@ThomasRoderick This hull design.. As for the name, its this. As for what I originally wanted the name to be, it would be something like this. "Сталину слава! "
@jamesPLANESii Its sitting on a runway because I was messing with the lifeboat drop. As for the ship lying on its side, its because I disabled the gyroscopes and ran it aground just to see what would happen.
@DuckMint Maybe not this one, but since it appears that nobody has anything against the forward superstructure design, I'll be able to use it more often and get more upvotes.
@GritAerospaceSolutionsLTD Yes. And like the herald of Free Enterprise, its nearly impossible to see the bow doors from the flying bridge. Or the main bridge.
@Sgtk I always use fuselage blocks scaled up by 5,10 or 20 so I can reduce the number of parts, which allows me to use more for the superstructure. And it allows me to assemble ships easily since they are mostly the same size.
@randomusername But if the cost of a naval nuclear reactor is excluded, two of these ships could be build and they would still cost less money than a B-2 when in service.
While I do not believe that you can make them work while submerged, you can go around the problem by sticking the missiles on pistons. It also works very well in multiplayer if you want to massacre the server without getting caught.
Change the input of the engine to something like "Brake"? Or maybe give the engine an activation group with zeroOnDeactivate="false"
As for the prop engine, reduce Example: min="0" max="1" input="Throttle" /> to min="0" max="0.5" input="Throttle" /> and increase <PropEngineAdvanced.State power
@Stellarlabs if you were to sort all of my stuff by the number of parts, you would probably find that there are way too many of them with exactly 666 parts. Maybe its a coincidence, maybe its not.
@GeneralOliverVonBismarck Definitely. Like the North Koreans somehow getting their hands on a battlecruiser sort of unrealism.
+1Fictionals based on real stuff.
+1@Tang0five Yes
+1The maxRpm=" property?
+1@ThomasRoderick This hull design.. As for the name, its this. As for what I originally wanted the name to be, it would be something like this. "Сталину слава! "
+1@Strikefighter04 Bread and this
+1@Stormfur It blows up.
+11:Was playing simple rockets back in 2014 and saw that Jundroo was developing a new game.
2: Playing for fun
3: Fictional ships
4: Both
5: !
+1@randomusername You'll need another vertical stabilizer at the front to stop it from drifting when you turn.
+1@MegaFox Oh yes, it can probably hold somewhere around 100,000 "sheep". But feeding the cargo is a bit more complicated.
+14 to 8 hours. I've got a few hundred subassemblies and spare parts to help me build stuff faster.
+1@Spacedoge12345plane This, this and this are in the 510-550 meter range. Its imposible as of now to go any larger.
+1@horatio Unfortunately, no. The lowest part count I can get is 923.
+1@GeneralOliverVonBismarck Its somewhere behind the bridge. Or you could disable activation group 8, enable group 5 and start turning.
+1@jamesPLANESii Its sitting on a runway because I was messing with the lifeboat drop. As for the ship lying on its side, its because I disabled the gyroscopes and ran it aground just to see what would happen.
+1@tylerdeveneuxmusic Nope. Unless Simplerockets 2 lets me build space battleships.
+1Rosetta?
+1@DuckMint Maybe not this one, but since it appears that nobody has anything against the forward superstructure design, I'll be able to use it more often and get more upvotes.
+1@GritAerospaceSolutionsLTD Yes. And like the herald of Free Enterprise, its nearly impossible to see the bow doors from the flying bridge. Or the main bridge.
+1@Strikefighter04 Thanks!
+1@Sgtk I always use fuselage blocks scaled up by 5,10 or 20 so I can reduce the number of parts, which allows me to use more for the superstructure. And it allows me to assemble ships easily since they are mostly the same size.
+1@randomusername But if the cost of a naval nuclear reactor is excluded, two of these ships could be build and they would still cost less money than a B-2 when in service.
+1@Minecraftpoweer And the honor of being run over by a 330,000 kg pair of freight locomotives
+1While I do not believe that you can make them work while submerged, you can go around the problem by sticking the missiles on pistons. It also works very well in multiplayer if you want to massacre the server without getting caught.
+1@randomusername A jet powered Carvair with a long nose.
+1@randomusername Yes, a few days ago, though It'll take a while before the first planes with it are posted.
+1@randomusername Its not actually a HS.121 trident, the name is just a placeholder.
+1@randomusername Yes, the rear door was too annoying, so i just removed it.
+1@TMR9001 @Caveman999 Jawohl, kameraden. Just ignore the roundel, please.
+1@TMR9001 Try downloading it and pressing "okay" when it tells you that it is missing parts. Then, press the undo button and press redo.
+1@KaiserTheKeyboard A refitted destroyer built in the 1910s that somehow avoids being scrapped for at least 90 years.
+1Around 6.65 pounds per gallon.
+1Change all the "wing-3" to "wing-2" in the craft xml file.
+1@KidKromosone @VVarperro02 Its just a coincidence. Like the part count of the other two carriers that came before it.
+1Delete <Cockpit.State primaryCockpit="True" />
+1</Part>
@Franticmatty @FastDan @RailfanEthan Thank you!
+1@Apfelsaft @getorge @CaesiciusPlanes Thanks!
+1If you are referring to the "jetstream" between "notifications" and "profile":
+1When you follow another user, the crafts that they upload go there.
Change the input of the engine to something like "Brake"? Or maybe give the engine an activation group with zeroOnDeactivate="false"
+1As for the prop engine, reduce Example: min="0" max="1" input="Throttle" /> to min="0" max="0.5" input="Throttle" /> and increase <PropEngineAdvanced.State power
I guess this post is a sign that sign jokes are actually funny.
+1Yes @Apfelsaft
+1@Stellarlabs if you were to sort all of my stuff by the number of parts, you would probably find that there are way too many of them with exactly 666 parts. Maybe its a coincidence, maybe its not.
+1@PhantomBladeCorp Finally someone noticed the spelling mistake. I had better change it now.
+1Cockpit first so its harder to break any pistons or rotators.
+1@AceOfSpade @SSSvaSSa @T8flightcrafts Thanks!
+1@Thepilot172 Nope
+1@Thepilot172 I used to fly around in a Nemesis. Then, the interior got removed.
+1
+1@redbear89 It could be a container storage station if you were to remove the control pods and engines.
+1That is one way to assemble a ship...
+1