@MAPA thanks. History must have been at least as difficult to get right as was the build itself. Literally months of studying every bit of information available on these, including a visit to the SMS Bodrog / Sava, which is still afloat in Belgrade.
@Mousewithamachinegun122 eh, it's just kids. You can't expect kids to be rational. I'm on pretty good terms now, years later, with the very worst of them.
It's perfect now (:
By the way, mentioning people in description won't send them a notification and will not be a clickable link. To make a clickable link, write [text] (URL of the page).
Why not make it maneuverable? These things were quite maneuverable. You just need a large vertical wing near CoM to provide directional stability, another one in the tail, and some actual control surfaces. Also, it should be steerable on the pitch axis via both ballast trimming and elevators.
Andrew has actually been replaced by an automation back when I was a moderator. I never found out what happened to the real Andrew. I guess automaton malfunctioned yesterday and they're cleaning up the mess now.
@Graingy I relaxed the standard because I had some time left and decided to rate those few builds that didn't meet the requirements but didn't entirely miss the topic.
@Densja if I'm not mistaken, that would be my friend @BogdanX. Unfortunately, he deleted his account a few months ago, so your best bet would be modifying this build back to a single plane.
@SunnyOmori a piece of advice from a guy that's been with this community for eight years now: this kind of stunts might earn you some credit with the newer members of the community, but no lasting reputation. My advice to you is to start making builds, and good ones at that, if you want people here to recognize you. For random chatting and socializing, use many discord server linked in the pinned "List Of Discord Servers" forum post.
If you want to actually play the game, you can learn from other builders, both by exploring their builds, and by asking them how they did certain things. If you're just here for internet points and cheap validation, you'll find Facebook a much better alternative.
This post is so far against the rules that it would have earned you a ban back when I was a moderator. Let's wait and see what current moderators think about this blatant abuse of the point system.
Deleting parts with backspace button doesn't work. Other keyboard inputs are working properly.
Fine Tuner mod is bricked. It doesn't move or rotate parts.
Is the challenge accepting armored fighting vehicles that border on tanks or are often mislabeled as tanks, such as assault guns, self-propelled artillery, wheeled vehicles with tank guns, and tank destroyers?
By the way, this is a pretty nice challenge. Good luck with it.
@BluestBoi oh, never mind that. When you have a history of hosting popular challenges, you learn to use as much of a harsh tone as you can. It makes people read the rules carefully, resulting in higher quality of entries, and more good airships for the community to enjoy.
@Planemaker1012 I'm glad you like it. Half of the building process here was shaving off excess parts and tweaking functionality. I too was playing on a second-hand laptop at the time, and the goal is to make it not lag even on my device.
@asteroidbook345 thank you for clarifying all that. I was almost afraid I was up against a rational person here. So:
Lacking moral high ground means you are morally wrong. You admitted to not having it.
You have failed to discuss facts, thus making it apparent that you are also factually wrong.
You keep insisting on insulting me, proving the poor quality of your character, and making your entire statement pointless by virtue of being a lesser man.
@asteroidbook345 unfortunately, you have just lost your moral high ground by attacking my ideology without reasonable arguments, and by insulting me.
I must advise practicing your manners, as well as expanding your vocabulary, and learning how to converse.
@Terminator2809 since you have failed to read it, I'll paste it here for you:
"You have been permanently banned from PortSP for persistent immature and disruptive behavior, having been warned far too many times.
Sad to see you go, it's not us, it's you.
kind wishes
EternalDarkness"
Having pretty much mastered fuselages by now, I think you should also try custom wings. This technique offers decent, easy to make custom wings with low part count.
As always, nice build.
You should have given the engine less torque in my opinion. Taking off is really difficult. Wheels could have been scaled by width to reduce the attachment point size. Other than that, it's a very nice build.
@ThomasRoderick thank you. I was never truly gone, I was checking the site and Discord a few times a day, but yeah, I wasn't posting for a while (:
+1@TheMouse lol enjoy. I hope it won't cause you too much lag.
+1@Rjenteissussy @Eeoo here's how.
+1@MAPA thanks. History must have been at least as difficult to get right as was the build itself. Literally months of studying every bit of information available on these, including a visit to the SMS Bodrog / Sava, which is still afloat in Belgrade.
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph Stara Pazova. Ti?
+1Nije loše. Baš sam danas video par Orlova kod Batajnice.
+1Congratulations on reaching Gold, @Sano24.
+1@Mousewithamachinegun122 eh, it's just kids. You can't expect kids to be rational. I'm on pretty good terms now, years later, with the very worst of them.
+1It's perfect now (:
+1By the way, mentioning people in description won't send them a notification and will not be a clickable link. To make a clickable link, write [text] (URL of the page).
@Monarchii oh, I didn't know it's for that challenge. Still, could have used gyro for better turning. Good work on the PID controller though.
+1Why not make it maneuverable? These things were quite maneuverable. You just need a large vertical wing near CoM to provide directional stability, another one in the tail, and some actual control surfaces. Also, it should be steerable on the pitch axis via both ballast trimming and elevators.
