26.0k Kendog84 Comments

  • Mil A-24 Thunderhind II 1.9 years ago

    Acquisition officer: "We want you to take elements that make A-10 and Mi-24 Hind great, and combine that into one package."

    The resulting aircraft: * incoherent pain noise *

    +5
  • Tutorial Person 2.0 years ago

    Shhhh, quiet everyone! It's saying something!

    "Kill meeee..."

    +5
  • Detachers 2.2 years ago

    I think you can do

    SelectedWeapon="name of your weapon" & -FireWeapons

    This will fire everything with that name all at once though, so something like

    SelectedWeapon="name of your weapon" & ammo("name of your weapon") > X & FireWeapons

    Might work better.
    Bomb A's detachers will fire when the ammo "Cluster Bomb" is 1, for example, and Bomb B's will fire when it's 0. You have to do this with all the detachers though, so it'll be a little tedious job.

    You can put "none" "null" or any other gibberish in the activation group of your submunition so they won't add numbers to the ammo counter (for the ease of writing FT)

    +5
  • Eurofighter Typhoon 2.3 years ago

    Love the low-poly style, fun to fly as well!

    +5
  • Buoyancy based warship damage model (tech demonstrator) 2.0 years ago

    Video with audio commentary explaining this will (probably) be uploaded later.

    +4
  • Cargo jet - tank loading demonstration 2.2 years ago

    This is a video demonstration of my in-progress airlift-capable army project. It will be a all-in-one pack of a large STOL cargo jet, a tank (M103), and some light armors. Basically a small unit of army with individually controllable vehicles you can airlift to another island. Still far from completion, things like cargo lock needs further improvement (though it may not get one). It's a rather ambitious project for me, so I'm intending to take it slow and steady.

    *Used a pre existing pic I took for my M103 as the thumbnail.

    +4
  • (Probably not) The First Ever Recorded Naval Battle (against a player built AI ship) 1.5 years ago

    YT description coppypasta
    You hear those peashooters?

    Yeah, those.
    They are supposed to be 12cm guns.

    Ahem.
    Here I present you (probably not) the first ever recorded Naval battle in SimplePlanes history against an AI ship (=player built aircraft).

    I'm doing these mock battles (in fact just started doing it) to see the problems and "bugs" that I have to squish.
    Need for some kinda horizontal stabilizer for one thing. Ship rolls left to right when hit (yes, those peashooters do have a lot of impact force), and that really messes with the aim. I don't want to watch them shoot each other for 10 hours before one come out on top. And you don't either, do you?

    We need to
    -Shorten battle time (ie we need them to sink faster).
    I have some possible solutions, but they all come with a downside.
    1) lower hull HP
    --ship becomes vulnerable to other kinds of attack, such as torpedo. And I wanna implement torps)

    2) increase cannon (impact) damage
    --giving more energy to the shell will make the roll much much worse. This will also make them physically push the ships, which looks (looked, I tested) really weird and unrealistic. If you increase ship's mass to counter this, it then messes up rotators, and turrets will become really wobbly.
    3)...

    4)Add a tiny bit of explosion damage
    --No. explosion is weird and can't be controlled unlike impact damage.

    5)Increase rate of fire
    --Viable.

    6)Fight closer to each other
    --Also viable.

    Combination of "lower HP" "Higher ROF" and "Closer shooting distance" may be the way to go. At least these are the ones I like.

    Ingredients:
    -Buoyancy based damage model ship
    -Auto aim for the guns
    -Bot Activator Missile (AI airplanes start using guns once they fire or run out of missile)
    -Some love (aka blood and guts and other gross stuff we convince ourselves that we have nothing to do wi-)

    +3
  • Instant custom mission / No MODs (AI bomber demo 2) 1.8 years ago

    @DimitriIqbal91
    Thanks. I'm a mobile peasant myself, so/and I wanted to expand the range of things we can do in the game. Reeally looking forward to some kind of team assigning option (for AIs) though, there's only so much you can do working around the limitations.

