damper on suspension, increase physics quality.
@210100 I hate you.
+2Im glad i could help! They deserve it!
+1Yeah, I think you did! Again, Im impressed with how smooth and simple it looks.
+4Reminds me of randomusername, Although they were probably before your time.
@F104Deathtrap
But it wouldn't be worth the cost to upgrade, because the rafale is still good, they already own them.
I
+1Asteroidbook345:
Because it's an older plane...
That's like asking why the F-16 exists. It's clearly a very good plane, otherwise they
would have retired it by now.
I
The people who own it probably did quite a bit of research into whether or not to replace them, And found it was better to keep them, So... Its probably a good plane for its time. You gotta take into account that planes often last for decades in service.
I actually think its one of the most beautiful planes ever.
+51