I guess you want to make this thing with a label ?
I would use TargetHeading I think, but I don’t know why you said it doesn’t work... Actually it’s quite simple Funky trees
It would be something like this:
{deltaangle(Heading, TargetHeading)<5 & deltaangle(Heading, TargetHeading)>-5 ? "[x]" : (deltaangle(Heading, TargetHeading)<-5 ? "<-" : "->")}
It’s a simple code that measure the TargetHeading, write [x] if the target is between 5° and 355° relative to you, if not it write the arrow if it’s on the left (>180) or on the right (<180).
Hope this will help you
Not bad but... you forgot the airbrakes !
Also you have put airbrakes for the landing gear hatches, and it reduces the speed a lot, I think you need to land at 400 or 500 kmh...
Nice build, the performances are quite accurate, livery isn't bad
Next time, maybe you could put info about the advised carrier landing speed for example ? And the flaps angle advised
Tested, the shape is beautiful, the doors feature is cool, maybe the instrument panel is a bit empty, even if you tried to put some things. The rollrate is too high for a cessna, and the landing gear is too strong. But overall it's a good build, keep it up !
Awesome ! You made a very good job with the placement of instruments. The only flaws I found is that there is a gauge fixed to the brake lever, and also I must had to find that AG8 unlock the commands...
But overall it's very good
Just to know, were you only a passenger on your flight ? or pilot ?
I was thinking cute tank
But I see that you reproduced the armor ! wow ! really cool !
Missing the 1:1 scale and maybe a more detailed version (I can help you if you would) and it could be awesome (valid for all your tanks)
First download lol
Very cool truck, I think it's the best log truck I have never seen on the website
The most functions work well, but the storks island logs are a bit too long... I think a telescopic arm would have been good
Also you should add somedamperMultiplierin the rotators, because they are a bit brutal
I guess you want to make this thing with a label ?
+2I would use TargetHeading I think, but I don’t know why you said it doesn’t work... Actually it’s quite simple Funky trees
It would be something like this:
{deltaangle(Heading, TargetHeading)<5 & deltaangle(Heading, TargetHeading)>-5 ? "[x]" : (deltaangle(Heading, TargetHeading)<-5 ? "<-" : "->")}
It’s a simple code that measure the TargetHeading, write [x] if the target is between 5° and 355° relative to you, if not it write the arrow if it’s on the left (>180) or on the right (<180).
Hope this will help you
Why not ? I already have some experiences with this mod
+2Not bad but... you forgot the airbrakes !
+2Also you have put airbrakes for the landing gear hatches, and it reduces the speed a lot, I think you need to land at 400 or 500 kmh...
Everyone is just obsessed with news
+2@ReinMcDeer You have probably never heard of it, it’s a project in France (we will make it fly !), here is the webpage
+2I participate in a A-26 restoration project, so I can tell this one is beautiful !
+2Next time can you write a quick tutorial about the deployment order ? it's quite difficult...
+2But a nice build anyway !
Nice build ! but please correct the manufacturer in the title !
+2And for the pronunciation, it's like [aloo-wet]
Keep it up, good job
@WinsWings I think that wheels touch the LG doors at high G force
+2Nice build, the performances are quite accurate, livery isn't bad
+2Next time, maybe you could put info about the advised carrier landing speed for example ? And the flaps angle advised
Oh the Samu ! I know them well x)
+2Nice build !
@HuskyDynamics01 Ah yes, I hadn't thought about that
+2@MrCOPTY Best language
+2Very good find !
+2Lol
+2The cockpit hud thing looks very futuristic, it's beautiful
+2Simple and beautiful !
+2The first car I bought in Asphalt nitro
+2I like this type of videos
+2Tested, the shape is beautiful, the doors feature is cool, maybe the instrument panel is a bit empty, even if you tried to put some things. The rollrate is too high for a cessna, and the landing gear is too strong. But overall it's a good build, keep it up !
+2What is this "650-pounds flares" ? Either way, it's fictional.
+2@TheGliderGuy Nice
+2Wow ! Very nice
+2@AcebroMobileuser Useful graph about airfoils
+2@AcebroMobileuser Yeah, if you change the airfoil type it changes the performances of your wing
+2Nice flight physics for a RC airplane (I guess ?)
+2I think its more realistic with "flat bottom" wings (maybe elevators too)
Awesome ! You made a very good job with the placement of instruments. The only flaws I found is that there is a gauge fixed to the brake lever, and also I must had to find that AG8 unlock the commands...
+2But overall it's very good
Just to know, were you only a passenger on your flight ? or pilot ?
@BassemT90 I think he made this version to be mobile friendly. Maybe he doesn't have time to make other liveries.
+2@GalacticaAsia Luckily lol
+2Good, but not very detailed
+2Yeee a french plane
+2Anyway looks nice
Oh mon dieu mais c'est la police vietnamienne pour avoir un véhicule pareil
+2@WarHawk95 Good news at last
+2Good for a mobile friendly build !
+2USAF Tu-95* lmao
+2Oh, the chinese A320 thing
+2@TatsuTheOtaku Thx
+2@gmmmsoares @CalebRepublic @PhantomAviator Thanks !
+2This things are possible with some FT code. But we lack a good alarm so. Because magnet produce not very appropriate sound.
+2Never heard of this company, thank you for letting me discover it
+2Btw nice truck
I was thinking cute tank
+2But I see that you reproduced the armor ! wow ! really cool !
Missing the 1:1 scale and maybe a more detailed version (I can help you if you would) and it could be awesome (valid for all your tanks)
Can you stop with that
+2I think we understood your opinion
First download lol
+2Very cool truck, I think it's the best log truck I have never seen on the website
The most functions work well, but the storks island logs are a bit too long... I think a telescopic arm would have been good
Also you should add some
damperMultiplierin the rotators, because they are a bit brutalNice, but the dampers and the brakes are too hard
+2@SatryawanArya He didn't make a system for this but sometimes there is a release system (not here)
+2Car challenger
+2Maybe a nice plane dude ! I'm building a Porter (a Turbo-Porter B2-H4) too, I will test your aircraft but it looks be very good !
+2I’m in dude
+2it's a 757 version like the C-32 ?
+2Wish, go to hell
+2