@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook you can make an unlisted build. In four and a half years, I assumed you have figured out using unlisted post for communication.
Part of your description has been removed as inappropriate. Please do not post drawings of inappropriately dressed females. If you have such content on your otber posts, remove is, as any future ones I stumble uoon will result in a strike.
@DADDADATHEDAD have you read terms of service? Jundroo is based in the US. According to US laws, you must be over 13 years old for companies to collect your online data. Since your posts and comments are your data, Jundroo mustn't keep them on their servers.
I have edited your post to avoid mass tagging and begging for upvotes part. No "upvote to be tagged", as some users will upvote a nice teaser and then be annoyed when tagged on the build, and you'll get points from users who don't like the teaser but want to be tagged on the build.
@KnightOfRen I'm certain that most of the people tagged at the bottom of the comment section never asked to be tagged on this post. I have taken your side against people talking bad about your builds, but if I see you tag everyone you know on a build again, I'll go through your posts and issue you a strike for every instance of mass tagging. It is a form of begging for upvotes, since people know you know they saw the post, and don't want to make you feel bad by not upvoting. It's a bannable offense.
I have managed to persuade Bogdan, a good friend of mine, to let his account be restored so the builds aren't lost. We'll see if he'll be using it in the future.
@asteroidbook345 I cannot run this build, and only have three pictures to work off of. Description says that the build is unfinished too. Specs seem realistic, but I've seen builds with perfect specs fail to take off.
Exactly what I've been saying. Stealth isn't something you put on the plane to make it invisible, it's just a buzzword attached to every plane with anti-detection features.
A user got a temp ban for breaking the rules. That's what users get when they break the rules. We don't give cookies for breaking the rules, since that would be counter-productive, and because cookies would get spoiled by the time they reach the recipient.
@hRmm you can download, and when you get the message that build could not be loaded, click undo, then redo. Build will spawn without the mod part, and you can use it. Since mod part here is not crucial for the functionality of the build, you should be able to play with it just fine.
Not bad, though I prefer sharp trailing edge. Also, good luck with the cockpit. Airliners using that fuselage technique are notoriously difficult to add cockpit windows to.
How extensive is the usage of funky trees on it? Funky trees can greatly enhance performance of a vehicle. My latest post, a howitzer, uses them to reduce acceleration while maintaining climbing ability and to reduce wheel turning angle as the speed increases.
Btw, you could hang out on SPMC sometime. I haven't seen you there in a while.
Speaking as one builder to another, @Akali, how did you manage to miss so many errors? Ailerons move in the same direction, slats extend upwards which real ones never do, rudder is inverted, and the build has more drag than a small country. Also, I've never seen a user higher than white level forget to paint the tires black. You even made a video which clearly shows the problem with ailerons. My advice is to spend a few more hours to make this build actually function and then to link the fixed version in description.
@sheepsblood indeed politics have no place on this site, and insulting an entire country over a build isn't a very nice thing to do. Your comment has been removed.
I'd hate to see you go. Leave the account and come back during school breaks. As for the game dying, another update has been confirmed months ago, when WNP was added as a dev.
I suggest using this technique to get custom control surfaces fairly easily. If you want more complex wings, you can find ways to improve that technique or use that technique until you master a better one. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned technique, I'll be happy to explain.
@Viper3000ad set max to 0.8 and min to 0.4 and 10° angle. Or, if it should deflect +-4° as aileron and -4° as a flap, "0.4,-0.4" on one rotator and "0,-0.4" on the other.
Design is very nice, although that view-obstructing rotator on the hood was unnecessary. Power to weight ratio and lift seem good, although the plane is very nose-heavy and pulls to the left due to CoM being off-center. Adding around 150lbs to the right wing fixes the roll issue, while "pre-trimming" by angling the horizontal stabilizer would fix the nose heaviness.
@Musselk auto credit only credits QinguyuZhou for the nose section. You need to credit him for the tail and to credit other users you took parts from. You can copy links in your browser and paste them into the description. Or at least, just state which part came from who. That will suffice.
Very well made plane. Nice performance. Only thing you forgot is to reduce the "brakeTorque" value of wheels, making the plane nose over if you hit the brakes.
Thank you all for participating. You can find your build on one of two pages of the results, with a little bit of feedback for each entry.
