Your entry has been rejected as it doesn't meet the required part count (150 parts). I suggestr trying again with sculpted fuselage, custom wings, details...
@JohnnyBoythePilot what part of "two to ten seats" stated in the challenge requirements is so hard to understand? Every participant so far opted for either a single seater or twenty seater.
@Zippy6 dilapidated one would probably be more difficult if you want to go all out. It would include paint chips and parts where paint and vinyls peeled off. It would also increase part count. Other than that, it's just a matter of 0.8 gloss and 0.2 gloss.
@T8flightcrafts I'll probably upload a list of inspirations tomorrow. It'll include some conventional single and twin engines, as well as some less conventional examples I'd like to see.
@Chancey21 one per category is allowed. And I don't want ultralights and race planes as I am trying to encourage people to build personal transport planes.
@Kimcotupan15 I'm glad you like it. I consider it by best mobile-friendly build. If you decide to make a small plane yourself, consider participating in my upcoming General Aviation challenge. It should be posted today or tomorrow.
Unfortunately, a notification on jet streams will stay visible even if you remove the build. However, thumbnail won't show if the build is removed. There's nothing else that can be done to make your public build inaccessible.
You'll have to wait for a dozen more years for that one. World war three is yet to happen, and we are yet to see what technologies are to be used in it. Tag "futuristic" fits builds that "would be used in WW3 if it happened in 2118".
It is a SimplePlanes-only phenomenon. Due to unbalanced drag, lift or mass, plane rolls to one side. It is actually a product of autoyaw if caused by drag.
There's more to upvote yield than posting time. You seem to be overusing X-ray on thumbnails and often only using one of possible three screenshots per build. You should try to show best features of the build with other two pictures. Custom background mods are also a good option for increasing likeability of your thumbnail.
Main gear should be further forward, half a meter (or roughly two feet) behind CoM. Other than that, very nice build for your level, as far as I can see without downloading. I'll download it tomorrow if I don't forget.
Whip antennas, VLS cells, more communication and sensory equipment (optional, you can say it's inside the superstructure), rudders and props, insignia...
Control surfaces have their trailing edges separated, and they are themselves separated from the fuselage and wingtip, and are sticking out behind the trailing edge of the wing root and tip. On real one, control surfaces are barely noticeable when not deflected.
That guy is lucky he didn't write that here on the site. You've been a part of this community for ages, and it's a bit sad to see you go. However, your choice. See you on SR2.
There are multiple ways of making flaps:
- via XML (use Overload mod, set input of a control surface to VTOL;
- put a wing piece on a rotator and nudge the assembly into place;
- Attach wing to a fuselage block attached to a rotator for a full custom (fuselage-covered) wing.
Your entry has been rejected as it doesn't meet the required part count (150 parts). I suggestr trying again with sculpted fuselage, custom wings, details...
+2@ND40X that's great. I'm looking forward to your entry.
+2@JohnnyBoythePilot what part of "two to ten seats" stated in the challenge requirements is so hard to understand? Every participant so far opted for either a single seater or twenty seater.
+2@Zippy6 dilapidated one would probably be more difficult if you want to go all out. It would include paint chips and parts where paint and vinyls peeled off. It would also increase part count. Other than that, it's just a matter of 0.8 gloss and 0.2 gloss.
+2@T8flightcrafts I'll probably upload a list of inspirations tomorrow. It'll include some conventional single and twin engines, as well as some less conventional examples I'd like to see.
+2@Chancey21 a floaty biplane? Excellent choice. I was already afraid I'll get 172 Cessna 172s.
+2@BogdanX keep quiet, you'll scare away other participants. Nobody wants you as an opponent :)
+2@Chancey21 one per category is allowed. And I don't want ultralights and race planes as I am trying to encourage people to build personal transport planes.
+2@Chancey21 @Kimcotupan15 you've expressed interest in the challenge. Here it is.