+1If you're taking build suggestions, I'd like to see Vickers F.B.9 in your style.
+1@ccc12345 no worries, and no need to apologize. Just don't do it again, and everything is fine.
+1@Numbers2 SP and SR2 accounts are connected. A ban on one platform extends to the other. Or so it used to be, if they haven't changed it.
+1Andrew has actually been replaced by an automation back when I was a moderator. I never found out what happened to the real Andrew. I guess automaton malfunctioned yesterday and they're cleaning up the mess now.
+1@Mousewithamachinegun123 if you want to make hyperlink, use parentheses. These: "()". Not "{}".
+1Very nice build. Very pleasant to fly, even on my phone. Looks great for its part count too.
+1@Graingy I relaxed the standard because I had some time left and decided to rate those few builds that didn't meet the requirements but didn't entirely miss the topic.
+1Amazing build Dim. Looks perfect, loads of details, great proportion... Good work.
+1@ccc12345 sure.
+1@Densja if I'm not mistaken, that would be my friend @BogdanX. Unfortunately, he deleted his account a few months ago, so your best bet would be modifying this build back to a single plane.
+1Very impressive wave motion simulation.
+1@SunnyOmori a piece of advice from a guy that's been with this community for eight years now: this kind of stunts might earn you some credit with the newer members of the community, but no lasting reputation. My advice to you is to start making builds, and good ones at that, if you want people here to recognize you. For random chatting and socializing, use many discord server linked in the pinned "List Of Discord Servers" forum post.
+1If you want to actually play the game, you can learn from other builders, both by exploring their builds, and by asking them how they did certain things. If you're just here for internet points and cheap validation, you'll find Facebook a much better alternative.
Dornier trademark pointy wings (:
+1This post is so far against the rules that it would have earned you a ban back when I was a moderator. Let's wait and see what current moderators think about this blatant abuse of the point system.
+1@Type2volkswagen you're in time for the challenge. I'm just waiting for one more entry.
+1I like this one.
It looks amazing B. I love it.
+1bug
Deleting parts with backspace button doesn't work. Other keyboard inputs are working properly.
+1Fine Tuner mod is bricked. It doesn't move or rotate parts.
A very fine build, especially for the part count. It has a bit of trouble losing speed, but other than that, flies very well.
+1@WinsWings it is.
+1Thanks for the entry. It looks really nice.
+1@Quartz05 you don't have to, of course, though you could benefit from it. We're sharing ideas and techniques there.
+1Is the challenge accepting armored fighting vehicles that border on tanks or are often mislabeled as tanks, such as assault guns, self-propelled artillery, wheeled vehicles with tank guns, and tank destroyers?
+1By the way, this is a pretty nice challenge. Good luck with it.
@ACGspOfficial let's say a winner should receive ten upvotes. You go to ten of their builds, and upvote them. That's really all there is to it.
+1@ACGspOfficial by upvoting their builds.
+1@BluestBoi oh, never mind that. When you have a history of hosting popular challenges, you learn to use as much of a harsh tone as you can. It makes people read the rules carefully, resulting in higher quality of entries, and more good airships for the community to enjoy.
+1Thanks for the entry.
+1I didn't think I'd ever see a Kraguj properly done on SP. Good job.
+1@MrShenanigansSP I will probably accommodate a few late entries.
+1@UnmanagedReservoir you can't limit art, eh?
+1@Planemaker1012 I'm glad you like it. Half of the building process here was shaving off excess parts and tweaking functionality. I too was playing on a second-hand laptop at the time, and the goal is to make it not lag even on my device.
+1@asteroidbook345 thank you for clarifying all that. I was almost afraid I was up against a rational person here. So:
+1Lacking moral high ground means you are morally wrong. You admitted to not having it.
You have failed to discuss facts, thus making it apparent that you are also factually wrong.
You keep insisting on insulting me, proving the poor quality of your character, and making your entire statement pointless by virtue of being a lesser man.
@asteroidbook345 unfortunately, you have just lost your moral high ground by attacking my ideology without reasonable arguments, and by insulting me.
+1I must advise practicing your manners, as well as expanding your vocabulary, and learning how to converse.
@Garuda dobrodošao na SimplePlanes. Ovo je jednostavan, brzinski projekat, ali mi je drago da ti se sviđa.
+1Are those custom wings that I see? (:
+1@Terminator2809 since you have failed to read it, I'll paste it here for you:
+1"You have been permanently banned from PortSP for persistent immature and disruptive behavior, having been warned far too many times.
Sad to see you go, it's not us, it's you.
kind wishes
EternalDarkness"
@Terminator2809 You had a message accompanying the ban.
+1Having pretty much mastered fuselages by now, I think you should also try custom wings. This technique offers decent, easy to make custom wings with low part count.
+1As always, nice build.
You should have given the engine less torque in my opinion. Taking off is really difficult. Wheels could have been scaled by width to reduce the attachment point size. Other than that, it's a very nice build.
+1@MAPA you're welcome buddy. It's a duty of us veterans to help the new guys get better and get noticed.
+1