@SpiritusRaptor
@DeathStalker627
@BoganBoganTheMan
@Pilotmario
@ChunderDownUndeR
@KRAYTEK999
@ErvenDynamics
@Kimcotupan15
@Dllama4
@JohnnyBoythePilot
@FairFireFight
@EliteArsenals24
@Bukkeum
@DarDragon
@SnoWFLakE0s
@Akhtar04
@BlazeInfinity
@ProjectTank
@ThomasRoderick
@GeneralOliverVonBismarck
@kshatria
@UnguidedCylinder
@Tiseth
@Stoney
@logizAircrafts
@0n33
@SubXTribe
@BigBoiPlanes
@HarryBen47
@IGNikolaev
@Alexiozo
@Hiluks1
@FastRacer023
@Ratakis
@Patrick195
@Incertname
@TMach5
@BagelPlane
@Armyguy1534
@Generalkeath
@xXEdgynamehere
@winterro
@88blaroo
@SirTimothy1943
@GCPrototypes
@LordAidanYT
@Supernovaboss504
@SledDriver like Squirrel, I too have never insulted you. I'm just doing what I'm supposed to do. I even though we're on good terms. Anyway, since you have invited me to issue you a strike, you have been issued a strike for hostile behavior shown in the comment section of this post. I have archived this page as it is now, just in case you change your mind.
@ThomasRoderick I will try to take appropriate target for the system (a byplane for early guns, cruise missiles for anti-missile systems... ) and will test without mods.
I was picking between a pusher and a self propelled barge for my entry and chose a barge. I'm glad somebody made a pusher, I love those.
+4@Numbers HellFireKoder did all the talking for the mod team here. I have nothing to add. His comment is on top, pinned.
+4@Yolobroskaterman a number of your comments has been removed. You have been issued a strike.
+4Moderator team has decided to let you keep the account. Happy new year.
+4@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook you can make an unlisted build. In four and a half years, I assumed you have figured out using unlisted post for communication.
+4Part of your description has been removed as inappropriate. Please do not post drawings of inappropriately dressed females. If you have such content on your otber posts, remove is, as any future ones I stumble uoon will result in a strike.
+4Yes. You really ought to learn to download the challenge and make your own successors though.
+4@DADDADATHEDAD have you read terms of service? Jundroo is based in the US. According to US laws, you must be over 13 years old for companies to collect your online data. Since your posts and comments are your data, Jundroo mustn't keep them on their servers.
+4This is unique. No idea how I missed it originally.
+4I have edited your post to avoid mass tagging and begging for upvotes part. No "upvote to be tagged", as some users will upvote a nice teaser and then be annoyed when tagged on the build, and you'll get points from users who don't like the teaser but want to be tagged on the build.
+4@KnightOfRen I'm certain that most of the people tagged at the bottom of the comment section never asked to be tagged on this post. I have taken your side against people talking bad about your builds, but if I see you tag everyone you know on a build again, I'll go through your posts and issue you a strike for every instance of mass tagging. It is a form of begging for upvotes, since people know you know they saw the post, and don't want to make you feel bad by not upvoting. It's a bannable offense.
+4I have managed to persuade Bogdan, a good friend of mine, to let his account be restored so the builds aren't lost. We'll see if he'll be using it in the future.
+4@asteroidbook345 I cannot run this build, and only have three pictures to work off of. Description says that the build is unfinished too. Specs seem realistic, but I've seen builds with perfect specs fail to take off.
+4Exactly what I've been saying. Stealth isn't something you put on the plane to make it invisible, it's just a buzzword attached to every plane with anti-detection features.
+4@tylerdeveneuxmusic I tried downloading and I couldn't. It's a bit too deleted, unfortunately. I can visit its page.
+4A user got a temp ban for breaking the rules. That's what users get when they break the rules. We don't give cookies for breaking the rules, since that would be counter-productive, and because cookies would get spoiled by the time they reach the recipient.
+4@hRmm you can download, and when you get the message that build could not be loaded, click undo, then redo. Build will spawn without the mod part, and you can use it. Since mod part here is not crucial for the functionality of the build, you should be able to play with it just fine.
+4Nice mushroom. That build is gonna be the best slice of pizza on the site :)
+4Hello and welcome to the community. Dunno if you've seen the rules yet. Follow them, and you'll have a good time here. I wish you lots of points :)
+4Hey, SPesus isn't scary. He's a nice moderator.
+4@Armyguy1534 hmm... ok.
+4Your post has been removed as spam.
+4It looks very nice. Looking at the stats though, I'd say it has too much drag and way too much power.
+4Not bad, though I prefer sharp trailing edge. Also, good luck with the cockpit. Airliners using that fuselage technique are notoriously difficult to add cockpit windows to.
+4How extensive is the usage of funky trees on it? Funky trees can greatly enhance performance of a vehicle. My latest post, a howitzer, uses them to reduce acceleration while maintaining climbing ability and to reduce wheel turning angle as the speed increases.