+2@Kimcotupan15 I'm glad you like it. I consider it by best mobile-friendly build. If you decide to make a small plane yourself, consider participating in my upcoming General Aviation challenge. It should be posted today or tomorrow.
+2@BlackhattAircraft you've upvoted this post, and yet you keep tagging me to remove copies...
+2You should do sharp edges on elevators of that Heinkel.
+2Unfortunately, a notification on jet streams will stay visible even if you remove the build. However, thumbnail won't show if the build is removed. There's nothing else that can be done to make your public build inaccessible.
+2@RamboJutter I'm not allowed to answer that :)
+2@DemonSniper8 true that. And user posting it would be immediately permanently banned.
+2I'm more of a beer person, but thanks all the same :)
+2That's quick. It's one of the best looking engines I've seen on the site.
+2This engine looks amazing. How long did it take you to make it?
+2I've heard of real planes that were developed more quickly than this one :)
+2You'll have to wait for a dozen more years for that one. World war three is yet to happen, and we are yet to see what technologies are to be used in it. Tag "futuristic" fits builds that "would be used in WW3 if it happened in 2118".
+2@Squirrel snitches to Andrew
+2It is a SimplePlanes-only phenomenon. Due to unbalanced drag, lift or mass, plane rolls to one side. It is actually a product of autoyaw if caused by drag.
+2Now that's what I call a proper successor build / edit. Can't wait to see it done.
+2There's more to upvote yield than posting time. You seem to be overusing X-ray on thumbnails and often only using one of possible three screenshots per build. You should try to show best features of the build with other two pictures. Custom background mods are also a good option for increasing likeability of your thumbnail.
+2I-16 is already an eggplane. No need to modify it. Try Po-2. I've never seen an egg biplane.
+2Click here. I have already explained the only way to edit the gun sound without using mods.
+2@Mod here's a good chance to get back into it :)
+2Just 50 parts?! Ok, I might be able to fit inside that range, but I might also quadruple it with M.Corp coat of arms.
+2Main gear should be further forward, half a meter (or roughly two feet) behind CoM. Other than that, very nice build for your level, as far as I can see without downloading. I'll download it tomorrow if I don't forget.
+2I'm upvoting for the build quality. I still hold that real Zumwalt class is a failure.
+2Whip antennas, VLS cells, more communication and sensory equipment (optional, you can say it's inside the superstructure), rudders and props, insignia...
+2What kind of mods? Maps, parts, editor tools...?
+2SP isn't anywhere near dead. I just got 64 upvotes on a build.
+2Great job. This is one of the best flying helicopters I have used so far. Best vertical landing I have ever performed.
+2Nice plane. However, diameter of the prop is too large, forcing the upper wing to be too high.
+2JamusPlanesII
+2It seems to be Jundroo-ed Nimitz class carrier.
+2lol, you need less money to produce Po-2 than to produce a wheel for the Airbus.
+2Not bad. Still, 1000+ parts and stock ailerons...
+2The build you deleted was featured?! Ok, I'll refeature it.
+2Here's how you do it.
+2@FastDan I'm just doing my job. Thanks for pointing it out.
+2@Diam would you mind changing your gravatar picture? The on you are using is borderline NSFW.
+2Control surfaces have their trailing edges separated, and they are themselves separated from the fuselage and wingtip, and are sticking out behind the trailing edge of the wing root and tip. On real one, control surfaces are barely noticeable when not deflected.
+2I'm pretty sure that it already has more parts than some of my builds.
+2That guy is lucky he didn't write that here on the site. You've been a part of this community for ages, and it's a bit sad to see you go. However, your choice. See you on SR2.
+2I chopped a wasp in half in flight today, but you don't see me making a post about it... Still, nice story.
+2@QingyuZhou because magic.
+2There are multiple ways of making flaps:
+2- via XML (use Overload mod, set input of a control surface to VTOL;
- put a wing piece on a rotator and nudge the assembly into place;
- Attach wing to a fuselage block attached to a rotator for a full custom (fuselage-covered) wing.
@Chancey21 thanks.
+2