Russia 1 and 2 seem like they would be the most universally effective due to the less bold colors, but Ukraine 2 and 3 are also extremely good-looking. Not so much a fan of Ukraine 1 or the Kazakhstan pattern; in my opinion that kind of bold and blobby camo only works with like Vietnam-era greens and browns.
"Bold and willful, they do not tremble as they blaspheme the glorious ones, whereas angels, though greater in might and power, do not pronounce a blasphemous judgment against them before the Lord. But these, like irrational animals, creatures of instinct, born to be caught and destroyed, blaspheming about matters of which they are ignorant, will also be destroyed in their destruction, suffering wrong as the wage for their wrongdoing." 2 Peter 2:10-13, ESV
There should be a movement increment (or something similar named, I forgot what it's labeled as) towards the bottom of the position/rotation adjustment panel. You might need to scroll down.
The default value should be .078125
The C-47 in question has 47 parts and no interior. The only notable difference between it and a civilian DC-3 at that scale is the cargo door (and technically the engine performance, but better to get that so that it flies like it should rather than making the numbers in the editor match up precisely). In short, I do not understand the problem.
Huh, okay. Well, in order to give my thoughts I'm going to know precisely what you mean by "lack of effort put in by Jundroo," because wrapping up development on a nine-year-old game to finally fully move to their next major project is decidedly not lack of effort.
My inability to understand the meaning of this post is further impeded by your inability to communicate in a decipherable manner, as well as an abhorrent lack of both punctuation and any kind of formatting structure.
Short version:
When you bought the game you did so with the full knowledge that development would eventually come to an end, as with pretty much every other game that doesn't follow the content-as-a-service model, and now that that time has come you're claiming you've been betrayed?
Have y'all not had games reach end-of-life before? They aren't trying to subconsciously convert everyone to Juno so they can axe SP, they're just finished developing SP and have moved on to their next project (and are showing it off here because... people that play both, I guess?).
it feels like a massive stab in the back for Jundroo to pay little to no attention to Simpleplanes to make it a better PC and mobile game
The game has been out for over nine years (December 2014 was the first launch, on mobile only; the Steam version came a year later), which is a fairly long time for a video game these days and a rather absurdly long time for an indie game, much less a studio's first truly successful game (sorry SimplePhysics and SR1, but it's kinda true), much less one that was originally just a mobile game. There is no backstabbing or desecration (whatever that would mean in this context); it's been public knowledge for a long time now that SP is built on spaghetti code and became more and more difficult to update over the years (a fate Juno will hopefully avoid now that they know what not to do).
The game isn't being worked on anymore because it's almost a decade old and the developers decided it was time to work on something bigger and (arguably) better. That's just how it is.
Also, please don't tag me on things I have not requested to be tagged on.
Well, I use Firefox as well and this hasn't happened to me (so far, at least), so I'd suggest running a virus scan on your end.
Also, what adblock do you use?
@ColonelRelford If only the airlines and the FAA still saw it this way... Now it's all about how many boxes they can check off to hit the DEI numbers, not about the competency and experience of their flight crews.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: The physical laws of aviation do not care about the race, gender identity, skin tone, or any other social "qualifiers" the flight crew may have. Aviation is the one field where skill and experience should be prioritized over all else, and it pains me that somehow this has been cast aside in order for airlines to fill more DEI checkboxes for better press.
Despite what your English teachers may tell you (it's okay, mine did too), Wikipedia is a decent source for getting basic information about a topic. It's not good to use for more in-depth research, and it's not a good source to cite (though the sources it cites could well be of use), but it's still a very good resource for general information.
As a member of the element fanbase, no.
Assuming you are meaning Potassium [subscript] 3, all that would indicate is three potassium atoms per molecule (plus this does in fact already happen - with iron - in potassium ferricyanide and several other compounds).
Also, Potassium-3 would either be a compound or an ion, not a new element. If the number of protons doesn't change, it's still potassium.
(As a final thing, allow me to introduce you to the "rumored" Helium-2, the diproton. Other than your terminology this is probably the most cursed thing you mentioned.)
Keeping the nose extra high on landing so that you come in slow also helps, if the aircraft has a tendency to dig in and nose over in the water. With some planes you want to almost bring it to a stall a few feet above the water and just let it plop down rather than trying to hold a more conventional landing airspeed all the way down to the water.
@Drewski02 You would need to replace the yoke with one of the standard Yoke parts (because I don't know how to set up the custom-built yoke with VR handgrips properly), but otherwise it should all work in VR, yes.
@marianmadalin32 To clarify, you're looking for someone to completely recreate, from a PDF document, all of the technical drawings for a P-51 Mustang (for which there are thousands) in CAD, with the only compensation being mentioned on the sponsors list on the project website?
Not sure if you're aware, but a) That's a several thousand hour job, because each drawing would literally have to be recreated by hand in AutoCAD, and b) This is a website for an airplane-building indie videogame, not a CNC or CAD forum. You may have better luck asking on a more appropriate website, but I doubt you'll find anyone willing to do several thousand CAD drawings just to get their name put on the website.