+4Btw, you could hang out on SPMC sometime. I haven't seen you there in a while.
Speaking as one builder to another, @Akali, how did you manage to miss so many errors? Ailerons move in the same direction, slats extend upwards which real ones never do, rudder is inverted, and the build has more drag than a small country. Also, I've never seen a user higher than white level forget to paint the tires black. You even made a video which clearly shows the problem with ailerons. My advice is to spend a few more hours to make this build actually function and then to link the fixed version in description.
+4@sheepsblood indeed politics have no place on this site, and insulting an entire country over a build isn't a very nice thing to do. Your comment has been removed.
+4@X4JB nah. He gave a full credit and updated the build to 1.9 standard.
+4You got banned. Reason: "You can't talk about other games".
+4Just kidding, we're not Wargaming :)
You need to set input to
+4LaunchWeaponsorLaunchWeapon, can't remember exactly.@JamesBleriot this seems to be a new user. And no, "everyone" tag doesn't work. You have simply tagged an account named everyone.
+4I'd hate to see you go. Leave the account and come back during school breaks. As for the game dying, another update has been confirmed months ago, when WNP was added as a dev.
+4I suggest using this technique to get custom control surfaces fairly easily. If you want more complex wings, you can find ways to improve that technique or use that technique until you master a better one. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned technique, I'll be happy to explain.
+4@Viper3000ad set max to 0.8 and min to 0.4 and 10° angle. Or, if it should deflect +-4° as aileron and -4° as a flap, "0.4,-0.4" on one rotator and "0,-0.4" on the other.
+4Design is very nice, although that view-obstructing rotator on the hood was unnecessary. Power to weight ratio and lift seem good, although the plane is very nose-heavy and pulls to the left due to CoM being off-center. Adding around 150lbs to the right wing fixes the roll issue, while "pre-trimming" by angling the horizontal stabilizer would fix the nose heaviness.
+4Oh look, custom control surfaces meme :)
+4You're supposed to give challenge rewards by upvoting a number of winner's builds, not by upvoting the entry from multiple accounts.
+4He already did. Tail of this build is identical to the one here, except you switched colors.
+4@Musselk auto credit only credits QinguyuZhou for the nose section. You need to credit him for the tail and to credit other users you took parts from. You can copy links in your browser and paste them into the description. Or at least, just state which part came from who. That will suffice.
+4Very well made plane. Nice performance. Only thing you forgot is to reduce the "brakeTorque" value of wheels, making the plane nose over if you hit the brakes.
+4This plane skipped the leg day.
+4Thank you all for participating. You can find your build on one of two pages of the results, with a little bit of feedback for each entry.
+4@SpiritusRaptor
@DeathStalker627
@BoganBoganTheMan
@Pilotmario
@ChunderDownUndeR
@KRAYTEK999
@ErvenDynamics
@Kimcotupan15
@Dllama4
@JohnnyBoythePilot
@FairFireFight
@EliteArsenals24
@Bukkeum
@DarDragon
@SnoWFLakE0s
@Akhtar04
@BlazeInfinity
@ProjectTank
@ThomasRoderick
@GeneralOliverVonBismarck
@kshatria
@UnguidedCylinder
@Tiseth
@Stoney
@logizAircrafts
@0n33
@SubXTribe
@BigBoiPlanes
@HarryBen47
@IGNikolaev
@Alexiozo
@Hiluks1
@FastRacer023
@Ratakis
@Patrick195
@Incertname
@TMach5
@BagelPlane
@Armyguy1534
@Generalkeath
@xXEdgynamehere
@winterro
@88blaroo
@SirTimothy1943
@GCPrototypes
@LordAidanYT
@Supernovaboss504
Not bad. Does a great job showcasing the build. That landing was awful though. You opened the chute early.
+4@BlueCitrus it won't get removed. It is related to aviation and doesn't depict another game.
+4Depends. Are farts good or bad energy?
+4@SledDriver like Squirrel, I too have never insulted you. I'm just doing what I'm supposed to do. I even though we're on good terms. Anyway, since you have invited me to issue you a strike, you have been issued a strike for hostile behavior shown in the comment section of this post. I have archived this page as it is now, just in case you change your mind.
+4@xGeneralFischx there are no corrupt mods, buddy. Also, every auto-removed post is checked by moderators and approved if it doesn't break rules.
+4@grizzlitn you can xml edit a post to be a successor. Remind me to explain how before you post. If it fails, I'll accept it anyway.
+4@ThomasRoderick I will try to take appropriate target for the system (a byplane for early guns, cruise missiles for anti-missile systems... ) and will test without mods.
+4Use structural wings in custom control surfaces.
+4