    +3
  • Air Defense 1.8 years ago

    Flak guns are directly stoaken from winterro's USS Langley

    +3
  • SIMPLECHEATS II, an updated, comprehensive list of all known XML attributes 1.9 years ago

    About bomb and bomb's explosion radius

    (I'll probably have submitted this to the google doc form by the time anyone reads this)
    【My testing method】
    I put bomb on a tower which releases the bomb and causes it to explode upon hitting the ground.
    Measured bomb's explosion radius by lining up panels (with labels that indicated the distance) every 10 meters from the point of explosion, and recording the furthest panel affected by the explosion. Panels were all disconnected from the cockpit or other stuff. I've done this on Wright Airport default spawn.
    (This one is about bombs. I haven't made my testing contraption public yet, but it's a pretty simple thing)
    .
    【What I've learnt】
    -1 explosionScale makes about 80 meters of blast radius. Stuff at the edge of blast radius was affected less (barely affected).
    .
    -explosionScale multiplies the blast radius in a linear manner. 1 ES creates 80m blast radius, 2 es 160m, 3 es 240m... etc. At least that was the case in my testing, with the contraption that could measure effect up to 500 meters.
    .
    -Scale of the bomb 'part' does not seem to affect blast radius or damage. (If it's large enough, bomb collides with the ground earlier and resulting explosion can occur at higher position)
    .
    -Detonating multiple bombs of the same exploSc at the same location does not change blast radius. I assume it only affects damage within the radius.
    .
    -Unrelated but...
    If you make the scale of a part in a build really really large, like "500000,1,1" large, it messes up the particular aircraft data. Some parts will move and some parts become invisible. Couldn't be fixed by exiting the game. If you save the aircraft in this state, I would guess that the aircraft file in question is ruined.

    +3
  • F-105D Thunderchief 2.0 years ago

    Holy cappuccino, I thought, for a moment, my in-progress Thud somehow got published. lol

    Sorry for opening the comment like that. Nice Thud build, very much appreciate the realistic-leaning performance, and cockpit's nice and clean, too.
    Kinda impressed that your main landing gear works well even on low-physics also, as I've been struggling to get mine work on low physics. (Seems I was looking at a wrong solution, increasing part mass and stuff)

    +3
  • Small Feature Wish List for v1.11 Update 2.0 years ago

    I'd love more UI customization options.

    Off the top of my head, something like--
    -Ability to set UI scale for designer and in-flight separately
    -Customizable individual button size & placement for inflight screen (for mobile), and
    -Ability to change UI scale in designer & inflight screen (without exiting them)

    +3
  • Relatively Simple Smallarms pack 1 2.1 years ago

    @glueisglue
    Thanks for the feedback, I was thinking of making other countries weapons in a similar style. Will do in the future (probably not soon)

    +3
  • Bug thread for v1.12.128 (current version) 2.4 years ago

    Listing order of planes in Race Against Opponent and Dogfight mode menu seems to totally be random, and it makes it very hard to find a specific plane when you have more than a few dozen on your game, let alone a few hundred. I think it's in dire need of a comprehensible numerical+alphabetical listing order, and also a search feature (like in build mode or in-flight AI spawner) would be highly appreciated.

    +3
  • GPS (Functional) 2.5 years ago

    Please ignore my suggestion in the previous comment, I didn't realize it already had a zoom in/out feature! Clearly I didn't read the description.. oh well.

    I thought it was a bug at first, as I accidentally toggled it and saw the map "act weird" as I pitched my plane up and down, haha. Very cool feature!

    +3
  • Ground Target - Freight Train (prototype) 7 months ago

    @Monarchii
    Nobody told me about the ritual! AUGHHH!!! (thrown off an aircraft, into kraken's mouth)

    +2
  • [AI] auto ejecting Wasp-B 1.2 years ago

    When I saw the teaser, I speculated that this was using fuel tank and fuel percentage for the trigger, as I could get an auto-ejecting pilot with that method (which had big fuel tanks (capacity wise) in each wing, so when one of them gets destroyed, fuel percentage gets really low, which activates the detacher)... but wow, I didn't think it would be this advanced!! Great job!

