Man, that trailing edge is a mess. I love the overall shape, but I just can't get over that. Maybe try the technique linked in my bio. It's simple and ends up looking much better, especially on fighters.
You could have included so much more info. For example, ducted tail rotor is called "fenestron" and it is a design develped by Sud Aviation and first used on Aerospatiale Gazelle.
There are mods that allow you to set designer background color. Designer Suit does it if I remember correctly. That way, you don't have to use a huge platform that ruins orthographic views. Also, be sure to use all three screenshots to better show your build.
@ND40X not to be a meany or anything, but you are using a misleading thumbnail that is not showing the actual build to attract undeserved attention. That can get your post removed.
Have you considered spending more time per build, refining it, smoothing out its performance, adding details, using more advanced techniques? Then you'll never reach upload limit.
Alternately, you could put some color into your builds and start scoring upvotes. Also, use background mods to better present your builds. If you have another reason for quitting, it's fine by me.
Having finally tested this build, I must say it looks great for the part count. However, I'd like to see rudder responding to input and paddle wheels turning. For rudder, just use a rotator, and for paddle wheels you can use VTOL nozzles and a floppy rotator.
@Strikefighter04 they should add "vehicle" tag to the search then, just like I did in the link below. Or do you want a tag for a specific model of a truck? We want to keep the tags versatile. If you can describe the build by combining existing tags, there's no need for a new tag.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
It has changes from the original, it's a successor, and credit has been given. It is even approved by the original builder a few comments below. An example of how to do a successor build.
I've removed your post so it won't spark any drama. Thanks for letting me know, but in the future, please be more subtle. Discord DMs and tagging on unlisted posts are options too.
@DPSAircraftManufacturer flaps are easy. Use this technique to get pretty wings and set inner control surface rotators to VTOL and their input to "-1,0".
@DPSAircraftManufacturer stock control surfaces act depending on the position of the wing, not position of the control surface. If most of the wing is ahead of CoM, elevators and flaps will act "reversed".
@ChunderDownUndeR you should have mentioned that in description. You would have gotten a higher quality and performance mark, though I didn't take out a lot from that anyway, not being sure if it's a feature.
@JohnnyBoythePilot I said that the chassis wouldn't hold the system because the chassis is segmented instead of being one single tubular or frame chassis. Weak spots are right in front and behind the system. Also, a spam of small missiles wouldn't be effective, as there's too many of them, making reloading too expensive for the kind of system that is expected to spend four to five missiles per sortie.
@Sm10684 :)
+1Ok then. Still, either announce that this is your new account, or don't repost builds from your old one. People will be reporting them as copies.
+1@WarHawk95 eh, it's an old comment. Your latest on this post. I just replaced the "F word" with something else :)
+1@WarHawk95 and FrenchFry didn't take a nickname that seems french. French fries are Belgian :)
+1@WarHawk95 I have edited your comment to remove a partially censored curse word. Please refrain from cursing on the site.
+1Man, that trailing edge is a mess. I love the overall shape, but I just can't get over that. Maybe try the technique linked in my bio. It's simple and ends up looking much better, especially on fighters.
+1Your post has been removed. You can find all stock planes here. Please read the rules.
+1Number 12. Seems to be almost done.
+1@Nerfaddict your comment has been removed for depicting NSFW content (suicide). You have been issued a strike.
+1You could have included so much more info. For example, ducted tail rotor is called "fenestron" and it is a design develped by Sud Aviation and first used on Aerospatiale Gazelle.
+1There are mods that allow you to set designer background color. Designer Suit does it if I remember correctly. That way, you don't have to use a huge platform that ruins orthographic views. Also, be sure to use all three screenshots to better show your build.
+1@Atomicdragon for ban evasion. Circumventing a ban with an alt is a bannable offense.
+1I'd like it better with all-moving tail controlling both pitch and roll, but other than that, amazing build. Great performance.
