I'm pretty much fine with flying around the entire SP island chain repetitively. Though it would be nice if there were new places or something bigger around the corner, you can do just about whatever you want to.
Look.
People are gonna like whatever they like. It doesn't matter. Some glue eater who made a derp build will have his creation upvoted cause everyone thinks it's funny, and that's okay.
.
You don't get to control what people want to approve by their tastes and what they want leave alone. Just build, enjoy, and post it if you feel like it. Users come across what you made and they find it interesting? Good on you. They don't? Just move on.
Still managed to splinter this thing with my Mamba Viper. Missiles don't even go that fast.
Decent build though. It's one hell of a flying chainsaw with those miniguns
I just do this with direct impact missiles possessing 0.3-0.4 explosionScale. Doesn't immediately kill whatever it hits. Especially bigger AI's spawned.
.
But then again, you can use proxdetonation to better simulate realistic damage on targets whilst keeping explosionScale untouched, as said by @ZeroWithSlashedO
@SnapTite Let me point out a few things that you mentioned here.
- OP is not a native English speaker, and uses a translator to get things in order with the description. It's bound to make mistakes. Whether they can just copypasta an entire wikipedia page just for this purpose or not, is entirely by their choice.
- Physics realism in SimplePlanes was never the best. Nor is any flight simulator's. The ludicrous numbers are highly likely just what they are for compensation in flight performance due to, again, this game's physics being complete balls and how this fighter was built in the first place by the OP.
- You're making a big deal out of small things that can easily be corrected. I don't think it would hurt you to criticize people without indirectly calling them out for and implying that they're dumb.
- And since you seem to be more on the well educated side, why don't you try your hand at building a realistic Fw-190 because you feel quite passionate about it.
.
I acknowledge that Sergio666 has flaws in building (and I still can't quite get over the low vertical offset of the pilot camera) but you have to admit that there was effort put in. Let alone making the build appear decent. It still needs a ton of work, that can't be denied. But the way you presented your criticism on this is downright just trying to make him look bad for little stuff.
@ToeTips lol I really don't build at all. Even if I do it's just one thing and that's it for the rest of the year. Most of my stuff are modified pre-existing builds of others.
You take a look for yourself what I got in store.
@TheTomatoLover So you upvoted even though you don't like this
@gigachad You're generalizing by a wide margin there.
Frd Cow Cop Chaser
+2Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation?
+2That's a fancy way of saying lethal lightbulb
I'm pretty much fine with flying around the entire SP island chain repetitively. Though it would be nice if there were new places or something bigger around the corner, you can do just about whatever you want to.
+2@winterro
Ivan: We do ammorak, tovarisch?
Alexei: Da. We do ammorak. we reech ai es es in 3 sekonds wit dis teknik.
Ammunition Exploded
+1PSM Laptop. Next question.
@MrOofington And she was. Alot of times.
@Rainbowdash247 It runs fine on a lemon with electrodes shoved up both ends so I guess you're ok
+3Waiting for a '67 Shelby GT500
+1flonkr
Guess the air force and navy had some fun 9 months ago
+1JET HAS BEEN POSTED. CLICK ME.
@EasternPatrick
@jamesPLANESii
@WinsWings
@ReinMcDeer - F-16C base build
@Inuyasha8215
@Nahida1645
At least FOD damage with this one shouldn't be a problem
+1...Then there's birdstrikes
At least FOD damage with this one shouldn't be a problem
...Then there's birdstrikes
C3 Kirara haver here.
+110/10 meow
So this is the thing I've been seeing glued to a wire pedestal at Wright all the time
+1omaigod forzi horzo colb w mincarp wowowow
@SPairforce Cause P-48 minus 1 is P-47
Only been in for 4 years. Never heard of you.
But welcome back, even though from the looks of things you don't really stay frequently
Plane's image quality could be better but it's fine overall
+1trigr
Meme oversaturation
P-47 that got caught in the Hiroshima nuking
Kawasaki concept looks like a downsized Legacy Hornet
Look.
People are gonna like whatever they like. It doesn't matter. Some glue eater who made a derp build will have his creation upvoted cause everyone thinks it's funny, and that's okay.
.
You don't get to control what people want to approve by their tastes and what they want leave alone. Just build, enjoy, and post it if you feel like it. Users come across what you made and they find it interesting? Good on you. They don't? Just move on.
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
zondar
@TheGoodDogJackie Don't just come in here and advertise on someone else's build. If people see your build, they'll try it out of their own accord.
+5Holy shit how long has it been since I last returned to Plazma Burst.
+2Thank you for bringing back so much great memories of the past
You better use cannons instead of wing guns or miniguns for the lasers
Welcome to the Navy.
+2We have floating elevators
@Nahida1645
@Inuyasha8215
@KudaOni
Click me for the Zhongli Tomcat
@Zaineman Jesus Christ why are you upvote spamming me? I didn't do anything lol
Rebull
egg dropper
Still managed to splinter this thing with my Mamba Viper. Missiles don't even go that fast.
Decent build though. It's one hell of a flying chainsaw with those miniguns
@Nahida1645 Nahida had it first.
borgir
+3@Sakorsky God's dead. We're on our own
+2@Kangy
+3This
Or this for glass fuselages
For the glass fuselage, you change the one-way color visibility via
hideInside@Kangy
This
Or this
@Kangy You can set the canopy colors to be one-way via XML
+1That way only the tint can be seen from the outside, but not from inside.
I just do this with direct impact missiles possessing 0.3-0.4
explosionScale. Doesn't immediately kill whatever it hits. Especially bigger AI's spawned..
But then again, you can use
proxdetonationto better simulate realistic damage on targets whilst keepingexplosionScaleuntouched, as said by @ZeroWithSlashedO@SnapTite Let me point out a few things that you mentioned here.
+1- OP is not a native English speaker, and uses a translator to get things in order with the description. It's bound to make mistakes. Whether they can just copypasta an entire wikipedia page just for this purpose or not, is entirely by their choice.
- Physics realism in SimplePlanes was never the best. Nor is any flight simulator's. The ludicrous numbers are highly likely just what they are for compensation in flight performance due to, again, this game's physics being complete balls and how this fighter was built in the first place by the OP.
- You're making a big deal out of small things that can easily be corrected. I don't think it would hurt you to criticize people without indirectly calling them out for and implying that they're dumb.
- And since you seem to be more on the well educated side, why don't you try your hand at building a realistic Fw-190 because you feel quite passionate about it.
.
I acknowledge that Sergio666 has flaws in building (and I still can't quite get over the low vertical offset of the pilot camera) but you have to admit that there was effort put in. Let alone making the build appear decent. It still needs a ton of work, that can't be denied. But the way you presented your criticism on this is downright just trying to make him look bad for little stuff.
I still can't see how she's a cabbage when she strongly resembles a radish more
+1@ToeTips lol I really don't build at all. Even if I do it's just one thing and that's it for the rest of the year. Most of my stuff are modified pre-existing builds of others.
You take a look for yourself what I got in store.