    +2
  • BogdanX build preservation project: hub 1.2 years ago

    @DatMaluchGuy19
    Yeah. I've seen some arguments and mean comments thrown among users myself. And you kinda have to make some assessment on a person's character based on their history, and sometimes reputation, but it's good to remember that your image of the person is based on an incomplete picture (it depends, right).
    And if it's a petty drama, it's better to stay away and don't touch on it in order not to contribute to the mess. If it's really bad, I'd probably tell them to use block feature though.

    +2
  • BogdanX build preservation project: hub 1.2 years ago

    @DatMaluchGuy19
    Hey buddy, I don't know the history of the person well so I can't confirm these claim one way or the other (negative or positive), but you shouldn't pass a judgement on a person based on what others are saying or telling you alone, let alone call them a scum. The person's reputation may or may not be granted, but we should leave the hard feelings for the people who have firsthand experience with them to hold.

    +2
  • [Target Airbase] BSAF 'Camp Poostein' v1 (700 parts) 1.2 years ago

    @LunarEclipseSP
    Thank you!

    +2
  • EggPlane: F4 Phantom 1.8 years ago

    Hello,
    I've noticed there's an upload of an ever-so-slightly modified copy of this build, without credit or any mention of you or this post.
    Not sure if you care, but I figured I'd let you know.
    https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/39AjPa/Egg-series-1F-4-eggton
    The user Waffle15 has also uploaded your eggplane AN-225, again with no credit.

    +2
  • CBU-2/A and CBU-14/A (cluster bomb (munition) dispensers) - custom weapons 1.8 years ago

    @C47skytrain
    Me too. Even a smaller caliber explosive cannon (100mm with explosiveScaler of 0.5 or so for example) does enough damage to insta-kill/disconnect a 100000 HP block.
    Also, got it, will notify you of the next weapon.

    +2
  • CBU-2/A and CBU-14/A (cluster bomb (munition) dispensers) - custom weapons 1.8 years ago

    @C47skytrain
    Thanks!! Glad you enjoyed them:)
    I certainly will keep making custom weapons for a while. I'll tag you on the next upload if you like.

    +2
  • Instant custom mission / No MODs (AI bomber demo 2) 1.8 years ago

    @FOXG @PlayMinecraft
    Thanks:) AI AAAs already exist, this one's by MysteryTimeTraveler (I used lower part version, you can find it in the successor list)
    https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/j40xqF/ZSU-23-4-Shilka-AI-Ground-Target
    I'm making another low-part version more optimized for my purpose

    +2
  • Never look him in the eye (MiG monster) 1.8 years ago

    @RepublicOfCursedPlanes
    Hey I feel ya, we all have days when we need a washing machine in a plane building game.

    +2
  • Mammooth Hydra Mk.1 Desert Camo 1.8 years ago

    "Stolen aircraft, prepare to vaporized"
    L1 L2 L2 ↑ ↓ ↓ ↑ R1 R2 R2

    Cheat Activated

    I used to be able to activate many of those cheats without looking at anything, and I could so it pretty fast. lol Occasionally did the thing where you climb beyond the altitude limit with a floaty tank, spawn a bunch of Hydras mid-fall, and see them hit the ground and explode after you landed. I played the game on PS2.
    .
    .
    Sorry, I couldn't see your response before the post was removed (like last week), but these new paint schemes are pretty sick, love them!
    I might try and see if I can make custom landing gears for the plane. (Emphasis on might)

    +2
  • Text label Tank Track ( low lag solution! ) 1.8 years ago

    This is such a cool innovation, and I love the older-gen videogame look of it! (Really reminds me of tank track in some PS2 games and such). Kinda feels fitting for SP. Really great in terms of part-economy/game performance than the existing methods, too, which is awesome.
    Kudos/thanks for sharing the idea with!! X)

