@Th3Missil3 It's a bit more all over the place, but they do have different throttle responses for afterburner and that's by design (The FT is under Afterburner or Afb1/2)
Some have it slower (ex. F-104C, F-14A) and others faster (ex. F-16C, F-14B)
I may need to tweak speed/accel in some places though
@ZeroWithSlashedO I did, top and bottom half
It helps you get that sort of egg-looking cross section and also helps with how the bottom section of the F-14 fuselage flattens off as it goes backwards
@ZeroWithSlashedO Linus showed me a cool trick where if you use hollow glass fuselages with 100% opacity, the Primary Color paints the outside and Trim 1 paints the inside. Perfect for landing gear doors
@PriusCat Thanks for the heads up, will release a fix
I was pressing AG4 before AG5 in my final check, which explains it
I copied and pasted a sparrow pylon as a subassembly and the problem must've carried over
@Spitfirelad05 I also did it on my F-14D
@PriusCat Since this is a late F-14A, no. At that point, most tomcats had them welded shut or removed. But I am thinking about doing a separate early F-14A, which would have them.
@Graingy They do have 0 drag and it seems to not cause problems for me at least
The only weirdness that comes with it is that the COM is higher than it should be because the mass block is on top
@Graingy It makes them easier to access, otherwise I'd have to zoom inside the plane or use the connections tab
I also have a temporary unlimited fuel block and an artificial mass block on the outside (So it's easy to delete) so I can do flight tests before adding proper fuel and weight
This the main reason why explosionScale=0.5 still isn't enough to stop complete destruction of the crafts. If you test some of the clean loadouts, it's not as much of an issue. I can't think of a way around it though.
@ThatKindaWeeb I mean, technically it's a modified J-11, but yeah it's a newer Flanker
I thought about bombers a little bit, but I haven't planned anything concretely
@ThatKindaWeeb From what I know, the J-16 is newer and is produced by China whereas the Su-30MKK was produced by Russia and exported to China. The J-16 also carries Chinese missiles rather than Russian ones.
Another small thing, the MKK has the horizontal-tip vertical fins while the J-16 has the angled ones seen on most Su-27 variants.
@TwoTurboMan I thought about doing that, but since it would require a lot of upkeep, I wouldn't want to do it if not a lot of people were interested. I might make a forum post and see what people think.
@PrussianAirlines Average Danger Zone fan vs Chad Mighty Wings enjoyer
@Th3Missil3 It's a bit more all over the place, but they do have different throttle responses for afterburner and that's by design (The FT is under Afterburner or Afb1/2)
Some have it slower (ex. F-104C, F-14A) and others faster (ex. F-16C, F-14B)
I may need to tweak speed/accel in some places though
@ZeroWithSlashedO I did, top and bottom half
It helps you get that sort of egg-looking cross section and also helps with how the bottom section of the F-14 fuselage flattens off as it goes backwards
@ZeroWithSlashedO Linus showed me a cool trick where if you use hollow glass fuselages with 100% opacity, the Primary Color paints the outside and Trim 1 paints the inside. Perfect for landing gear doors
@TheCommentaryGuy Thanks, should be fixed now! What's funny is that the antennas were flip flopped, I should've expected something else to be off.
@PriusCat Thanks for the heads up, will release a fix
I was pressing AG4 before AG5 in my final check, which explains it
I copied and pasted a sparrow pylon as a subassembly and the problem must've carried over
@3bdo When I press AG4/5, it seems to work properly
How did you get the Sparrow to go with the tanks?
Please use your jetstream 👇
@BYardley @BadahhMuscleCar001 @Khanskaya
@IDK0 @TwoTurboMan @CaptainBrayden
Please use your jetstream 👇
@BYardley @BadahhMuscleCar001 @Khanskaya
@IDK0 @TwoTurboMan @CaptainBrayden
@TheCommentaryGuy It's not pictured here, but I did make the LAU-138 :)
@TwoTurboMan 65 km (All the missiles in the WBD have a reduced range)
wait there was a shortcut for nudging :|
I aleays clicked using the menu
@SpetzavodHeavyIndustries it is, but you can put more than one flight computer and take the altitude from the other one using variables
@Kenzar If it's the code from the spreadsheet, you have to input your own values into the spreadsheet and get the code from there
@Kenzar Was the code you borrowed for a rear facing turret?
@Cristoferlelex I'd like to release it sometime in in summer
Based intake design
@Th3Missil3 Sure, no problem
@Th3Missil3 I planned on doing one loadout for special variants, so it's not planned
@TwoTurboMan I don't have a solid release date planned at the moment
SimplePlanes +1
Well.
This is news
BACKWARDS COMPATIBLE LETSSSS GO
I know this wasn't easy to implement, thanks devs.
Pretty much any time you want something to oscillate/cycle
I also used it on my Abrams to know where the turret is facing
Armor-Piercing: ???
Fin-Stabilized: yes
Discarding Sabot: no
@TheCommentaryGuy I always have to make compromises since I use default nozzles, but this came out a lot better than i thought it would
@FlirBlitz I heard about this from another person as well
It's a war server right? I'm guessing the units have to be original builds?
@Spitfirelad05 I also did it on my F-14D
@PriusCat Since this is a late F-14A, no. At that point, most tomcats had them welded shut or removed.
But I am thinking about doing a separate early F-14A, which would have them.
The answer to life, the universe, and everything?
Digital Flare Simulator
@TwoTurboMan I'm thinking of doing the VF-2 scheme from the 1980's
@ThatKindaWeeb It might be connections
Try deleting certain bits and see what else comes off with it
@Graingy They do have 0 drag and it seems to not cause problems for me at least
The only weirdness that comes with it is that the COM is higher than it should be because the mass block is on top
@TheCommentaryGuy It appears so :)
@Graingy It makes them easier to access, otherwise I'd have to zoom inside the plane or use the connections tab
I also have a temporary unlimited fuel block and an artificial mass block on the outside (So it's easy to delete) so I can do flight tests before adding proper fuel and weight
@ThatKindaWeeb Sure, just tag on unlisted
This the main reason why explosionScale=0.5 still isn't enough to stop complete destruction of the crafts. If you test some of the clean loadouts, it's not as much of an issue. I can't think of a way around it though.
@Gady13131 That's just the tag I put on my aircraft so I know which is mine
G4 is for the 4th gen of the standard/style I'm building in
@TheAviator77 Thanks for the correction
@Erc90F4RU All good :)
you should probably use [JPN] instead...
That tag is technically a slur :/
Towomcot
Grumman: I have two sides
@ThatKindaWeeb I mean, technically it's a modified J-11, but yeah it's a newer Flanker
I thought about bombers a little bit, but I haven't planned anything concretely
@ThatKindaWeeb From what I know, the J-16 is newer and is produced by China whereas the Su-30MKK was produced by Russia and exported to China. The J-16 also carries Chinese missiles rather than Russian ones.
Another small thing, the MKK has the horizontal-tip vertical fins while the J-16 has the angled ones seen on most Su-27 variants.
@Erc90F4RU @Noname918181 they might be getting removed gradually
Not all my photos got removed at the same time
Boulton Paul Defiant?
It needs a name!
I guess the discord thing finally happened
@TwoTurboMan I thought about doing that, but since it would require a lot of upkeep, I wouldn't want to do it if not a lot of people were interested. I might make a forum post and see what people think.
@Boeig @ShinyGemsBro it gone :(