25.2k LeonardoEngineering Comments

  • Focke Wulf Ta-283 4.9 years ago

    I see wunderwaffe.
    can't contain the need of doing
    the Reich thing.
    upvote.
    spotlight.
    enjoy wunderwaffe.

    +2
  • Focke Wulf - Triebflugel 5.0 years ago

    @FlyingThings well, in this case, I love you too for liking my creation! :)

  • New Input System Explanation & Tutorial (Funky Trees) 5.0 years ago

    @SnoWFLakE0s I tried right now, and Max value isn't limited as far as I can tell.
    When I do as you say in the Video, the rotor keeps spinning endlessly

  • New Input System Explanation & Tutorial (Funky Trees) 5.0 years ago

    Let me just correct you over the "Bomb Bay" part.
    You were using the Altitude - 3000 input, but in that case, as soon as you surpass 3000 meters, the Rotor will go crazy because its max value is increasing with the altitude.
    To Keep the Input as 1 you should add the min function before the whole input, like
    min(Altitude - 3000, 1)

    In this way, the maximum input it will get is going to be 1, being the smaller number when the Altitude value starts to go crazy.

  • Focke Wulf - Triebflugel 5.0 years ago

    @hellgaming if you're talking about the X-4s yes, but you have to be in a range of 1.2Km from your target.

  • Topattack 5.0 years ago

    "Javelins Crying in the background"

  • Focke Wulf - Triebflugel 5.0 years ago

    @09thiccfish actually, you've been Rick Rolled

  • Focke Wulf - Triebflugel 5.0 years ago

    @B217293615234lover
    Nani?

  • H-101 Alicanto 5.0 years ago

    @TheMitsuboshiBoi
    OOF
    HOW DARE YOU

  • ATAK 5.0 years ago

    @DeathStalker627 sure, just be sure to use my one, so that the autocredit system appears

  • V something 5.0 years ago

    THIS IS SICK
    And also a way more accurate rappresentation of pulse jet engines than the ones made before the update!

    +2
  • Focke Wulf - Triebflugel 5.0 years ago

    @BusterShortWolf thank you for the kind comment!
    And yes, It actually was the plane in the movie!

  • ATAK 5.0 years ago

    @TheCreatorandDestroyer99 I simply didn't want to bother them, and I always prefer to ask politely first ☺️

  • ATAK 5.0 years ago

    Excuse me, this is my AH-121 Dardo.
    You just removed the original cockpit piece and replaced it in a build of your.
    I kindly ask you to put it down, or to create another one with autocredit.

  • Funky Trees! 5.0 years ago

    This is some amazing news!
    Now our possibilities are truly going to be endless!

  • NEW RULES 5.0 years ago

    @EternalDarkness ok, thanks for answering!

  • NEW RULES 5.0 years ago

    @EternalDarkness alright, thank you.
    Another quick question, as I was thinking about making a challenge myself: can in-game screenshots be used as thumbnails as far as they concern the topic the challenge is about? For example, can I use for a "Ground Attack Challenge" a screenshot of one of my planes in action?

  • Heights that youve never thought of 5.0 years ago

    Now I understand what your name meant.

    +2
  • NEW RULES 5.0 years ago

    @EternalDarkness personally I don't see the issue with challenges though..
    I perfectly agree with the new rules, do not get me wrong, but if it's a challenge there should be no problem, as it doesn't concern the build itself, but it's like creating a Forum Post.
    Even though in-game made depictions like the one made by @SnoWFLakE0s on his Santa Gift Box challenge look pretty neat to be honest!

    Anyway was there any special reason behind this choice?

    +2
  • Focke Wulf - Triebflugel 5.0 years ago

    @Minecraftpoweer you weren't complaining, we were just talking :(

  • NEW RULES 5.0 years ago

    @EternalDarkness can I keep Rick Rolling people?
    Or is it still considered a crime against humanity? 😂

    +6
  • Focke Wulf - Triebflugel 5.0 years ago

    @Minecraftpoweer did you.. Did you just delete your comment? 😕

  • NEW RULES 5.0 years ago

    @UltimatePlayer123 okay

    +5
  • NEW RULES 5.0 years ago

    @EternalDarkness whoops, I didn't reload the page.
    Sorry for the dumb question then!

  • NEW RULES 5.0 years ago

    @EternalDarkness so no issues regarding the use of a thumbnail with text and logo right?

  • Focke Wulf - Triebflugel 5.0 years ago

    @Minecraftpoweer in fact, almost nobody complained about it, except for someone that probably got angry because my build surpassed by almost 100 votes his latest one in which he probably spent a lot of time and effort.
    Or at least that's what I understood after all the messages I received regarded how my builds sucked and why I don't deserve such upvotes.

  • Mitsubishi A6M5 Zero-sen 5.0 years ago

    "I'm just going to sit here, waiting for a Ki-61 to appear on pancelvonat's gallery.
    Then I will reach true happiness.
    " - Sun Tzu

    +2
  • Focke Wulf - Triebflugel 5.0 years ago

    @Gameboi14 technically they should be 180, but yes, it's still an impressive result, considering that it's a build for which I've never had many expectancies.

  • Focke Wulf - Triebflugel 5.0 years ago

    @Noname918181 I know, but apparently this time my build caught A LOT of attention, and someone probably got angry about it, and by seeing the link in description they immediately thought it was being used to bait upvotes intentionally.
    Things then got worse because without my knowledge, the link allowed users with less than 30 points to upvote the build, and so I proceeded to remove the link as soon as the issue came out.
    Let's avoid the whole part about the insults I received, because it all turned out to be a matter of envy.