    +2
  • Blast radius tester (Bomb tester) - 1 explosionScale = about 80m (74m?) blast radius, I think (Boom 50/Boom 25 facts) 1.9 years ago

    @ThomasRoderick
    Speaking of which, have I shown you this yet? I did some testings on explosive cannon damage, and the result was kinda confusing. I need to do further testings to know what's up with it, but my plan to utilize explosive shells for the ship combat thing seems to have hit a wall. I just can't tell how the damage & insta-kill trigger scales with the explosion scale/caliber.
    .
    .
    Cannon: 100mm/explosionScaler 0.1
    .
    (impactDamageScaler is set to 0, and muzzle velocity has no effect on damage. 500m/s shell and 999999m/s shell gave me the same result)
    .
    Block
    1 HP - takes 1-2 shots (1-0.5 damage)
    10 HP - takes 1-5 shots (10-2 damage)
    100 HP - takes 3-10 shots (33-10 damage)
    500 HP - 14-42 shots (35-12 damage)
    750hp - 21-62 shots (35-12 damage)
    900hp - 25-49-73 shots (36-12 dmg)
    1000hp - 27-54-82 (37-12)
    1500hp - 41-122 (37-12)
    .
    10000 hp
    estimate: 285-833 (35-12 dmg)
    Result: 269-538-539-806-807-808-810 (37.17-12.34 dmg)
    .
    .
    100mm/0.2 ES
    HP 10000: insta-kill (10000+ dmg)
    Hp 100000: insta kill (100000+)
    Hp 1000000: instakill
    .
    1000mm/0.15 es
    Hp 1000000: instakill
    .
    200mm/0.05es
    HP 1000 - 690-1036
    .
    200mm/0.1es
    Hp 10000 - instakill
    20000 - 2-1 shots

    +2
  • Blast radius tester (Bomb tester) - 1 explosionScale = about 80m (74m?) blast radius, I think (Boom 50/Boom 25 facts) 1.9 years ago

    @ThomasRoderick
    Hurrah indeed!
    Shame drag doesn't affect bomb's fall speed though, I wanted to differentiate old ww2 era high-drag GP bombs from modern low-drag ones. It's not impossible, but will take too much work & increase parts count unnecessarily. But on the positive side of things, now I have one less (fewer) reason to not disable drag calculations on bombs, so that's good.
    Thanks for the link to your forum post btw, I was just thinking of looking for that myself.

    +2
  • Automatic gift delivery 1.9 years ago

    @DatRoadTrainGuy19
    What about the game settings?
    Playing on low physics might help a little (these trucks should work fine on low physics, since they have no suspension parts)

    +2
  • Cannon damage tester B Mk1 (block mass 900000) 1.9 years ago

    @11qazxc
    It seems the damage value dice is rerolled every shot for (probably) every cannon. Still random, but at least they aren't locked into a single value per session like we thought

    +2
  • Cannon damage tester Mk3.5 (for kinetic damage only) - impact damage scaler, muzzle velocity, caliber, diameter, explosionScale 1.9 years ago

    @11qazxc @ThomasRoderick @Astro12 @wernster
    (Sorry for the repeated tagging,)
    I think we have a pretty good idea on how cannon damage works and is calculated (ignoring the velocity drop over time)

    +2
  • (Outdated) Cannon Damage Tester Mk3.2 (average damage calcurator) 1.9 years ago

    @11qazxc @ThomasRoderick @Astro12
    New damage tester

    +2
  • (Outdated) Damage mechanics test 4 explosionScale (impactDamageScaler, explosionScale, muzzle / projectile velocity, diameter / caliber, collision, partCollisionResponse) 1.9 years ago

    Also, I'll be pinning comments that I think has especially useful/new info, but it ruins the order of the comments and will make it hard to follow the discussion later, so I'll probably pick and compile them into a more easily-readable format later. Suggestions or help are welcome.
    .
    Speaking of which, is there a game mechanics equivalent of SimpleCheats or Snowflakes' Funky Trees Guide? I think it would be nice to have these useful info in a easily readable and accessible format. Right now, as far as I'm aware, these info are scattered all over the site, discord and such, and can be removed by accident or the whim of the creator of the post.

