@EternalDarkness Against land targets or for secondary purposes such as signalling, illumination, and smoke laying. It's for the various Paternian riverine warfare craft, from light gunboats to heavy monitors with navalized Victoria tank turrets.
I take it that this would include riverine craft, such as river monitors and gunboats. While not particularly accurate, they're perfect for putting an illumination shell or smoke shell for whatever purposes may be necessary for such munitions.
Also good for blowing up shore installations with explosive shells. Other weapons such as automatic cannons, rocket, and missile systems would not necessarily be able to hit targets in cover, while a mortar may be able to hit them. Although I suppose you could use an automatic grenade launcher for that, but a 120mm mortar has the hitting power of a 155mm howitzer.
I know some PT boats employed them for similar purposes.
How about a coilgun? I’ve heard that multiple-stage coilgun are being explored for use in mortars of 120mm and 81mm caliber, to be carried on vehicles. @EternalDarkness
Nyet. Efforts by the Paternian Air Force, Army, Navy, and Marine Corps interdicted vital supplies of vodka. Without vodka to power them, their advance slowed. @InternationalAircraftCompany
@EternalDarkness I think your tanks are fantastic, as are your builds.
However, I do suggest renaming this particular machine, since "ARV" in common use with such forces typically means "Armored Recovery Vehicle." Basically a tow truck or wrecker for tanks.
The 90mm gun has comparable performance to the 105mm M7, a Paternian derivative of the Royal Ordnance L7.
The side armor of the Victoria isn't particularly thick.
Very few AU tanks were knocked out by CAF forces, simply because they were rarely employed during this time. The nature of the terrain favored wheeled vehicles such as this and the Zamburak. Tanks in our use were mostly good for propaganda, given the limited number available and the lack of suitability to the terrain. @PyrusEnderhunter
Well, I was initially a decentralized insurgent movement with very wide support. There was no fixed command structure between the various battalion-sized forces.
Thus, your Army could not deal with them effectively, since they were accustomed to the very heavy centralization of GLA forces. Taking out leaders had little effect on the AU.
By the later stages where the AU forces became more centralized, they have already begun to employ more conventional tactics. @PyrusEnderhunter
Paternia will remain as the Paternian Conglomerate, a merger of all major Paternian industrial groups, including but not limited to Paternian Defense Industries, Bandit, KRIEG, Dragon, Carlton Firearms, Rocker Armaments, Tesla Electronics, Temco Systems, and the Detroit Arsenal. @PyrusEnderhunter
This will pair nicely with it.
@EternalDarkness Against land targets or for secondary purposes such as signalling, illumination, and smoke laying. It's for the various Paternian riverine warfare craft, from light gunboats to heavy monitors with navalized Victoria tank turrets.
I take it that this would include riverine craft, such as river monitors and gunboats. While not particularly accurate, they're perfect for putting an illumination shell or smoke shell for whatever purposes may be necessary for such munitions.
Also good for blowing up shore installations with explosive shells. Other weapons such as automatic cannons, rocket, and missile systems would not necessarily be able to hit targets in cover, while a mortar may be able to hit them. Although I suppose you could use an automatic grenade launcher for that, but a 120mm mortar has the hitting power of a 155mm howitzer.
I know some PT boats employed them for similar purposes.
How about a coilgun? I’ve heard that multiple-stage coilgun are being explored for use in mortars of 120mm and 81mm caliber, to be carried on vehicles. @EternalDarkness
@Flash0of0green Thanks!
It’s an anti-aircraft vehicle. @JustaSuthernBoy
Nyet. Efforts by the Paternian Air Force, Army, Navy, and Marine Corps interdicted vital supplies of vodka. Without vodka to power them, their advance slowed. @InternationalAircraftCompany
Basically this.
The Soviets won, but as a result was in a worse position than before. @Awsomur
@lllKenlll Np! The nose could use some improvements, but you've nailed the wing shape.
@EternalDarkness I think your tanks are fantastic, as are your builds.
However, I do suggest renaming this particular machine, since "ARV" in common use with such forces typically means "Armored Recovery Vehicle." Basically a tow truck or wrecker for tanks.
@PyrusEnderhunter It's modern chemistry and metallurgy. The 105mm M7 was designed in the 1950's.
This gun was developed in the 1990's.
@BaconAircraft Certainly! Tu-144 can run off vodka, the fuel of the motherland!
The 90mm gun has comparable performance to the 105mm M7, a Paternian derivative of the Royal Ordnance L7.
The side armor of the Victoria isn't particularly thick.
Very few AU tanks were knocked out by CAF forces, simply because they were rarely employed during this time. The nature of the terrain favored wheeled vehicles such as this and the Zamburak. Tanks in our use were mostly good for propaganda, given the limited number available and the lack of suitability to the terrain. @PyrusEnderhunter
@Hayhayjam664 Set it to "automatic."
Is the props set for manual pitch adjustment?
I like tanks.
Victoria, here we come!
@phanps Sounds good!
@JustaSuthernBoy Did you say jeep with a .50 cal?
@GermanWarMachine I have made an Ontos-like vehicle a while back. Probably will remaster it, but there's a bunch of projects that I'd like to get to.
@PyrusEnderhunter Read up.
@Liquidfox Thanks!
@JustaSuthernBoy Comes with the .50 cal spotting rifle.
@JustaSuthernBoy Got plenty more. Got one with a 106mm recoilless rifle coming up.
@PyrusEnderhunter Reupload. Nobody really saw the last one.
@JustaSuthernBoy Thanks!
@Ghavin2000 I have on several occasions.
However, I've got a backlog of projects to do and upload, so yeah.
Well, I was initially a decentralized insurgent movement with very wide support. There was no fixed command structure between the various battalion-sized forces.
Thus, your Army could not deal with them effectively, since they were accustomed to the very heavy centralization of GLA forces. Taking out leaders had little effect on the AU.
By the later stages where the AU forces became more centralized, they have already begun to employ more conventional tactics. @PyrusEnderhunter
@PyrusEnderhunter It's not my fault that I'm a better writer and typist than you.
Git gud.
@PyrusEnderhunter Not my problem that you didn't authorize anyone to take your spot in your absence, so the decay rule settled in.
It was inspired by the Pilatus PC-9 and the Embraer EMB-312 Tucano.
The T-6 Texan II is a derivative of the PC-9 though. @N124Hawk
Thanks! @Tazziedevil04
Indeed. A few (read: a ton) of refinements, but nonetheless retaining the same basic design. @Dllama4
@PyrusEnderhunter Not really.
We'll just be selling guns and maybe getting into fights when we get bored.
Paternia will remain as the Paternian Conglomerate, a merger of all major Paternian industrial groups, including but not limited to Paternian Defense Industries, Bandit, KRIEG, Dragon, Carlton Firearms, Rocker Armaments, Tesla Electronics, Temco Systems, and the Detroit Arsenal. @PyrusEnderhunter
I know. They were gifts from Paternia. @PyrusEnderhunter
I think you can upvote now. @SimpleWolf
Standard takeoff procedure is 50% flaps, full throttle, and elevators up fully. @marcox43
@marcox43 Looks pretty sweet.
@marcox43 Use flaps. That's what they're for.
Then proceed with that. @SimpleWolf
Idk. What's your favorite plane? @SimpleWolf
Thanks! @SimpleWolf
Just build stuff.
@5stars Someone spotlighted it.
@PilotOfFuture That works better.
"2 guys inside me"
Yeah, you might want to rephrase that.
Still, nice ... aircraft.
Thanks? @bjac0
Np! @LuukPlanes
Looks nice.
@grizzlitn Thanks!
Thanks! @Johnnyboy9