I would love to see those pictures of the progress you've made on the frames and formers, though.
Jundroo made a free version of Juno: New Origins with optional paid DLC that works out to be more expensive than just buying the regular game; Andrew got censored, then banned, then unbanned for apparently leaking something about the team's future plans that nobody actually saw before it was taken down; and my upper back hurts because I slept funny :/
How's your 2024 going so far?
Oddly enough, this is impossible (at least to my knowledge). There is no readable FT or XML parameter that outputs whether a craft is being locked or not.
Get them to make a backup of whatever's on the computer in case it decides to spontaneously kablooey (if they won't accept the battery as a reason, tell them it's for data security or something. There's lots of reasons to be doing it even if the battery isn't a problem, so I'm sure you can come up with some explanation).
I would not recommend trying to break the computer or anything. Either way, they'll get mad at you (probably claiming that it was fine until you broke it). At this point, I think the best you can do is keep pointing it out and suggesting fixes, make sure that anything valuable or important saved on the computer is moved elsewhere or at least backed up on an external drive, and wait for an "I told you so" moment. If they aren't listening to you, and they won't listen to anyone else, there's really not much else to be done.
Perhaps point it out to the TSA agent when they are going through security for the plane if it's still a concern by that point.
@O202 There are far more of us than there are of you. You have a choice to make: Either you stop antagonizing people and go back to whoever you were before all this started, or you keep trying to drive your wedge into this community in an attempt to turn us against our friends for reasons only known to you. The choice is up to you, but as it stands you are already at a net loss in terms of support.
You're right about one thing, though. This will be fun.
I thought acquiring people was frowned upon after the Civil War
+1Russia 1 and 2 seem like they would be the most universally effective due to the less bold colors, but Ukraine 2 and 3 are also extremely good-looking. Not so much a fan of Ukraine 1 or the Kazakhstan pattern; in my opinion that kind of bold and blobby camo only works with like Vietnam-era greens and browns.
+1@Monarchii uh oh I've been spotted
+1DE6 control stand go brr
+1@Funnny
"Bold and willful, they do not tremble as they blaspheme the glorious ones, whereas angels, though greater in might and power, do not pronounce a blasphemous judgment against them before the Lord. But these, like irrational animals, creatures of instinct, born to be caught and destroyed, blaspheming about matters of which they are ignorant, will also be destroyed in their destruction, suffering wrong as the wage for their wrongdoing."
+12 Peter 2:10-13, ESV
@AtlasAir747MyBeloved oh hey spy on me next
+1(like seriously go ahead and do it, I want to see if my online security is as good as I think it is)
What possessed you to make this, and why did you listen
+1Objectively the best replica on the site of a very unique and beautiful plane. Well done!
+1There should be a movement increment (or something similar named, I forgot what it's labeled as) towards the bottom of the position/rotation adjustment panel. You might need to scroll down.
+1The default value should be .078125
- You're being creepy again, stop it.
- The C-47 in question has 47 parts and no interior. The only notable difference between it and a civilian DC-3 at that scale is the cargo door (and technically the engine performance, but better to get that so that it flies like it should rather than making the numbers in the editor match up precisely). In short, I do not understand the problem.
+1
+1LEGO disassembling sounds@HuskyDynamics01
+1edit: yep
@WisconsinStatePolice you shall NOT slander Burt Rutan in this house
+1Huh, okay. Well, in order to give my thoughts I'm going to know precisely what you mean by "lack of effort put in by Jundroo," because wrapping up development on a nine-year-old game to finally fully move to their next major project is decidedly not lack of effort.
+1My inability to understand the meaning of this post is further impeded by your inability to communicate in a decipherable manner, as well as an abhorrent lack of both punctuation and any kind of formatting structure.
+1Short version:
+1When you bought the game you did so with the full knowledge that development would eventually come to an end, as with pretty much every other game that doesn't follow the content-as-a-service model, and now that that time has come you're claiming you've been betrayed?
Have y'all not had games reach end-of-life before? They aren't trying to subconsciously convert everyone to Juno so they can axe SP, they're just finished developing SP and have moved on to their next project (and are showing it off here because... people that play both, I guess?).
The game has been out for over nine years (December 2014 was the first launch, on mobile only; the Steam version came a year later), which is a fairly long time for a video game these days and a rather absurdly long time for an indie game, much less a studio's first truly successful game (sorry SimplePhysics and SR1, but it's kinda true), much less one that was originally just a mobile game. There is no backstabbing or desecration (whatever that would mean in this context); it's been public knowledge for a long time now that SP is built on spaghetti code and became more and more difficult to update over the years (a fate Juno will hopefully avoid now that they know what not to do).
+1The game isn't being worked on anymore because it's almost a decade old and the developers decided it was time to work on something bigger and (arguably) better. That's just how it is.
Also, please don't tag me on things I have not requested to be tagged on.
One way to check whether it's Firefox or not would be to visit the site in a different browser.
+1Well, I use Firefox as well and this hasn't happened to me (so far, at least), so I'd suggest running a virus scan on your end.