    +2
  • (Outdated) Damage mechanics test 4 explosionScale (impactDamageScaler, explosionScale, muzzle / projectile velocity, diameter / caliber, collision, partCollisionResponse) 1.9 years ago

    Built a new test gear (for non-explosive ammo).
    https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/Epj6OF/Damage-test-gear-cannon
    This one has 4 cannons, and they automatically stop firing when the respective block is destroyed (they are enabled when green cannons above each block is connected to the cockpit). You can re-enable them and count the rounds fired with AG1.

    @11qazxc @ThomasRoderick

    +2
  • (Outdated) Damage mechanics test 4 explosionScale (impactDamageScaler, explosionScale, muzzle / projectile velocity, diameter / caliber, collision, partCollisionResponse) 1.9 years ago

    @ThomasRoderick

    What I have seen

    I've seen that too, and your hypothesis, theory, whatever's the right word here would make sense.
    (It's been bugging me as it happens with my Sinkable Ship when I blow it up with explosives, scatters the light buoyancy blocks all over the place and kinda ruins the immersion/fun)

    @Astro12
    Yeah, this thread alone has shown me that there are so many mechanic to it that I wasn't aware of. I just gotta hope I can make a decent HP/survivability& damage system for different class of armor/ship types.

    +2
  • Some Random (But Probably Useful) Findings 1.9 years ago

    @ThomasRoderick
    Huh.. thanks, that's good to know.
    I was kinda working on the assumption that what I said was the case (without testing, was just guessing).
    And yeah, rocket's explosion doesn't seem to change in any way (people/I build & have to build custom rockets to simulate ones with bigger boom for that--explosion scaler for rocket & pod would be really nice)

    +2
  • Sinkable ship damage model (buoyancy) - Description Redone! 2.0 years ago

    @mire233
    It's so they don't get 'deleted' when hit, same for the fake hull. I forgot to mention in this post, but that's another main point of the system (if you build your ship like normal, cannon shell literally deletes parts and it looks really weird)

    +2
  • PQ-14 2.0 years ago

    @11qazxc
    1 & 2)
    Thanks, that worked. And yeah, I was confused about wpSystem_ctgt_id thing (I didn't know what an activator was). 100 (for both) seems good enough at the moment.
    This is an already solved issue, but for the sake record, and maybe to save me or others in the future... I was getting "NaN" on my "Current ID" section of the label initially after the plane reached the first way point, and that confused me--and turns out, I somehow typed in "0" in the part of wpSystemctgtid where you're supposed to enter number of IDs. (It has to be the correct number!) Just leaving it here in case I get the same error in the future and forget why.

    wpSystemctgtid variable setter must be zero if Time is less than 0.1s, but Time is global so...

    That makes sense. Will try that (replacing Tim with sum(1)) and get back to you.

    IDK why it works such way. It only uses coords to get angle to waypoint, and then uses that angle to turn.

    Might have something to do with the gyro. It made the plane much more stable, but I wouldn't be surprised if it's interfering with the control surfaces and what they're trying to do.

    Not a surprise. ...

    Yeah. Not much of an issue anymore, though, thanks to the now bigger horizontal distance requirement.

    +2
  • How to get a free tank 2.0 years ago

    Free tanks for everyone! This is a [insert a holiday of your choice] Miracle!

    +2
  • Buoyancy based warship damage model (tech demonstrator) 2.0 years ago

    @JaeBeansS
    Hehehe
    After all any game can be made better with a nice naval combat, wouldn't you agree? lol

    @Graingy
    Mmhm! lol

    +2
  • Embraer EMB-203 Ipanema 2.0 years ago

    Clean and low-part, and flies well. Love it!