+1@Atomicdragon apology accepted. Try to be nicer to the community from now on please.
+1@Dragontooth42809 you have been issued a strike for excessive profanity.
+1@ND40X not to be a meany or anything, but you are using a misleading thumbnail that is not showing the actual build to attract undeserved attention. That can get your post removed.
+1Have you considered spending more time per build, refining it, smoothing out its performance, adding details, using more advanced techniques? Then you'll never reach upload limit.
+1@SpencerTreePuncher I'm glad you like it buddy.
+1Alternately, you could put some color into your builds and start scoring upvotes. Also, use background mods to better present your builds. If you have another reason for quitting, it's fine by me.
+1@CrashFighter05 thanks :)
+1@belugasub thanks :)
+1@Koengerays no problem buddy.
+1@WarHawk95 yes, it's very nice for his level.
+1@HellFireKoder I think you've just been unleashed.
+1Having finally tested this build, I must say it looks great for the part count. However, I'd like to see rudder responding to input and paddle wheels turning. For rudder, just use a rotator, and for paddle wheels you can use VTOL nozzles and a floppy rotator.
+1I have edited your post as asking for upvotes is against the rules.
+1Join some SP Discord servers. Hanging out with other members of the community might help. You can join the most oopular one through a link in my bio.
+1@Strikefighter04 they should add "vehicle" tag to the search then, just like I did in the link below. Or do you want a tag for a specific model of a truck? We want to keep the tags versatile. If you can describe the build by combining existing tags, there's no need for a new tag.
+1I removed it, then noticed @randomusername, the original builder, approves this post so I re-approved it. Forgot to remove the comment though, @Nickr.
+1Planes will be made regardless of challenges, @enzoBoeing757 .
+1Maybe he blocked you, so you cannot tag him while he can still tag you if he decides to communicate. If you don't want him to, block him back.
+1Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
+1Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@spefyjerbf no problem. Beautiful design.
+1It's so cute :)
+1And it's named after my favourite place.
It has changes from the original, it's a successor, and credit has been given. It is even approved by the original builder a few comments below. An example of how to do a successor build.
+1Nora B-52 howitzer, Utva Kobac intermediate trainer, BOV-10 scout car, or any other Yugoimport SPDR product.
+1You seem to have accidentally posted this twice. I have removed the one with no upvotes for you.
+1@SpencerTreePuncher I have a few unposted builds in my saves. I might post one of those or make something new.
+1@SpencerTreePuncher thanks.
+1I've removed your post so it won't spark any drama. Thanks for letting me know, but in the future, please be more subtle. Discord DMs and tagging on unlisted posts are options too.
+1Excellent build. The most realistic broadside I've seen so far.
+1@Kimcotupan15 thanks. Main goal was to keep the part count as low as possible.
+1@Minecraftpoweer no problem.
+1@DPSAircraftManufacturer what I mean is that by now, I might have over a hundred planes with flaps. That's over two hundred flaps :)
+1@DPSAircraftManufacturer flaps are easy. Use this technique to get pretty wings and set inner control surface rotators to VTOL and their input to "-1,0".
+1@DPSAircraftManufacturer no problem.
+1@DPSAircraftManufacturer you get to have flaps that only move one way (down) and that produce extra lift exactly where you put them.
+1@DPSAircraftManufacturer stock control surfaces act depending on the position of the wing, not position of the control surface. If most of the wing is ahead of CoM, elevators and flaps will act "reversed".
+1@ChunderDownUndeR you should have mentioned that in description. You would have gotten a higher quality and performance mark, though I didn't take out a lot from that anyway, not being sure if it's a feature.
+1@JohnnyBoythePilot I said that the chassis wouldn't hold the system because the chassis is segmented instead of being one single tubular or frame chassis. Weak spots are right in front and behind the system. Also, a spam of small missiles wouldn't be effective, as there's too many of them, making reloading too expensive for the kind of system that is expected to spend four to five missiles per sortie.
+1