+1Also, what adblock do you use?
Conformal centerline drop tank.
+1@ColonelRelford If only the airlines and the FAA still saw it this way... Now it's all about how many boxes they can check off to hit the DEI numbers, not about the competency and experience of their flight crews.
+1I've said it before and I'll say it again: The physical laws of aviation do not care about the race, gender identity, skin tone, or any other social "qualifiers" the flight crew may have. Aviation is the one field where skill and experience should be prioritized over all else, and it pains me that somehow this has been cast aside in order for airlines to fill more DEI checkboxes for better press.
@Mousewithamachinegun123
Despite what your English teachers may tell you (it's okay, mine did too), Wikipedia is a decent source for getting basic information about a topic. It's not good to use for more in-depth research, and it's not a good source to cite (though the sources it cites could well be of use), but it's still a very good resource for general information.
+1That's piracy. Don't pirate from Jundroo, they are nice people.
+1@Randomplayer :D
+1https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/3Ynfu3/Supermarine-Spitfire-Mk-Vb
+1
+1Shapeism
As a member of the element fanbase, no.
+1Assuming you are meaning Potassium [subscript] 3, all that would indicate is three potassium atoms per molecule (plus this does in fact already happen - with iron - in potassium ferricyanide and several other compounds).
Also, Potassium-3 would either be a compound or an ion, not a new element. If the number of protons doesn't change, it's still potassium.
(As a final thing, allow me to introduce you to the "rumored" Helium-2, the diproton. Other than your terminology this is probably the most cursed thing you mentioned.)
No. Just no.
+1Please do not the airplane.
Keeping the nose extra high on landing so that you come in slow also helps, if the aircraft has a tendency to dig in and nose over in the water. With some planes you want to almost bring it to a stall a few feet above the water and just let it plop down rather than trying to hold a more conventional landing airspeed all the way down to the water.
+1@Drewski02 You would need to replace the yoke with one of the standard Yoke parts (because I don't know how to set up the custom-built yoke with VR handgrips properly), but otherwise it should all work in VR, yes.
+1I hope those aren't the Emperor's convoys I keep bombing...
+1@marianmadalin32 To clarify, you're looking for someone to completely recreate, from a PDF document, all of the technical drawings for a P-51 Mustang (for which there are thousands) in CAD, with the only compensation being mentioned on the sponsors list on the project website?
+1Not sure if you're aware, but a) That's a several thousand hour job, because each drawing would literally have to be recreated by hand in AutoCAD, and b) This is a website for an airplane-building indie videogame, not a CNC or CAD forum. You may have better luck asking on a more appropriate website, but I doubt you'll find anyone willing to do several thousand CAD drawings just to get their name put on the website.
I would love to see those pictures of the progress you've made on the frames and formers, though.
Jundroo made a free version of Juno: New Origins with optional paid DLC that works out to be more expensive than just buying the regular game; Andrew got censored, then banned, then unbanned for apparently leaking something about the team's future plans that nobody actually saw before it was taken down; and my upper back hurts because I slept funny :/
+1How's your 2024 going so far?
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/kIsKa4/Flying-Wing
+1This is like the first time I have ever seen someone say Maywar is too small.
+1Oddly enough, this is impossible (at least to my knowledge). There is no readable FT or XML parameter that outputs whether a craft is being locked or not.
+1Earth is pretty cool
+1Looks great!
+1Is the track the same gauge as Scratchoza's SPR map?
Ryanair joke
+1The StabYeet Mk.1
+1@starmango It's currently just shy of 3am in Indonesia, so we can only wait and see until morning. Xtars posted this at roughly 10pm local time.
+1Oh goodness no. It's a website, and websites go down sometimes.
This was one of the longer outages I can recall as of recent, but certainly not the first.
+1Get them to make a backup of whatever's on the computer in case it decides to spontaneously kablooey (if they won't accept the battery as a reason, tell them it's for data security or something. There's lots of reasons to be doing it even if the battery isn't a problem, so I'm sure you can come up with some explanation).
I would not recommend trying to break the computer or anything. Either way, they'll get mad at you (probably claiming that it was fine until you broke it). At this point, I think the best you can do is keep pointing it out and suggesting fixes, make sure that anything valuable or important saved on the computer is moved elsewhere or at least backed up on an external drive, and wait for an "I told you so" moment. If they aren't listening to you, and they won't listen to anyone else, there's really not much else to be done.
Perhaps point it out to the TSA agent when they are going through security for the plane if it's still a concern by that point.
+1beans
+1@O202 There are far more of us than there are of you. You have a choice to make: Either you stop antagonizing people and go back to whoever you were before all this started, or you keep trying to drive your wedge into this community in an attempt to turn us against our friends for reasons only known to you. The choice is up to you, but as it stands you are already at a net loss in terms of support.
You're right about one thing, though. This will be fun.
+1I hear rotor blades
+1I personally like
+1KLONKI think this has the best looks to part count ratio I have ever seen. Outstanding!
+1@Aviator720 wha
+1gruhyingie
+1