  • SkyWolf A-425 Early 5.0 years ago

    This looks gorgeous!
    What's behind the choice of adding those two smaller wings on the underside?

  • Focke Wulf - Triebflugel 5.0 years ago

    @typeZERO
    Exactly

  • RJ-Leduc "Rene" F1 5.0 years ago

    @RamboJutter got it, but if you're going to build more of those prototypes try to keep it as a feature, it drastically increases realism!

  • Focke Wulf - Triebflugel 5.0 years ago

    @Noname918181 you had my curiosity, but now you have my attention

    +3
  • RJ-Leduc "Rene" F1 5.0 years ago

    @RamboJutter why? That would have been so cool!

  • RJ-Leduc "Rene" F1 5.0 years ago

    @Mustang51 fun fact, bolognese is actually an American invention, and we do not even put meatballs in our pasta here 😂

    Anyway, didn't Leduc have this really big fascination with Ramjets?

  • Mikoyan MiG-31 K Foxhound 5.0 years ago

    Can I try it now? 😂

    +1
  • Focke Wulf - Triebflugel 5.0 years ago

    @B217293615234lover then you will be ERASED

  • Boeing 737-500WL 5.0 years ago

    @JED those builds are often underrated, what a shame :(

    +1
  • Boeing 737-500WL 5.0 years ago

    Marvelous! Keep up the good work!

  • M.1 5.0 years ago

    @Mustang51 I agree with you my friend, it reminds me of one of those early-war French fighters like the Arsenal VG-33 or the Caudron C.714

    +2
  • Personal Milestone Achieved! 5.0 years ago

    @BogdanX haha
    now my thoughts have been confirmed.

  • Personal Milestone Achieved! 5.0 years ago

    @ThePilotDude did I have to confess the false to you guys accusing me of doing that intentionally?
    What was I supposed to apologize for?
    And, was I the first one to go under your build to insult you repeatedly?
    If there's one thing I don't tolerate it's arrogance my friend. You aren't the guy in this particular case.
    And if you think I'm the one replying with the same scorn, get some screenshot by Bogdan, and read the whole thing

  • Personal Milestone Achieved! 5.0 years ago

    @VVMC yes, that's the Altare della Patria, or simply Vittoriano

  • Personal Milestone Achieved! 5.0 years ago

    @BogdanX again, as always, you keep focusing on the wrong arguments.
    1. Never tagged people in descriptions nor comments to make them upvote my builds, since I have no need to do so.
    I get spotlighted because people like my builds, not because I ask to. And clearly, your fixation with this whole accident just lets me know that you have some kind of "upvote related issue" towards me or my build in specific.
    2. It was an example.
    3. You are just basing yourself with accusations, I never built for upvotes, and there's nothing wrong to ask people to upvote if they like my builds to rank up.
    If you think this is wrong, do a reality check fella.
    4. If it says "You can't respond anymore to this user" well, yes.
    5. How stupid could you be, I was just celebrating for a personal result of mine. I don't care about what you think.
    6. My scheme? Of doing what?
    Getting angry when people accuse me and try to get me covered up with lies?
    7. Just because it happened with this build, doesn't mean it's now my fault if people will do this. As I said many times, I wasn't the first to do this, and I have no idea if the ones before me knew about the exploit, but I did not.
    8. You're just being an asshole here, so I'll skip.
    9. After all the mess you've done, are you really asking this?
    @EternalDarkness asked me kindly to do so in first place, and so I did.
    Again, thanks, but I don't like to be friend with people that have fake convictions towards me, and that refuse to understand.
    Just because you're the second ranked Platinum user, and you may feel powerful for that, doesn't give you any reasons to act as if you were the boss. You're on my same level, if not lower as you keep showing.
    No one even mentioned you here, so you had no reason to keep this going.
    Attacking and then telling to let go, just doesn't suit a person that's right.
    And so, after all you've done, I hope a won't see a reply of yours on any of my build ever again. And I really hope this time you actually manage to understand the last message.
    Have a nice day.

  • Focke Wulf - Triebflugel 5.0 years ago

    @Armyguy1534 lol no wait, we still love you

  • Personal Milestone Achieved! 5.0 years ago

    @BogdanX @ThePilotDude and I'd appreciate an answer this time.

  • Personal Milestone Achieved! 5.0 years ago

    @belugasub

    Thonks

  • Personal Milestone Achieved! 5.0 years ago

    And @BogdanX, unlike you did with me on Discord, I never even went near to blocking you, simply because there's no reason to do so as you are on my same level.

    From now on, I'd appreciate a bit more respect towards other people, first of all because you're just talking behind a screen, and second of all, because you never know who's in front of you.

    Just because you saw a gold account, with twice the upvotes and downloads that you got on his latest post, you thought it was right to treat me like shit?

  • Personal Milestone Achieved! 5.0 years ago

    @ThePilotDude if it was just that, I wouldn't be so angry right now.
    Bogdan's apparently known for this kind of behavior, and that's what grinded my gears.
    @BogdanX There are ways and ways to say things.
    If you only made me notice that the upvote bypass happened due to the link politely, and without calling me a liar and insinuating that I knew about the exploit, while I told you many times I wasn't aware of it, nothing of all this would have happened.
    Apparently manners are a virtue of few.