    +2
  • Buoyancy based warship damage model (tech demonstrator) 2.0 years ago

    @GR0SUPRA
    Thank you!:)

    @WolfHunter9111
    mm yes! loo

    +2
  • Automatic gift delivery 2.0 years ago

    Spawned a bunch (more than 5) at the same time and watched them go, they rarely collided with each other when driving around. They did sometimes bunch up in one destination (one time, 3 trucks drove to the loading area behind the terminal building at once), and when it happened they did get stuck on each other for a while. Even then, they'd usually unstuck eventually. I don't think there's an easy fix for this though, given that they can't "see" each other. It would be great if we had access to something like gametick, and use it to offset destination coords by a few meters, but for now, I think this is already great as it is.
    I'll probably (or maybe) play around with the system later and see if I can create a different route.

    +2
  • Wright Airport Map with Detailed Coordinates (for autopilot coding and stuff. Longitude/latitude, XYZ coords, aerial recon photo) 2.0 years ago

    @rexzion
    AI plane with auto land/takeoff capability? That sounds great.
    Also... holy crap. I've been hoping to see an actual coords based guided weapon.

    +2
  • FT tech idea: Simulated bomb/missile camera for manual remote guidance 2.0 years ago

    One major drawback of this system is that you can't (easily) guide the bomb to a non-lockable plane, object, etc. (which is the main point of using manually controlled munitions in the game) so maybe a feature that lets you manually enter target coordinates might be neat, too.

    +2
  • ZIS-5 truck w M1939 37mm AA gun 2.0 years ago

    @SyntheticL @FOXG
    Well, here it is!
    I was gonna say, "no, I'm kinda busy with other stuff" but I had all the ingredients, so here's something. Not a quad MG or the cannon on war thunder thing though, I used my pre-existing 37mm cannon I built around the same time.

    +2
  • PQ-14 2.0 years ago

    Say, either this or system like this would work on ships too, wouldn't it?
    You can even create a fleet that loams the map on a set course. I can't work on one yet but with sufficiently simple/low part ship builds, having sea traffic without a mod (and on mobile) seems very much possible.

    I'm just throwing ideas as I come up with them, but... if you (I mean anyone, as in general you) have an amphibious craft that can beach on some land, and manage to make them stop for a while and lower ramp, you have an AI ferry that can carry your car or whatever to another location. Seems kinda fun to me

    +2
  • Autopilot with Predetermined Course/destination? (AI bomber, concept) 2.1 years ago

    @OrderlyHippo @11qazxc @rexzion
    (Let me know if you don't need or want to get tagged)
    First decent prototype using B-36. I'll publish it later after I'm done making a few more modifications. This one is using original PQ-14 FT, so no waypoint system yet.
    https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/J9N6c0/PQB-36-AI-bomber-AIB-YG-v1

    Set to fly 1700m (I think), and bomb Yeager airport's runway. Flies at around 540kph max in my usual testings. Spawn this near Wright, or somewhere between Wright and Yeager.
    Bomb trigger, dropping delay, and course heavily affects the accuracy. Waypoint system will probably improve accuracy (sorry, haven't tested your modified version yet 11qazxc), but trigger needs improvement as well (it needs to adjust to current altitude). Some RNG like element might be great also, if that's even possible (can be based on speed, heading, etc.)
    It's pretty fun though, spawn like 5 of them, and you get a pretty neat formation of bombers.

    +2
  • Relatively Simple Smallarms pack 1 2.1 years ago

    @C47skytrain
    No worries, I'm still trying to figure out appropriate damage myself.
    The reason I I lowered 50cal damage a lot though, is so it doesn't destroy tanks and other 'armored' vehicles in like 10 seconds. Default 25 damage gun could blow up a tank with 10000 hp blocks for armor really quick (.50 cap shouldn't even be able to do damage to the frontal armor of a post ww2 heavy tank, but the game doesn't have thickness value, so high HP and modified weapon damage is the best we can do now)

    For a similar reason I tend to lower wing gun damage of my aircraft as well, but again, still trying to figure out what's a good value (you can also increase part HP, so you don't want to make it too weak or too strong).

    Oh and yeah, I messed up the shotgun when I uploaded the thing lol It's just hidden though, so unhide and it comes back

    +2